Hi Hans
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 16:22:55 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009 14:49:07 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Right, how about this:
/*
* These pixel codes uniquely
Vendor is below:
usb 1-8: New USB device found, idVendor=05d8, idProduct=810f
usb 1-8: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
Note it does work as I said AFTER boot is complete but not if its plugged in during the
boot phase..
so i must be something to do with how USB is
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 07:05:49PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 05:00:40PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:29:44PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
For sure we need to add an
On 12/01/09 22:05, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
So, I would just add the IR sysfs parameters at the /sys/class/input, if
the device is an IR (or create it is /sys/class/input/IR).
No, you add it to the physical device node.
The usb mouse on the system I'm working on is here:
zweiblum kraxel
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 07:05:49PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 05:00:40PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:29:44PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
For sure
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 12/01/09 22:05, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
So, I would just add the IR sysfs parameters at the /sys/class/input, if
the device is an IR (or create it is /sys/class/input/IR).
No, you add it to the physical device node.
The usb mouse on the system I'm working on
On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
Ondrej Zary wrote:
Fix completely broken mute handling radio-sf16fmi.
The sound was muted immediately after tuning in KRadio.
Also fix typos and add SF16-FMP to the texts.
I do not have device anymore. Looks OK to me.
Signed-off-by:
Hi Ondrej,
2009/12/2 Ondrej Zary li...@rainbow-software.org:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
Ondrej Zary wrote:
Fix completely broken mute handling radio-sf16fmi.
The sound was muted immediately after tuning in KRadio.
Also fix typos and add SF16-FMP to the texts.
I
Hello,
Is someone already working on supporting the TBS 6980 Dual DVB-S2 PCIe
card? http://www.tbsdtv.com/english/product/6980.html
Chips in use appear to be:
- Conexant CX23885 (PCI Express bridge)
- NXP/Conexant CX24132 (DVB-S/S2 tuner)
- NXP/Conexant CX24117 (DVB-S/S2 demodulator)
I know
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Vincent McIntyre
vincent.mcint...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rob
I missed your followup and tested the 'revert.diff' patch, attached
for reference.
I have been slow replying because I've been scratching my head over the
results.
I used 'signaltest.pl' to test[1],
Hi,
I'm trying to run OMAP3 ISP previewer in oneshot mode, without much success.
My goal is to put a 6MB Bayer10 image (captured on the same OMAP3 EVM)
into RAM, run previewer and get its output in RAM. I use linux-2.6.29 kernel
with ISP driver from omap3camera git tree.
For testing purposes
Magnus,
Thanks for the patch. For non-page aligned user space pointers I agree
that a fix is needed. Don't you think the while loop in
videobuf_dma_contig_user_get() also needs to be adjusted to include
the last page? I think the while loop checks one page too little in
the non-aligned case
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:30:29PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:44:58AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 07:05:49PM -0200, Mauro
On 12/2/09 12:30 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
(for each remote/substream that they can recognize).
I'm assuming that, by remote, you're referring to a remote receiver (and
not to
the remote itself), right?
If we could separate by remote transmitter that would be the best I
think, but I
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
The raw interface applies only to the devices that doesn't have a hardware
decoder
(something between 40%-60% of the currently supported devices).
50% is quite a number I think. But if driver does not allow access to
the raw stream - it will refuse binding to
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for
the kernels and architectures in the list below.
Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb:
date:Wed Dec 2 19:00:03 CET 2009
path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb
changeset: 13538:e0cd9a337600
gcc version: gcc
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
The raw interface applies only to the devices that doesn't have a hardware
decoder
(something between 40%-60% of the currently supported devices).
50% is quite a number I think. But if
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
...
(for each remote/substream that they can recognize).
I'm assuming that, by remote, you're referring to a remote receiver (and
not to
the remote itself), right?
If we could separate by remote
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:22:18PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 12/2/09 12:30 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
(for each remote/substream that they can recognize).
I'm assuming that, by remote, you're referring to a remote receiver
(and not to
the remote itself), right?
If we could separate
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
The raw interface applies only to the devices that doesn't have a hardware
decoder
(something between 40%-60% of the
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 05:33:34PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
The raw interface applies only to the devices that doesn't have a hardware
decoder
(something between 40%-60% of the currently supported devices).
50% is quite a number I think. But if driver
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:22:18PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 12/2/09 12:30 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
(for each remote/substream that they can recognize).
I'm assuming that, by remote, you're referring to a remote receiver
(and not to
the
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:04:30PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:22:18PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 12/2/09 12:30 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
(for each remote/substream that they can recognize).
I'm assuming that,
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:04:30PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:22:18PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 12/2/09 12:30 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
(for each remote/substream that they can recognize).
On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:04:30PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:22:18PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 12/2/09 12:30 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
(for each remote/substream
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:42:13PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:04:30PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:22:18PM -0500, Jarod Wilson
Jon Smirl wrote:
IR devices transmit vendor/device/command triplets. They are easy to
tell apart and create an evdev device corresponding to each
vendor/device pair or something else along those lines.
What they transmit depend on the used protocol. With NEC and RC5 (currently, the
most
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 06:23:51PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:04:30PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Now I understand that if 2 remotes send completely identical signals we
won't be
Jon Smirl wrote:
Some major use cases:
using IR as a keyboard replacement, controlling X and apps with it in
via mouse and keyboard emulation.
using IR to control a headless embedded device possibly running
multiple apps - like audio and home automation (my app)
IR during boot when it is the
On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
...
Personally, I've always considered the driver/interface to be the
receiver, not the remote. The lirc drivers operate at the receiver
level, anyway, and the distinction between different remotes is made by
the lirc daemon.
The fact
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
My main point is that each of these devices has device ID that can be
determined without having to first do some protocol analysis and table
lookups to figure out which device some random IR input is actually
coming from.
Heh, right back
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 06:23:51PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:04:30PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Now I understand that if 2 remotes send completely identical
On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Trent Piepho wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
My main point is that each of these devices has device ID that can be
determined without having to first do some protocol analysis and table
lookups to figure out which device some random IR input is
From: Muralidharan Karicheri m-kariche...@ti.com
This patch updates the v4l2-dvb documentation for the new video timings API
added.
Also updated the document based on comments from Hans Verkuil
Reviewed-by: Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl
Signed-off-by: Muralidharan Karicheri
Hans,
I have updated the API documentation based on your comments and the updated
patch is sent to the list. So could you please send a pull request to Mauro for
the video timing API patch along with this documentation patch? If there are
any minor issues, I would prefer to fix it by another
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Bert Massop bert.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
Jan Sundman jan.sundman at aland.net writes:
Hi,
I just received a usb DVB-T card and have been trying to get it to work
under Ubuntu 9.10, but to no avail. dmesg shows the following when
plugging in the card:
[
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:22:18PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 12/2/09 12:30 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
(for each remote/substream that they can recognize).
I'm assuming
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:55 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
...
(for each remote/substream that they can recognize).
I'm assuming that, by remote, you're referring to a remote receiver (and
not to
the
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 12:14 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:04:30PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Didn't Jon posted his example whith programmable remote pretending to be
several separate remotes (depending on the mode of operation) so that
several devices/applications
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:22:18PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 12/2/09 12:30 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
(for each remote/substream that they can recognize).
Am Mittwoch, den 02.12.2009, 20:19 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 12:14 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:04:30PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Didn't Jon posted his example whith programmable remote pretending to be
several separate remotes
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Jon Smirl wrote:
A bluetooth remote has a specific device ID that the receiver has to pair
with. Your usb mouse and keyboard each have specific device IDs. A usb IR
*receiver* has a specific device ID, the remotes do not. So there's the
major difference from your
On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Trent Piepho wrote:
...
Now I understand that if 2 remotes send completely identical signals we
won't be able to separate them, but in cases when we can I think we
should.
I don't have a problem with that, if its a truly desired feature. But
for the most part, I
On Dec 1, 2009, at 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Anyway, we shouldn't postpone lirc drivers addition due to that. There are
still lots of work
to do before we'll be able to split the tables from the kernel drivers.
Indeed. The sysfs bits are future work for both lirc and evdev drivers.
Hi Mauro,
Please pull from http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-timings for the
following:
- v4l: Adding Digital Video Timings APIs
- v4l2-spec: Digital Video Timings API documentation
- v4l2-spec: updated revision history, updated version to 2.6.33.
Murali, I've added you as one of the
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 04:55:00 Andy Walls wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either
changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is today
with mercurial.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:22:18PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 12/2/09
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Trent Piepho wrote:
...
Now I understand that if 2 remotes send completely identical signals we
won't be able to separate them, but in cases when we can I think we
should.
I don't have a
Is there anything I can do to help? This is a show stopping bug for me.
Thanks,
Sean Lazar
Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14564
Summary: capture-example sleeping function called from invalid
-Original Message-
From: Karicheri, Muralidharan
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:49 PM
To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; hverk...@xs4all.nl;
khil...@deeprootsystems.com
Cc: davinci-linux-open-sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; Hiremath,
Vaibhav; Karicheri, Muralidharan
Subject:
+1 for git, I really really really miss being able to do
a simple git rebase, and no rebase is not evil not as long
as you don't use it for anything but local patches.
Regards,
Hans
On 12/01/2009 03:59 PM, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to start a discussion which ideally
51 matches
Mail list logo
