You make some good points Lachlan, but to be honest,
http://www.alleged.org.uk/pdc/2003/xhtml2-cite.html
rang very true for me
Even with HTML 4's var, code, samp and kbd, we still have to use a
combination of codepre for formatting as well as annoyingly having to
translate and into lt;
Richard Czeiger wrote:
You make some good points Lachlan, but to be honest,
http://www.alleged.org.uk/pdc/2003/xhtml2-cite.html
rang very true for me
That particular article is 3 years old and was referring to an old draft
of XHTML 2.0. The cite element has since returned.
To the list,I'm looking for webstandards/css complaint sites with flash in them. Clever flash, flash that looks Ajaxy, heavy good actionscripting, innovative menus, generic random animation... Those sort of things.
The only one I can remember, but not find again, was for an ISP (I think), had a
The best I can offer is one that use flash for vector images and scales depending on the width of your browser window. (try a few size c=variations)http://nickcowie.com/It is a proof of concept and there are some problems anybody not using a windows flash player (ie Mac or *nix). More details
First. I am a firm believer in web standards. Not just CSS but also usability and accessibility.The article is by no means comprehensive and the BBC do have a vested interest in selling their efforts at accessibility. But...
I currently do a lot of flash work for the BBC on the Digital curriculam
Thanks for your input, Peter, I found that very useful. I would
certainly agree with your comment:
Its all about the audience!
And in the case of the e-learning site you linked to (nice work, by the
way, the web designers top tips are especially good) Flash is definitely
the way to go. I know
What are the Groups thoughts on trustmarks?
http://www.e-consultancy.com/news-blog/361985/accessibility--are-trustmarks-the-answer.html
Are they a waste of money or are they really better than
in-house testing and a paragraph on how the site is accessible?
Thanks
Emma
This looks little better to me than an advertising piece
for another (poor quality?) commercial service. I have no experience of this
company, but SiteMorse are probably the leaders in this field, and have courted
plenty of controversy along the way.
Any testing is better than no testing,
Bugger off Segala. These trustmarks really annoy me,
Just more commerical organisations seeking to make money.
Why not just use the W3C icons or the Cynthia icon tested at the page
bottom?
I'm not paying someone who knows less than me to rate my site.
Even the RNIB See it Right logo costs
Bugger off Segala. These trustmarks really annoy me,
Just more commerical organisations seeking to make money.
Agreed. If a large company like O2 hadn't decided to buy into it, it
would have been easier to fob off. I know I could do a better job in
testing but little old me doesn't have as
Trevor Boult wrote:
Hi All,
Just my penneth worth.
I have always said anything that needs a plugin is automaticaly
un-accessable.
Trevor.
(the following is NOT aimed at Trevor - I am merely illustrating a point)
I have always thought that anything which uses a browser is just a pain
in
On 10/31/06, Eystein Alnaes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the list,
I'm looking for webstandards/css complaint sites with flash in them. Clever
flash, flash that looks Ajaxy, heavy good actionscripting, innovative menus,
generic random animation... Those sort of things.
The only one I can
On 10/31/06, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/06, Eystein Alnaes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the list,
I'm looking for webstandards/css complaint sites with flash in them. Clever
flash, flash that looks Ajaxy, heavy good actionscripting, innovative menus,
generic random
Maybe if we had a trade association / union we could elect someone to
represent us and pay membership dues to send the person. There've got to
be at least 6-7000 standardistas who could chip in a buck.
--
Marc Luzietti
Flagship Project
Bayview Financial, L.P.
(305) 341-5624
Also, it's great
Hey gang,
I have been doing a lot of research lately on mobile web development. I have
been reading about recommendations to use XHTML - Basic because it brings a
smaller set of tags with it.
I don't have much experience using XHTML - Basic. I realize that this has a
different DOCTYPE.
I'm looking for webstandards/css complaint sites with flash in them.
OK, Stylegala is the best place to look. A bunch of examples:http://www.hellgatelondon.com/https://www.widsets.com/
http://web.burza.hr/en/thanks. http://web.burza.hr/en/ was the one I was thinking of.
New W3C Member = The Web Standards Group
A tought or am I nute?
Bruce Prochnau
BKDesign Solutions
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] W3C's new Plan for HTML
Maybe if we had a trade
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:52:48AM -0500, Justin Thorp wrote:
Does this mean I need to make mobile version of my page with that
specific DOCTYPE? How does this work?
I'm yet to run across a (younger than three years) cell phone with a
browser on it that was not entirely happy with my HTML
On 10/31/06, David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:52:48AM -0500, Justin Thorp wrote:
Does this mean I need to make mobile version of my page with that
specific DOCTYPE? How does this work?
I'm yet to run across a (younger than three years) cell phone with a
Where's the humor tag when you need it? ;^) LOL
Best regards,
Marilyn Langfeld
Langfeldesigns
On Oct 31, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Designer wrote:
I have always thought that anything which uses a browser is just a
pain in the butt. I switch off all styles, disable javascript, and
I have no
Hi, I try to use 'list-style: decimal' for the first time.
The list has some 15 items, at tenth, it goes with '0' and the
following items start from 1, 2, 3... again.
The W3C CSS 2 spec about list style for decimal is vague.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/generate.html#lists
decimal -
Hello Tee,
Unless I'm missing something, if you want a numbered list 1-15, just use
ordered list element: ol
ol
liList item one/li
liList item two/li
[...]
liList item fourteen/li
liList item fifteen/li
/ol
It'll number the list as you want without having to specify anything.
On Oct 31, 2006, at 2:58 PM, Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
Hello Tee,
Unless I'm missing something, if you want a numbered list 1-15,
just use
ordered list element: ol
ol
liList item one/li
liList item two/li
[...]
liList item fourteen/li
liList item fifteen/li
/ol
It'll
On Oct 31, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Tee G. Peng wrote:
Unless I'm missing something, if you want a numbered list 1-15,
just use
ordered list element: ol
ol
liList item one/li
liList item two/li
[...]
liList item fourteen/li
liList item fifteen/li
/ol
Hmmm, OL gives a 25 pixel
You're welcome Tee. Glad I could help.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Tee G. Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] list-style: decimal
On Oct 31, 2006, at 2:58 PM, Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
Hello Tee,
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tee G. Peng
Sent: Wednesday, 1 November 2006 6:34 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] list-style: decimal
Hi, I try to use 'list-style: decimal' for the first time.
What
On 10/31/06, Tee G. Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, OL gives a 25 pixel default space between number and the
content. There isn't seemed a way to override it, this is really
undesirable.
You should change the margin or padding on the OL or LI, one of those
settings decides the space
On Oct 31, 2006, at 3:36 PM, Gav wrote:
What difference does it make if you used
'list-style-type: decimal'
Instead.
Gav, I am glad you asked. So I changed back to UL and added 'list-
style-type: decimal' to see if it makes any difference, only did I
find out the list-style:
What difference does it make if you used
'list-style-type: decimal'
Instead.
Gav, I am glad you asked. So I changed back to UL and added 'list-
style-type: decimal' to see if it makes any difference, only did I
find out the list-style: decimal does work for increasing number
but the
Hi, While you are looking at my the list-style: decimal, can you also
check a problem that I haven't been able to solve?
I use Thierry's toggled elements. It works really nice, but if a
floated div inserted, something goes wrong. I want the DL element
floats around the floated box when
makethe large of the left colum 100%
From:Tee G.Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To:wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgTo:wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject:[WSG] display: table causing Gecko based browsers extra space forDate:Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:22:12 -0800Hi, While you are looking at my the list-style:
Hi there
I've just had to add a link to a site I made a little while ago, and
although the stylesheet makes all links bold, this one isn't! I can't for
the life of me see why - can anyone here?
http://www.byronalexandercentre.com/links.html
And by the way - I do know I should have made the
Susie,Having looked at the page I'm going to assume you're referring to the way visited links are styled, since all of the links on this page were bolded when I viewed it. The trouble, then, appears to be here:
a:link { font-weight: bold; color:#003399; text-decoration: none; }a:visited {
Emma Sax wrote:
Agreed. If a large company like O2 hadn't decided to buy into it, it
would have been easier to fob off.
Didn't Segala CEO Paul Walsh actually work for O2 at some point, before
setting up on his own? At the very least, he had some prior connection
with them, but my memory
On Oct 31, 2006, at 5:35 PM, Carlos Carreo wrote:
make the large of the left colum 100%
Hi Carlos, thank you for looking, but I apologize I do not understand
which one you are referring to. The left colum I could think of is
#content but I don't want it be 100% as this is a two columns
Tim wrote:
Why not just use the W3C icons or the Cynthia icon tested at the page
bottom?
I'm not paying someone who knows less than me to rate my site.
Even the RNIB See it Right logo costs money. Why get sucked into a lot
of commercial greed?
The W3C or Cynthia badges only attest that a
On Nov 1, 2006, at 10:22 AM, Tee G.Peng wrote:
Thierry suggested adding display: table or inline-table in dd and
dt. 'Inline table' doesn't solves the Safari's problem for (1) but
the 'table' does, however it resulting bigger spacing (top and
bottom) in Gecko based browsers. playing with
37 matches
Mail list logo
