We need to find our own solution to the new TLD problem, and the
cooperative maintenance of the Virtual Inclusive Root.
Burying your head in the sand and wishing the problem away won't make it
so.
Ignore ICANN to your own detriment.
Perhaps, but saying these ISO protocols suck and should
i don't think the routing registries have signed contracts with ICANN yet
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, at 17:58 [=GMT-0400], Richard J. Sexton wrote:
We need to find our own solution to the new TLD problem, and the
cooperative maintenance of the Virtual Inclusive Root.
Burying your head in
Is this true?
yes it is true
Does it not depend on _how_ you work inside ICANN?
no it does not depend on how you work inside of icann since the
private BWG mail list started in 1998 I have been an active
participant in that group of people who have all tried to work within
ICANN and
Beautiful. But who gave you your IP number?
dhcp.sorry
--
The COOK Report on Internet, 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA
(609) 882-2572 (phone fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index to 9 years
of the COOK Report at
Which is why we need laws governing the DNS, not committees.
-- ken
P.S. Richard: Your address: (Richard J. Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED])
always bounces as undeliverable, if that info is helpful to you.
you simply DO NOT UNDERSTAND ken...
although I admitt I didn't fully
don't be offended, but your method is doomed to failure..
you will NEVER EVER get enough people to understand and to care
enough to make a dent in the monolith...
what you can do is begin to grasp the end to end problems and see how
trust fits and see that if end to end can be
P.S. Stef: You keep presuming I'm advocating centralization.
Please do not pidgeon-hole my ideas to fit your expectations.
I'm advocating quite the opposite: Decentralized democracy,
composed of individuals practicing reponsible self rule from
a global sense of our deep interactivity, a
governance mechanism are tiresome
because they do not deflect ICANN one nano meter from the path it is
on.
here is an essay co authored by myself and dave hughes
yesterday...send it where you wish
The Real ICANN, by Gordon Cook and Dave Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Australian
I didn't see this message when it came by because I have been
filtering rhonda hauben to my trash for the last two years.
unfortunately I did see it when someone else naively asked it it were true.
I was a participant and a critic in many of the events she ties to
describe without a shred
And open sourced, auditable solution is much preferable over Joop's
version of "democracy."
--
Best regards,
Williammailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I certainly like an open source auditable election. Anyone notice
yet that with election.com running the ICANN at
Well DAMN her to hell and gone! She insults us. how many time in
past did she deny that ICANN was a regulatory body or governing
body. Does she not remember her argument with Farber on his very
point!?
No one with a shred of any clue should ever trust this woman again.
Let her go off
Excellent suggestions eric but contarry to the entire pattern of behavior of these
people who believe that they and only they have the god given right to run the
internet.
"the Internet is for everyone"
just look at ICANN and savour the flavor of THAT assertion.
"vinton g. cerf" wrote:
if ICANN gave a damn it would have tried MUCH harder.
At 1:26 PM -0400 7/31/00, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
It's also worth noting that virtually every other major Internet
service has been swamped by unexpected load. Predicting load, and
engineering for it without prior experience in that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Large Membership Elections
The Board finalized the process for initial selection
of five Directors by its At Large Membership. Those
Directors should be seated in time for ICANN's annual
meeting in Los Angeles on November 13-14, 2000.
Following is the
You just did esther. your first comment to this list in months.. I wish you
many long happy hours in depositions and the court room
Ken, as you know, I cannot commment.
Esther
At 11:15 PM 6/25/00 -0700, you wrote:
The marketplace in action
Any response?
-- ken
From:
Michael Sondow wrote:
Diane Cabell wrote:
I do not teach a seminar of any kind for the Association of Internet
Professionals. Your statement is a total fabrication.
A total fabrication? Then why does Bret Fausett's website
(http://www.lextext.com/news/3-2.html) say ""Diane
Dave Farber writes to his IP list:
"I am, on the average, very impressed with the staff at the FCC. As I
have said before, they do what they believe is best for the country
recognizing that they are dealing with powerful industrial players
who often run to the Hill and the courts for
Roger Cochetti says:
In other words, put into immediate effect a measure which is
currently being hotly disputed and which runs directly counter to
the interests of a large percentage of Internet users.
In the spirit of gaining new experience and as a reflection of the rapid
global growth
It has always been surprising to me that General Atomics and ATT, who were
part of the initial InterNIC, received no flack for notholding up their
portion of the Cooperative Agreement. Maybe ATT did some work but their
Annual Report of, I believe 1996 didn't even mention that role.
Ellen
Question for david conrad,
DNSSEC is clearly a good thing. But my question is based on my
recollection of the IETF list December 99 discussion of unencumbered
host to host connectivity across the internet. IPSEC if I recall
correctly can't get through a NAT box. Can DNSSEC successfully
Mike, david conrad is correct in what he says about routing
registries and small isps, they complain vociferously but there are
valid technical reasons for what has been done, and since the number
of isps has grown from maybe 1000 five years ago to about 10,000 now
. of course the non
From the executive summary of the April 2000 COOK Report on Internet.
for full summary see http://cookreport.com/09.01.shtml
Essays, pp. 23- 27
Thinking
We present roughly half of Ed Gerck's Thinking Essay in the belief
that readers will begin to understand why we consider it the single
Ms. Simons is very plainly muddle headed.
Barbara Simons wrote:
Dear Michael,
I infer from your note that you approve of my article
on government surveillance. I'm glad to hear that.
You may also like the article I've included below,
a version of which will be appearing in the next issue
Hey michael, go read the list archives and you can find out a
lotstop whining.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
Dear Friends,
I've tried to find out how the ICIIU is funded but I can't find this
piece of information on their web site. Come to think of it, I can't find
And I consider myself an ICIIU sympathizer as well Mr. Pawlo.
Now may we ask you to disclose where your priorities are?
At 12:29 AM 2/24/00 +0100, you wrote:
Dear Friends,
I've tried to find out how the ICIIU is funded but I can't find this
piece of information on their web site. Come to
of this planet
Gordon Cook wrote:
Hey michael, go read the list archives and you can find out a
lot.
I don't know what you're talking about, and frankly I don't want to
know. Go read them yourself.
stop whining.
You're the one who's been doing all the whining lately:
"We all
ayebrother sextonI believe you.but as someone else who
has been alleged to be a paid NSI agent... I must assert that it is
widely known that you are a dangerous man..and do you know the
filthy rumor mongers come to me and they say that sexton must be a
buddy of that other
these idiots do try don't they?
From: "icann" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Update on ICANN Cairo Meetings @ Call for Sponsors
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 09:41:34 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
UPDATE
Sigh,
I went to the full filling on edgar and looked again. there NSI
informs us that
" A failure in the operation of our registration system or other
events could result in deletion of one or more domain names from the Internet
for a period of time.
" A failure in the operation or
Congratulations to Network solutions for being ripped by carolyn
duffy marsan in longish article on shared registry protocol
imbrogliocomplete with good quotes from ed gerck and patrick
falstrom. of course she does blow a lot of her accomplishment with a
quote from the bogus jeff
to those asking i have seen this in hadcopy only its probably on
their web site but alas I have no url
The COOK Report on InternetIndex to seven years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA
1) If we don't the ITU will take over. Still waiting for Dave Farber and
Tamar Frankel for their promised explanations as to why this is true.
2) For the stability of the Interent.
No, I havn't lost my miod, I'm just testing my new signature file.
Nice sig richard.
Uncle Dave the Fox is
Lets see if I understand what Is now being debated on the IETF list.
NSI makes shared data base and gets panel of outside experts to
comment on the code and protocols designed to implement the data base.
The experts tell NSI that what they have designed is a bunch of crap
that will lead to
http://cookreport.com/neptibalb.shtml
these are the costumed buddhist monks of he tengboche monastery near
mt everest
The COOK Report on InternetIndex to seven years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ
Here is the bogus stability that mike roberts and esther dyson, and
ibm have brought to the internet.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1999-12/21/113l-122199-idx.html
The COOK Report on InternetIndex to
In a very long article we summarize our knowledge of the ICANN
debate. The article uncovers participants and some of the details
of the secret meeting of July 30, 1999. This meeting sponsored and
brokered by IBM shows that ICANN, far from being a consensus
organization, is the creature of
This is the unholy alliance that gave us the ICANN board.
We still do not know who was part of that alliance, what criteria they
used to select the candidates for the initial board, and what quid pro
quos were made among those doing selecting.
No but there is plenty of circumstantial
e NTIA has now taken on these
powers?
There is no doubt a line connecting the two projects. Perhaps Gordon
Cook can connect the dots.
I remember at Geneva last year listening to the lawyer from
Jones and Day saying that all power of ICANN, according
to the bylaws, would
your reply is helpful.
but as far as being scared by alternatives.(too).
I don't think I follow you here..
i don't see any aternatives to be scared by...except the MORASS that
lessig bemoans...
the very morass that allows the icanntes to do what they are doing
and get away
At 10:55 AM 11/24/99 -0500, Tamar Frankel wrote:
I do not think we disagree. I certainly agree with Larry Lessig, and I did
read his book. We disagree on the timing. I am willing to be more patient,
and hope that people like you will continue to demand more accountability.
I did not conclude
Tony. I tried to get
http://www.itu.int/itudoc/gs/council/c99/docs/docs1/051.html
and was asked for a TIES user name and password.
what am i doing wrong?
The ITU General Secretariat has launched a proceeding
on its role involving the Internet and DNS. This was
contained in a 21
Dave Farber wrote:
[Does Jerri know something I don't know about the state of the ICANN
or is she just being sloppy calling ICANN "The Internet's governing
board" djf]
I reply:
Dave: she knows full well what you seem unwilling to admit.. Of
course it is the the governing board. i
As ICANN moves to break its by laws one more time by nominating and
then placing ex congressman Rick White on its board lets look one
more time at its origins.
They begin with Larry Landweber's October 1, 1995 memo to the ISOC
board detailing an ISOC master plan successfully carried out over
h for explaining their ominous but
otherwise vague warnings.
Gordon Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But now the other part of this picture also begins to come into
focus. This is the curious insistence of folk like Vint Cerf, John
Patick and Dave Farber to say that if ICANN does not succeed
Gordon Cook wrote:
greg -- you may be right.
Yet if you are right and with an ICANN failure all big business would
have to do would be to go to Congress for a quick and easy fix, then
I ask what are Cerf and Patrick afraid of?
Personally, I think that Cerf and Patrick (and others
After all of ICANN's saber rattling about how it would bing the NSI
to heel and through measures ranging up to and includng rebid of the
cooperative agreement by sept 30 next year in order to put NSI out
of business, we have now a deal where, thanks to DoC and ICANN, NSI
has managed to get
Can DoC Empower ICANN?
The answer is likely yes if no one questions highly suspect DOC
authority in this area. The big prize seems to be the root zone
files. If NTIA closes out is MOU by giving ICANN the root, it will
be exercising authority which most observers that we have talked with
Yet another propaganda piece artfully and deceptively designed to
reassure those who haven't been paying close attention to facts of
what this unsuable unaccountable clique is doing. The pattern of
deception continues. ISOC, Vint cerf, Patrick himself, Roberts,
Dyson continue to manuever
Does anyone have the date and contest for this outstanding comment?
In a recent New York Times article, Esther Dyson
was quoted as saying "With all due respect, we
are less interested in complaints about process"
and more interested in "doing real work and
moving forward."
I have just heard a very disturbing rumor from a very credible
source. Former Washington state Congressman Rick White is believed
to be running for a seat on the ICANN Board representing the Domain
Name Supporting Organization.
White, an attorney with Perkins Koie (Coie?) was elected to
idate is likely former
Congressman Rick Waters, from the Pacific Northwest, who is
apparently very well known and has worked in this area."
End quotation from cohen - Gordon Cook speaking:
White, an attorney with Perkins Koie (Coie?) was elected to Congress
in 1994 as a foot soldier to New
is accountable to his shareholders, not to the
Internet Community (not even to speak about the IFWP list).
Regards
Roberto
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 14 September 1999 9:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IFWP] Jim Rutt Should Resign
Rutt in his Rutt report said he cared about the internet. That one
of his highest priorities was to preserve the freedom and
independence of the Internet.
Today I heard from a source with primary knowledge that Pincus wasn't
lying.that NSI rather than fight ICANN will enable it by
[Richard J. Solomon is the Chief Scientist of the UPenn Center for
Communications Technology and Policy and the co-author with Lee
McKnight and Russell Neuman of The Gordian Knot: Gridlock on the
Information Highway (MIT Press, 1997)
Would the U.S. Government regulate the Internet? And how
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 08:40:38 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP: "The Regulatory Ratchet" and Interception
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I promised further word on the identity of the author of the paper on
which I based the long introduction to my even longer report on
ICANN. The author is Professor Milton Mueller of School of
Information Studies of Syracuse University. Milton's paper analyzes
ICANN as, at least in part, the
let's hope she is telling the truth. I for one don't believe that she is.
I found Esther's written critique of content "self-regulation," as distributed
on Farber's list, to be wonderfully on target--and a great relief.
Esther Dyson wrote:
FWIW, the first thing I said when I stood up was
ISOC'S ICANN COALITION WIDENS ITS CONTROL
ATTEMPTS TO REGULATE DNS - INVITES TRADEMARK, IP, ITU,
EC, E-COMMERCE INTERESTS TO EXPAND ICANN SCOPE
ICANN ALLOWS PROPERTY RIGHTS TELCO REGULATORY INTERESTS TO
STRUCTURE SOS TO ENSURE THEIR MAXIMUM ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE
ICANN is moving forward
Editor's Note: If one does not understand how ICANN came to be, one
will not grasp the complex interaction of forces that are powering
it. It will remain the mysterious black box that can be interpreted
differently for different audiences. The tiny group directing it has
found it desirable
Dave this is a perfectly reasonable comment. There is only one point
on which I STRONGLY disagree with it.
you say: If ICANN fails it
will be taken as a indicator that the net can not manage itself and
we will get "Adult" supervision which believe me we will not like.
Vint, Esther, John and
Dave Farber noted his agreement with Greg Skinner's assertion below.
Many thanks, yes yes yes
At 2:20 PM -0700 9/10/99, Greg Skinner wrote:
It strikes me that Farber is not so much defending ICANN (as it currently
exists) as he is defending *the process* by which there can be Internet
This is my concern also. Or some remote NGO.
Diane Cabell
http://www.mama-tech.com
Fausett, Gaeta Lund
Boston
Then give us substance Diane. Use you lawyerly skills to back up
these vague assertions instead of always excusing ICANN's heavy
handedness.
Some remote NGO. Isn't that just
Since Esther's at the global meeting for establishing mandatory net
content ratings, and seems to be chafing a bit over it, I'd like to
point something out:
Domain names would probably have to be rated as well.
Since Esther *is* at this conference, and is the de facto face of ICANN,
shouldn't
would be nice to know indeed i suspect that they will approve
another extension of the testbed since nsi would sign their
capitulation papers.
more important is that i hope brock meeks is covering the
confirmation hear ings for the new administrator of NTIA.
lets hope he gets asked
Gordon Cook wrote:
more important is that i hope brock meeks is covering the
confirmation hear ings for the new administrator of NTIA.
Who is it?
Michael Sondow I.C.I.I.U. http://www.iciiu.org
Tel. (718)846
[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: And that comment about 'without any of
the messy enforcement problems' got him in some hot water along with
adding still more fuel to the fire in the ICANN controversy. ICANN
has some very bizarre ways they want to deal with domain name disputes
to say the least
The text of my essay last night contained an inadvertent error and an
ambiguity. Here is the problematic text:
While ICANN has been a closed door black box, the Europeans do have
two members of a ten member board. Before they sit back with
satisfaction that Christopher Wilkinson has their
Follow the Money: an Inside View of ICANN Fundraising
The COOK Report has received the full text of nine email messages
detailing ICANN's efforts in June to stave off bankruptcy. It has
obtained independent verification that they are messages that were
given by ICANN to the House Commerce
Although her ICANN role may have brought her some discomfort, she has
picked up some nice rewards this year. The first was her very own
television commercial on behalf of IBM's e-commerce campaign. The
second came on June 8th when in London, the WPP Group PLC, one of the
largest advertising
gee...huge laughthanks
At 10:36 PM 8/26/99 -0400, Gordon Cook wrote:
Bah, what crapof course sondow is real. geez richard, secondary
cookreport will you so I can be fantasized about by these idiots.
Done. Anybody else need secondary service and want to be part
of the conspiracy
Bah, what crapof course sondow is real. geez richard, secondary
cookreport will you so I can be fantasized about by these idiots.
Craig maybe when you live another 25 or 30 years you will see enough
examples of socialist and their caring ideology turning into tyranny
to know better than
note that jerri Claussing refers to icann in the haedline as
"internet's Governing Body" the lady has that right. wonder how
that will go down the throats of the icann apologists?
NYTimes
http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/08/cyber/articles/25domain.html
CNET
OKtony or someone else.what has to happen before this becomes
effective as far as IETF is concerned?
does bill manning whose salary is paid by ICANN, eastlake who works
for one of the primary implementors of ICANN and the guy from nokia
have the power to implement the gac's wishes?
Look who wrote this:
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (IBM)
Eric Brunner (Nokia)
Eric has been active in First Nation issues; maybe this is the first
step towards genuinely independent domains for them. (And you
thought 250 was a reasonable number off xxTLDs!)
kerry
sorry I don't understand what
oooh.wake up gordo.sorry I KNOW** now** what financials
ellen was talking about.cancell that last send SIGH!
... This is NOT a criticism of Berkman. If
Berkman had not risen to the task, we wouldn't even get to see the
financials.
Indeed. The Berkman folks have
basic netiquette jeff mason, if I send you a message to you alone it
generally is because I don't want to take a disagreement into the
public domain.to take the contents of a private message and make
them public without the permission of the sender is just not
done.defining private
to jeff mason plonk
The COOK Report on InternetIndex to seven years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookreport.com
(609) 882-2572 (phone fax) The only Good ICANN is a Dead
* Moderator's Choice. A Berkman staff person -- primarily Professor
Zittrain, for those of you wondering! -- reviews all the messages received
prior to the first time remote comments are recognized on a particular
subject, and he reads the ones that he thinks are most significant.
my understanding is that estee has a friend at ogilvie who agreed to
lend ogilvies services at a greatly reduced rateseems that
ogilvie thought the prestiege of being the firm that sold the net
down the river was too much for ogilvie to pass up.
once again I ask for accounting
Complexity, confusion, etc. can't possibly
explain the media blackout on ICANN!
Maybe not, but if I were an editor, simplistic political concepts,
such as identifying concern for anything but neoliberal economics
as Socialism, would rather put me off publishing your piece. Good
judgement
The two seats formerly held by NSI will now be represented by
David R. Johnson and Phil L. Sbarbaro
An NSI seat has been taken from NSI and given instead to its attorney?
Is ICANN that dumb or is this a major con job?
They certainly didnt improve their credibility by submitting
On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Gordon Cook wrote:
if the internet is to be homogenized or globalized under uniform laws
and controls, let it be done openly and honestly and NOT under the
guise of setting up ICANN to bring competition into dns and protect
us from evil NSI.. although I must say
Please rest assured that this item below is not based on fact - "may" =/=
"will" and CORE can anticipate what it wants without making it so. ICANN has
made no decisions in this regardand cannot at this point, as most of you
know.
Esther, I am glad to see your denial, because when the CORE
http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/stories/news/0,4164,2311649,00.html
randy barret. ignorant fool
The COOK Report on InternetIndex to seven years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA
legal authority.
At 12:46 PM -0400 8/11/99, Nick Patience wrote:
There is a comment option on the site, I'm surprised it's still empty :)
http://www.zdnet.com/tlkbck/comment/321/0,7091,68185-new,00.html
At 11:55 AM 8/11/99 -0400, you wrote:
At 11:27 AM 8/11/99 , Gordon Cook wrote:
http
yeah, I do remember when you called memust have been at least 2
years ago you sounded dreadfully reasonable It took other
people at least 4 to 6 weeks to convince me that you were part crazy
alternic/edns crowd and therefore not taken seriously
This stuff is far to much off
Ah yes, what bliss ignorance isthanks for reminding me why I
filtered both these people.
Hey Bob, what plans to You Ronda and Bill have for us ?
At 10:38 PM 8/3/99 -0700, you wrote:
At 08:13 AM 8/3/99 -0400, you wrote:
Concerning the following stuff below, much of this discussion
At 07:57 AM 8/3/99 -0400, Ronda Hauben wrote:
And the Internet isn't "private computer networks".
Prove it.
don't look for ronda to respond in any reasonable fashion as far
as i can tell she is simply not interested in taking her blinders off.
This program posts news to thousands of
Oh my god, so ronda as the denizen of usenet can't see the
telecommunications world except through USEnet glasses too funny
why can't you get it through you head ronda that Tony is talking
international telecommunications *LAW* as defined by the ITU and by
governments which are obliged
: v04210112b3cd09a7b80c@[192.168.0.1]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:06:29 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Gordon Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] Internet stability
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="
Ms. Burr,
That was hardly very helpful. When did you receive the proposal?
Where is the text? Or does it have to be FOIAed? When will you
complete your review and reach a decision? Why don't you answer
Dan's question? Are we to infer that in your opinion these servers
have no influence
carolyn duffy marsan in a 3/4 page article writes
"Indeed just the threat of competition has already brought some of
these benefits to the market place. Internet name registration fees,
for example have dropped from $100 for a two year registration to
$70."
the drop in price she cites is
When NSI initiates legal action against the department of commerce,
the house of cards built by the clinton gore administration on the
commerce NTIA foundation will come crashing down. Pincus has been
warned that his assertions will not withstand the scrutiny of the
discovery process but he
Nice post Jim. I interviewed the CTO of Williams (Tulsa OK) today.
He is selling OC48s as single lambdas using Sycamore transponders at
60% of the price of the sonet equivatent. provisioning time 6 days
as opposed to 6 months for sonet. They have had the service
commercially released for
Diane and Karl,
In the context of the Network Solutions Cooperative Agreement, the
creation of the whois database did not create a US government asset
nor was it intended to do so.
It wasn't intended for the primary (let alone "exclusive") benefit of
the government. Such benefit was merely
I filtered him about 2 weeks ago.
quality of life is much enhanced since then
We now have three clear ad hominem attacks by Dave Crocker.
The question is, do we continue to tolerate them?
The COOK Report on Internet
COOK: I did not realize that SAIC was now a minority shareholder.
Certainly still with enormous influence, but at least without
outright control.
From Edgar:
Excerpts Form 10-Q for NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC /DE/ filed on May 17 1999
SECONDARY STOCK OFFERING
On February 12, 1999, Network
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/daily/july99/internet22.htm
The roots of the current conflict extend back
to 1992, when the Internet was the territory of
academics and computer enthusiasts. Needing
an organization to manage
absolutely Jay. how do you think the slime from alex ogilvie
earn their hoped for future fees from ICANN except by saying to
esther appear to drop your fee and open a board meeting and you will
get news stories where you look truly reformed because well will
write release telling lazy
Given today's events, Jim Rutt better announce the formation of a
Global Open Registry Association and solicit the 224 country code
TLDs to join the Registry Association before the GAC makes them
obsolete. The Registry Association better also form its own
independent Root and invite the 224
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
