Hello!
If you want to compare the different CMS's features:
http://www.cmsmatrix.org/
Regards,
Aleyda Solis
***
aleydasolis.com
2007/1/23, Kekay Olvera [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does any one can recommend me a good CMS software?
Regards,
Enrique | boundlessenergy.net
OK...but does anyone know of a good CMS that is compliant and/or in xHTML?
That would be very cool...
Cheers - Noah
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
You can visite
http://www.opensourcecms.com/,
and try the Open Source CMS demo.
? Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:51:50
I recommend Typo3. It's more than a CMS, it's a framework. It is currently
accepted and supported by many developers with extended functionality called
extensions. It is also XHTML compliant. The joy of it all is that is open
source. Visit www.typo3.org http://www.typo3.org/ for more.
You can take a look at Drupal: http://drupal.org/
It is open source, a lot of templates and modules, work with compliant XHTML
and CSS.
Here you can see a development process done with Drupal at:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/ibm/osource/implement.html
Regards,
Aleyda Solis
Quoth Noah at 01/25/07 20:31...
OK...but does anyone know of a good CMS that is compliant and/or in xHTML?
Remember, a CMS is only as good as its users/authors. With a perfect
CMS, with styles/templates that use well-formed XHTML and CSS, the
result can still be total rubbish if mis-used.
Hi list,
Anyone have any up to date links/resources on using alternative stylesheets,
for other browsers than IE.
Opera, netscape..
thanks,
Jim
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Katrina wrote:
Your post really reminded me of an older post that talked about this:
http://www.usability.com.au/resources/ozewai2005/
May I asked which automated accessibility test?
Hope that helps.
Kat
http://fae.cita.uiuc.edu/ - it's pretty good generally, but as with all
automated tools
Ben Buchanan wrote:
It's a persistent misconception that accessibility has anything to do
with the design. We all have to educate clients on this point and hope
the message gets out there.
Ben... You must elaborate loads on that. If you're saying that a site,
no matter how terribly designed,
tidy is awesome. I agree whole heartedly with Matthew.
I wrote a simple script that use tidy extension in php5 I
cleaned up 100+ ugly messy documents saved from word
the whole thing including setting up tidy in php5 and the script (testing
etc)
took under 2 hours
sorry to all if I have gone
.. and search engine friendly ?
Rob.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 25/01/2007 10:01:16
OK...but does anyone know of a good CMS that is compliant and/or in
xHTML?
That would be very cool...
Cheers - Noah
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
You can visite
At 06:22 AM 1/25/2007, you wrote:
... and search engine friendly ?
Rob.
I've been using the Xoops CMS (xoops.org) for building sites now for about
two years and I've been happy with both how it works and the flexibility it
allows me to modify things. Though many of the themes for it are
Enrique,
I have been working with a few different and very good CMS systems for quite
a while.
There's one that I would recommend for large websites that also require a
lot of functionality, a lot of specific control, numerous different users
with different rights, accessibility validation,
The use of hidden headings for navigation is of benefit to anyone whose user
agent does not support CSS, not just screen reader users. We are seeing an
increasing number of sites built that way and there isn't a downside that I
can think of so perhaps it should become standard practice.
Screen
Steve Green wrote:
The use of hidden headings for navigation is of benefit to anyone whose user
agent does not support CSS, not just screen reader users. We are seeing an
increasing number of sites built that way and there isn't a downside that I
can think of so perhaps it should become standard
On 25 Jan 2007, at 10:59:24, Jim Callender wrote:
Anyone have any up to date links/resources on using alternative
stylesheets,
for other browsers than IE.
Opera, netscape..
You should turn the problem around. It's easy to produce CSS that
works for Firefox, Opera and Safari (and other
Hi all,
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/how_to_style_a_code_listing.asp
Thanks.
---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
***
List Guidelines:
On 25 Jan 2007, at 15:03:37, Barney Carroll wrote:
In particular, the new Google Image search - flashy effect, but
utterly useless.
Ouch, I hadn't seen that before. I completely agree: they're just
pimping it out with something of no value at all. To paraphrase Chris
Rock, just because
We are doing another free JAWS screen reader demo (our 7th!) on the
afternoon of Monday 19 February 2007. A couple of the places are already
booked but there are still six left. We limit the demo to 8 people so book
early.
The demo starts at 1:30pm and a free light buffet is available from 12:30
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
On 25 Jan 2007, at 10:59:24, Jim Callender wrote:
Oh, and always use strict rendering mode: some people think using
quirks mode makes life easier but they're wrong - or rather, I
strongly disagree :-)
HTH,
Nick.
--Nick Fitzsimons
More challenging (and some say a lot
Hi,
As Barney Carroll mentioned in a post to the group earlier today,
Google Images has changed so that information such as image
dimensions and domain is only displayed when mousing over an image.
My tests in Firefox show that using the tab key to give focus to an
image doesn't reveal
Steve Green wrote:
The use of hidden headings for navigation is of benefit to anyone
whose user agent does not support CSS, not just screen reader users.
We are seeing an increasing number of sites built that way and there
isn't a downside that I can think of so perhaps it should become
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
Hi,
As Barney Carroll mentioned in a post to the group earlier today,
Google Images has changed so that information such as image dimensions
and domain is only displayed when mousing over an image.
My tests in Firefox show that using the tab key to give focus to an
Brian Cummiskey wrote:
The majority of Google is inaccessible in some shape or form. What's
one more piece going to do?
I hate to sound like a fascist, but in terms of usability for sighted
users with compliant browsers (I know, why would we even care?), this is
the first time Google's
On 1/24/07 6:55 PM, Andy Woznica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this issue has truly been resolved by someone I'd love to know.
I have done this a few times. The only way to get it to not freak is to
remove ALL hover effects along with the wmode suggestion.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior
Barney Carroll wrote:
I hate to sound like a fascist, but in terms of usability for sighted
users with compliant browsers (I know, why would we even care?), this is
the first time Google's eccentric attitude to standards has actually
impeded my use of any of their services.
The notion merits
John,
I would agree that there is little or no value in providing a heading for a
single list. However, we often work on sites that have thousands of pages,
that have at least two levels of navigation menus and sometimes three. There
are often other lists at the top of the page, such as to the
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Hi all,
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/how_to_style_a_code_listing.asp
If whitespace needs to be preserved even when CSS is off (can't
remember...is it python or something that actually depends on
Barney Carroll wrote:
[snip]
The notion merits consideration: These incredibly 'inaccessible'
services are some of the most incredibly accessed on the web.
The times, they are a'changing.
I've been observing (with some horror) the changing face of the web.
Ebay, Google etc, Blogs
On 25 Jan 2007, at 18:50:17, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Hi all,
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/how_to_style_a_code_listing.asp
If whitespace needs to be preserved even when CSS is off (can't
On 1/25/07 1:30 PM, Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this issue has truly been resolved by someone I'd love to know.
I have done this a few times. The only way to get it to not freak is to
remove ALL hover effects along with the wmode suggestion.
HTH
Hover effects on the
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/how_to_style_a_code_listing.asp
If whitespace needs to be preserved even when CSS is off (can't
remember...is it python or something that actually depends on having
At 1/25/2007 08:12 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/how_to_style_a_code_listing.asp
You say, With images off, the numbering would disappear because of
lack of contrast between foreground and background color.
This problem wouldn't exist if you simply chose the
Hi folks, great conversation we got going here. :)
I just checked a site I did that uses suckerfish and swfObject...
iBook g4 using OS 10.4 and Safari 2.0.4(419.3)
The flyouts actually behave very well when the Flash is animating (no
flickering or anything - perfect)... but when the Flash
Steve Green wrote:
John,
I would agree that there is little or no value in providing a heading
for a single list. However, we often work on sites that have
thousands of pages, that have at least two levels of navigation menus
and sometimes three. There are often other lists at the top of
On 25 Jan 2007, at 20:44:10, Micky Hulse wrote:
2. Avoid using flyouts completely.
That gets my vote. They're irritating and a usability nightmare. If
clients ask for them it's our job to educate them out of such stupidity.
(Just my 0.02GBP.)
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
2. Avoid using flyouts completely.
That gets my vote. They're irritating and a usability nightmare. If
clients ask for them it's our job to educate them out of such stupidity.
(Just my 0.02GBP.)
Hehe, mine too. At least, that is my sentiment starting last Monday when
From: Micky Hulse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hehe, mine too. At least, that is my sentiment starting last Monday
when my boss wanted me to update our sites suckerfish-style menu so
it worked in IE7... Not that that is hard, but it also had to
function well in IE5/Mac/PC... Ouch... I am still working on
Paul Novitski wrote:
At 1/25/2007 08:12 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/how_to_style_a_code_listing.asp
You say, With images off, the numbering would disappear because of
lack of contrast between foreground and background color.
This problem wouldn't exist if
Al Sparber wrote:
http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/navigation/auto_hide/index.htm
Thanks Al! Looks like some solid code, thanks for sharing! :)
Cheers,
Micky
--
Wishlist: http://snipurl.com/vrs9
Switch: http://browsehappy.com/
BCC?: http://snipurl.com/w6f8
My:
Other suggestions?
Just one horrible one: Build your navigation into the offending Flash piece!
It did cross my mind. Ok, I'm off to beat myself with birch twigs..
A
On 1/25/07 3:44 PM, Micky Hulse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks, great conversation we got going here. :)
I just
Title: SilverStripe Newsletter
Looking at the thread above, I see people asking for; Compliant CMS Search-engine friendly We've been developing an open-source CMS that amoung other things, is; Compliant (the templates can be as compliant as you can make them;
Andy Woznica wrote:
Other suggestions?
Just one horrible one: Build your navigation into the offending Flash piece!
It did cross my mind. Ok, I'm off to beat myself with birch twigs..
LOL! Actually, good tip... and I have seen it done well (not drop-downs
though):
http://guilago.se/
On Jan 26, 2007, at 1:12 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/how_to_style_a_code_listing.asp
Why the need for a background image ?
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/listing.html
(the div is there to give
I have a co-worker, that whenever he creates a class, puts div in
front of it if the class is being assigned to a div. Here's an example:
div.container {
background-color: #fff;
margin-bottom: 18px;
}
div.container div.container_inner {
border: 1px solid #bbb;
On 1/25/07, Michael Turnwall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a co-worker, that whenever he creates a class, puts div in front of
it if the class is being assigned to a div. Here's an example:
div.container {
background-color: #fff;
margin-bottom: 18px;
}
div.container div.container_inner {
I was enjoying this little discussion so i decided to put together some of
our points and views in my blog
http://germworks.net/blog/2007/01/26/attention-web-lecturers
im updating it at the moment so please bear with any little problems.
On 1/25/07, Lucien Stals [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 25, 2007, at 5:33 PM, Michael Turnwall wrote:
I have a co-worker, that whenever he creates a class, puts div in
front of it if the class is being assigned to a div. Here's an
example:
div.container {
background-color: #fff;
margin-bottom: 18px;
}
div.container
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/how_to_style_a_code_listing.asp
Why the need for a background image ?
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/listing.html
This is brilliant!
Duh! I can't believe I missed
**A new version of the Illinois Functional Web Accessibility Evaluator (FAE
v. 0.9.2) is now available:
http://fae.cita.uiuc.eduhttps://ms1.express.cites.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/fetch.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffae.cita.uiuc.edu
---
Register for a free user
No need to apologise mate. I understand why you get angry as myself I agree
that people should not make excusses for
On 1/26/07, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Russ, the group and teachers, it was a knee jerk mental response
to make that unfair statement about teachers generally.
I did
It's a persistent misconception that accessibility has anything to do
with the design. We all have to educate clients on this point and hope
the message gets out there.
Ben... You must elaborate loads on that. If you're saying that a site,
no matter how terribly designed, is still possible to
51 matches
Mail list logo
