How about publishing the takanon in transparent format (as it is designed by
GNU Free Documentation License:
CITATION
A Transparent copy of the Document means a machine-readable copy,
represented in a format whose specification is available to the general
public, that is suitable for revising
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 14:57, Boris Gorelik wrote:
How about publishing the takanon in transparent format (as it is designed by
snip.
I just think in terms of idiological consistency.
We will. The only reason the takanon is like this is because it was
written by lawyers (being a legal
Can someone please explain to me the advantages of a transparent format
version of a document that is, by definition, centerally managed?
Sh.
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 14:57, Boris Gorelik wrote:
How about publishing the takanon in transparent format (as it
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 15:59, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Can someone please explain to me the advantages of a transparent format
version of a document that is, by definition, centerally managed?
Supposed someone wants to suggest a change to the Takanon - he can edit
the transparent format document
On Sunday 29 December 2002 15:44, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
..
We will. The only reason the takanon is like this is because it was
written by lawyers (being a legal document) for Rasham Ha Amutut which
works with (you guessed it) DOC files and it is still being debated by
Which means that the
Quoting b g, from the post of Sun, 29 Dec:
We will. The only reason the takanon is like this is because it was
written by lawyers (being a legal document) for Rasham Ha Amutut which
works with (you guessed it) DOC files and it is still being debated by
Which means that the amuta has a
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002, b g wrote about Re: Takanon in transparent format [Was: Re:
Hamakor website]:
We will. The only reason the takanon is like this is because it was
written by lawyers (being a legal document) for Rasham Ha Amutut which
works with (you guessed it) DOC files
On 29 Dec 2002 16:04:48 +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 15:59, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Can someone please explain to me the advantages of a transparent format
version of a document that is, by definition, centerally managed?
Supposed someone wants to
Just a minor correction taken as an excuse to educate people about such
organizations - (or I am going to be corrected) - the body in
charge of the Takanon, and which is the top body in an Amuta in general,
is the assembly (i.e. all voting members of the Amuta). The Vaad is just
the
Here's hoping that you will get the attention my exact same posting didn't.
Sh.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a minor correction taken as an excuse to educate people about such
organizations - (or I am going to be corrected) - the body in
charge of the Takanon, and which is the top
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote about Re: Takanon in transparent format
[Was: Re: Hamakor website]:
Here's hoping that you will get the attention my exact same posting didn't.
It's nice to see that a board member isn't trigger-happy to wield his power,
but the truth (I think, I am
Quoting Nadav Har'El, from the post of Sun, 29 Dec:
The 5 people on the vaad were voted to actually do things
(...)
all this and more on the general discussion list of Hamakor
(discuss-subscribe(at)hamakor.org.il)
now for other exciting news of linux-il
like... if my closed-source Java program
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 05:19:20PM +0200, b g wrote:
On Sunday 29 December 2002 15:44, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
..
We will. The only reason the takanon is like this is because it was
written by lawyers (being a legal document) for Rasham Ha Amutut which
works with (you guessed it) DOC files
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 06:00:25PM +0200, Ira Abramov wrote:
seriously, why should the registrar care if it's transparent or opaque
if he's not going to edit it? as long as it's an open and popular
standard it can be PDF or Flash for all I care :)
I believe that PDF is hardly popular
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 06:17:01PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
It's quite interesting, by the way, that they even take electronic documents,
MS-Word or not. From what I recall in my dealings with lawyers, or the lawyers
I see on TV ( ;) ), they always work with printed documents (on papers
Shaul Karl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How easy it is to create .pdfs on Windows without paying a lot of
money to Adobe?
Almost as easy as on Linux I'd say: install cygwin, create a LaTeX
doc, compile it to ps, use ps2pdf. All of that should work with
cygwin.
;-)
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL
Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's quite interesting, by the way, that they even take electronic
documents, MS-Word or not. From what I recall in my dealings with
lawyers, or the lawyers I see on TV ( ;) ), they always work with
printed documents (on papers with strange, non-standard
17 matches
Mail list logo
