I would like to repeat Vassilis questions:
Has this been implemented? Could this be implemented? Do the pfsense
dev's need some more info? Can we help with testing?
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Vassilis V. bigracc...@gmx.net wrote:
ADSL over PPPoE with constant changing IPs is the standard
If this is to be implemented it should be a tick box on each interfance.
Dropping all states if you want to move a cable/reroute it is not a good
idea.
This needs to be user controllable or only affect interface if
is_interface_type=pppoe.
Just my 2 cents.
-lsf
28. sep. 2014 19:19 skrev Hannes
Hi Guy's,
Anyone care to test if this fixes the issue?
I dont have a pppoe myself , but do think everyone with a changing wan
ip is affected by old udp states that stay alive long after a outbound
natted ip has changed..
I think there is no danger in dropping all states that use that specific
First off, let me point out that I am a user, not a developer. Secondly
you may want to tone down the attitude. Since many of the developers
volunteer, they won't bother taking on a bug that is a) limited in scope
b) having someone pester them about. that being said, the bug is NOT
exclusive
Hello,
I wonder what the reason for not getting
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1629 fixed?
Many gave up waiting for this, but it seems there must be a proper
reason for it. May I ask what the problem is not being able to use
pfSense with Asterisk?
Regards
On 26/9/14 11:43 am, Hannes Werner wrote:
I wonder what the reason for not getting
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1629 fixed?
Many gave up waiting for this, but it seems there must be a proper
reason for it. May I ask what the problem is not being able to use
pfSense with Asterisk?
Worth
I'm sure more people are with dynamic WAN IPs and facing this problem.
The issue #1629 is showing this clearly. If at least there would be a
report saying we are not going to fix it than all of those could
decide to use or not to use pfsense.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Chris Bagnall
On 26/09/2014 11:58, Chris Bagnall wrote:
Worth mentioning here that many of us are using Asterisk behind
pfSense without any issue at all.
The triggers for this issue seem to be, specifically:
- PPPoE WAN interface
- dynamic WAN IP
- SIP service provider
We (one of my $dayjobs is a VoIP
On 26/9/14 12:06 pm, Giles Coochey wrote:
I can think of many reasons, why running a service such as Asterisk, on
an IP address that you have a temporary lease for (thus only have a
passing relationship with, before it is passed to someone else), would
be pretty bad practice.
I think Giles
are you saying that people with dynamic IP shouldn't use pfSense
behind an Asterisk service? I've had asterisk running behind Fritz-Box
for years without any trouble. I've seen the cheapest router being
able to handle this like the speedports. I can't believe pfSense is
unable to do this, but it
On 26/9/14 12:42 pm, Hannes Werner wrote:
are you saying that people with dynamic IP shouldn't use pfSense
behind an Asterisk service?
Firstly - it's not my place to say anything of the sort - I have no
connection to the pfSense team (apart from as a satisfied user). I
suspect one of the
On 26/09/2014 12:42, Hannes Werner wrote:
are you saying that people with dynamic IP shouldn't use pfSense
behind an Asterisk service? I've had asterisk running behind Fritz-Box
for years without any trouble. I've seen the cheapest router being
able to handle this like the speedports. I can't
thank you very much Giles, but unfortunately it doesn't help.
anyone here who is using asterisk behind pfSense on a dynamic IP WAN
successfully?
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 26/09/2014 12:42, Hannes Werner wrote:
are you saying that people with
Not too much related, but I am.
I'm using a multi-wan connection to different ISP who give me dynamic IP
address. I set up the Internet connection via a couple of different routers,
one for each ISP.
The difference in my configuration is that the routers connect to the ISP via
PPPoA and PF is
Hannes Werner wrote on 26.09.2014 16:51:
thank you very much Giles, but unfortunately it doesn't help.
anyone here who is using asterisk behind pfSense on a dynamic IP WAN
successfully?
Hello Hannes!
I have also used asterisk behind a dynamic PPPoE WAN. I had the exact
same issues that
In the different environments where I use PF I'm using different appliances
acting as modem/routers.
In most cases I use those supplied by the ISP.
In other cases I use some other low-medium level modem/routers.
As an example some are Tp-link TD-W8968.
All these modem/routers connect:
- to the
Thanks Vassilis,
I've these settings already - without any success.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Vassilis V. bigracc...@gmx.net wrote:
Hannes Werner wrote on 26.09.2014 16:51:
thank you very much Giles, but unfortunately it doesn't help.
anyone here who is using asterisk behind pfSense
17 matches
Mail list logo
