> -Original Message-
> From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of
> mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 2:27 PM
> To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [pfSense] malformed packets
>
> thank you for your' reply,
>
> Sorry for the noise, should be all good now.
>
Gotta Love Chris! Thanks for your ongoing support to this project.
Ryan
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
I have and it works great. I did my port forwarding and I think I also had to
check the box for static port on the outbound nat rule. I will look at my
rules when I get home tonight to see what I did.
From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Brian Caouette
Sent: Sunday,
ESX does more than Virtualize the hardware, it also virtualizes 1 or more
switches.
You could use a managed switch and have each virtual network set on a different
vlan. You would then assign each nic in each virtual machine to one of these
virtual networks. You would also assign the ports in
You can set a nat forward on dns port to force all dns request to go to a
specific address.
Firewall>NAT
Interface > LAN (or your internal interface you wish to use) Protocol TCP/UDP
Destination: Any
Destination Port Range: 53
Redirect Target IP: Where you want it to go, Perhaps OpenDNS address.
mment. He says that the public IP is
197.156.75.53 on the ISP side. This appears to be a proper gateway.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Ryan Rodrigue
wrote:
I am just a big dummy that is coming in late in the game. Is it possible
that they are sending that IP to a router/modem an
Please don't top post. It makes helping difficult.
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of eyobe kebede
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 9:36 AM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re: [pfSense] help
we are using dSL and let me gi
I am just a big dummy that is coming in late in the game. Is it possible
that they are sending that IP to a router/modem and the router is doing nat.
If so, is it possible to diable the routing functions and just use this as a
bridge and not a router. I have seen this before with DSL and some cab
> -Original Message-
> From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-
> boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Rodrigue
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 4:18 PM
> To: k_...@hotmail.com; 'pfSense support and discussion'
> Subject: Re
> -Original Message-
> From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-
> boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of k_o_l
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 3:53 PM
> To: 'pfSense support and discussion'
> Subject: Re: [pfSense] General question
>
> From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mai
Ryan Rodrigue
<http://www.aarelectronics.com/> Description:
http://email.aaremail.net/AAR.png
P.O. Box 4336
Chief Technical Manager
Houma, LA 70361
A A R Electronics, Inc
Phone (985) 876-4096
510 West Tunnel Blvd
Phone (800) 649-7346
Houma, LA 70360
Fax (985) 853-0134
und nat rule for internal server to use VIP. ( I have
never tried this, but it seems like it should work )
Option 2:
Don't use port forward. Use 1:1 NAT and use firewall rules to block
unwanted traffic ( I have tried this and it works great. )
Ryan Rodrigue
I Fixed it
Just in case anyone wants to know what I did
1 I backed up my config.
2 I went through file and cleaned up some lines in there about old
unused packages
3 Restored config using file I cleaned up.
4 I did a firmware upgrade to the same version
Problem Solved. Tha
> What firmware version is on both of those?
On both boxes:
2.0.1-RELEASE (i386)
built on Mon Dec 12 18:24:17 EST 2011
FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p6
That is part of my confusion. Both were upgraded from 1.2 a while back. I
think 1 may have had the 1.2 package for the traffic graphs, but it was too
I have 2 boxes on the same network. Both are configured almost the same.
One of them shows IP addresses when I go to Status > Traffic Graphs. One
does not.The one that does not work even looks different. The one that
does not works also says array. I am not sure what that means. I tried
ba
> -Original Message-
> From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-
> boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of James Caldwell
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 9:44 AM
> To: pfSense support and discussion
> Subject: Re: [pfSense] Building Reports and Content Filters
>
> https://ww
assign a
static IP address to a road warrior. I am asking because I have spent more
than 2 hours googling and reviewing configs but nothing.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Luis
2012/10/3 Ryan Rodrigue
I am not sure. I have used PPTP. It includes a user management. Maybe a
radius
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Luis Carrion
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 6:30 AM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re: [pfSense] IPSec client for iPad
> -Original Message-
> From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-
> boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Vieri
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 7:29 AM
> To: list@lists.pfsense.org
> Subject: [pfSense] installing a database server
>
> Hi,
>
> How "unstable" would it be to in
different network range? If not maybe the ISP could do this for you. A
workaround I do not like, but has worked for some is to add another router
in the mix to change one of the gateway IP's to a different subnet.
Ryan Rodrigue
<http://www.aarelectronics.com/>
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Fuchs, Martin
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 9:40 AM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Squid package syslog
Do you perhaps have any idea if it's possible to do this with some
con
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Ryan Rodrigue
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 7:27 AM
To: 'pfSense support and discussion'
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Squid package syslog
I am trying to setup Cyberoam iView for squid. It appears
I am trying to setup Cyberoam iView for squid. It appears it simply is
setup as a destination syslog server. I cannot find in the squid package
where to setup the syslog server at.
Is there somewhere special I need to go, or is this function simply not
available?
Sorry if I seem a little i
I am trying to setup Cyberoam iView for squid. It appears it simply is
setup as a destination syslog server. I cannot find in the squid package
where to setup the syslog server at.
Is there somewhere special I need to go, or is this function simply not
available?
Ryan
This works on PFsense?
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Bill Yuan
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 7:59 AM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: [pfSense] whiltelist of mac address
hi ,
i want to create a whitelist of mac address
Is the vulgarity in the subject really necessary?
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Ok you need to delete the rules you created. Add 1 NAT rule.
Leave everything at default. Only change the following.
1 Set Interface to WAN
2 Change Protocol to UDP, TCP, or TCP/UDP depending on your needs
3 Set Destination Port range From: t other an
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Chris Buechler
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:21 PM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re: [pfSense] is pfSense the right choice?
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Noam Birn
Ryan, your solution worked just fine, but in addition I added a fw rule to
catch all http (port 80) traffic and had it redirected to 8080, that way you
don't need to change the proxy on the individual hosts
K_o_l
How and where did you add such a rule? I would like it to work in
transpar
>>This is excellent Ryan, how about the nat/firewall rules?
Nothing special. Like I said. It really just works.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
That's funny. It deleted all of the values. I cleaned it up a little and
put the correct values in red
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Ryan Rodrigue
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 5:24 PM
To: 'pfSense support and
Mine is up and running, but I have to manually put the dansguardian port in
the web browser as a proxy server. I do not have it working for transparent
squid
As you can see, most of the settings are default.
These are the Dansguardian settings. (I hope you can read this).
Daemon
Listening Sett
>-Original Message-
>From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org
[mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Giles Coochey
>Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 8:26 AM
>To: list@lists.pfsense.org
>Subject: [pfSense] THREAD HIJACK
>
>Just a note -
>
>When starting a new thread or question can
>
>Thank you, Jim
>
>That was the info I was looking for :-)
>Unfortunately there is no 1800 (30m) there ! Are you aware of anything else
in the firewall that repeats, times-out, whatever after 30m ?
>
>Claus
>
I had the same issue with broadvox and asterisk (separate box) going through
PFsense
OK. Stupid solution here, but put a static route in either the host using
IP route if it is windows, or put a static route in the default gateway of
that host. I have had some issues in the past and also put a static gateway
in the first router as well.
Internet > Router 1 > Router 2 ( on same s
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of mayank bhagat
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 7:33 AM
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
Subject: [pfSense] firewall delay response
Hello,
I want to use pfsense as router, I have configured it as below
Wan: 2
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Bill Yuan
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 10:00 AM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re: [pfSense] error when installing pfsense 2.1 developement on my
pc
hi , thanks for you quick response.
hi all,
i am trying to install the pfsense 2.1 development version on my pc, but
met lots of problems,
my pc using a ASUS P5LD2 motherboard, with Core E4700 , Hard Disk :
hitachi HDT725032vlat80 320G
in the beginning , it sucks at 38% when i am trying to install it , after i
cancel th
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 10:00 AM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfSense help with creating rules
Hi Nathan,
> Anyways, didn't mean to hijack
- Original Message -
> From: "Nathan Eisenberg"
> To: athom...@athompso.net, "pfSense support and discussion"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 2:56:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfSense help with creating rules
> > I think the entire ISP operation I partly run has... three routers
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Chris Buechler
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 8:48 AM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Odd circumstances
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Ryan Rodrigue
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Mehma Sarja
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 8:39 AM
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Odd circumstances
On 11/29/11 5:49 AM, Ryan Rodrigue wrote:
> What is
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Mehma Sarja
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 7:41 PM
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Odd circumstances
On 11/16/11 6:56 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 201
>Yes - it's easy for the media (and idiots like the BSA) to talk about
popular media and software, since that gives them huge figures, especially
by making the assumption that everyone who downloaded an unauthorised copy
of something would otherwise have bought it at full price. But for a
specia
Man, I really wish I could help you. You give such good details of the
problem, you deserve some assistance. I am currently using both and have
not have any mail delivery issues to date. Just for thought, did you try a
clean install and setup the rules rather than an upgrade? I only mention
be
45 matches
Mail list logo
