Steve Litt wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 02:01, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
Then there's the fact that some of us have dialup, and some in rural
areas are years from getting broadband. The just upgrade your qt
suggestion could be a day's downloading over a phone line
John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 4:07 PM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JOHN CULLETON wrote:
on recommending Lyx to TEX newbies. If someone can cite a version of
Lyx that runs without tears on the latest stable version of Slack
(12) then I may give it a try again
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No offense intended Steve but you are obviously confused with version
numbers etc. I even suspect that you didn't even fully read the README
and INSTALL that come with the source. As an end-user, either you wait
for your
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the case of Steve, his problem was clearly something he could have
resolved by himself without questioning our choice of development
tool.
Well, anybody can at least question our choices. This does not mean
that we
Steve Litt wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 02:01, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
Then there's the fact that some of us have dialup, and some in rural
areas are years from getting broadband. The just upgrade your qt
suggestion could be a day's downloading over a phone line
Steve Litt wrote:
Yeah, that's the way to get LyX users -- tell em if they're not willing to
upgrade the very vitals of their OS so that the developers can use the latest
and greatest Qt instead of providing compatibility with a couple year old
version (Qt 4 came out summer 2005, but Qt 4.2 is
Steve Litt wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 02:01, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
Then there's the fact that some of us have dialup, and some in rural
areas are years from getting broadband. The just upgrade your qt
suggestion could be a day's downloading over a phone line
John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 4:07 PM, Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JOHN CULLETON wrote:
on recommending Lyx to TEX newbies. If someone can cite a version of
Lyx that runs without tears on the latest stable version of Slack
(12) then I may give it a try
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
No offense intended Steve but you are obviously confused with version
numbers etc. I even suspect that you didn't even fully read the README
and INSTALL that come with the source. As an end-user, either you wait
fo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In the case of Steve, his problem was clearly something he could have
resolved by himself without questioning our choice of development
tool.
Well, anybody can at least question our choices. This does not mean
t
Steve Litt wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 02:01, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
Then there's the fact that some of us have dialup, and some in rural
areas are years from getting broadband. The "just upgrade your qt"
suggestion could be a day's downloading over a
Steve Litt wrote:
Yeah, that's the way to get LyX users -- tell em if they're not willing to
upgrade the very vitals of their OS so that the developers can use the latest
and greatest Qt instead of providing compatibility with a couple year old
version (Qt 4 came out summer 2005, but Qt 4.2 is
Steve Litt wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 02:01, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
Then there's the fact that some of us have dialup, and some in rural
areas are years from getting broadband. The "just upgrade your qt"
suggestion could be a day's downloading over a
JOHN CULLETON wrote:
While in the process of trying to add things like Qt4 to my Slack 12
system I managed to mung my ability to send outgoing mail. I
reinstalled on a fresh partition but I still have problems. So among
other things I am giving up on Lyx. More to the point, I am giving up
on
Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 18 February 2008 18:01, Pavel Sanda wrote:
It shouldn't be this difficult to compile LyX. It wasn't this difficult a
couple years ago.
actually this should be the job of your distro maintainers, not lyx.
I've been hearing a lot of that type of comment lately, and
JOHN CULLETON wrote:
While in the process of trying to add things like Qt4 to my Slack 12
system I managed to mung my ability to send outgoing mail. I
reinstalled on a fresh partition but I still have problems. So among
other things I am giving up on Lyx. More to the point, I am giving up
on
Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 18 February 2008 18:01, Pavel Sanda wrote:
It shouldn't be this difficult to compile LyX. It wasn't this difficult a
couple years ago.
actually this should be the job of your distro maintainers, not lyx.
I've been hearing a lot of that type of comment lately, and
JOHN CULLETON wrote:
While in the process of trying to add things like Qt4 to my Slack 12
system I managed to mung my ability to send outgoing mail. I
reinstalled on a fresh partition but I still have problems. So among
other things I am giving up on Lyx. More to the point, I am giving up
on
Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 18 February 2008 18:01, Pavel Sanda wrote:
It shouldn't be this difficult to compile LyX. It wasn't this difficult a
couple years ago.
actually this should be the job of your distro maintainers, not lyx.
I've been hearing a lot of that type of comment lately, and
Maximilian Wollner wrote:
Also, I would like to detach the
document outliner.
Did you try to drag the title bar of the outliner? I know that Mac
drawer are special but on Window and X11 you can easily detach it.
And I would like the setup to stay as it was when I
close and reopen LyX
Maximilian Wollner wrote:
Also, I would like to detach the
document outliner.
Did you try to drag the title bar of the outliner? I know that Mac
drawer are special but on Window and X11 you can easily detach it.
And I would like the setup to stay as it was when I
close and reopen LyX
Maximilian Wollner wrote:
Also, I would like to detach the
document outliner.
Did you try to drag the title bar of the outliner? I know that Mac
drawer are special but on Window and X11 you can easily detach it.
And I would like the setup to stay as it was when I
close and reopen LyX
Nicolás wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Nicolás [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When a file is closed the memory the file was using is released and
when LyX is minimized, the memory used is reduced to a minimum. That's
great! However, this is no longer true when LyX is running and I go
into and
Nicolás wrote:
I am working with 3 documents, 2 of which have plenty of formulae.
When I open the three of them, LyX uses 40Mb of RAM. If I close them,
the memory consumption reduces to about 25Mb-33Mb. When LyX has been
running for a while (and several hibernations have happened), LyX
Nicolás wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Nicolás [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When a file is closed the memory the file was using is released and
when LyX is minimized, the memory used is reduced to a minimum. That's
great! However, this is no longer true when LyX is running and I go
into and
Nicolás wrote:
I am working with 3 documents, 2 of which have plenty of formulae.
When I open the three of them, LyX uses 40Mb of RAM. If I close them,
the memory consumption reduces to about 25Mb-33Mb. When LyX has been
running for a while (and several hibernations have happened), LyX
Nicolás wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Nicolás <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
When a file is closed the memory the file was using is released and
when LyX is minimized, the memory used is reduced to a minimum. That's
great! However, this is no longer true when LyX is running and I go
into
Nicolás wrote:
I am working with 3 documents, 2 of which have plenty of formulae.
When I open the three of them, LyX uses 40Mb of RAM. If I close them,
the memory consumption reduces to about 25Mb-33Mb. When LyX has been
running for a while (and several hibernations have happened), LyX
rgheck wrote:
\bind C-apostrophe accent-acute
\bind C-S-quotedbl accent-umlaut
Note that, to get these to work, you may also need to change some
earlier bindings. In cua.bind, I had to change:
\bind ~S-M-quotedblquote-insert single
\bind ~S-C-quotedblself-insert \
to
\bind
rgheck wrote:
\bind C-apostrophe accent-acute
\bind C-S-quotedbl accent-umlaut
Note that, to get these to work, you may also need to change some
earlier bindings. In cua.bind, I had to change:
\bind ~S-M-quotedblquote-insert single
\bind ~S-C-quotedblself-insert \
to
\bind
rgheck wrote:
\bind "C-apostrophe" "accent-acute"
\bind "C-S-quotedbl" "accent-umlaut"
Note that, to get these to work, you may also need to change some
earlier bindings. In cua.bind, I had to change:
\bind "~S-M-quotedbl""quote-insert single"
\bind "~S-C-quotedbl"
shiknar wrote:
How do I promote/demote an entire branch?
Unfortunately this is not implemented. I have this in my todo list
though... maybe I'll implement it for 1.6. But I don't think I'll have
time; this is no difficult stuff if someone wants to volunteer...
On the GUI side, I am thinking
shiknar wrote:
How do I promote/demote an entire branch?
Unfortunately this is not implemented. I have this in my todo list
though... maybe I'll implement it for 1.6. But I don't think I'll have
time; this is no difficult stuff if someone wants to volunteer...
On the GUI side, I am thinking
shiknar wrote:
How do I promote/demote an entire branch?
Unfortunately this is not implemented. I have this in my todo list
though... maybe I'll implement it for 1.6. But I don't think I'll have
time; this is no difficult stuff if someone wants to volunteer...
On the GUI side, I am thinking
Milen Ivanov wrote:
Dear Abdel,
I'd be interested in a more detailed comparison about the speed.
It is mostly my general feeling, but I have collected some data for a
rather arbitrary example.
1/ I run Linux F8 on laptop with Intel 1.7GHz and XP on Intel 1GHz (both
32bit, of course). Now,
Milen Ivanov wrote:
Dear Abdel,
I'd be interested in a more detailed comparison about the speed.
It is mostly my general feeling, but I have collected some data for a
rather arbitrary example.
1/ I run Linux F8 on laptop with Intel 1.7GHz and XP on Intel 1GHz (both
32bit, of course). Now,
Milen Ivanov wrote:
Dear Abdel,
I'd be interested in a more detailed comparison about the speed.
It is mostly my general feeling, but I have collected some data for a
rather arbitrary example.
1/ I run Linux F8 on laptop with Intel 1.7GHz and XP on Intel 1GHz (both
32bit, of course). Now,
Tobias Krause wrote:
This is weird and something I cannot reproduce under Windows. Maybe it
is a bug of Qt under X11?
It does not seem to be a X11 bug: I use windows (Vista) and LyX 1.5.3
Really? Then it might be a bug in Qt under Vista as I use XP, or maybe
it is a bug of Vista :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
rgheck wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should Alt-space work on windows to access the drowp down list
that lets you select paragraph style?
On Linux, it's Alt-P, space.
Also in Windows. In Windows, alt-space opens
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Tobias Krause wrote:
This is weird and something I cannot reproduce under Windows. Maybe
it is a bug of Qt under X11?
It does not seem to be a X11 bug: I use windows (Vista) and LyX 1.5.3
Really? Then it might be a bug in Qt under Vista as I
Ryan Cross wrote:
Yes, I meant in the Child Document Dialog (though there are other dialogs
for inserting files that might benefit from a similar function).
I have created this issue -
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4475please let me know if it
is insufficient.
It is, thanks. I've
Tobias Krause wrote:
This is weird and something I cannot reproduce under Windows. Maybe it
is a bug of Qt under X11?
It does not seem to be a X11 bug: I use windows (Vista) and LyX 1.5.3
Really? Then it might be a bug in Qt under Vista as I use XP, or maybe
it is a bug of Vista :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
rgheck wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should Alt-space work on windows to access the drowp down list
that lets you select paragraph style?
On Linux, it's Alt-P, space.
Also in Windows. In Windows, alt-space opens
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Tobias Krause wrote:
This is weird and something I cannot reproduce under Windows. Maybe
it is a bug of Qt under X11?
It does not seem to be a X11 bug: I use windows (Vista) and LyX 1.5.3
Really? Then it might be a bug in Qt under Vista as I
Ryan Cross wrote:
Yes, I meant in the Child Document Dialog (though there are other dialogs
for inserting files that might benefit from a similar function).
I have created this issue -
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4475please let me know if it
is insufficient.
It is, thanks. I've
Tobias Krause wrote:
This is weird and something I cannot reproduce under Windows. Maybe it
is a bug of Qt under X11?
It does not seem to be a X11 bug: I use windows (Vista) and LyX 1.5.3
Really? Then it might be a bug in Qt under Vista as I use XP, or maybe
it is a bug of Vista :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
rgheck wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Should Alt-space work on windows to access the drowp down list
that lets > you select paragraph style?
>
On Linux, it's Alt-P, space.
Also in Windows. In Windows, alt-space
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Tobias Krause wrote:
This is weird and something I cannot reproduce under Windows. Maybe
it is a bug of Qt under X11?
It does not seem to be a X11 bug: I use windows (Vista) and LyX 1.5.3
Really? Then it might be a bug in Qt under Vista as I
Ryan Cross wrote:
Yes, I meant in the Child Document Dialog (though there are other dialogs
for inserting files that might benefit from a similar function).
I have created this issue -
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4475please let me know if it
is insufficient.
It is, thanks. I've
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !
Since 1.5 version (if i remember well) I've a lot of problem with the keyboard
shortcuts.
I mean, I use a lot of shortcut for math symbol, and when I type too quickly, I
get a menu (as example, alt-m-f will give alt-f)
You should try 'Alt-m f', i.e. make sure to
Tobias Krause wrote:
I mean, I use a lot of shortcut for math symbol, and when I type too
quickly, I
get a menu (as example, alt-m-f will give alt-f)
I have a similar problem trying e.g. to insert a footnote via Alt-i f:
* if I type Alt-i-f too fast it ends up like Alt-f
* if a type
Ryan Cross wrote:
Not sure if this would be the best place to post this, but it dawned on me
today that it would be really useful if I could have an option in the insert
file dialog box to create a new file,
You mean in the 'Child Document' dialog right?
instead of just browsing for an
Ryan Cross wrote:
HI,
I decided to upgrade to 1.5.3 today (windows) and tried working with a file
that has several child documents included. When trying to view the pdf (and
thus opening all the child docs), I am getting an error that the child docs
have a different text class than the parent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !
Since 1.5 version (if i remember well) I've a lot of problem with the keyboard
shortcuts.
I mean, I use a lot of shortcut for math symbol, and when I type too quickly, I
get a menu (as example, alt-m-f will give alt-f)
You should try 'Alt-m f', i.e. make sure to
Tobias Krause wrote:
I mean, I use a lot of shortcut for math symbol, and when I type too
quickly, I
get a menu (as example, alt-m-f will give alt-f)
I have a similar problem trying e.g. to insert a footnote via Alt-i f:
* if I type Alt-i-f too fast it ends up like Alt-f
* if a type
Ryan Cross wrote:
Not sure if this would be the best place to post this, but it dawned on me
today that it would be really useful if I could have an option in the insert
file dialog box to create a new file,
You mean in the 'Child Document' dialog right?
instead of just browsing for an
Ryan Cross wrote:
HI,
I decided to upgrade to 1.5.3 today (windows) and tried working with a file
that has several child documents included. When trying to view the pdf (and
thus opening all the child docs), I am getting an error that the child docs
have a different text class than the parent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !
Since 1.5 version (if i remember well) I've a lot of problem with the keyboard
shortcuts.
I mean, I use a lot of shortcut for math symbol, and when I type too quickly, I
get a menu (as example, alt-m-f will give alt-f)
You should try 'Alt-m f', i.e. make sure to
Tobias Krause wrote:
I mean, I use a lot of shortcut for math symbol, and when I type too
quickly, I
get a menu (as example, alt-m-f will give alt-f)
I have a similar problem trying e.g. to insert a footnote via Alt-i f:
* if I type Alt-i-f too fast it ends up like Alt-f
* if a type
Ryan Cross wrote:
Not sure if this would be the best place to post this, but it dawned on me
today that it would be really useful if I could have an option in the insert
file dialog box to create a new file,
You mean in the 'Child Document' dialog right?
instead of just browsing for an
Ryan Cross wrote:
HI,
I decided to upgrade to 1.5.3 today (windows) and tried working with a file
that has several child documents included. When trying to view the pdf (and
thus opening all the child docs), I am getting an error that the child docs
have a different text class than the parent
Hellmut Weber wrote:
Hi all,
I'm also a great fan of outlining serious texts and have also made some
experiences with kdissert (being a fan of MindMaps still much longer
than of any advanced text system).
OTOH I'm using LyX-1.5.3 now for quite a while and am VERY content for
my (restricted)
Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 31 December 2007 05:11, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
So why don't you use LyX-1.5 directly then? Or more specifically what is
missing in LyX outlining facilities?
He Abdel,
I haven't yet used 1.5, but when I do I'm pretty sure I'll find one thing
missing in its
Hellmut Weber wrote:
Hi all,
I'm also a great fan of outlining serious texts and have also made some
experiences with kdissert (being a fan of MindMaps still much longer
than of any advanced text system).
OTOH I'm using LyX-1.5.3 now for quite a while and am VERY content for
my (restricted)
Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 31 December 2007 05:11, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
So why don't you use LyX-1.5 directly then? Or more specifically what is
missing in LyX outlining facilities?
He Abdel,
I haven't yet used 1.5, but when I do I'm pretty sure I'll find one thing
missing in its
Hellmut Weber wrote:
Hi all,
I'm also a great fan of outlining serious texts and have also made some
experiences with kdissert (being a fan of MindMaps still much longer
than of any advanced text system).
OTOH I'm using LyX-1.5.3 now for quite a while and am VERY content for
my (restricted)
Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 31 December 2007 05:11, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
So why don't you use LyX-1.5 directly then? Or more specifically what is
missing in LyX outlining facilities?
He Abdel,
I haven't yet used 1.5, but when I do I'm pretty sure I'll find one thing
missing in its
Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
For the first time I've gone beyond book outlining in VO (VimOutliner) and am
actually writing the book (via body text) in VO. What this does is eliminate
the artificial demarkation between outlining and writing.
It's very possible, and in fact quite likely, that
Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
For the first time I've gone beyond book outlining in VO (VimOutliner) and am
actually writing the book (via body text) in VO. What this does is eliminate
the artificial demarkation between outlining and writing.
It's very possible, and in fact quite likely, that
Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
For the first time I've gone beyond book outlining in VO (VimOutliner) and am
actually writing the book (via body text) in VO. What this does is eliminate
the artificial demarkation between outlining and writing.
It's very possible, and in fact quite likely, that
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:30:17PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hi Abdel,
Ahhh! at last a (good) report about the increased speed in 1.5.3! You're
very welcome.
the speed problems are still a very weird problem I can hardly reproduce.
Yesterday it occured
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:30:17PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hi Abdel,
Ahhh! at last a (good) report about the increased speed in 1.5.3! You're
very welcome.
the speed problems are still a very weird problem I can hardly reproduce.
Yesterday it occured
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:30:17PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hi Abdel,
Ahhh! at last a (good) report about the increased speed in 1.5.3! You're
very welcome.
the speed problems are still a very weird problem I can hardly reproduce.
Yesterday it occured
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
I've personally been experimenting with all the distros I can.
Currently I'm on Slackware, but qt4 failed to build so I haven't been
able to get LyX on yet. I also have an iBook running Debian Etch with
1.5.3. I must say too that 1.5.3 has GREATLY increased the typing
speed
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
I've personally been experimenting with all the distros I can.
Currently I'm on Slackware, but qt4 failed to build so I haven't been
able to get LyX on yet. I also have an iBook running Debian Etch with
1.5.3. I must say too that 1.5.3 has GREATLY increased the typing
speed
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
I've personally been experimenting with all the distros I can.
Currently I'm on Slackware, but qt4 failed to build so I haven't been
able to get LyX on yet. I also have an iBook running Debian Etch with
1.5.3. I must say too that 1.5.3 has GREATLY increased the typing
speed
Faith Anne Scott wrote:
I don't have that menu. Under Tools, all I have is Spellchecker, Count
Words, and TeX Information.
If that is the case then we have a bigger problem with your installation
and I'm afraid I cannot help you much. I'll let the MacOS experts
comment on this.
Please try
Jens Noeckel wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote:
Hi,
on Mac OS X 10.4 with LyX 1.5.3 (Intel), text input in the main window
slows down to a crawl when editing a large document while at the same
time the cross-reference window is left open. It's not noticeable with
small
Jens Noeckel wrote:
On Dec 26, 2007, at 12:56 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jens Noeckel wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote:
Hi,
on Mac OS X 10.4 with LyX 1.5.3 (Intel), text input in the main
window slows down to a crawl when editing a large document while at
the same
Faith Anne Scott wrote:
I don't have that menu. Under Tools, all I have is Spellchecker, Count
Words, and TeX Information.
If that is the case then we have a bigger problem with your installation
and I'm afraid I cannot help you much. I'll let the MacOS experts
comment on this.
Please try
Jens Noeckel wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote:
Hi,
on Mac OS X 10.4 with LyX 1.5.3 (Intel), text input in the main window
slows down to a crawl when editing a large document while at the same
time the cross-reference window is left open. It's not noticeable with
small
Jens Noeckel wrote:
On Dec 26, 2007, at 12:56 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jens Noeckel wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote:
Hi,
on Mac OS X 10.4 with LyX 1.5.3 (Intel), text input in the main
window slows down to a crawl when editing a large document while at
the same
Faith Anne Scott wrote:
I don't have that menu. Under Tools, all I have is Spellchecker, Count
Words, and TeX Information.
If that is the case then we have a bigger problem with your installation
and I'm afraid I cannot help you much. I'll let the MacOS experts
comment on this.
Please try
Jens Noeckel wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote:
Hi,
on Mac OS X 10.4 with LyX 1.5.3 (Intel), text input in the main window
slows down to a crawl when editing a large document while at the same
time the cross-reference window is left open. It's not noticeable with
small
Jens Noeckel wrote:
On Dec 26, 2007, at 12:56 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jens Noeckel wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote:
Hi,
on Mac OS X 10.4 with LyX 1.5.3 (Intel), text input in the main
window slows down to a crawl when editing a large document while at
the same
Faith Anne Scott wrote:
Hi all! Sorry for the dumb question, but here goes...
My installation of LyX says it doesn't know how to write PDF files - what do
I need to do?
Try the menu Tools - Reconfigure and then restart.
Abdel.
Faith Anne Scott wrote:
Hi all! Sorry for the dumb question, but here goes...
My installation of LyX says it doesn't know how to write PDF files - what do
I need to do?
Try the menu Tools - Reconfigure and then restart.
Abdel.
Faith Anne Scott wrote:
Hi all! Sorry for the dumb question, but here goes...
My installation of LyX says it doesn't know how to write PDF files - what do
I need to do?
Try the menu "Tools -> Reconfigure" and then restart.
Abdel.
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
Hi LyX folks,
On a longer train journey I had the opportunity to actually do some work
with LyX on my new Mac. While doing so, I observed a couple of issues.
Some of them might be related to the fact that I am still using it in a
very Windows-like way, especially with
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
Hi LyX folks,
On a longer train journey I had the opportunity to actually do some work
with LyX on my new Mac. While doing so, I observed a couple of issues.
Some of them might be related to the fact that I am still using it in a
very Windows-like way, especially with
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
Hi LyX folks,
On a longer train journey I had the opportunity to actually do some work
with LyX on my new Mac. While doing so, I observed a couple of issues.
Some of them might be related to the fact that I am still using it in a
very Windows-like way, especially with
Christopher Reeve wrote:
Hi,
I'm using LyX 1.52 on a mac os 10.4.
On the wiki it says that with version 1.5 I should be able to have
more than one view of the same buffer.
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX15#toc3
This would be very useful to me. Could anyone tell me how to do this?
File
Christopher Reeve wrote:
Thanks,
Very clever, just maybe not that intuitive.
Well, it is in line with Firefox for example. But I would personally
prefer to put it in a new Window menu like in MSWord. What would you
suggest?
I guess it will all change again with the next big updates in 1.6.
Christopher Reeve wrote:
Yes, I guess it is sort of in line with Firefox. Only with Firefox you
have literally a new window where you can have a new set of tabs. What
LyX is actually doing is cloning the current window, rather than
creating a new one which no other software I know is able to
Christopher Reeve wrote:
Hi,
I'm using LyX 1.52 on a mac os 10.4.
On the wiki it says that with version 1.5 I should be able to have
more than one view of the same buffer.
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX15#toc3
This would be very useful to me. Could anyone tell me how to do this?
File
Christopher Reeve wrote:
Thanks,
Very clever, just maybe not that intuitive.
Well, it is in line with Firefox for example. But I would personally
prefer to put it in a new Window menu like in MSWord. What would you
suggest?
I guess it will all change again with the next big updates in 1.6.
Christopher Reeve wrote:
Yes, I guess it is sort of in line with Firefox. Only with Firefox you
have literally a new window where you can have a new set of tabs. What
LyX is actually doing is cloning the current window, rather than
creating a new one which no other software I know is able to
Christopher Reeve wrote:
Hi,
I'm using LyX 1.52 on a mac os 10.4.
On the wiki it says that with version 1.5 I should be able to have
more than one view of the same buffer.
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX15#toc3
This would be very useful to me. Could anyone tell me how to do this?
File
Christopher Reeve wrote:
Thanks,
Very clever, just maybe not that intuitive.
Well, it is in line with Firefox for example. But I would personally
prefer to put it in a new Window menu like in MSWord. What would you
suggest?
I guess it will all change again with the next big updates in 1.6.
Christopher Reeve wrote:
Yes, I guess it is sort of in line with Firefox. Only with Firefox you
have literally a new window where you can have a new set of tabs. What
LyX is actually doing is cloning the current window, rather than
creating a new one which no other software I know is able to
1101 - 1200 of 1683 matches
Mail list logo
