ave it continue with the current
> behavior.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Apr 11, 2017, at 5:47 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I can see both sides of the argument.
>>
>> Rather than changing the semantics of the existing method, what
I can see both sides of the argument.
Rather than changing the semantics of the existing method, what about adding a
method `Configurator.initializeStrict(String, String)` which fails if the
specified file doesn't exist? Not sure what the best way to fail is: return
null or throw exception...
A better error message sounds like a good idea.
If you make a Jira ticket for this, please make it part of the "ergonomics"
epic: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1811
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Mikael Ståldal
wrote:
> Some configuration file formats
;>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> I created a new git repo for log4j2-tools. We should not create any more
>>>> modules if we can avoid it.
>>>>
>>>
or server and another for the other
> tools?
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I thought we were going to name this module log4j-tools instead of
>> log4j-server, so it can host all our standalone apps?
&
I thought we were going to name this module log4j-tools instead of
log4j-server, so it can host all our standalone apps?
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:11 PM, wrote:
> Update BOM
>
>
> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/repo
> Commit:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15962607#comment-15962607
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1873:
-
I'm open to ideas.
We did something similar
Blogged: https://blogs.apache.org/logging/entry/log4j-2-8-2-released
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 1:53 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> The Apache Log4j 2 team is pleased to announce the Log4j 2.8.2 release!
>
> Apache Log4j is a well known framework for logging application behavior.
>
Good find. I noticed that the document points to Apache Sling and says "uses
the most common parts today used for logging: SLF4J for clients and logback for
processing." Seems like Sling decided that in 2013 and never looked back.
Which is fine, but I believe Log4j2 has changed the landscape
So, exceptions are swallowed and no newlines are rendered? Interesting.
What's the use case?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 7:30, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am considering a new layout called "MessageLayout" which would be
> synonymous with:.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15942847#comment-15942847
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1857:
-
Yes, good idea. I am swamped with other work. Can you provide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15942847#comment-15942847
]
Remko Popma edited comment on LOG4J2-1857 at 3/27/17 8:41 AM:
--
Yes, good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15942265#comment-15942265
]
Remko Popma edited comment on LOG4J2-1857 at 3/26/17 12:57 PM:
---
Does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1857:
Description: How can I list all loggers via JMX / jolokia? (was: Who I can
list all logger via
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15942265#comment-15942265
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1857:
-
Does this work for you?
{code}
String serviceUrl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma closed LOG4J2-1370.
---
Resolution: Resolved
User reported that a they could not reproduce the issue any more after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma resolved LOG4J2-1849.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.8.2
Fixed in commit c822338.
Please verify and close
Sorry, no idea. A separate repo sounds cleaner, but I haven't spent as much
time as you thinking about this, so perhaps I'm wrong. It would be nice to
not require Java 9 unless you want to compile the StackWalker stuff...
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Ralph Goers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1841:
Fix Version/s: 2.8.2
Setting fix version to prevent this issue from dropping below the horizon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15926127#comment-15926127
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1849:
-
Thanks for the test. I will need to modify it slightly because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15924232#comment-15924232
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1849:
-
I've started to look at this. The idea of FixedDateFormat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma reassigned LOG4J2-1849:
---
Assignee: Remko Popma
> Broken FixedDateFormat tests when daylight saving time sta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906209#comment-15906209
]
Remko Popma edited comment on LOG4J2-1359 at 3/11/17 2:09 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906209#comment-15906209
]
Remko Popma edited comment on LOG4J2-1359 at 3/11/17 2:05 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906209#comment-15906209
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1359:
-
Is it possible to compile only one class with Java 9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15905468#comment-15905468
]
Remko Popma edited comment on LOG4J2-1844 at 3/10/17 5:46 PM:
--
I believe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma resolved LOG4J2-1844.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
I believe the specified pattern is wrong and should be {{ %d\{-MM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1844:
Description:
if pattern contains Month like {{%d\{-mm-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS\}}}
log has wrong Month
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma reassigned LOG4J2-1844:
---
Assignee: Remko Popma
> Not the correct value of the month in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15903193#comment-15903193
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1841:
-
Sounds like we should roll back LOG4J2-248. Matt, what do you
log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ -> d...@logging.apache.org
+1
log4j-user@, log4php-user@, log4net-user@, log4cxx-user@, general@ ->
u...@logging.apache.org
Interesting discussion. I can see both pros and cons. How will this work for
users currently subscribed to
releases of Log4j 2 and log4j-scala should be
>>> independent in both ways, right?
>>>
>>> I think I have coordination between log4j-scala and Scala language covered
>>> already.
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Remko Popma <r
ydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think we should keep the current doc pages on the site perhaps under a
> different heading. This would be interesting for people who cannot keep up
> with the latest.
>
> Gary
>
>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gm
t;
>> On Mar 3, 2017, at 2:20 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yes but only the JMH benchmarks. Is that acceptable?
>>
>> The latency tests and the non-JMH Async Logger tests are too involved...
>>
>> One thing to bear in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15895092#comment-15895092
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1259:
-
Do you want to provide a patch for the Log4j2 manual?
> Lo
Yes but only the JMH benchmarks. Is that acceptable?
The latency tests and the non-JMH Async Logger tests are too involved...
One thing to bear in mind, we carefully documented the versions of the
libraries we compared against with our benchmark results. The fact that newer
versions of these
gt;>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> One issue we came across in practice is that Scala 2.12 requires Java
>>>>>>>> 8, but we don't want to require that
Blogged: https://blogs.apache.org/logging/entry/log4j-2-8-1-released
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> The Apache Log4j 2 team is pleased to announce the Log4j 2.8.1 release!
>
> Apache Log4j is a well known framework for logging application
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15891237#comment-15891237
]
Remko Popma edited comment on LOG4J2-1761 at 3/1/17 10:58 PM:
--
You can get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15891237#comment-15891237
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1761:
-
You can get some of the advantages by using AsyncAppender. You
Darn, we'll miss each other by 18 hours. Almost indeed!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 20:32, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I land at AMS on March 5 9 AM. Almost!
>
> Gary
>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Remko Popma
+1
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 27, 2017, at 3:09, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.8.1 the next version of the Log4j 2 project.
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
> [] +1, release the artifacts
> []
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15889858#comment-15889858
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1829:
-
Have you seen the Custom Delete action supported
person! Are you in Europe now?
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> FYI I won't be able to start reviewing until Wednesday (likely evening
>> Amsterdam time).
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27,
To be honest I still don't understand
* the vision of what we ultimately want to achieve
* how different repos fit into that vision
* what different websites we are planning to create to give users access to
these different modules
* what websites are going to be driven from which modules or
FYI I won't be able to start reviewing until Wednesday (likely evening
Amsterdam time).
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:09 Ralph Goers wrote:
> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.8.1 the next version of the Log4j 2
> project.
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes
code doesn't have a need for complicated
> layouts, but ensuring the write buffer has enough space between each and
> every byte would be extremely tedious).
>
> On 26 February 2017 at 19:48, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Similarly to the way the drain() method giv
Similarly to the way the drain() method gives *implementations *the
flexibility to return a different ByteBuffer, I wanted to also give *callers
*the flexibility to drain a different ByteBuffer. I don't have a concrete
use case for it, but I imagined there might be cases where callers
overflowed
Afonso Murakami, if you are a chatbot please unsubscribe. You are failing
the Turing test.
Guys, I suspect someone is trying to train their chatbot on our mailing
list...
If this continues we may need to unsubscribe it ourselves...
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Matt Sicker
Afonso, are you a robot?
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Afonso Murakami
wrote:
> That is great thank you very much for your help
>
> On Feb 26, 2017, at 3:36 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Afonso, are you on the right mailing list?
>
> Anyways, I've made
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15884093#comment-15884093
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1797:
-
Would it be possible to use the LMAX ExceptionHandler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15884087#comment-15884087
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1807:
-
Looking at the code, I would suggest:
* removing the non
Thanks Matt!
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Changed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1823
>
> On 24 February 2017 at 12:58, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 I'm fine with undeprecatin
+1 I'm fine with undeprecating MessageSupplier.
Remko
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 19:07, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> In log4j-api, the interface MessageSupplier has been deprecated ever since we
> realized that we didn't need it and could just use Supplier for
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15876449#comment-15876449
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1820:
-
Hi Jason, I'm traveling and may not get around to looking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1760:
Fix Version/s: 2.8.1
> AsyncAppender with LinkedTransferQueue.of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma reassigned LOG4J2-1760:
---
Assignee: Remko Popma
> AsyncAppender with LinkedTransferQueue.of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15872993#comment-15872993
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1563:
-
I Saw you raised LOG4J2-1820 for the new issue. Perfect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15872545#comment-15872545
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1807:
-
They have different usages. From memory: the Builder is used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15871191#comment-15871191
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1807:
-
Gary, will do. I'll try to make time in the next few weeks
Hi Leon,
Yes by default the thread name is cached.
There is a system property to switch that off: see
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/master/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/async/ThreadNameCachingStrategy.java
The reason for the caching is that every call
The new test failure (can't open zip) looks like a one-off...
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 9:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Apache wrote:
>> What problem before what?
>>
>> RollingAppenderSizeTest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma closed LOG4J2-1816.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Pull request accepted in commit 2cb9949.
Keep 'em coming!
> Fix minOccur in lo
Remko Popma created LOG4J2-1816:
---
Summary: Fix minOccur in log4j-config.xsd
Key: LOG4J2-1816
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1816
Project: Log4j 2
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15865220#comment-15865220
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1814:
-
That is what I had in mind. Sorry I wasn't clear.
> Wrap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15865065#comment-15865065
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1814:
-
Also, improve the docs to clarify usage
(http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1814:
Description:
The $ExtendedLogger is interpreted as an environment variable.
{code}
$ java -cp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1814:
Description:
The $ExtendedLogger is interpreted as an environment variable.
{code}
$ java -cp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1814:
External issue URL:
https://gist.github.com/sdwsk/47b86d243023b1583d340889a89639f6
> Wrap
Remko Popma created LOG4J2-1814:
---
Summary: Wrapper Generate$ExtendedLogger name inconvenient on
Linux
Key: LOG4J2-1814
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1814
Project: Log4j 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15863818#comment-15863818
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1808:
-
Glad to hear that.
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodEr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15863065#comment-15863065
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1813:
-
That is certainly an improvement and I like the initiative
#FriendsDontLetFriendsUseJavaUtilLogging
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But I agree it is interesting to see that a simple (RAF)FileAppender will
> outperform async logging if the sustained logging rate is faster than the
> appe
more. We did document that
<https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/performance.html#fileLoggingComparison>
but perhaps we need to evangelize it more...
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The queue is bigger but still fills up quic
I will be travelling to Holland between Feb 15 and March 5th, with sporadic
internet access at times, so I may be slow to reply during this period.
Remko
full. I also don’t understand why AsyncLogger is
> slower as it should have a large ring buffer if I understand correctly.
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Feb 11, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think it is a good idea to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15862663#comment-15862663
]
Remko Popma edited comment on LOG4J2-1811 at 2/12/17 6:00 AM:
--
I agree
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15862663#comment-15862663
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1811:
-
I agree our documentation is very good and certainly thorough
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1813:
Description:
People find it difficult to troubleshoot Log4j 2 configuration issues. Many
people
Remko Popma created LOG4J2-1813:
---
Summary: Provide shorter and more intuitive way to switch on Log4j
internal debug logging
Key: LOG4J2-1813
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1813
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1812:
Description:
When configuration fails because no Log4j 2 configuration file is found
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15862652#comment-15862652
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1812:
-
Added above text to the error message in commit 2467ef5
Remko Popma created LOG4J2-1812:
---
Summary: Improve error message when log4j 2 configuration file not
found
Key: LOG4J2-1812
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1812
Project: Log4j 2
Remko Popma created LOG4J2-1811:
---
Summary: Log4j 2 configuration/usage ergonomics
Key: LOG4J2-1811
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1811
Project: Log4j 2
Issue Type: Epic
mbers on the Logback
>>>>>> user’s list so he can add them to his spreadsheet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From your numbers and the numbers I’ve been getting, it is clear to me
>>>>>> that the SSDs in Apple’s MacBook’s are pretty awesome. From the hardware
>>>
hile maintaining effective finality instead. I just wish Java
> had final be the default.
>
> On 10 February 2017 at 05:34, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Generally agree except that we agreed that the final qualifier was
>> optional. This may not be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15861335#comment-15861335
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1678:
-
Can you provide details on why you think there's a problem
Generally agree except that we agreed that the final qualifier was optional.
This may not be easy (or possible?) to verify automatically anyway.
Otherwise all looks reasonable.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 10, 2017, at 17:55, Mikael Ståldal wrote:
>
> Seems
backFilethrpt 10
>> 1192.594 ± 57.777 ops/ms
>>
>> I will try the other machines later and post those results.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>> On Feb 9, 2017, at 5:22 AM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ceki r
ded, not the encoder, so it looks like the confit needs to be
> changed and the test rerun.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Feb 9, 2017, at 3:08 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> FYI, The write and flush methods in BufferedOutputStream are also
> synchronized, so w
FYI, The write and flush methods in BufferedOutputStream are also synchronized,
so we won't be able to do away with synchronization completely.
In OutputStreamManager we synchronize multiple methods but these are nested
calls. I thought reentrant synchronization had negligible overhead but I
I will try taking a look when I get home from work tonight.
Ceki reported some strange numbers about Log4j 1 outperforming Log4j2 before,
and when we showed results from 3 or 4 environments that disproved his claims,
he never really explained how that happened.
Not sure if there's some issue
AM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>> True, but I would still like to also see what difference it makes using the
>> FileChannel instead of the OutputStream.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>> On Feb 7, 2017, at 9:45 AM, Remko Popma <remko.
gt; now that I can't even remember the last time I had to write an actual lock.
>>
>> On 6 February 2017 at 22:02, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Logback 1.2-SNAPSHOT
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>> On Feb 6, 2017,
Sorry what 1.2 do you mean?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 7, 2017, at 11:06, Apache wrote:
>
> In 1.2? That may work for a FileOutputStream but it isn’t guaranteed to work
> for others.
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Feb 6, 2017, at 5:23 PM, Matt Sicker
t; On Feb 6, 2017, at 9:15 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I remember Ralph mentioned that he tested it out and found that it worked
>> pretty well. See issue: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1359>
>>
>> On 6 February 2017 at
I haven't had a chance to look at this yet, but is the new stack walking
API in Java 9 of any use for us? I believe applications/libraries like
Log4j were supposed to be the drivers behind this feature, but last time I
checked they were not going to cater for our use case (inspect the stack
from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15853416#comment-15853416
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1809:
-
Where will this interface be used? Inside PropertiesUtil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15853001#comment-15853001
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1808:
-
The method {{ThreadContext.getThreadContextMap()}} was added
>),
>> don't recall if attributes are supported. If not, that's a feature we can
>> support for sure.
>>
>>> On 2 February 2017 at 18:27, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Darn, I apologize for that one.
>>>
>>> Gary
>
1 - 100 of 5562 matches
Mail list logo