Re: Gnuplot format & converter script

On 04/05/2017 01:36, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Works well! I found what I think is unexpected behavior: if I select the graphics inset (e.g. after I have followed your instructions and clicked on "run" and everything looks good), and copy it, I am presented with the authorization dialog. [...] Can

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

On 05/01/2017 05:37 AM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Monday, 1 May 2017 03.46.51 WEST Richard Heck wrote: >> On 04/30/2017 07:23 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> Suppose that a system has both Qt 4 and Qt 5 development libraries >>> installed. Should our automake and CMake build systems choose to

Re: further add-ons for 2.3.0 ? (was: Re: Gnuplot format & converter script)

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 01:06:44AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > As we're on this, a few other things I had in my tommaso/master [1], out of > which: > I'd really love to have 3)... Is it polished? Is there a trac ticket for this one? Or an archived discussion? > about 2) I'm stuck with

Re: Gnuplot format & converter script

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:54:47AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 03/05/2017 15:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Tommaso, I'm still curious if you are planning to implement the gnuplot > > patch for 2.3.0? Or perhaps you already did and I missed it? > > > > The reason I ask is that time is

Re: 2.3.0alpha1-1 round 2

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:34:32AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2017 um 00:04:44, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > > El 03.05.2017 a las 12:40, Scott Kostyshak escribió: > > > > > Here are the tar balls for round 2 of 2.3.0alpha1-1: > > > > I tried to check the

further add-ons for 2.3.0 ? (was: Re: Gnuplot format & converter script)

As we're on this, a few other things I had in my tommaso/master [1], out of which: I'd really love to have 3)... about 2) I'm stuck with recurring to Emacs-editing the first line of a .lyx file every time I face that issue :-)... just pushed 1), needs to be tried by someone guess 4) might

Re: Gnuplot format & converter script

On 03/05/2017 15:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Tommaso, I'm still curious if you are planning to implement the gnuplot patch for 2.3.0? Or perhaps you already did and I missed it? The reason I ask is that time is running out to get features into 2.3.0 before we should focus completely on bug

Re: 2.3.0alpha1-1 round 2

Am Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2017 um 00:04:44, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > El 03.05.2017 a las 12:40, Scott Kostyshak escribió: > > > Here are the tar balls for round 2 of 2.3.0alpha1-1: > > I tried to check the signature but get this message: > > Signed on 2017-05-03 12:27 with unknown

Re: [patch] support for document class option leqno

El 03.05.2017 a las 12:05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió: To state it again: the number may be on the left without leqno. Do we want to provide a way to set it on the right in such cases? I wrote in my last mail why I wouldn't do this. If others think different then fine by me if we support

Re: attic/id_UserGuide iconv errors

Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 21:20:11, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2017-04-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] > > > On current master if I do: > > > ctest -R "id_UserGuide_pdf2" > > > I get a failed export, and iconv errors such as: > > >

Re: 2.3.0alpha1-1 round 2

El 03.05.2017 a las 12:40, Scott Kostyshak escribió: Here are the tar balls for round 2 of 2.3.0alpha1-1: I tried to check the signature but get this message: Signed on 2017-05-03 12:27 with unknown certificate 0xDE7A44FAC7FB382D. The signature is invalid: No public certificate to verify the

Re: attic/id_UserGuide iconv errors

On 2017-04-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] > On current master if I do: > ctest -R "id_UserGuide_pdf2" > I get a failed export, and iconv errors such as: > Error 84 returned from iconv when converting from UCS-4LE to > ISO-8859-15: Invalid or incomplete

Re: [LyX/master] support to indent formulas

Dear Uwe, the GUI for "fleqn" still says "[ ] Indent Formulas". However, formulas are always indented (except for documents with "fleqn" and "mathindent=0"). > The "fleqn" option determines whether equations are *aligned* or *centered*. > In both cases, the equations are indented: either with

Re: Re-organizing templates and examples folders (#8715)

Dear LyX developers, with feature freeze nearing, I'd like to take up the discussion of templates and examples folders: On 2017-04-20, Helge Hafting wrote: > ... please make [templates] go to ~/.lyx/templates and have > tools->reconfigure create the symlink to the system template folder. ... >

Re: [LyX/master] findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer

Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 18:57:57, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta > On 03/05/2017 17:42, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > On 03/05/2017 17:37, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > >> Kornel, would you mind to re-run the tests ? > > > > I have this one consistently failing: > > > >

Re: [patch] support for document class option leqno

On 2017-05-03, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 02/05/2017 à 23:02, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : ... > To state it again: the number may be on the left without leqno. Do we > want to provide a way to set it on the right in such cases? ... > or flat out admit that we do not care if Arabic users have a >

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:29:30AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 02/05/2017 à 03:13, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 07:21:18PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: > > > Le 01/05/2017 à 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > > > > We can define a lower bound for acceptable

Re: [LyX/master] findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer

On 03/05/2017 17:42, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: On 03/05/2017 17:37, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Kornel, would you mind to re-run the tests ? I have this one consistently failing: findadv-02-in.txt: FAILED will dig shortly (I'm going off-line a few hours). this is what

Re: [LyX/master] findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer

On 03/05/2017 17:42, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: On 03/05/2017 17:37, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Kornel, would you mind to re-run the tests ? I have this one consistently failing: findadv-02-in.txt: FAILED will dig shortly (I'm going off-line a few hours). this is what

Re: [LyX/master] findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer

Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 17:42:25, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta > On 03/05/2017 17:37, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > Kornel, would you mind to re-run the tests ? > > I have this one consistently failing: > > findadv-02-in.txt: FAILED This one passes

Re: [LyX/master] findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer

On 03/05/2017 17:37, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Kornel, would you mind to re-run the tests ? I have this one consistently failing: findadv-02-in.txt: FAILED will dig shortly (I'm going off-line a few hours). T.

Re: [LyX/master] Revert "findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer"

Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 17:20:17, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta > commit 100a7ee22ff44fd101af4e52bdb3d632244ba258 > Author: Tommaso Cucinotta > Date: Wed May 3 16:37:11 2017 +0200 > > Revert "findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer" > >

Re: [LyX/master] findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer

Le 03/05/2017 à 17:37, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit : As for the "word-findadv" verb, I don't have strong opinions about hiding that, and I don't know for sure what these "Edit" vs "Hidden" etc. flags are for :(... It is to know in what group the function appears when one tries to customize the

Re: [LyX/master] findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer

On 03/05/2017 11:26, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 3610cdf66944dc790e2e3df666e99f33c45b1ede Yes, this is much less surprising than to two other commits. this is now (correctly) fixed in commit cf6bbe21 Author: Tommaso Cucinotta Date: Wed May 3 17:32:31 2017 +0200

Re: [LyX/master] findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer

my bad, quite blind commits without testing, I just reverted the suppression of the "word-findadv" lfun name, but, as you just pointed out, it was actually the crash fix to break all tests :-)! (just confirmed that reverting that as well recovers a working findadv pane) T. On

Re: has anyone tested master with GCC 7.1?

Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 14:57:11, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 03/05/2017 à 14:40, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > Just compiled. This are the logged warnings: > > /usr/src/lyx/lyx-git/3rdparty/mythes/1.2.5/mythes.cxx:51:29: warning: > > comparison between signed and

Re: Gnuplot format & converter script

On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:28:27PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 11:51:55AM +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > On 04/11/2016 10:31, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > enable the feature. Also, I guess that integration of external materials > > > > suffers of similar

Re: has anyone tested master with GCC 7.1?

Le 03/05/2017 à 14:40, Kornel Benko a écrit : Just compiled. This are the logged warnings: /usr/src/lyx/lyx-git/3rdparty/mythes/1.2.5/mythes.cxx:51:29: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]

Re: has anyone tested master with GCC 7.1?

Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 13:54:14, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 03/05/2017 à 13:21, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > I'm just curious, has anyone tested compiling master with GCC 7.1? > > I'm wondering if any of the changes [1] affect LyX. > > Not me. Latest ubuntu has

Re: has anyone tested master with GCC 7.1?

Le 03/05/2017 à 13:21, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I'm just curious, has anyone tested compiling master with GCC 7.1? I'm wondering if any of the changes [1] affect LyX. Not me. Latest ubuntu has 6.3. We might have some new warnings, although clang++ does not show any (and we use coverity

Re: should wiki uploads be https by default?

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 02:01:37AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I have the same comment for > > https://www.lyx.org/Download > > We have e.g. the Windows icon as: > > http://www.lyx.org/images/oswin.gif > > In the source, it is written as > > %lfloat% images:oswin.gif Bump. It

has anyone tested master with GCC 7.1?

I'm just curious, has anyone tested compiling master with GCC 7.1? I'm wondering if any of the changes [1] affect LyX. Scott [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature

update on feature freeze

Dear all, (TLDR: feature freeze is 19 May. After 10 May, patches implementing a new feature need a +1 from another LyX developer before committing to master) The feature freeze is still planned for 19 May. Starting 10 May, a +1 is needed from another LyX developer for any patch that is

Re: LyX 2.3.0alpha1-1

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 07:32:13AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2017 um 19:19:44, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 08:24:40AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Montag, 1. Mai 2017 um 20:25:44, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > >

Re: Crash with using lyx-function word-findadv

Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2017 um 17:56:21, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta > On 02/05/2017 11:19, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Start lyx > > select new file > > type anything e.g. 'abcd' > > Goto home position > > in minibuffer type word-findadv a > > Any (or no at all) parameter to this

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #192

https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/192/

Re: [patch] support for document class option leqno

Le 02/05/2017 à 23:02, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : I see it a bit different: - leqno puts the formula number ALWAYS on the left side. This is clearly stated in the AMS manuals and also in the LaTeX companion 2nd edition. I spent some time in testing out Farsi, Arabic and Hebrew and with leqno I get the

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #175

https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/175/

Re: Default to Qt 4 or Qt 5 with our build systems?

Le 02/05/2017 à 03:13, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 07:21:18PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: Le 01/05/2017 à 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for python 3 vs 2. I would not want a crappy qt 5.1 on a

Re: [LyX/master] findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer

Le 03/05/2017 à 10:44, Kornel Benko a écrit : Testing manually, I see, that replace is not working. (E.g. findadv does not find anything) Hm, test passes after reverting also 3610cdf66944dc790e2e3df666e99f33c45b1ede Yes, this is much less surprising than to two other commits. JMarc

Re: [LyX/master] findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer

Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 10:08:40, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 03/05/2017 à 10:05, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 09:41:08, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > > > >> Le 03/05/2017 à 07:48, Stephan Witt a écrit : > >>>

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #183

https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/183/

Re: [LyX/master] findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer

Le 03/05/2017 à 10:05, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 09:41:08, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Le 03/05/2017 à 07:48, Stephan Witt a écrit : Something like the attached patch is needed!? Yes, I just did that. JMarc You did, but without test.

Re: [LyX/master] findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer

Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 09:41:08, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 03/05/2017 à 07:48, Stephan Witt a écrit : > > Something like the attached patch is needed!? > > Yes, I just did that. > > JMarc You did, but without test. # ctest -R findadv ...

Re: [LyX/master] findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer

Le 03/05/2017 à 07:48, Stephan Witt a écrit : Something like the attached patch is needed!? Yes, I just did that. JMarc

Re: [LyX/master] Added testcase for crash with using function word-findadv

Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 01:42:08, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta > hmm.., not sure if [8c101829/lyxgit] would need a rollback then... I still hope that it will be possible to use this function from the minibuffer. Someday. Sure, it feels hopelessly ... > T. > > On

Re: [patch] support for document class option leqno

Dear Uwe, dear Jean-Marc, dear LyX developers, On 2017-05-02, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > El 02.05.2017 a las 17:02, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió: >> 1/ understand, for the various languages and packages implementing these >> languages what are the cases where the default is to put the number on >>