Hrm... Sounds interesting
Just how is beer Way Off Topic on a Linux list?
considering Linux keeps talking about free beer. I woundn't say its that off
topic
Simon
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe,
Taplin, Simon S wrote:
I'm looking at doing some Linux training while working. I see in Linux
Journal that there are two main OS independent version, the LPI LPI (Linux
Professionals Institute) and the SAIR GNU linux. Which is better? And why?
Thanks
Simon
LAN Administrator
Damelin
burns wrote:
[snip]
First, LPI does not run courses (I don't think). They establish a test and
certification standard which many folks who do run courses will base their
training upon.
Personally, I believe that courses that follow the LPI model are superior to
the SAIR GNU genre.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 03:22:41PM +0200, Taplin, Simon S wrote:
I'm looking at doing some Linux training while working. I see in Linux
Journal that there are two main OS independent version, the LPI LPI (Linux
Professionals Institute) and the SAIR GNU linux. Which is better? And why?
My 2
On Thursday 26 July 2001 07:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seeing as the release of a trial version of Kylix attracted some attention
on the a while back I figured I'd post the release of the open edition,
which is freely usable in the development of GPL'd apps.
These webcasts play in RealPlayer. I found the three for the debate and
panel discussion very educational and informative. I found the one by Fred
Baker informative as well. Each of these segments run from 20 to 40 minutes
each so they can take some time to watch. I just thought I'd throw
Kernel - Freeze Recovery (Bandel / Meissner)
PS DAVID, doesn't ^^^this also have to be compiled as magic sysrq in the
kernel???
Sound-Remote Sound (Stew Benedict)
--
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 05:10:29 -0600, Kurt Wall wrote:
4. They keep spamming me.
Kurt
Now there's a good reason! ROFLMAO ;-)
stayler
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 06:14:29AM -0700, Shawn Tayler wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 05:10:29 -0600, Kurt Wall wrote:
4. They keep spamming me.
Kurt
Now there's a good reason! ROFLMAO ;-)
It's sufficient to keep me from buying anything from anybody.
Bill
--
INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Andrew wrote:
Kernel - Freeze Recovery (Bandel / Meissner)
PS DAVID, doesn't ^^^this also have to be compiled as magic sysrq in the
kernel???
Yes. However, up until now (and unfortunately I can't seem to locate my
WHATSIN file for W3.1), Caldera has done this by default. I
Running COL 2.2. Recently had to shift my ide cdrom from primary slave
to secondary slave on my box. Needless to say the auto cdrom icon
doesn't access the cdrom in its new position. The secondary primary is
occupied by an ide cdrw.
I tried to mount the cdrom using# mount -t auto /dev/hdc
--- Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running COL 2.2. Recently had to shift my ide cdrom from primary slave
to secondary slave on my box. Needless to say the auto cdrom icon
doesn't access the cdrom in its new position. The secondary primary is
occupied by an ide cdrw.
I tried to mount the
Net Llama wrote:
--- David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Andrew wrote:
Kernel - Freeze Recovery (Bandel / Meissner)
PS DAVID, doesn't ^^^this also have to be compiled as magic
sysrq in the
kernel???
Yes. However, up until now (and unfortunately I can't
I tried to mount the cdrom using# mount -t auto /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom and
got an error message that the device was read only. Next tried id of
/dev/hdd and with same result. Then tried /dev/hdc4 got number too large
Dont' forget that cdrom's are always mounted read only by default. You need
to
--- Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know for sure but I may have a new virus knocking at my door. In
the last few hours I have received the same e-mail from eight
different
addresses that I don't know. All of them have an attachment and appear
to be identical as follows,
Net Llama wrote:
--- Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know for sure but I may have a new virus knocking at my door. In
the last few hours I have received the same e-mail from eight
different
addresses that I don't know. All of them have an attachment and appear
to be identical as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
My guess is that it contains the W32.Sircam.Worm@mm worm
(http:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
I've known of *MANY* (many possibly meaning a lot) mails containing it these last few
days.
The subject is the name of the infected attachment and the body
dep wrote:
On Friday 27 July 2001 03:49 pm, Lee wrote:
| Don't know for sure but I may have a new virus knocking at my door.
| In the last few hours I have received the same e-mail from eight
| different addresses that I don't know. All of them have an
| attachment and appear to be
Excellent review. Guess it's time to get off my butt and install RH7.1.
I'm especially glad to hear that it works.
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001 00:04:48 +1130
Mike Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've installed it and while I'm not super-impressed, it's a *definite*
move
forward,
--
Ken Moffat
--- dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 27 July 2001 03:49 pm, Lee wrote:
| Don't know for sure but I may have a new virus knocking at my door.
| In the last few hours I have received the same e-mail from eight
| different addresses that I don't know. All of them have an
| attachment and
--- Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dep wrote:
On Friday 27 July 2001 03:49 pm, Lee wrote:
| Don't know for sure but I may have a new virus knocking at my
door.
| In the last few hours I have received the same e-mail from eight
| different addresses that I don't know. All of them have
Found a use for it. Everytime I get one of these infected e-mails I
notify the sender that
they may be infected and make a point that my Linux system is immune
to this particular virus.
Gets them wondering just what Linux is all about.
I got one of those the other day. I sent it back
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:05:30PM -0400, Joel Hammer wrote:
I use mutt.
I would like mutt to be able to start abiword for .doc attachments (word
documents) and acrobat reader to display pdf document attachments.
However, mutt's viewer lists both of these attachments as octet-stream.
I
From the same mail server, probably the same client machine, the IP of
the mail server and it name are identical... I guess its be careful
what you wish for
stayler
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe,
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 06:14:29AM -0700, Shawn Tayler wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 05:10:29 -0600, Kurt Wall wrote:
4. They keep spamming me.
Kurt
Now there's a good reason! ROFLMAO ;-)
It's sufficient to keep me from buying anything from anybody.
Here,
--- Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Net Llama wrote:
Then why are you so afraid of opening it?
Because the damned thing might end up in a non functioning binary
which takes up HD space.
Oh, but the email that it came with, that you downloaded, somehow isn't
taking up the very same exact
--- Shawn Tayler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking this, is there a Virus scanner that works in Linux? I'd like
to be able to ID these little bugs. My McAfee OS/2 scanner won't ID
Sircam, even with the new DAT's as the scan engine is ancient, and
won't be renewed anytime soon
I rather
Net Llama wrote:
--- Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Net Llama wrote:
Then why are you so afraid of opening it?
Because the damned thing might end up in a non functioning binary
which takes up HD space.
Oh, but the email that it came with, that you downloaded, somehow isn't
taking up
Net Llama wrote:
--- Shawn Tayler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking this, is there a Virus scanner that works in Linux? I'd like
to be able to ID these little bugs. My McAfee OS/2 scanner won't ID
Sircam, even with the new DAT's as the scan engine is ancient, and
won't be renewed
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 07:57:47PM -0700, Net Llama wrote:
--- Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Net Llama wrote:
Then why are you so afraid of opening it?
Because the damned thing might end up in a non functioning binary
which takes up HD space.
Oh, but the email that it came with,
On Friday 27 July 2001 08:48 pm, Shawn Tayler wrote:
| Is there a Jerry Andrews on the list? I finally got the Sircam
| mailed to me from his machine. The adress is changed, I may try
| mailing a couple permutations to tell him he's infected. I was
| wondering if anyone on the list knows
I haven't got any of these or the SirCam stuff(looking around quickly for
wood to knock on). I don't think it's this list, the name doesn't sound
familiar.
Jim
On Friday July 27, 2001 10:48 pm, dep wrote:
On Friday 27 July 2001 08:48 pm, Shawn Tayler wrote:
| Is there a Jerry Andrews on
The worm seems to be able to pick up a mailto: link from a
web page stored in the machine.
The most horrible consequence may not be that it destroys
files on the victims' machine, but its ability to pick up at
random a file to append itself -- while you got a resume
from Jerry Andrews, one of my
33 matches
Mail list logo
