Germ wrote:
Hey my 2c
Its a bit boring for my likeing
The banner is a bit bland and the webpage itself is just information.
What about graphics? The banner is just a school of fish. Maybe a
collage or something would be nice. The code may be correct and web
standard but what if it is
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've been experimenting all night and firefox doesn't want to render
the svg file at all. i get a download dialog box about the svg file.
i just now found out there is not a svg plugin in the download actions
dialog of my copy and it is the
Richard Czeiger wrote:
SCG is natively supported in the latest version of FireFox (though it
doesn't have 100% support yet).
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/svg/
Failing that, you can use the Adobe plugin
http://www.adobe.com/svg/
it turns out that ff renders the svg-t format natively.
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
I saved your file (+svg) to my local dev server, and there it works
correctly, although the svg file doesn't scale to the size of the object.
that was another problem i have been dealing with. i have played with
svg before and when i used width:100% in the css,
i have located the htaccess file on my server. my host doesn't want to
change their current setup. what is the proper syntax to add this to
the htaccess file? i would really like to do a copy and paste on this.
would someone please help?
lastly, is there a mime type svg-xml?
dwain
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have located the htaccess file on my server. my host doesn't want
to change their current setup. what is the proper syntax to add this
to the htaccess file? i would really like to do a copy and paste on
this. would someone please help?
David Laakso wrote:
CK wrote:
Hi,
My attempt at learning a step backwards has left me stumped:
(http://working.bushidodeep.com/table_layout/2Col_layout.html)
I've validation errors that I'm unable to debug. Would someone guide
me to the correct solution?
A tableless layout
Rachel May wrote:
Seeing as we're on a big rant here I might as well add my 2c!
Today I went to New Zealand's National Museum website - Te Papa. I searched
for the information I was after (about native spiders) and came across the
content and then - woah. The layout was all wrong (content was
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks, i have done this and it does not appear to work. the file is
up now if you would like to check out the results.
http://www.alforddesigngroup.com/sandbox/svg-test.html
It works insofar as your .svg file is now sent with the correct
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i repurposed the svg. firefox still doesn't get it but opera 9.01
renders it correctly. is there something i am missing?
dwain
Which version of Firefox are you using? FF only supports SVG from
version 1.5 onwards, IIRC.
I can see the
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i repurposed the svg. firefox still doesn't get it but opera 9.01
renders it correctly. is there something i am missing?
dwain
Looking at it in the Firefox DOM Inspector shows it as having
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] it just hit me. opera was obeying the css and firefox ignored
it. strange, huh?
:-)
Not at all... ;-)
Seriously, it isn't the first time I've experienced such behavior in
Gecko. Although CSS should rule, Gecko often ignores it and use
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
Looking at it in the Firefox DOM Inspector shows it as having width
and height of 2.8E+06, which is almost 3 million pixels square.
This is specified at the start of your SVG in the width and height
attributes:
svg xmlns=http://www.w3.org/2000/svg;
like a dog with a bone ... i converted the border again in corel draw
13. it's a bit smaller now in file size than the last time; funny, i
thought it would always be the same size. never mind that.
fire fox still has scroll bars, but i'm getting some interesting
behavior. when you scroll,
Matthew Cruickshank wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if this is a scalable vector graphic, then why doesn't firefox scale it?
Because even though it is a vector an SVG gets to say what resolution it
should be rendered at. In this case your svg file is requesting a
specific width of 900px and
Matthew Cruickshank wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
would you look at the image now with css constraints /**/ out? a year
ago i put up a svg file and set the width to 100% and the file sized
to the window regardless of resolution. this one doesn't seem to do
that. what i read the other
Matthew Cruickshank wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now if there had been something wrong with my coding, i'm sure someone
would have said something. may i safely assume that there is nothing
wrong with the coding?
Are you kidding me? It's like I hadn't said a word.
Your code is wrong.
first, i would like to apologize to the list for my obsessive behavior
dealing with svg files for the past several days. second, i would like
to apologize for flaming firefox in my frustration. third, i would like
to apologize to matthew for getting on his last nerve.
the pointed questions:
Matthew Cruickshank wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thank you for the definitive statement.
The blinked text was also in my second post.
now that you understand what i am trying to do, is it possible?
I still don't understand; you have conflicting requirements. Without
putting text in
marvin hunkin wrote:
Hi.
if any one can help me, could they send their e-mail address.
Okay developing a couple of websites, and coding them using html, and a
text editor called textpad.
Now, my sites have the following features.
that they all have frames
i don't think that's such a good
Kim Nylander wrote:
Greetings.
I am in a dilemma. I have to create an ordered list with the following
nested scheme:
1. Item
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
View this in WebKit browsers only. (Hence the subject of this post):
http://decaffeinated.org/archives/projects/multibg/background-image.html
Yeah, WebKit implemented that a few months ago. It's the new
multiple-backgrounds syntax from the CSS3
David Cameron wrote:
Problems:
Opera / Firefox menu bar sits higher that drop-down menu, making
navigation impossible.
do you think that enclosing the drop down in a table has anything to do
with the positioning?
dwain
***
David Cameron wrote:
Problems:
Opera / Firefox menu bar sits higher that drop-down menu, making
navigation impossible.
here's your problem:
.menu ul li
{
float:left;
position:relative;
list-style-type: none;
padding-left:0px;
font-size: 93%;
display:inline;
margin:0;
padding:0;
font-size:
Kevin Murphy wrote:
I'm still seeing only a very small percentage of users with IE 7, but
even after its released, my campus CS department has the auto updates
for things like IE disabled, so I don't think that our lab computers
will be upgrading when everyone else does, and i don't think we
Peter Firminger wrote:
Hi,
Probably don't want this thread to keep going as it is kind of off-topic,
but I'm certainly not removing links to anything based on a stupid newbie
tool made by a company whose ethics are down there with the virus makers
themselves.
Just ignore it and it'll go away
hi,
i have seen small css and xhtml w3c icons to place on pages. would
someone tell me where i can obtain these small icons?
dwain
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
thanks to you all for the links. i do appreciate it.
dwain
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Is that good enough now? :)
wonderful! i need to tidy a horizontal menu on my nephew's site. may i
use this and is a tutorial on how to make this happen forth coming
(along with the js)?
i see you have copyrighted the process; will you have a problem with
sharing
Christian Montoya wrote:
On 10/17/06, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the public release of IE7 nearly on us I'm just wondering whether
it's better to download the fix to stop IE7 installing via automatic
update and continue to use IE7 as a standalone, or let IE7 replace IE6
and
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
I will not be allowing IE7 to be
installed on my main computer, until most of the bugs have been worked
out, and a couple of security updates have been applied :-).
how do you go about doing this?
dwain
John Faulds wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:52:17 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
I will not be allowing IE7 to be
installed on my main computer, until most of the bugs have been
worked out, and a couple of security updates have been applied :-).
how do you go about
i got an email telling me my reply was being scrutinized because i had a suspicious header. all i did was reply to a post.On 11/6/06, Germ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:can i please ask what this is about???
On 11/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The message you sent requires that you
ie6, ff 2.0, opera 9.0.2 and mozilla 1.7.12 render the page properly. ie 7
sticks some copyright info, which is enclosed in a div with the powered by
info, to the left of the validate buttons. why?
dwain
http://www.alforddesigngroup.com/
in ie7 the valid div hangs over the container div. all other browsers
that i can check render the div inside the container with a 1em margin.
what do i need to do to fix this so ie7 will render properly?
dwain
***
List
but it's supposed to be up to standards, yes?
dwain
On 11/22/06, Micky Hulse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Pennell wrote:
Code? Link? Telepathic mind-meld? Throw us a frickin bone, here
Lol!
Sounds like a clearing problem maybe?
--
Wishlist: http://snipurl.com/vrs9
Switch:
http://www.alforddesigngroup.com/
hey, it's 0100hrs where i am; i've been at this for some time now. sorry
for the brain fart.
dwain
On 11/22/06, Matthew Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/22/06, Dwain Alford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in ie7 the valid div hangs over the container div
the width and height values now, or just width?
dwain
On 11/22/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dwain Alford wrote:
but it's supposed to be up to standards, yes?
Not according to those who have created it.
They have only said that IE7 is up to _some_ of the standards :-)
I would start
you have given to the community
and it will work regardless of js.
but, i digress. what did i miss in the link you gave me with regard to the
way i have done it?
dwain
On 11/30/06, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dwain Alford wrote:
i posted this request to another list and have
ah ha, onclick. i like that. so i guess i go borrow your code? is there
js involved? there doesn't seem to be any here, yes?
thanks, this is a terrific solution and i think it works better for me.
dwain
On 11/30/06, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dwain Alford wrote:
i'm
i have a js menu that i finally got to work. i have a couple of questions.
one pertains to the menu and one pertains to best practices with regard to
the menu and site.
1. the menu operates as expected, except that only on the index page is the
sub-li background transparent and the copy and
On 12/26/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dwain Alford wrote:
1. the menu operates as expected, except that only on the index page
is the sub-li background transparent and the copy and the menu gets
all jumbled together in ie 6 and 7 and is unreadable.
http://www.studiokdd.com
would you check the following site for broken links, links that give a 404
error and see that the javascript works across browser land? i've looked
and checked until it all runs together and i can't see the forest for the
trees on a w2k box.
p.s. i don't have mac or linux, a look see on these
would making web designers get a certificate of some kind fix this
problem??
--
dwain alford
p.o. box 145
winfield, alabama 35594
u.s.a.
205.495.5619
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
--
dwain alford
p.o. box 145
winfield, alabama 35594
u.s.a
/new-orleans.html
css:http://www.studiokdd.com/css/studiokdd.css
dwain
--
dwain alford
p.o. box 145
winfield, alabama 35594
u.s.a.
tele: 205.487.2570
cell: 205.495.5619
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
/sandbox/new-orleans.html
css:http://www.studiokdd.com/css/studiokdd.css
dwain
--
dwain alford
p.o. box 145
winfield, alabama 35594
u.s.a.
tele: 205.487.2570
cell: 205.495.5619
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org
/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
--
dwain alford
p.o. box 145
winfield, alabama 35594
u.s.a.
tele: 205.487.2570
cell: 205.495.5619
***
List
.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
--
dwain alford
p.o
a
section of text and may contain several P tags, for example. Then you
could
style to DIV by adding a border.
Now the structure is semantic, and the visual effect (the horizontal line)
is in the CSS where it belongs.
Lucien.
On 19/2/07 4:44 PM, Dwain Alford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after
at the moment.
dwain
On 2/19/07, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dwain Alford wrote:
as long as i'm good to go with what i have, away with the hrs.
Uh, realizing, I hope, that the prior poster may be wrong :-)
Your HR will show a logical separation exists without depending
when i tiurn css off on a page i have done everything reverts to default (
i.e. h1, h2, etc.) and lines up down the left side of the page. without
using tables, is there a way to maintain the layout when css is turned off?
dwain
--
dwain alford
p.o. box 145
winfield, alabama 35594
u.s.a
lol. sometimes i love sarcasm.
dwain
On 2/20/07, Tee G. Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 2007, at 11:18 PM, Dwain Alford wrote:
when i tiurn css off on a page i have done everything reverts to
default (i.e. h1, h2, etc.) and lines up down the left side of the
page. without
53 matches
Mail list logo
