Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 11:47:45PM +, Rich Shepard wrote: > Have you any thoughts on how I can track the source of this discrepancy? I mentioned modules in my first email so I'm assuming you already checked modules as the source of discrepancy. If you send us a minimal example, we can

Re: Book class supporting fancychap package [RESOLVED]

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: I'll find docs for scrlayer and scrlayer-scrpage to understand what they do and would like your suggestions for a book class that allows other than the default chapter heading style. These are too complicated for me to implement. I'll move the text

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Try making a copy of the document and opening the copy. Paul, I'm taking a different approach. My last book, published by Springer, used the svmono.cls/svmono.layout so I figured out how to use it as the current book's class. Still no Check TeX in

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Paul A. Rubin
On 12/23/2017 06:47 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Rich Shepard wrote:  Yes, Check TeX appears in the Introduction document. It does show up in an article-class documents (one of mine as well as the Introduction). It does not appear in book or report classes: I tried Standard,

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Paul A. Rubin
On 12/23/2017 06:22 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Paul A. Rubin wrote: That would be running buffer-chktex in the minibuffer, as Scott mentioned ... except you said it wouldn't work. :-( Paul,   I'll try it again. And, how do I get the minibuffer back at the bottom of the

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: Yes, Check TeX appears in the Introduction document. It does show up in an article-class documents (one of mine as well as the Introduction). It does not appear in book or report classes: I tried Standard, KOMA-Script, and Memoir books and Standard and

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Rich, I just wanted to make sure you saw this question. Did you check for a very simple document? Scott, Mea culpa. I've been distracted with other issues (such as not previewing or compiling), but those have now been resolved. In addition to

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Paul A. Rubin wrote: That would be running buffer-chktex in the minibuffer, as Scott mentioned ... except you said it wouldn't work. :-( Paul, I'll try it again. And, how do I get the minibuffer back at the bottom of the window rather than on the right side? Not sure

Book class supporting fancychap package

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
I've been using the KOMA-Script classes for my writing because of the flexibility they offer. The current document uses the KOMA-Script book class which has deprcated fonts incompatible with the fncychap package: Class scrbook Warning: Usage of package `fancyhdr' together (scrbook)

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 05:32:03PM +, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > If it is a "yes", can you see if it shows up in a very simple document > (no modules added or anything like that)? Rich, I just wanted to make sure you saw this question. Did you check for a very simple document? In addition to

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Paul A. Rubin
On 12/23/2017 05:02 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:   It is strange that it's present but not on the menu. If there's a way to manually invoke chktex that'll work for me. That would be running buffer-chktex in the minibuffer, as Scott mentioned ... except you said it wouldn't work. :-( Paul

Issues with version control

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
I _thought_ I had set up version control using GIT. Checking in the document after adding text now generates an error (see attached .png). Turns out that there was no .git repository in that directory, so I created one manually and will manually commit changes. Perhaps it's not working from

Re: Preview error [FIXED]

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: What have I done incorrectly? Don't know, but deleting all around the title, then adding extratitle and other environments back one at a time fixed the issue. Rich

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Well, I'm bamfoozled. That makes two of us. Incidentally, there are a bunch of screenshot utilities (I use gnome-screenshot) that include a delay feature. If you have one of those, select the screen area to grab, set a timer, then zip back to LyX

Re: Preview error

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: Now when I try to preview the document I get this error; LyX: Error in latex paragraphs: You are using at least one layout (Title) intended for the title, after using non-title layouts. This could lead to missing or incorrect output. Error log shows:

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Paul A. Rubin
On 12/23/2017 03:57 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Paul A. Rubin wrote: This should be redundant, given that the config script appeared to find chktex, but better safe than sorry. If you open Tools > Preferences... > Output > LaTeX and gaze upon the "CheckTeX command:" box, do

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Paul A. Rubin wrote: This should be redundant, given that the config script appeared to find chktex, but better safe than sorry. If you open Tools > Preferences... > Output > LaTeX and gaze upon the "CheckTeX command:" box, do you espy "chktex -n1 -n3 -n6 -n9 -n22 -n25 -n30

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Paul A. Rubin
On 12/23/2017 02:44 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Just to be clear, it does not appear in the Tools menu with a document loaded? Paul,   Yep. The environments sequence I provided is from one of the opened documents, a book. Not sure how (or why) one would

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Just to be clear, it does not appear in the Tools menu with a document loaded? Paul, Yep. The environments sequence I provided is from one of the opened documents, a book. Not sure how (or why) one would look to lint anything else. Rich

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Paul A. Rubin
On 12/23/2017 01:49 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Scott's referring to the LyX configuration script. Run Tools > Reconfigure, then find configure.log in your ~/.lyx directory and either eyeball it in an editor or run "grep -i chktex configure.log" to see if

Preview error

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
Using lyx-2.2.3; KOMA-Script book class. The environment sequence at the beginning of the document is: Extratitle Title Author frontmatter ToC Standard (\chapter*{Preface}) Chapter (1) Now when I try to preview the document I get this error; LyX: Error in latex paragraphs: You are using at

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Scott's referring to the LyX configuration script. Run Tools > Reconfigure, then find configure.log in your ~/.lyx directory and either eyeball it in an editor or run "grep -i chktex configure.log" to see if the configure script found the ChkTeX

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Paul A. Rubin
On 12/23/2017 12:46 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Scott Kostyshak wrote: What does your configure log show for chktex? It should show something like: INFO: checking for ChkTeX... INFO: +checking for "chktex"... followed by a "yes" or a "no". Scott,   I use the

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: "Command disabled (buffer-chkbox)". Typo: that should be buffer-chktex. Rich

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Scott Kostyshak wrote: If it doesn't show up there, what is the output in the messages pane of running the following LFUN directly? buffer-chktex Scott, Using Alt-x opens the mini-buffer and running buffer-chktex tells me "Command disabled (buffer-chkbox)". Looks

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Scott Kostyshak wrote: What does your configure log show for chktex? It should show something like: INFO: checking for ChkTeX... INFO: +checking for "chktex"... followed by a "yes" or a "no". Scott, I use the SlackBuilds.org build script (and have for many years) and

Re: chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 05:20:42PM +, Rich Shepard wrote: > The 'Additional' manual, in Section 7.1 reads, "If you have the chktex > program installed you'll find in the Tools menu the entry: Check TeX.' > > Here, with TeXLive-20170520 I find: > > $ locate chktex > /usr/bin/chktex >

chktex

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
The 'Additional' manual, in Section 7.1 reads, "If you have the chktex program installed you'll find in the Tools menu the entry: Check TeX.' Here, with TeXLive-20170520 I find: $ locate chktex /usr/bin/chktex /usr/man/man1/chktex.1.gz /usr/share/texmf-dist/chktex

Re: Fancyhdr

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Ricardo Berlasso wrote: Yes. The "Fancy" option indeed adds that line to the preamble. You can check what's on the "hidden" preamble by opening the "code pane" (View → Code Preview Pane) and select the "Only Preamble" option. Ricardo, That's interesting. When I looked

Re: Fancyhdr

2017-12-23 Thread Ricardo Berlasso
2017-12-23 17:00 GMT+01:00 Rich Shepard : > When I select 'Fancy' in the page layout settings is it redundant to add > \usepackage{fancyhdr} in the preamble? > Yes. The "Fancy" option indeed adds that line to the preamble. You can check what's on the "hidden" preamble

Fancyhdr

2017-12-23 Thread Rich Shepard
When I select 'Fancy' in the page layout settings is it redundant to add \usepackage{fancyhdr} in the preamble? Rich

Re: Creating a statement of account [RESOVED]L

2017-12-23 Thread Steve Litt
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 05:47:22 -0800 (PST) Rich Shepard wrote: > On Fri, 22 Dec 2017, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > > I tend to agree with Steve's points. > > Joel, > >I fail to understand why you and Steve think LyX/LaTeX is not > suitable for producing an

File names -- 2.3rc1

2017-12-23 Thread F M Salter
Hi,     Lyx 2.3 rc1 fails to save certain file names correctly!     I wish to create file names matching a particular pattern.   I enter the intended title  ---   test-2017.Dec.23.   Copy it with control-c.     Open the "save as" dialogue and paste using control-v.  At this point all appears