On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, voguemaster wrote:
when i say something is bloated, i mean it takes too many resources. as
you quite well know, two programs doing the same things can use different
ammounts of resources. in fact, the same program can do the same thing in
two manners - one optimized and
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, guy keren wrote:
the kde folks went over board with things, without caring if it runs on
older hardware - hence, the bloat. when you have a new PC that runs very
fast, you can loose awareness to how bloated your code is. i just bought a
new computer a week ago, and
How about this for a minimalistic graphic www browser?
http://browser.arachne.cz/
Cheers,
Henry
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo
there you go. the fact that IE runs slow on some hardware, does not mean
that every other browser has to run as slow. if we looked up to misrosoft
for comparing stuff, linux would have crashed every few days and we'd be
filling fine. is that the kind of standard you're looking for?
Of
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, voguemaster wrote:
there you go. the fact that IE runs slow on some hardware, does not mean
that every other browser has to run as slow. if we looked up to misrosoft
for comparing stuff, linux would have crashed every few days and we'd be
filling fine. is that the kind
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, guy keren wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
When do you know you're talking to an open source supporter?
When he's looking for alternatives to *Mozilla* :-)
the fact that something is open
when i say something is bloated, i mean it takes too many resources. as
you quite well know, two programs doing the same things can use different
ammounts of resources. in fact, the same program can do the same thing in
two manners - one optimized and one not.
And what would you say were
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, voguemaster wrote:
when i say something is bloated, i mean it takes too many resources. as
you quite well know, two programs doing the same things can use different
ammounts of resources. in fact, the same program can do the same thing in
two manners - one optimized
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, guy keren wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, guy keren wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
When do you know you're talking to an open source supporter?
When he's looking for alternatives to *Mozilla
I'm using Galeon regularly, it's plenty fast for me, but my machine is
not a 300MHz one, on a Athlon 700MHz it worked smoothly enough.
I have no hebrew problems with it, to the best of my knowledge it works
the same as for Mozilla. Rendering is fine, just like mozilla, that is
to say that IE
When do you know you're talking to an open source supporter?
When he's looking for alternatives to *Mozilla* :-)
Alexander Maryanovsky.
At 12:38 28.11.2002 +0200, Baruch Even wrote:
I'm using Galeon regularly, it's plenty fast for me, but my machine is
not a 300MHz one, on a Athlon 700MHz
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
When do you know you're talking to an open source supporter?
When he's looking for alternatives to *Mozilla* :-)
the fact that something is open-source, doesn't have to mean its a
resource hog. and mozilla is a great resource hog, and so
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, guy keren wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
When do you know you're talking to an open source supporter?
When he's looking for alternatives to *Mozilla* :-)
the fact that something is open-source, doesn't have to mean its a
resource hog
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 05:39:16PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, guy keren wrote:
the fact that something is open-source, doesn't have to mean its a
resource hog. and mozilla is a great resource hog, and so is KDE. and
unlike various movie playing software - they don't
14 matches
Mail list logo
