Hi all,
Very occasionally I get bizarre inconsistencies with Safari display
compared to other browsers. Back in the day I'd sit back, take a look at
the code, go through archived bug reports and allocate the problem via
deduction.
Sadly these days I have my developer toolbars and DOM
Barney,
I am confused by this - did you download WebKit, or some other utility?
If it was just WebKit, then at least you know that the bug will be gone
from a future version of Safari !
Mike
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
On Nov 16, 2006, at 7:48 PM, Barney Carroll wrote:
Today I found this fantastic utility [http://webkit.org/]. WebKit
is a terribly vague name, but I suppose 'the WebKit nightly build'
about sums it up. I fired it up and went to look at my bug in
question and got so distracted by its
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Barney,
I am confused by this - did you download WebKit, or some other utility?
If it was just WebKit, then at least you know that the bug will be gone
from a future version of Safari !
Mike
Yes, I did... And that is kind of a guilty, comforting thought;
hopefully
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
WebKit is the rendering engine behind Safari. What you have downloaded
is a nightly build of what will be Safari 3.0 in Spring 2007. And yes,
Safari 3.0 will have a WebInspector, just as OmniWeb 5.5 already has one
- not a surpirse, as it uses the same WebKit
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Close Omniweb and type the following (exactly !) in a new terminal window:
defaults write com.omnigroup.OmniWeb5 WebKitDeveloperExtras -bool true
(one line, watch out for wrapping).
And you'll see that it is still missing some panes.
Fantastic! This is exactly what
Barney,
Have a look at the second link on the left hand side of that site -
Surfin' Safari Blog - lots of references to Apple in there. Not 100%
sure of the exact relationship between WebKit and Safari releases, but
I'm sure you can find out if you look (I could have sworn it was in the
'About
On 11/16/06 5:48 AM, Barney Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I found this fantastic utility [http://webkit.org/]. WebKit is a
terribly vague name, but I suppose 'the WebKit nightly build' about sums
it up.
Although I couldn't tell from your message, you might already have figured
out
OmniWeb's inspection kit isn't fully functional yet - the search tool
(great idea) doesn't work yet, and the same goes for the metrics and
properties tabs. However the style viewer is incredibly useful.
It specifies that it is a 'computed style' viewer - an interesting
distinction. Gecko
Tom Livingston wrote:
Hello list,
I am about to embark on my first Sliding Doors tab adventure. Just wondering
if Doug Bowman¹s ALA articles from 2003 are the best resource for this. Are
there newer updated resources?
I'd say Doug's article is absolutely fine for what it does. It's
entirely
Anybody know about this?
body:last-child ... {}
I saw this a while back and chuckled, but today I found cause to use it.
It's supposedly a hack for WebKit browsers (I don't understand how there
could be any ambiguity over what the last child of the body could be,
but there you go). I've seen
On 16 Nov 2006, at 11:41:40, Barney Carroll wrote:
I do know that generally it [Safari] treats the styling of forms
with disdain (plus I'm using javascript on them for display
purposes, oo-er). Is there any other significant 'bug' I should
know about?
Long, long ago - well, within
Barney Carroll wrote:
Anybody know about this?
body:last-child ... {}
I saw this a while back and chuckled, but today I found cause to use
it. It's supposedly a hack for WebKit browsers (I don't understand how
there could be any ambiguity over what the last child of the body
could be, but
On 16 Nov 2006, at 14:37:50, Barney Carroll wrote:
-khtml-text-decorations-in-effect
...Which I have seen in effect - proprietary and usually only used
in Apple sites since it is naturally not w3 css.
It depends what you mean by W3C CSS. The CSS spec allows for vendor-
specific extension
On 11/16/06 10:30 AM, Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am about to embark on my first Sliding Doors tab adventure.
And already IE6 pisses me off...
http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/06/
The left image on the Home tab is transparent in the upper-left corner as
shown. IE 6 doesn't like
On the other hand, one of the major plusses for Camino is that it is
more tightly integrated with the OS than FireFox is, so it also uses the
OSX form elements au-naturale. (And pays attention to the proxy settings
in the OS, which is rather handy on my laptop.) I think what you really
meant to
Try using negative values on margin-right instead of margin-left
On 11/16/06, Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/16/06 10:30 AM, Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am about to embark on my first Sliding Doors tab adventure.
And already IE6 pisses me off...
Tom Livingston wrote:
Hello list,
I am about to embark on my first Sliding Doors tab adventure. Just
wondering if Doug Bowman¹s ALA articles from 2003 are the best
resource for this. Are there newer updated resources?
From the same era:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/scalable.asp
Only if
On 16 Nov 2006, at 17:16:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bad Thing(tm)
Mike
And there I was thinking the bt in bt.com stood for British
Telecom (tm)
;-)
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
On 11/16/06 12:25 PM, Claudio Dias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try using negative values on margin-right instead of margin-left
I may be implementing it wrong, but this doesn¹t seem to do what I am after.
Thanks though.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the other hand, one of the major plusses for Camino is that it is
more tightly integrated with the OS than FireFox is, so it also uses the
OSX form elements au-naturale. (And pays attention to the proxy settings
in the OS, which is rather handy on my laptop.) I think
Hello again all,
On this page:
http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/06/index.cfm
FF (Mac anyway) and Safari are showing a gap under the header. IE (6 and 7)
are looking good.
Anyone see what I¹m doing wrong? Any comments on anything in general?
Thanks!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia
On 16 Nov 2006, at 21:04:40, Tom Livingston wrote:
http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/06/index.cfm
In Firefox's DOM Inspector, I did the following:
Remove the br class=clear / from after both navbar and header;
Set float: left; on both header and navbar, to make them
contain their floated
Tom Livingston wrote:
On this page:
http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/06/index.cfm
FF (Mac anyway) and Safari are showing a gap under the header.
The break tag may be to blame for that. Try putting a height on .clear
in addition to line-height.
lr
On 11/16/06 4:32 PM, Nick Fitzsimons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remove the br class=clear / from after both navbar and header;
Set float: left; on both header and navbar, to make them
contain their floated elements.
Bingo. Thanks!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic
HI people!
The week is drawing to an end...many of you have had a week of
nightmare code and semantic nightmares...but never fear - have a
listen to this song and know that you are not alone...
http://www.esanity.co.uk/podcasts/HandsToBoag.mp3
D
ps - sorry if this has already been posted.
--
Makes me wanna throw my laptop on the fire and get down..
Too some seriously accessible content.
A
-
Andy Woznica
Actofdesign
http://www.actofdesign.com
On 11/16/06 7:08 PM, Darren Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI people!
The week is drawing to an
Oh, thank you! Hilarious. Lets play it at next years web directions and all
hold hands.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Woznica [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] A little Friday fun
Makes me wanna throw my
28 matches
Mail list logo
