Re: Development and Release Model

On 02/05/2011 15:12, Richard Heck wrote: I'd like to start a discussion not so much about git and branches and stuff, but more about what our release pattern will be and how that will be managed. It's inspired in part by some worries Pavel expressed: i have been thinking about the proposed

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 02/05/2011 11:04, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2011-05-02, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 2-5-2011 3:15, Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:58:59AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: [...] my fear is also that while the extensive branch usage is superior from the geeky point of view, its

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 02/05/2011 13:40, Pavel Sanda wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I don't really get this. When used to it, I don't think it is technically a very difficult workflow. do you know the story about the guy who didn't step into the development for several month/years? because it was difficult

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 02/05/2011 13:52, Pavel Sanda wrote: venom00 wrote: I don't really get this. When used to it, I don't think it is technically a very difficult workflow. Second, does that mean that the less skilled developers are only allowed to do small things and refrain from the larger features because

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 02/05/2011 14:03, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: For the casual patch contributor who wants to work as if it was svn, it is very simple: Formerly it was: initially: svn checkout periodically: svn up to view diff: svn diff to revert local changes: svn revert Now

Re: Development and Release Model

On 02/05/2011 15:12, Richard Heck wrote: I'd like to start a discussion not so much about git and branches and stuff, but more about what our release pattern will be and how that will be managed. It's inspired in part by some worries Pavel expressed: i have been thinking about the proposed

Re: Some stats for 2.0 development

On 30/04/2011 14:41, Pavel Sanda wrote: hi all, some stats for 2.0 development. (you will need mail client with fixed chars proper tabs handling). * commit activity: Trunk 2.0: Branch 1.6: rgheck 1552spitz 752 sanda 1202uwestoe 692 uwestoe 1050vfr 297 vfr 922

Re: Some stats for 2.0 development

On 30/04/2011 14:41, Pavel Sanda wrote: hi all, some stats for 2.0 development. (you will need mail client with fixed chars& proper tabs handling). * commit activity: Trunk 2.0: Branch 1.6: rgheck 1552spitz 752 sanda 1202uwestoe 692 uwestoe 1050vfr 297 vfr 922

Re: Maintenance release management

On 04/29/2011 07:50 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Dear all, as you all know meanwhile, I will step back as maintenance release manager as soon as LyX 1.6.10 is released. I'm glad to inform you that Richard accepted to take over maintenance release management. This is an excellent solution,

Re: Maintenance release management

On 04/29/2011 07:50 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Dear all, as you all know meanwhile, I will step back as maintenance release manager as soon as LyX 1.6.10 is released. I'm glad to inform you that Richard accepted to take over maintenance release management. This is an excellent solution,

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 07:43 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 04/26/2011 12:18 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 26-4-2011 18:12, Johannes Wilm wrote: Will this mean that we will not be allowed to put bib-information into the header until 2013? At the earliest point in time, this will be released in the

Re: r38530 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/insets

On 04/27/2011 12:41 AM, rgh...@lyx.org wrote: Author: rgheck Date: Wed Apr 27 00:41:48 2011 New Revision: 38530 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38530 Log: Fix bug #7490. As the bug report notes, you do NOT get this crash if you move up or down in the table a bit before you do the rest.

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 07:43 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 04/26/2011 12:18 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 26-4-2011 18:12, Johannes Wilm wrote: Will this mean that we will not be allowed to put bib-information into the header until 2013? At the earliest point in time, this will be released in the

Re: r38530 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/insets

On 04/27/2011 12:41 AM, rgh...@lyx.org wrote: Author: rgheck Date: Wed Apr 27 00:41:48 2011 New Revision: 38530 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38530 Log: Fix bug #7490. As the bug report notes, you do NOT get this crash if you move up or down in the table a bit before you do the rest.

Re: Feature: Support for other citation styles

On 04/25/2011 07:07 PM, Johannes Wilm wrote: I think this is a non-discussion. Neither one of us can control what Lyx-developers choose to decide in 3-7 years, when LyX3.0 comes out. Make it 10 ;-) Some of us will be retired by then... Abdel.

Re: Feature: Support for other citation styles

On 04/26/2011 10:11 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 26-4-2011 9:32, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/25/2011 07:07 PM, Johannes Wilm wrote: I think this is a non-discussion. Neither one of us can control what Lyx-developers choose to decide in 3-7 years, when LyX3.0 comes out. Make it 10

Re: Goals and Milestones for LyX3.0

On 04/26/2011 10:17 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 26-4-2011 10:13, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/26/2011 10:11 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 26-4-2011 9:32, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/25/2011 07:07 PM, Johannes Wilm wrote: I think this is a non-discussion. Neither one

Re: Goals and Milestones for LyX3.0

On 04/26/2011 10:29 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 26/04/2011 10:25, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : Shouldn't we start with 2.1 first? I guess there will still be 2.0.x bug fix release an that Jürgen will keep maintain them. Yes; no. If not Jürgen then who? You? I'd like to propose

Re: Goals and Milestones for LyX3.0

On 04/26/2011 10:43 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Yes; no. If not Jürgen then who? You? You. Bouh!

Re: Goals and Milestones for LyX3.0

On 04/26/2011 10:48 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I'd like to propose that 2.x release are only about GUI improvements and code cleanup. IOW 2.x should keep the file format unchanged. How are you going to do that? No format change? This is not going to happen. Why not? Why

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 10:59 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I'd like to propose that 2.x release are only about GUI improvements and code cleanup. IOW 2.x should keep the file format unchanged. 3.0 would in this scheme introduce a new file format, maybe XML, maybe not. You're just moving up the

Re: Goals and Milestones for LyX3.0

On 04/26/2011 02:40 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 04/26/2011 05:04 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/26/2011 10:48 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I'd like to propose that 2.x release are only about GUI improvements and code cleanup. IOW 2.x should keep the file format

Re: Goals and Milestones for LyX3.0

On 04/26/2011 02:45 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 04/26/2011 05:57 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: That's also why time between releases are sooo long... 2 or 3 releases every six without file format changes sounds very appealing to the user that I am. To the developer, this means

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 05:29 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: file-format changes releases. i must admit that being lately forced to cooperate with people not having full control over the version of LyX installed release cycle of 2 years does not sound so bad to me ;-p Which is

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 05:00 PM, Richard Heck wrote: I am still wondering if there is not some way to proceed here that would allow more new features that do not touch file format into the stable branch. It seems to me that the main concern is that some new features that could have been included in

Re: Splash.lyx document: LyX Graphical Tour

On 04/26/2011 05:30 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Diego Queiroz wrote: Isn't interesting to update the Graphical Tour of LyX? http://www.lyx.org/Walkthrough It is mentioned in splash.lyx document but there is a long time it isn't updated... I think it should be updated with the final release of

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 05:40 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 26-4-2011 17:34, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/26/2011 05:29 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: file-format changes releases. i must admit that being lately forced to cooperate with people not having full control

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 05:52 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 26/04/2011 17:40, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : So we will have (maintenance releases) 2.0.0.0 end of april 2011 2.0.0.1 end of may 2011 2.0.0.2 end of july 2011 2.0.0.3 end of september 2011 (new feature releases) 2.0.1.0 end of

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 06:08 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I'd drop the stunning releases and increment the major version at each format change, in this case. Too many numbers. Wouldn't this be confusing for the user that suddenly 2.0/2.1/2.2 have the same file format. So he can easily upgrade. He

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 06:48 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: we are always seeing new developers around new releases; 2.0 is no exception. this looks as interesting insight, the more that i do not recognize that ;) isn't it just illusion made by the fact the we are in freeze, rejecting

Re: Feature: Support for other citation styles

On 04/25/2011 07:07 PM, Johannes Wilm wrote: I think this is a non-discussion. Neither one of us can control what Lyx-developers choose to decide in 3-7 years, when LyX3.0 comes out. Make it 10 ;-) Some of us will be retired by then... Abdel.

Re: Feature: Support for other citation styles

On 04/26/2011 10:11 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 26-4-2011 9:32, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/25/2011 07:07 PM, Johannes Wilm wrote: I think this is a non-discussion. Neither one of us can control what Lyx-developers choose to decide in 3-7 years, when LyX3.0 comes out. Make it 10

Re: Goals and Milestones for LyX3.0

On 04/26/2011 10:17 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 26-4-2011 10:13, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/26/2011 10:11 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 26-4-2011 9:32, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/25/2011 07:07 PM, Johannes Wilm wrote: I think this is a non-discussion. Neither one

Re: Goals and Milestones for LyX3.0

On 04/26/2011 10:29 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 26/04/2011 10:25, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : Shouldn't we start with 2.1 first? I guess there will still be 2.0.x bug fix release an that Jürgen will keep maintain them. Yes; no. If not Jürgen then who? You? I'd like to propose

Re: Goals and Milestones for LyX3.0

On 04/26/2011 10:43 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Yes; no. If not Jürgen then who? You? You. Bouh!

Re: Goals and Milestones for LyX3.0

On 04/26/2011 10:48 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I'd like to propose that 2.x release are only about GUI improvements and code cleanup. IOW 2.x should keep the file format unchanged. How are you going to do that? No format change? This is not going to happen. Why not? Why

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 10:59 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I'd like to propose that 2.x release are only about GUI improvements and code cleanup. IOW 2.x should keep the file format unchanged. 3.0 would in this scheme introduce a new file format, maybe XML, maybe not. You're just moving up the

Re: Goals and Milestones for LyX3.0

On 04/26/2011 02:40 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 04/26/2011 05:04 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/26/2011 10:48 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I'd like to propose that 2.x release are only about GUI improvements and code cleanup. IOW 2.x should keep the file format

Re: Goals and Milestones for LyX3.0

On 04/26/2011 02:45 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 04/26/2011 05:57 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: That's also why time between releases are sooo long... 2 or 3 releases every six without file format changes sounds very appealing to the user that I am. To the developer, this means

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 05:29 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: file-format changes releases. i must admit that being lately forced to cooperate with people not having full control over the version of LyX installed release cycle of 2 years does not sound so bad to me ;-p Which is

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 05:00 PM, Richard Heck wrote: I am still wondering if there is not some way to proceed here that would allow more new features that do not touch file format into the stable branch. It seems to me that the main concern is that some new features that could have been included in

Re: Splash.lyx document: LyX Graphical Tour

On 04/26/2011 05:30 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Diego Queiroz wrote: Isn't interesting to update the Graphical Tour of LyX? http://www.lyx.org/Walkthrough It is mentioned in splash.lyx document but there is a long time it isn't updated... I think it should be updated with the final release of

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 05:40 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 26-4-2011 17:34, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/26/2011 05:29 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: file-format changes releases. i must admit that being lately forced to cooperate with people not having full control

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 05:52 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 26/04/2011 17:40, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : So we will have (maintenance releases) 2.0.0.0 end of april 2011 2.0.0.1 end of may 2011 2.0.0.2 end of july 2011 2.0.0.3 end of september 2011 (new feature releases) 2.0.1.0 end of

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 06:08 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I'd drop the stunning releases and increment the major version at each format change, in this case. Too many numbers. Wouldn't this be confusing for the user that suddenly 2.0/2.1/2.2 have the same file format. So he can easily upgrade. He

Re: Development for LyX 2.1

On 04/26/2011 06:48 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: we are always seeing new developers around new releases; 2.0 is no exception. this looks as interesting insight, the more that i do not recognize that ;) isn't it just illusion made by the fact the we are in freeze, rejecting

Re: r38433 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On 04/18/2011 04:23 AM, rgh...@lyx.org wrote: Author: rgheck Date: Mon Apr 18 04:23:09 2011 New Revision: 38433 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38433 Log: Now how do you think that happened? Are you working anti-chronologically? Abdel.

Re: Layout questions

On 04/16/2011 10:12 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 04/16/2011 03:59 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 16/04/2011 3:40 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote: I am trying to address bug #7301 concerning the Springer layout files, and the following 4 questions have arisen: 1) NextNoIndent prevents the following

Re: ar.po review?

On 04/19/2011 01:48 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Hello Abdel, do you know arabic enough to review the few strings in layouttranslations? Not at all. I can ask my wife though... Abdel.

Re: Small glitch with \smallmatrix

On 04/22/2011 04:58 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: The attached patch fixes the deletion of an empty last row for \smallmatrix (this is part of bug #7484). It is a trivial patch, but to comply with the rules I need a nod from another developer for committing it to trunk. This can't introduce

Re: r38433 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On 04/18/2011 04:23 AM, rgh...@lyx.org wrote: Author: rgheck Date: Mon Apr 18 04:23:09 2011 New Revision: 38433 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38433 Log: Now how do you think that happened? Are you working anti-chronologically? Abdel.

Re: Layout questions

On 04/16/2011 10:12 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 04/16/2011 03:59 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 16/04/2011 3:40 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote: I am trying to address bug #7301 concerning the Springer layout files, and the following 4 questions have arisen: 1) NextNoIndent prevents the following

Re: ar.po review?

On 04/19/2011 01:48 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Hello Abdel, do you know arabic enough to review the few strings in layouttranslations? Not at all. I can ask my wife though... Abdel.

Re: Small glitch with \smallmatrix

On 04/22/2011 04:58 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: The attached patch fixes the deletion of an empty last row for \smallmatrix (this is part of bug #7484). It is a trivial patch, but to comply with the rules I need a nod from another developer for committing it to trunk. This can't introduce

Re: Towards RC4/final release

On 04/12/2011 06:50 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Pavel Sanda wrote: i haven't decided yet whether we should go for rc4 (~20th) or directly final one (~29th). lets see what will happen to the codebase in between. Please no further RC (and keep the strict commit rules). IMO the code is stable enough

Re: Towards RC4/final release

On 04/12/2011 06:50 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Pavel Sanda wrote: i haven't decided yet whether we should go for rc4 (~20th) or directly final one (~29th). lets see what will happen to the codebase in between. Please no further RC (and keep the strict commit rules). IMO the code is stable enough

Re: r38270 - lyx-devel/trunk/po

On 04/06/2011 01:02 AM, rgh...@lyx.org wrote: Author: rgheck Date: Wed Apr 6 01:02:12 2011 New Revision: 38270 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38270 Log: Slightly better warning reporting. OK, done for now. With the time you spent on this maybe it would have been ported to python

Re: PATCH for isWordSeparator

On 04/06/2011 05:19 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: The last changes regarding isWordSeparator and hard hyphens have a drawback... Now the single dash enclosed by white space is treated as a single word and the spell check marks it red - I'd rate this as a regression. The attached patch should fix

Re: r38270 - lyx-devel/trunk/po

On 04/06/2011 01:02 AM, rgh...@lyx.org wrote: Author: rgheck Date: Wed Apr 6 01:02:12 2011 New Revision: 38270 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38270 Log: Slightly better warning reporting. OK, done for now. With the time you spent on this maybe it would have been ported to python

Re: PATCH for isWordSeparator

On 04/06/2011 05:19 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: The last changes regarding isWordSeparator and hard hyphens have a drawback... Now the single dash enclosed by white space is treated as a single word and the spell check marks it red - I'd rate this as a regression. The attached patch should fix

Re: Spellchecker raises a question when Ignore all is used (Lyx-2.0.0svn)

On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: Hello, Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit 'Ignore all': cite We reached the end of the document, would you like to continue from the beginning? /cite If I say yes, it restars at the beginning, which is not

Re: navigation addition

On 04/04/2011 02:10 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote: Dear LyX developers It would be nice to have a lyx-fun for move to top of screen and move to bottom of screen-- in Wordstar-like editors, these are typically bound to C-q E and C-q X respectively. Please create a feature request entry

Re: Spellchecker raises a question when "Ignore all" is used (Lyx-2.0.0svn)

On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: Hello, Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit 'Ignore all': We reached the end of the document, would you like to continue from the beginning? If I say yes, it restars at the beginning, which is not what I

Re: navigation addition

On 04/04/2011 02:10 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote: Dear LyX developers It would be nice to have a lyx-fun for "move to top of screen" and "move to bottom of screen"-- in Wordstar-like editors, these are typically bound to C-q E and C-q X respectively. Please create a feature request

Re: r37916 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On 03/27/2011 09:16 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 13-3-2011 17:41, you...@lyx.org wrote: Author: younes Date: Sun Mar 13 17:41:47 2011 New Revision: 37916 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37916 Log: Temporally fix #7321 until a better solution is found. The auto scrolling is very

Re: r37916 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On 03/28/2011 10:33 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 28-3-2011 10:29, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 03/27/2011 09:16 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 13-3-2011 17:41, you...@lyx.org wrote: Author: younes Date: Sun Mar 13 17:41:47 2011 New Revision: 37916 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac

Re: r37916 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On 03/27/2011 09:16 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 13-3-2011 17:41, you...@lyx.org wrote: Author: younes Date: Sun Mar 13 17:41:47 2011 New Revision: 37916 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37916 Log: Temporally fix #7321 until a better solution is found. The auto scrolling is very

Re: r37916 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On 03/28/2011 10:33 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 28-3-2011 10:29, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 03/27/2011 09:16 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 13-3-2011 17:41, you...@lyx.org wrote: Author: younes Date: Sun Mar 13 17:41:47 2011 New Revision: 37916 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

On 25/03/2011 21:42, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:46:08PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote: Enrico Forestierifor...@lyx.org wrote in message news:20110325143448.ge29...@sirio.sssup.it... I don't agree. As you can see, additional icon sets may simply subsitute some icons. If

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

On 26/03/2011 09:58, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: The manuals mostly uses InsetInfo for the icons so they will get updated automatically... It uses also screenshots. Actually, this whole icon set discussion was the reason why I did not yet start to document the default

Re: r38063 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc

On 26/03/2011 16:33, sp...@lyx.org wrote: Author: spitz Date: Sat Mar 26 16:33:25 2011 New Revision: 38063 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38063 Log: * UserGuide.lyx: fix inset info argument. Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc/UserGuide.lyx Modified:

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

On 25/03/2011 21:42, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:46:08PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote: "Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110325143448.ge29...@sirio.sssup.it... I don't agree. As you can see, additional icon sets may simply subsitute some icons.

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

On 26/03/2011 09:58, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: The manuals mostly uses InsetInfo for the icons so they will get updated automatically... It uses also screenshots. Actually, this whole icon set discussion was the reason why I did not yet start to document the default

Re: r38063 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc

On 26/03/2011 16:33, sp...@lyx.org wrote: Author: spitz Date: Sat Mar 26 16:33:25 2011 New Revision: 38063 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38063 Log: * UserGuide.lyx: fix inset info argument. Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc/UserGuide.lyx Modified:

Re: [patch] output format clash

On 03/24/2011 04:25 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 23/03/2011 10:18 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 03/23/2011 06:27 PM, José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 23 March 2011 21:36:54 Pavel Sanda wrote: others, please note that we have new fellow on the developer's ship so do not forget to give him warm

Re: r38018 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4 frontends/qt4/ui

On 03/24/2011 07:50 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 24.03.2011 um 00:10 schrieb you...@lyx.org: Author: younes Date: Thu Mar 24 00:10:12 2011 New Revision: 38018 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38018 Log: Cleanup the SpellChecker dialog (fixes #7375 and #7379): * Transform Spellchecker.ui

Re: Towards rc2 (status update #2)

On 03/24/2011 05:17 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: hi all, due to unexpected events i will be mostly offline for the next few days. i would like that we freeze trunk tonight. only doc/translation updates should go in afterwards. the only exception would be critical bug fixes, like the mysterious one

Re: [patch] output format clash

On 03/24/2011 04:25 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 23/03/2011 10:18 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 03/23/2011 06:27 PM, José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 23 March 2011 21:36:54 Pavel Sanda wrote: others, please note that we have new fellow on the developer's ship so do not forget to give him warm

Re: r38018 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4 frontends/qt4/ui

On 03/24/2011 07:50 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 24.03.2011 um 00:10 schrieb you...@lyx.org: Author: younes Date: Thu Mar 24 00:10:12 2011 New Revision: 38018 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38018 Log: Cleanup the SpellChecker dialog (fixes #7375 and #7379): * Transform Spellchecker.ui

Re: Towards rc2 (status update #2)

On 03/24/2011 05:17 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: hi all, due to unexpected events i will be mostly offline for the next few days. i would like that we freeze trunk tonight. only doc/translation updates should go in afterwards. the only exception would be critical bug fixes, like the mysterious one

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/22/2011 08:20 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.03.2011 um 18:00 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 21.03.2011 um 09:43 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/21/2011 07:30 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 20.03.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: Hi Pavel, Here is a patch that should fixes #7375

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/23/2011 12:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 10:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/22/2011 08:20 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.03.2011 um 18:00 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 21.03.2011 um 09:43 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/21/2011 07:30 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/23/2011 02:15 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 13:56 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/23/2011 12:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 10:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/22/2011 08:20 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.03.2011 um 18:00 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/23/2011 06:28 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 15:34 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: For end-of-document I'd call it normal when LFUN_CHAR_FORWARD does not do anything. That was the original goal of the stuck_ variable - to catch the case when the last word is misspelled and you hit

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 23/03/2011 18:28, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 15:34 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/23/2011 02:15 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 13:56 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/23/2011 12:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 10:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/22

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 23/03/2011 18:28, Stephan Witt wrote: I'll try to solve the end-of-document too - but I doubt it could be done without any state variable... I managed to do this so I committed the patch. It seems to work fine now. Abdel.

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/22/2011 08:20 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.03.2011 um 18:00 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 21.03.2011 um 09:43 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/21/2011 07:30 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 20.03.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: Hi Pavel, Here is a patch that should fixes #7375

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/23/2011 12:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 10:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/22/2011 08:20 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.03.2011 um 18:00 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 21.03.2011 um 09:43 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/21/2011 07:30 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/23/2011 02:15 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 13:56 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/23/2011 12:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 10:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/22/2011 08:20 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.03.2011 um 18:00 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/23/2011 06:28 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 15:34 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: For end-of-document I'd call it normal when LFUN_CHAR_FORWARD does not do anything. That was the original goal of the stuck_ variable - to catch the case when the last word is misspelled and you hit

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 23/03/2011 18:28, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 15:34 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/23/2011 02:15 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 13:56 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/23/2011 12:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 10:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/22

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 23/03/2011 18:28, Stephan Witt wrote: I'll try to solve the end-of-document too - but I doubt it could be done without any state variable... I managed to do this so I committed the patch. It seems to work fine now. Abdel.

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/21/2011 07:30 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 20.03.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: Hi Pavel, Here is a patch that should fixes #7375. The patch is big but this is mostly mechanical changes needed for a proper Dock widget and code shuffling: * Transform Spellchecker.ui

Re: ANNOUNCE: Windows installer for RC1

On 03/21/2011 10:46 AM, Joost Verburg wrote: Michal ms-li...@ms.sebdan.com wrote in message news:20110321074737.2ec3@ms-dual... This might also be somehow related to http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg85707.html, though I haven't checked LyX 1.6.9 at all. No, LyX

Re: ANNOUNCE: Windows installer for RC1

On 03/21/2011 12:31 PM, Joost Verburg wrote: Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote in message news:4d87341c.5050...@lyx.org... I am not sure this is wise... might even be a good reason to step back to MSVC2008... at least until Qt switches to MSVC2010... But you are the one to decide

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/21/2011 07:30 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 20.03.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: Hi Pavel, Here is a patch that should fixes #7375. The patch is big but this is mostly mechanical changes needed for a proper Dock widget and code shuffling: * Transform Spellchecker.ui

Re: ANNOUNCE: Windows installer for RC1

On 03/21/2011 10:46 AM, Joost Verburg wrote: "Michal" wrote in message news:20110321074737.2ec3@ms-dual... This might also be somehow related to http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg85707.html, though I haven't checked LyX 1.6.9 at all. No,

Re: ANNOUNCE: Windows installer for RC1

On 03/21/2011 12:31 PM, Joost Verburg wrote: "Abdelrazak Younes" <you...@lyx.org> wrote in message news:4d87341c.5050...@lyx.org... I am not sure this is wise... might even be a good reason to step back to MSVC2008... at least until Qt switches to MSVC2010... But you are t

Re: Final round for UI changes

On 20/03/2011 16:22, Joost Verburg wrote: Edwin Leuven e.leu...@gmail.com wrote in message news:aanlktikf5+pazt7uj+cga+wkt1kj+3hpsc_xfpkkg...@mail.gmail.com... imo, 4 good reasons to go for it now I agree. Updating the icons and toolbar together makes much more sense. If we put it in now,

[Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

Hi Pavel, Here is a patch that should fixes #7375. The patch is big but this is mostly mechanical changes needed for a proper Dock widget and code shuffling: * Transform Spellchecker.ui into a simple QWidget * Pimpl all we can * Remove Close button (as for all other dock widgets) * Make the

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >