Re: OT Fwd: SuSE noshow at LWCE NY 2002

2002-02-05 Thread Matthew Carpenter
I agree whole-heartedly with everything you just said. Webmin and webmin-like tools are excellent and will get even better as better error-checking is written into the code. The biggest problem with Webmin is that it is all done in perl. I'd like to see the main system rewritten using J2EE (at

Re: OT Fwd: SuSE noshow at LWCE NY 2002

2002-02-05 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Not that I am at all anti-GUI. But there are and will ALWAYS be good reasons for a CLI. For instance, there are simple CLI tools which can be combined in any number of ways to find information and sort/cut/copy/mail/fold/spindle/mutilate/etc... which would take a long time to create a GUI to

Re: OT Fwd: SuSE noshow at LWCE NY 2002

2002-02-05 Thread dep
begin David A. Bandel's quote: | And my experience lately has been: | SuSE == RH (European style) == totally borken. | Mandrake on the other hand (8.1) has been nearly flawless. The 8.2 | Beta is even better. well, suse-7.3 is a pita in a lot of ways, some of them kernel-related, i think.

NO $#@^*% MAIL!

2002-02-05 Thread Glenn Williams
Would some kind soul please e-mail me off-list if you see this message? Thanks. Regards, Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Registered Linux User # 135678 - since 1994 Amateur Radio Packeteer since 1988 ___ Linux-users mailing list -

Script help

2002-02-05 Thread Tom Wilson
Hi all, First, my script abilility rests in /dev/null. That being said, what I am *trying* to do is get a text file with a list of MAC addresses and the corresponding IP's for certain ranges of IP's. Part of my solution: --- for i in `seq 100 120`; do ping -c 5

anyone have success with the new Mozilla-0.9.8 ?

2002-02-05 Thread Net Llama
I just downloaded the binary tarball of Mozilla (as i've done for every official Mozilla release since R16), and installed it in a new directory. However, when i try to run the mozilla binary (as root), i get a seg-fault: [root@netllama /root]# /opt/mozilla/mozilla /opt/mozilla/run-mozilla.sh:

Re: Suggested module for PCI LAN Card..?

2002-02-05 Thread Bill Campbell
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 07:02:52AM -0500, Jerry McBride wrote: On Mon, 04 Feb 2002 18:16:23 -0600 Michael Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to LinkSys support page they work fine with the ne2000 driver. Link: http://www.linksys.com/support/support.asp?spid=26 If it's the lne100tx,

Re: ssh X11 forwarding weirdness

2002-02-05 Thread Net Llama
--- David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 4 Feb 2002 20:55:08 -0800 (PST) begin Net Llama [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: I've got 2 boxes networked together with a patch cable. I can SSH back forth between them without a single problem. However, if i try to run an X app

some bits and trivia

2002-02-05 Thread Keith Antoine
I have been trying to get hold of the latest release of Caldera to no avail. Their site is constantly full and the mirrors do not have the latest release still. Does any one out there have a copy of the 3 iso's as yet or know of a reachable site? The reason is that I am using Mandrake 8.1

Re: Suggested module for PCI LAN Card..?

2002-02-05 Thread Jerry McBride
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 08:07:11 -0500 Bill Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, Im pretty sure that under winders the card came up as lne 100tx so I will give it a shot with tulip, if it fails will give it a go with the ne2000 then You booting this nic on a workstation 3.1? If so, the lionksys

Re: Suggested module for PCI LAN Card..?

2002-02-05 Thread Bill Day
kickin 2.4 8^) On Tuesday 05 February 2002 18:06, you were heard blurting out: On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 08:07:11 -0500 Bill Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, Im pretty sure that under winders the card came up as lne 100tx so I will give it a shot with tulip, if it fails will give it a go with

Re: Suggested module for PCI LAN Card..?

2002-02-05 Thread Michael Hipp
On Tuesday 05 February 2002 11:54 am, Bill Campbell wrote: We stopped using the LinkSys NICs because they didn't work all that well with the Tulip drivers unless you used ones with their patches. It's been a couple of years since we last tried this so they may be better now. I have been

Re: Suggested module for PCI LAN Card..?

2002-02-05 Thread Jim Conner
Yeah, since you beat my record uptime of 173 days and some odd hours you can now reboot. :) I have had good luck with 3com and d-link. Although d-link's that use the rtl8039(?) module is broken in kernel 2.4.2 to about 2.4.9(?). I know my d-link wouldn't transmit or recieve packets with

RE: Re: Suggested module for PCI LAN Card..?

2002-02-05 Thread kbb0927
I use the Linksys PCI NIC in my linux router box and it uses the tulip driver without incident. It is running under suse 7.2 with kernel 2.4.16 and runs perfectly every time @ 100 mbps, whereas the realtek 8139 in the same machine can't handle the 2.4.16 kernel and sticks @ 10 mbps. Regards,

RE: Re: Suggested module for PCI LAN Card..?

2002-02-05 Thread kbb0927
Netgear is great and rtl8139 has troubles for me above kernel 2.4.4. Bye, Keith B. Jim Conner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, since you beat my record uptime of 173 days and some odd hours you can now reboot. :) I have had good luck with 3com and d-link. Although d-link's that use the

Re: ssh X11 forwarding weirdness

2002-02-05 Thread David A. Bandel
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 06:39:14 -0800 (PST) begin Net Llama [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: [snip] Do you happen to know the syntax for this? I'm looking at both files and not seeing any variable for DISPLAY. in sshd_config: X11Forwarding yes X11DisplayOffset 10 the X11DisplayOffset tells

Re: NO $#@^*% MAIL!

2002-02-05 Thread David A. Bandel
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 12:36:33 -0700 begin Glenn Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: Would some kind soul please e-mail me off-list if you see this message? Thanks. Regards, Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Registered Linux User # 135678 - since 1994 Amateur Radio Packeteer

Re: anyone have success with the new Mozilla-0.9.8 ?

2002-02-05 Thread Ian
Net Llama wrote: I just downloaded the binary tarball of Mozilla (as i've done for every official Mozilla release since R16), and installed it in a new directory. However, when i try to run the mozilla binary (as root), i get a seg-fault: [root@netllama /root]# /opt/mozilla/mozilla

Re: Script help

2002-02-05 Thread Joel Hammer
Well, I don't understand the -w option. And I don't understand the pipe command, and I don't understand what the arp cache is too well, but: Why not just ping all these addresses first, then use arp to get their MAC's? If you are on this network, your arp cache will store those mac's, at least

Re: Script help

2002-02-05 Thread David A. Bandel
On Wed, 06 Feb 2002 03:26:27 +0800 begin Tom Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: Hi all, First, my script abilility rests in /dev/null. That being said, what I am *trying* to do is get a text file with a list of MAC addresses and the corresponding IP's for certain ranges of IP's.

Re: some bits and trivia

2002-02-05 Thread Ian
Keith Antoine wrote: SNIP This was sent to me by my daughter in NZ, what do you guys think? http://www.satirewire.com/news/jan02/australia.shtml Sorry I can't help you with the ISO's but the article was well written and carefully thought out. Can't say as I blame you lot. ;) -- Linux SxS

Thanks Douglas Hunley

2002-02-05 Thread Michael Hipp
I finally got around to doing *all* the stuff in SxS - XFREE - XFree410. What a difference! My Linux box no longer has to bow its head in shame next to the W2k machine for readabilty. And my 41-year-old eyeballs will forever be indebted. Thank you. Michael

Re: Script help

2002-02-05 Thread Ian
Tom Wilson wrote: Hi all, First, my script abilility rests in /dev/null. That being said, what I am *trying* to do is get a text file with a list of MAC addresses and the corresponding IP's for certain ranges of IP's. Part of my solution: --- for i in `seq

Re: anyone have success with the new Mozilla-0.9.8 ?

2002-02-05 Thread Net Llama
--- Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Net Llama wrote: I just downloaded the binary tarball of Mozilla (as i've done for every official Mozilla release since R16), and installed it in a new directory. However, when i try to run the mozilla binary (as root), i get a seg-fault:

Re: some bits and trivia

2002-02-05 Thread Net Llama
--- Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been trying to get hold of the latest release of Caldera to no avail. Their site is constantly full and the mirrors do not have the latest release still. Does any one out there have a copy of the 3 iso's as yet or know of a reachable

Re: anyone have success with the new Mozilla-0.9.8 ?

2002-02-05 Thread Ian
Net Llama wrote: --- Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Net Llama wrote: I just downloaded the binary tarball of Mozilla (as i've done for every official Mozilla release since R16), and installed it in a new directory. However, when i try to run the mozilla binary (as root), i

Re: ssh X11 forwarding weirdness

2002-02-05 Thread Net Llama
--- David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 06:39:14 -0800 (PST) begin Net Llama [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: Do you happen to know the syntax for this? I'm looking at both files and not seeing any variable for DISPLAY. in sshd_config: X11Forwarding yes

Re: DNS issues again

2002-02-05 Thread Bill Campbell
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 05:38:20PM -0500, Douglas J Hunley wrote: Looks like there's something wrong with the DNS for linux.nf (yes, again). Unfortunately, it's not something I have access to. Bear with us as the issue gets resolved and we implement secondary DNS servers. Sorry Considering

Apache and unknown file types...

2002-02-05 Thread Ian
When I d/l from the apache server running locally any file that it doesn't recognize, it seems to be mangling it somehow, possibly doing an ascii transfer of it or something like that. I keep a directory of wallpaper pics around and shared it out over the web server, but when I d/l a bitmap

Resend [Postifix on Redhat 7.2]

2002-02-05 Thread Ian
After wrangling with Sendmail some more...I've decided to repost this one from a few days back. Original Message Subject: Postifix on Redhat 7.2 Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:59:31 -0500 From: Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK, I've

Re: ssh X11 forwarding weirdness

2002-02-05 Thread David A. Bandel
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:49:02 -0800 (PST) begin Net Llama [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: [snip] All of that checks out. I made sure to set that stuff up beforehand. Still, no go. I ssh from boxA to boxB, run whatever, and it appears on the monitor for boxB. When you log in (from A to B),

Re: anyone have success with the new Mozilla-0.9.8 ?

2002-02-05 Thread David A. Bandel
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:32:56 -0800 (PST) begin Net Llama [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: [snip] That script is not of my creation, it came with Mozilla, and i'll also note that the same exact script came with the previous version of Mozilla. So, i'd say the odds are not the script, but the

SOLVED Re: Apache and unknown file types...

2002-02-05 Thread Ian
Ian wrote: When I d/l from the apache server running locally any file that it doesn't recognize, it seems to be mangling it somehow, possibly doing an ascii transfer of it or something like that. I keep a directory of wallpaper pics around and shared it out over the web server, but when

Re: Resend [Postifix on Redhat 7.2]

2002-02-05 Thread David A. Bandel
On Tue, 05 Feb 2002 21:15:50 -0500 begin Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: After wrangling with Sendmail some more...I've decided to repost this one from a few days back. Original Message Subject: Postifix on Redhat 7.2 Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:59:31 -0500 From:

Re: Resend [Postifix on Redhat 7.2]

2002-02-05 Thread Ian
David A. Bandel wrote: On Tue, 05 Feb 2002 21:15:50 -0500 begin Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: After wrangling with Sendmail some more...I've decided to repost this one from a few days back. Original Message Subject: Postifix on Redhat 7.2 Date: Sat, 02

Re: Suggested module for PCI LAN Card..?

2002-02-05 Thread Bill Day
Nah Jimmy.. I think I'll leave it up until I actually get the service here. 8^) They haven't even put the bandwidth to the towers yet. Once they survey my site(s) here and out in country and I decide whether I need a tower or not then I'll get antsy about getting another card in it 8^)

Where to get libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3

2002-02-05 Thread Michael Hipp
Where would I come up with a libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 and what would I do with it once I had it? I have a package to install that can't live without it. I'm running COLW 3.1.1. Thanks, Michael ___ Linux-users mailing list -

Re: some bits and trivia

2002-02-05 Thread Rick Sivernell
Skippy I would like the same iso's here. If Aussie land moves that close to the state, you can then come visit us more easilyg cheers -- Rick Sivernell Dallas, Texas 75287 972 306-2296 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1 Registered Linux User .~. / v \ /( _ )\ ^

Re: some bits and trivia

2002-02-05 Thread Keith Antoine
On Tuesday 05 February 2002 08:34 pm, Net Llama warbled: Sorry, no luck here either. I'm not sure what the user limit on their ISO server, but its most likely something incredibly low. Thanks for that Lonnie, they have been like that for a week now. What gets to me is that the lame brains

Re: Where to get libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3

2002-02-05 Thread Keith Antoine
On Tuesday 05 February 2002 10:23 pm, Michael Hipp warbled: Where would I come up with a libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 and what would I do with it once I had it? I have a package to install that can't live without it. I'm running COLW 3.1.1. Go to rpmfind.net and search for a suitable rpm.

Re: Where to get libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3

2002-02-05 Thread Michael Hipp
On Wednesday 06 February 2002 01:22 pm, Keith Antoine wrote: On Tuesday 05 February 2002 10:23 pm, Michael Hipp warbled: Where would I come up with a libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 and what would I do with it once I had it? I have a package to install that can't live without it. I'm running

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-02-05 Thread Keith Morse
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Bill Day wrote: Thanks Keith But Im still lost    8^( Going on with the trial and error... On Wednesday 30 January 2002 18:45, you were heard blurting out: Bill, just another quick reference I got turned on to by a friend is:

please let mehave nt again. i have messesd up my computer loading linux

2002-02-05 Thread gurmeet arora
Dear Sir, I have loaded linux Madrake which has become the boot loader. After loading from the Linix boot selector, for 'dos' which is the ntpartion I get the 'blue screen death' of Nt. Please help. I have tried different options including fdisk, partioning from nt, partioning from nt,