Ah, I see, thanks. I read right over that word I guess!
--
Steve Yates
ITS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of J. Hellenthal
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 6:26 PM
To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List
Subject: Re: [pfSense
r packages are necessary."
--
Steve Yates
ITS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of J. Hellenthal
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:54 PM
To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Upgrading versions - uninsta
st [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of J. Hellenthal
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:54 PM
To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Upgrading versions - uninstall packages?
I for one have not had to do this thus far. But those pfB messages are harmle
I for one have not had to do this thus far. But those pfB messages are harmless
and more of an alert that you will need to reload the IP tables afterwards but
that’s trivial. Keep in mind that I have not done that upgrade yet in a test
environment before a maintenance window I have on Saturday.
I started to upgrade from 2.3.3_1 to 2.3.4_1 today and as instructed by the
docs I uninstalled Suricata and PFBlockerNG first. I immediately got a flood
of alerts like "Unresolvable source alias 'pfB_GeoIPUSv4' for rule ...". Those
are of course popular packages. Do you all normally uninstall
Hi.
Can I suggest we add a note to the upgrade guide:
https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Upgrade_Guide
Unless I am mistaken, upgrading postfix and mailscanner from 2.1.5 is
not possible because of the pbi configuration. I needed to remove them
and then use pkg to install them and then adjust
This should answer your questions:
https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Upgrade_Guide
Von: Curtis Maurand
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. September 2015 17:30
An: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List
Betreff: [pfSense] upgrading
This has probably been covered, but I'm about to
This has probably been covered, but I'm about to do an upgrade from
1.2.3 to the current release. Would it be better for me to do a full
install, then restore the various configs that I need? NAT, PPTP,
Rules, etc?
Thanks for any advice you can give me before I start.
--Curtis
--
Best Rega
> On Dec 17, 2014, at 08:57, Carlos L. Martinez
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I will install two pfsense fws using 2.2RC next week. When 2.2 final will be
> released, upgrading from 2.2RC to 2.2 final will be supported or will I have
> to do a clean install?
You will be able to upgrade it to
Hi all, I will install two pfsense fws using 2.2RC next week. When 2.2 final will be released, upgrading from 2.2RC to 2.2 final will be supported or will I have to do a clean install?Thanks.___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsen
> On May 2, 2014, at 23:42, David Newman wrote:
>
> It's possible this is related to this being 4G Sandisk CF cards, and
> modern 2G and 4G Sandisk cards producing alignment errors.
Unlikely.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists
On 4/29/14, 11:44 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:38 AM, David Newman
> wrote:
>> On 4/29/14, 12:28 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:
>>
Still, I was unable do the 2.1.2 update from the GUI. The system
remained offline after 1 hour.
After power-cycling the syste
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Chris Bagnall
wrote:
> On 30/4/14 12:31 am, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>>
>> 4GB CF cards are pretty cheap these days - I would just buy one in the
>> store ($20) or online ($10 or so) and image that, pop it in the firewall and
>> import your config.
>
>
> Agreed, if the
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:38 AM, David Newman wrote:
> On 4/29/14, 12:28 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:
>
>>> Still, I was unable do the 2.1.2 update from the GUI. The system
>>> remained offline after 1 hour.
>>>
>>> After power-cycling the system, both partitions still came up with 2.1.1.
>>>
>>
>>
On 4/29/14, 4:34 PM, Chris Bagnall wrote:
> On 30/4/14 12:31 am, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>> 4GB CF cards are pretty cheap these days - I would just buy one in the
>> store ($20) or online ($10 or so) and image that, pop it in the
>> firewall and import your config.
>
> Agreed, if the devices are suita
On 4/29/14, 4:31 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> 4GB CF cards are pretty cheap these days - I would just buy one in the store
> ($20) or online ($10 or so) and image that, pop it in the firewall and import
> your config.
Thanks all for your responses.
I actually have spares. In this case the system i
On 30/4/14 12:31 am, Ryan Coleman wrote:
4GB CF cards are pretty cheap these days - I would just buy one in the store
($20) or online ($10 or so) and image that, pop it in the firewall and import
your config.
Agreed, if the devices are suitably close to you. A bit more of a
problem if they'r
4GB CF cards are pretty cheap these days - I would just buy one in the store
($20) or online ($10 or so) and image that, pop it in the firewall and import
your config.
On Apr 29, 2014, at 5:50 PM, Chris Bagnall wrote:
> On 29/4/14 7:40 pm, Vick Khera wrote:
>> I've now upgraded 3 separate ALI
On 29/4/14 7:40 pm, Vick Khera wrote:
I've now upgraded 3 separate ALIX boards to 2.1.2 (one from 2.1.0, the
other two from 2.0.1) with zero failures.
Perhaps try upgrade from the console menu. Just make sure that the
upgrade URL is configured correctly for the i386 version of pfsense.
Also wor
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:29 PM, David Newman wrote:
> Sorry for my confusing WRAP and Alix 2d13; the latter replaced the former.
>
> Still, I was unable do the 2.1.2 update from the GUI. The system
> remained offline after 1 hour.
>
> After power-cycling the system, both partitions still came up
On 4/29/14, 12:28 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:
>> Still, I was unable do the 2.1.2 update from the GUI. The system
>> remained offline after 1 hour.
>>
>> After power-cycling the system, both partitions still came up with 2.1.1.
>>
>
> Check the upgrade log under Diagnostics>Nanobsd, should have inf
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:29 PM, David Newman wrote:
> On 4/28/14, 5:28 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:43 PM, David Newman
>> wrote:
>>> With the NanoBSD image, is this advice about upgrading an Alix 2d13 by
>>> reflashing the CF card still current?
>>>
>>> https://doc.pfsen
On 4/28/14, 5:28 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:43 PM, David Newman wrote:
>> With the NanoBSD image, is this advice about upgrading an Alix 2d13 by
>> reflashing the CF card still current?
>>
>> https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/NanoBSD_on_WRAP
>
> This is about the WRAP, not
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:43 PM, David Newman wrote:
> With the NanoBSD image, is this advice about upgrading an Alix 2d13 by
> reflashing the CF card still current?
>
> https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/NanoBSD_on_WRAP
This is about the WRAP, not the ALIX. The WRAP won't boot those images
due to
I think you can just go into System -> Firmware
and do a Manual Update.
I did it 7 days 02 hrs 56 mins ago and it is pretty intuitive
It takes a long time to update (maybe 30+ minutes for my Alix board),
but it is done all over the Internet. Click a couple of times and then wait.
Status of up
With the NanoBSD image, is this advice about upgrading an Alix 2d13 by
reflashing the CF card still current?
https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/NanoBSD_on_WRAP
Thought I'd read somewhere about in-place upgrades, but this is the only
thing I can find. This is for a 2.1.1->2.1.2 upgrade.
Thanks!
d
On 08.04.2013 13:41 Rüdiger Gerolf Biernat wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> just used google to search my "problem" but only found an older thread -
> which basically confirmed my idea of upgrading/migrating.
> I want to upgrade/migrate away from an embedded install of pfsense
> 2.1beta1 to a full blown ins
Hi there,
just used google to search my "problem" but only found an older thread -
which basically confirmed my idea of upgrading/migrating.
I want to upgrade/migrate away from an embedded install of pfsense
2.1beta1 to a full blown install with a hard disk.
I run pfsense on an Alix board.
Ca
On 20-9-2011 7:12, Mark Wass wrote:
On 19/09/2011, at 6:08 PM, Mario Ciccarelli wrote:
Hi guys,
i have 2 appliances based on the 1.2.3 . They are in two office far
away many kilometers and i can upgrade only one at time in 2 - 3 days.
What's the best practice in this upgrading, causing the lit
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Mark Wass wrote:
> On 19/09/2011, at 6:08 PM, Mario Ciccarelli wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> i have 2 appliances based on the 1.2.3 . They are in two office far away
> many kilometers and i can upgrade only one at time in 2 - 3 days.
> What's the best practice in this u
On 19/09/2011, at 6:08 PM, Mario Ciccarelli wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> i have 2 appliances based on the 1.2.3 . They are in two office far away many
> kilometers and i can upgrade only one at time in 2 - 3 days.
> What's the best practice in this upgrading, causing the littlest downtime of
> VPN ? A
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Mario Ciccarelli
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> i have 2 appliances based on the 1.2.3 . They are in two office far away many
> kilometers and i can upgrade only one at time in 2 - 3 days.
> What's the best practice in this upgrading, causing the littlest downtime of
> VP
Hi guys,
i have 2 appliances based on the 1.2.3 . They are in two office far away many
kilometers and i can upgrade only one at time in 2 - 3 days.
What's the best practice in this upgrading, causing the littlest downtime of
VPN ? Are there any know issue to link via IPSEC VPN between 1.2.3 and
33 matches
Mail list logo
