Hi!
I have an IDE CD-ROM Drive. It is found on the same IDE interface as a
DVD Drive + CD-Rom Burner, which is a different interface than the
hard-disks' one.
When I use grip 3.0.7 to rip+encode a music CD, it rips it at about 4x,
while the CD-ROM drive is 52x. I already used hdparm -E 52
Hi Shlomi,
1. Is the other drive (DVD/CDR) idle during the ripping? IDE is not as
efficient as SCSI with regard to multiple devices using the IDE bus at the
same time.
2. Please send hdparm -i / -v output.
3. Which format do you encode to? What is the CPU usage of the encoding
process? Are you
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Tal, Shachar wrote:
Hi Shlomi,
1. Is the other drive (DVD/CDR) idle during the ripping? IDE is not as
efficient as SCSI with regard to multiple devices using the IDE bus at the
same time.
Yes, there's nothing in the other drive.
2. Please send hdparm -i / -v output.
I see nothing that may be the cause of this problem. Try increasing the
read-ahead size (# of sectors to read ahead, upon each request). It makes
sense on sequential access.
Shachar Tal
Verint Systems
-Original Message-
From: Shlomi Fish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
When I use grip 3.0.7 to rip+encode a music CD, it rips it at about 4x,
while the CD-ROM drive is 52x. I already used hdparm -E 52 /dev/hdd on the
drive and in Windows FreeRIP rips at close to full speed.
How can I rip at full speed using grip?
Did
From: Matan Ziv-Av [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Linux-IL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: grip rips at 4x speed instead of close to CD-ROM full-speed
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:24:24 +0200 (IST)
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
When I use grip 3.0.7 to rip+encode a
Hi,
I have been compiling for some time gideon/kdevelop3 from cvs into rpms. The
packages as well as the program it self are quite mature, so I think it's
time to spam this list a little more.
The packages were compiled on a stock Mandrake 9.1 and tested under 9.2, so
both distors can use
Hi,
The solution is very simple, you need to convert the Hebrew file names on the
server to UTF-8 encoded.
Here is a script adopted from the SAMBA docs:
find /path/to/share -type f -exec bash -c 'CP={}; ISO=`echo -n $CP | \
iconv -f cp862 -t UTF-8`; if [ $CP != $ISO ]; then mv $CP \
$ISO; fi'
Ahoy,
On 2003/10/26 21:33, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
On Sunday 26 October 2003 20:15, Eran Tromer wrote:
The distiction is anything but simple. [snip]
My answer was given in the form of two separate paragraphs and such a
choice of lexical structure usually denotes two separate subjects are
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
On Sunday 26 October 2003 23:38, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
The GPL, by design, is not a contract. As such, you must bring
yourself under its influence by wishing to distribute copyrighted
work for which the GPL was declared as a license.
I'm not
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 08:15:56PM +0200, Eran Tromer wrote:
As for the distinction you propose: what's the essential difference
between use via loadable libraries and and use via pipe commands?
In one case, you're using the application as it was planned to be
used by a user. In the other
Eran Tromer wrote:
Ahoy,
On 2003/10/26 21:33, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
On Sunday 26 October 2003 20:15, Eran Tromer wrote:
The distiction is anything but simple. [snip]
My answer was given in the form of two separate paragraphs and such a
choice of lexical structure usually denotes two
Hi all,
I have a GPL licensing question that came from a customer of mine:
That customer is currently developing a distributed client-server, where the
communication protocols between clients and servers are non-standard (i.e.
not HTTP or likes of it). The customer wishes to include
On Sunday 26 October 2003 23:38, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
The GPL, by design, is not a contract. As such, you must bring
yourself under its influence by wishing to distribute copyrighted
work for which the GPL was declared as a license.
I'm not lawyer and I might be dead wrong here, but for
On 2003/10/26 19:06, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
The distinction is very simple - whatever code that is a derived work from the
GPLed parts (and assuming they are *GPLed* and not, LGPLed, for example) can
only be distributed under the GPL license by him.
In practice what this usually boils down to
On Sunday 26 October 2003 16:26, Tal, Shachar wrote:
Hi all,
I have a GPL licensing question that came from a customer of mine:
That customer is currently developing a distributed client-server, where
the communication protocols between clients and servers are non-standard
(i.e. not HTTP or
On Sunday 26 October 2003 22:23, Eran Tromer wrote:
My first sentance (The distiction is anything but simple.) refers
to your first paragraph. The rest of my reply refers to your second
paragraph. Indeed, I neglected to employ appropriate lexical
constructs and quoting conventions, leading to
On Sunday 26 October 2003 20:15, Eran Tromer wrote:
On 2003/10/26 19:06, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
The distinction is very simple - whatever code that is a derived
work from the GPLed parts (and assuming they are *GPLed* and not,
LGPLed, for example) can only be distributed under the GPL
Well, you could try to write utf-8 instead of utf. I didn't have to
change anything, but then, I got all my Hebrew files changed to undescores
(like this: .___), which made me brake a few chairs.
Oh well, I guess you better take advices from someone who knows at least a
bit of what
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Tal, Shachar wrote:
Hi all,
I have a GPL licensing question that came from a customer of mine:
That customer is currently developing a distributed client-server, where the
communication protocols between clients and servers are non-standard (i.e.
not HTTP or likes of
, 26 2003, 16:26,Tal, Shachar:
not HTTP or likes of it). The customer wishes to include somewhat-modified
GPLed software components in its client software (e.g. python, GTK or
LAM/MPICH), while keeping his server implementation, protocol
implementation
gtk is LGPL you are safe.
--
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Tal, Shachar wrote:
Hi all,
I have a GPL licensing question that came from a customer of mine:
That customer is currently developing a distributed client-server, where the
communication protocols between clients and servers are non-standard (i.e.
not HTTP or likes of
On Sunday 26 October 2003 19:06, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
On Sunday 26 October 2003 16:26, Tal, Shachar wrote:
Hi all,
I have a GPL licensing question that came from a customer of mine:
That customer is currently developing a distributed client-server, where
the communication protocols
Thanks. Though, his particular implementation is patented, hence his
reluctance to release it under the GPL.
Shachar Tal
Verint Systems
-Original Message-
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 7:25 PM
To: Tal, Shachar; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
24 matches
Mail list logo
