Guenter Milde wrote:
> I assume, heb1.tex is "splash_good.tex" and heb2.tex is "splash_bad.tex",
> right?
I guess so. My newsreader did not display any names for the attachments at
Scotts message.
>
>> So, the real diferences of this change are:
>
>> 1) LyX writes cp1255 encoding instead of
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:49:26PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> However, I can confirm that the changes are intended.
Thanks for checking.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2016-02-14, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 08:54:57PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>>> On 2016-02-13, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> > After this commit, when I run the command
>>> > lyx -e luatex lib/doc/he/Intro.lyx
>>> > it either fails to produce
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:01:06AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 08:54:57PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2016-02-13, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >>
> >> > After this commit, when I run the command
> >>
> >> > lyx -e luatex
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 08:54:57PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2016-02-13, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> > After this commit, when I run the command
>>
>> > lyx -e luatex lib/doc/he/Intro.lyx
>>
>> > it either fails to produce Intro.tex or (on current master) it
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33
> Author: Günter Milde
> Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39 2015 +0200
>
> Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".
>
> Fixes output for 3 of
On 2016-02-13, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
>> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33
>> Author: Günter Milde
>> Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39 2015 +0200
>> Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 08:54:57PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-02-13, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
> >> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33
> >> Author: Günter Milde
> >> Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39
Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2015 um 10:33:58, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-11-03, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 06:49:01AM -0800, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> >
> >> > * to fix the regressions with "XeTeX + TeX fonts", a simple change in
> >> >
On 2015-11-03, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 06:49:01AM -0800, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> >
>> > * to fix the regressions with "XeTeX + TeX fonts", a simple change in
>> > PDFOptions.cpp is sufficient.
>> That is, 29 tests are now better than before.
>> Checking the output, all
On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 10:40:27PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
Dear Scott,
>> > thanks for the patch.
>> I modified it to use UTF8 with XeTeX without the
>> \inputencoding commands.
...
> I would say go ahead and commit if you are satisfied with it.
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 06:49:01AM -0800, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 3. November 2015 um 12:40:22, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
> > On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 10:40:27PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >
> > Dear Scott,
> >
> > >> >
Am Dienstag, 3. November 2015 um 12:40:22, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 10:40:27PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> Dear Scott,
>
> >> > thanks for the patch.
>
> >> I modified it to use UTF8 with XeTeX without
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 10:40:27PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-11-01, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > Dear Scott,
>
> > thanks for the patch.
>
> I modified it to use UTF8 with XeTeX without the
> \inputencoding commands. A short test here showed that this
> helps with Umlauts or Cyrillic
On 2015-11-01, Guenter Milde wrote:
> Dear Scott,
> thanks for the patch.
I modified it to use UTF8 with XeTeX without the
\inputencoding commands. A short test here showed that this
helps with Umlauts or Cyrillic charactes in the PDF Info.
Give it a try.
Günter
Exec: git 'diff' 2>&1
Dir:
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 11:52:26, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 19:11:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 05:57:46PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 09:21:15PM +, Guenter
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 11:55:47, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 11:52:26, schrieb Kornel Benko
>
> > Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 19:11:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 01:13:39PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 11:55:47, schrieb Kornel Benko
>
> > Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 11:52:26, schrieb Kornel Benko
> >
> > > Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 19:11:10, schrieb Scott
Dear Scott,
thanks for the patch.
On 2015-10-31, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 05:57:46PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 09:21:15PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> Does the attached patch look good?
It looks like a step in the right direction.
On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:45:38PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:12:04AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> >> On 2015-10-29, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> OK so it seems we're on the same page.
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 09:21:15PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:45:38PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:12:04AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> >> On
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 05:57:46PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 09:21:15PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > I'd prefer you to do this.
>
> OK I'll work on it.
Does the attached patch look good?
We need to do something similar for the other FIXMEs you put in
1523fc60,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:45:38PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:12:04AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2015-10-29, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > words, the only place that knows whether the inputenc package is
>
On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:12:04AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2015-10-29, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
...
> words, the only place that knows whether the inputenc package is
> loaded is BufferParams::writeEncodingPreamble()
This is my understanding,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:12:04AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-29, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> As my FIXME was wrong, so is your patch.
I see.
> > In regards to "Dont forget to keep this check in sync with the check
> > above!" this seems to be a good situation for a helper function
On 2015-10-29, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
>> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33
>> Author: Günter Milde
>> Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39 2015 +0200
>> Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts
On 2015-10-29, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:28:00PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:31:50AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> >> On 2015-10-26, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> >> > On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:31:50AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-26, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> Has anything changed in the last couple of days?
>
> Today, I found out that the problem is tricky:
>
> As the PDF-Info does not use TeX fonts,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:28:00PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:31:50AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2015-10-26, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> > On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> >> Has anything changed in the last
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33
> Author: Günter Milde
> Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39 2015 +0200
>
> Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".
>
> Fixes output for 3 of
On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:31:50AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2015-10-26, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> > On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> >> Has anything changed in the last couple of days?
>> I'l commit an updated FIXME.
> This does indeed sound
On 2015-10-26, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:31:49PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> With the latest 2 fixes (36b9645b5de6d463b4909 and 2aa65fdc8d2cde1ba863),
> all 4 test files compile.
>>> >> >> Includes "FIXME"s at places where
Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 01:53:24, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:01PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2015 um 11:31:09, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >
> > > On 2015-10-25, Georg Baum wrote:
> > > > Guenter
On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:31:49PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2015-10-23, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:10:05PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> >> On 2015-10-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:12:32AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 01:53:24, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:01PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > > Scott, could you please test if this fixes some more export tests?
> >
>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:05:59PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> The fix is simple: Re-add the deleted lines to set the encoding to utf8-
> plain (see attachment). Then Development.lyx compiles again for me. The
> encoding must always be utf8 for full unicode backends if non-TeX fonts are
> used.
On 2015-10-23, Georg Baum wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --]
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2015-10-21, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> It compiles fine before this commit.
>> Yes, but only "per accident": Development.lyx only uses some non-ASCII
>> characters, and these are also at
On 2015-10-25, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-25, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Guenter Milde wrote:
>>> I'll commit the patch for the patch and hope this will solve some more of
>>> the automatic XeTeX tests.
>> Please do.
> It is in.
> Scott, could you please test if this fixes some more export
On 2015-10-25, Georg Baum wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> I'll commit the patch for the patch and hope this will solve some more of
>> the automatic XeTeX tests.
> Please do.
It is in.
Scott, could you please test if this fixes some more export tests?
> BTW, the braces around the equality
Guenter Milde wrote:
> Just to be sure we don't misunderstand: The question is about tests
> compiling the documentation "as-is" (i.e. with *TeX fonts*) using
> XeTeX.
Thanks for the clarification, I think we misunderstood. For XeTeX + TeX
fonts I agree.
> For me, Development.lyx compiles fine
Am Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2015 um 11:31:09, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-10-25, Georg Baum wrote:
> > Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> >> I'll commit the patch for the patch and hope this will solve some more of
> >> the automatic XeTeX tests.
>
> > Please do.
>
> It is in.
>
>
On 2015-10-25, Georg Baum wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> Actually, the patch does now what Georg expected the old patch to do:
>> set encoding to ASCII for every use of XETEX, also with non-TeX fonts.
>> This fails with characters without a LICR defined by "xunicode".
>> So the current best
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:31:49PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-23, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:10:05PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2015-10-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
> >> >> commit
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:01PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2015 um 11:31:09, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
> > On 2015-10-25, Georg Baum wrote:
> > > Guenter Milde wrote:
> >
> > >> I'll commit the patch for the patch and hope this will solve some more
Guenter Milde wrote:
> Actually, the patch does now what Georg expected the old patch to do:
>
> set encoding to ASCII for every use of XETEX, also with non-TeX fonts.
>
> This fails with characters without a LICR defined by "xunicode".
>
> So the current best known version would be to admit
On 10/25/2015 07:31 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2015-10-25, Georg Baum wrote:
BTW, the braces around the equality comparison are not needed, so
to my eyes
if (!params().useNonTeXFonts && runparams.flavor == OutputParams::XETEX)
is more readable.
I don't know the operator precedence in C++,
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/25/2015 07:31 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2015-10-25, Georg Baum wrote:
>>> BTW, the braces around the equality comparison are not needed, so
>>> to my eyes
>>> if (!params().useNonTeXFonts && runparams.flavor == OutputParams::XETEX)
>>> is more readable.
>> I don't
On 2015-10-23, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:10:05PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2015-10-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
>> >> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33
>> >> Author: Günter Milde
On 2015-10-21, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 8bit --]
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:10:05PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> It may also be that I misunderstand what is done there, but basically, yes:
>> I believe that the test at these places must be for
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-21, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
>> It compiles fine before this commit.
>
> Yes, but only "per accident": Development.lyx only uses some non-ASCII
> characters, and these are also at the same place in Unicode and T1.
It was not by accident. It did compile before
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:10:05PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
> >> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33
> >> Author: Günter Milde
> >> Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:10:05PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> It may also be that I misunderstand what is done there, but basically, yes:
> I believe that the test at these places must be for "useNonTeXFonts" instead
> of "isFullUnicode", because XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts behave more
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33
> Author: Günter Milde
> Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39 2015 +0200
>
> Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".
>
> Fixes output for 3 of
On 2015-10-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
>> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33
>> Author: Günter Milde
>> Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39 2015 +0200
>> Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts
54 matches
Mail list logo