Dear list,
I was wondering if any of you has had to do this before, and has maybe
programmed a script or something to automate it: I need to look for all
descriptions in a file and insert an index entry with the described item
as text.
Thanks,
Manolo
But that does not save me from going description by description adding
the glossary entry manually, does it?
Manolo
rgheck escribió:
On 01/25/2010 11:56 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Dear list,
I was wondering if any of you has had to do this before, and has
maybe programmed a script
OK, thanks, I'll try that.
M
rgheck escribió:
On 01/25/2010 02:37 PM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
But that does not save me from going description by description
adding the glossary entry manually, does it?
You could redefine the description environment in such a way that it
handled
Dear list,
I was wondering if any of you has had to do this before, and has maybe
programmed a script or something to automate it: I need to look for all
descriptions in a file and insert an index entry with the described item
as text.
Thanks,
Manolo
But that does not save me from going description by description adding
the glossary entry manually, does it?
Manolo
rgheck escribió:
On 01/25/2010 11:56 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Dear list,
I was wondering if any of you has had to do this before, and has
maybe programmed a script
OK, thanks, I'll try that.
M
rgheck escribió:
On 01/25/2010 02:37 PM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
But that does not save me from going description by description
adding the glossary entry manually, does it?
You could redefine the description environment in such a way that it
handled
Dear list,
I was wondering if any of you has had to do this before, and has maybe
programmed a script or something to automate it: I need to look for all
descriptions in a file and insert an index entry with the described item
as text.
Thanks,
Manolo
But that does not save me from going description by description adding
the glossary entry manually, does it?
Manolo
rgheck escribió:
On 01/25/2010 11:56 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Dear list,
I was wondering if any of you has had to do this before, and has
maybe programmed a script
OK, thanks, I'll try that.
M
rgheck escribió:
On 01/25/2010 02:37 PM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
But that does not save me from going description by description
adding the glossary entry manually, does it?
You could redefine the description environment in such a way that it
handled
Of course, convert to txt and then count. That makes sense :)
Pavel Sanda escribió:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Manolo Martínez wrote:
I use Linux, yes. If you could provide that script, or a pointer where to
find it, it would be great :)
lyx -e text your_master.lyx
wc -w
Of course, convert to txt and then count. That makes sense :)
Pavel Sanda escribió:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Manolo Martínez wrote:
I use Linux, yes. If you could provide that script, or a pointer where to
find it, it would be great :)
lyx -e text your_master.lyx
wc -w
Of course, convert to txt and then count. That makes sense :)
Pavel Sanda escribió:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Manolo Martínez wrote:
I use Linux, yes. If you could provide that script, or a pointer where to
find it, it would be great :)
lyx -e text your_master.lyx
wc -w
I'm working with a long document in multiple files, and I can tell you
that most things do work very well:
* Labels from any file may be used everywhere
* You only need to include the bibliography once, etc.
About ortography, I guess one of the points of having multiple files is
being able to
I use Linux, yes. If you could provide that script, or a pointer where
to find it, it would be great :)
Manolo
Steve Litt escribió:
On Friday 08 January 2010 10:22:38 Manolo Martínez wrote:
About ortography, I guess one of the points of having multiple files is
being able to do
I'm working with a long document in multiple files, and I can tell you
that most things do work very well:
* Labels from any file may be used everywhere
* You only need to include the bibliography once, etc.
About ortography, I guess one of the points of having multiple files is
being able to
I use Linux, yes. If you could provide that script, or a pointer where
to find it, it would be great :)
Manolo
Steve Litt escribió:
On Friday 08 January 2010 10:22:38 Manolo Martínez wrote:
About ortography, I guess one of the points of having multiple files is
being able to do
I'm working with a long document in multiple files, and I can tell you
that most things do work very well:
* Labels from any file may be used everywhere
* You only need to include the bibliography once, etc.
About ortography, I guess one of the points of having multiple files is
being able to
I use Linux, yes. If you could provide that script, or a pointer where
to find it, it would be great :)
Manolo
Steve Litt escribió:
On Friday 08 January 2010 10:22:38 Manolo Martínez wrote:
About ortography, I guess one of the points of having multiple files is
being able to do
Why, of course. What happens when you try?
Horst Jurkat escribió:
Is it possible to open several files with lyx as same time?
Thanks in advance.
Horst Jurkat
Dear Horst, please remember to copy the list in your replies.
I know that i con open several files. But i do not want to open
singulary one file after the other. I have to open hundreds of files
which are in the same folder and search a possivility to open them
with one command (I have to
I'm sorry, I know next to nothing about Windows. The Python script I'm
attaching does what you need, maybe it helps?
Maybe someone else can provide more relevant help.
Cheers,
Manolo
Thanks. I have use the commands for a singel lyx-document and it
funktioned. But i do not know how i can
Why, of course. What happens when you try?
Horst Jurkat escribió:
Is it possible to open several files with lyx as same time?
Thanks in advance.
Horst Jurkat
Dear Horst, please remember to copy the list in your replies.
I know that i con open several files. But i do not want to open
singulary one file after the other. I have to open hundreds of files
which are in the same folder and search a possivility to open them
with one command (I have to
I'm sorry, I know next to nothing about Windows. The Python script I'm
attaching does what you need, maybe it helps?
Maybe someone else can provide more relevant help.
Cheers,
Manolo
Thanks. I have use the commands for a singel lyx-document and it
funktioned. But i do not know how i can
Why, of course. What happens when you try?
Horst Jurkat escribió:
Is it possible to open several files with lyx as same time?
Thanks in advance.
Horst Jurkat
Dear Horst, please remember to copy the list in your replies.
I know that i con open several files. But i do not want to open
singulary one file after the other. I have to open hundreds of files
which are in the same folder and search a possivility to open them
with one command (I have to
I'm sorry, I know next to nothing about Windows. The Python script I'm
attaching does what you need, maybe it helps?
Maybe someone else can provide more relevant help.
Cheers,
Manolo
Thanks. I have use the commands for a singel lyx-document and it
funktioned. But i do not know how i can
A similar thing happened to me some time ago and it turned out that I
was ammending not the bibtex file that LyX was using, but a backup.
I know I'm sillier than many, but, just in case, make sure you are
ammending the bibtex file LyX is using :)
Manolo
danielpferreira escribió:
Hi!
I'm a
A similar thing happened to me some time ago and it turned out that I
was ammending not the bibtex file that LyX was using, but a backup.
I know I'm sillier than many, but, just in case, make sure you are
ammending the bibtex file LyX is using :)
Manolo
danielpferreira escribió:
Hi!
I'm a
A similar thing happened to me some time ago and it turned out that I
was ammending not the bibtex file that LyX was using, but a backup.
I know I'm sillier than many, but, just in case, make sure you are
ammending the bibtex file LyX is using :)
Manolo
danielpferreira escribió:
Hi!
I'm a
Dear list,
I'm sorry I'm asking something that has been asked before but I was
hoping a way to do what I want to do has become available in the
meantime: is there anyway to break an equation in two lines in a place
that is inside brackets? I mean something like this:
a·(b + c +
d + e)
Thanks
Yes, what I wanted is in 18.1.4. Thanks, and sorry about that.
M
James C. Sutherland escribió:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 5:56 AM, Manolo Martí nez wrote:
is there anyway to break an equation in two lines in a place
that is inside brackets? I mean something like this:
a·(b + c +
d + e)
Dear list,
I'm sorry I'm asking something that has been asked before but I was
hoping a way to do what I want to do has become available in the
meantime: is there anyway to break an equation in two lines in a place
that is inside brackets? I mean something like this:
a·(b + c +
d + e)
Thanks
Yes, what I wanted is in 18.1.4. Thanks, and sorry about that.
M
James C. Sutherland escribió:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 5:56 AM, Manolo Martí nez wrote:
is there anyway to break an equation in two lines in a place
that is inside brackets? I mean something like this:
a·(b + c +
d + e)
Dear list,
I'm sorry I'm asking something that has been asked before but I was
hoping a way to do what I want to do has become available in the
meantime: is there anyway to break an equation in two lines in a place
that is inside brackets? I mean something like this:
a·(b + c +
d + e)
Thanks
Yes, what I wanted is in 18.1.4. Thanks, and sorry about that.
M
James C. Sutherland escribió:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 5:56 AM, Manolo Martí nez wrote:
is there anyway to break an equation in two lines in a place
that is inside brackets? I mean something like this:
a·(b + c +
d + e)
SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
rgheck wrote:
On 11/24/2009 05:51 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Hello,
Is there an easy way in LyX to enter ordinals such as 1st, 2nd, nth?
InsertFormattingSuperscript is the easist way I know. You can also
define a custom character style to represent
SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
rgheck wrote:
On 11/24/2009 05:51 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Hello,
Is there an easy way in LyX to enter ordinals such as 1st, 2nd, nth?
InsertFormattingSuperscript is the easist way I know. You can also
define a custom character style to represent
IN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
rgheck wrote:
On 11/24/2009 05:51 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Hello,
Is there an easy way in LyX to enter ordinals such as 1st, 2nd, nth?
Insert>Formatting>Superscript is the easist way I know. You can also
define a custom cha
Hello,
Is there an easy way in LyX to enter ordinals such as 1st, 2nd, nth?
Thanks,
Manolo
Thanks, yep, that's what I was doing. Maybe creating a keyboard shortcut
for that is the solution; I'll look into how to do it.
Cheers,
M
rgheck escribió:
On 11/24/2009 05:51 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Hello,
Is there an easy way in LyX to enter ordinals such as 1st, 2nd, nth
Hello,
Is there an easy way in LyX to enter ordinals such as 1st, 2nd, nth?
Thanks,
Manolo
Thanks, yep, that's what I was doing. Maybe creating a keyboard shortcut
for that is the solution; I'll look into how to do it.
Cheers,
M
rgheck escribió:
On 11/24/2009 05:51 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Hello,
Is there an easy way in LyX to enter ordinals such as 1st, 2nd, nth
Hello,
Is there an easy way in LyX to enter ordinals such as 1st, 2nd, nth?
Thanks,
Manolo
Thanks, yep, that's what I was doing. Maybe creating a keyboard shortcut
for that is the solution; I'll look into how to do it.
Cheers,
M
rgheck escribió:
On 11/24/2009 05:51 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Hello,
Is there an easy way in LyX to enter ordinals such as 1st, 2nd, nth?
Insert
Just in case, the document in question is the LyX document, not a BibTeX
document, right?
M
Uwe Stöhr escribió:
Adam Hoffman schrieb:
I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm
having an
issue that is not common to my previous LyX installs (1.6.?) on an XP
SP3
and
Just in case, the document in question is the LyX document, not a BibTeX
document, right?
M
Uwe Stöhr escribió:
Adam Hoffman schrieb:
I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm
having an
issue that is not common to my previous LyX installs (1.6.?) on an XP
SP3
and
Just in case, the document in question is the LyX document, not a BibTeX
document, right?
M
Uwe Stöhr escribió:
Adam Hoffman schrieb:
I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm
having an
issue that is not common to my previous LyX installs (1.6.?) on an XP
SP3
and
Using Insert List BibTeX bibliography opens a dialog where you can
add your bib document, right? Why don't you add it there?
M
Manolo
Giulio escribió:
hi
I have some problems with biblatex's bibliography. Indeed when i put in ERT
\printbibliography the output is empty.
I have opened the
Using Insert List BibTeX bibliography opens a dialog where you can
add your bib document, right? Why don't you add it there?
M
Manolo
Giulio escribió:
hi
I have some problems with biblatex's bibliography. Indeed when i put in ERT
\printbibliography the output is empty.
I have opened the
Using Insert > List > BibTeX bibliography opens a dialog where you can
add your bib document, right? Why don't you add it there?
M
Manolo
Giulio escribió:
hi
I have some problems with biblatex's bibliography. Indeed when i put in ERT
\printbibliography the output is empty.
I have opened
Done: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6313
Manolo
So, let me reforumulate my suggestion with this in mind: it would be
nice if the Latex errors message box that appears contained a line
reading ... for more information, see DocumentLaTeX log.
Could you file a bug (enhancement) report at
Done: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6313
Manolo
So, let me reforumulate my suggestion with this in mind: it would be
nice if the Latex errors message box that appears contained a line
reading ... for more information, see DocumentLaTeX log.
Could you file a bug (enhancement) report at
Done: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6313
Manolo
So, let me reforumulate my suggestion with this in mind: it would be
nice if the "Latex errors" message box that appears contained a line
reading "... for more information, see Document>LaTeX log".
Could you file a bug (enhancement)
AFAIK, this is LyX's default behaviour.
Did you try with DocumentLaTeX log after a compilation already
No! I was relying on the error messages that appear after a failed
compilation. Thanks, this is very useful.
So, let me reforumulate my suggestion with this in mind: it would be
nice
AFAIK, this is LyX's default behaviour.
Did you try with DocumentLaTeX log after a compilation already
No! I was relying on the error messages that appear after a failed
compilation. Thanks, this is very useful.
So, let me reforumulate my suggestion with this in mind: it would be
nice
AFAIK, this is LyX's default behaviour.
Did you try with Document>LaTeX log after a compilation already
No! I was relying on the error messages that appear after a failed
compilation. Thanks, this is very useful.
So, let me reforumulate my suggestion with this in mind: it would be
nice
Dear list,
I am working right now with a long document that has chapters as
separate files, included in a master document. I'm having the following
problem: chapter 5 exports to pdf perfectly on its own but, when
included in the master document, this latter document does not export
-although
That's not the problem, apparently. I have moved everything to the
master document's preamble and the strange behaviour recurs. Chapter 5
compiles. Master document w/o Ch. 5 compiles, but Master document with
Ch. 5 does not.
Thanks for your help, Richard.
Manolo
rgheck escribió:
Is
Thanks for the suggestion. Surprisingly, LaTeX does compile; with a
bunch of errors in the .log, to be sure, but none of them fatal.
How can I find out what the compiler was doing when it stumbled upon the
things that LyX finds offending? The part of the .log file that seems
relevant is:
Dear list,
I am working right now with a long document that has chapters as
separate files, included in a master document. I'm having the following
problem: chapter 5 exports to pdf perfectly on its own but, when
included in the master document, this latter document does not export
-although
That's not the problem, apparently. I have moved everything to the
master document's preamble and the strange behaviour recurs. Chapter 5
compiles. Master document w/o Ch. 5 compiles, but Master document with
Ch. 5 does not.
Thanks for your help, Richard.
Manolo
rgheck escribió:
Is
Thanks for the suggestion. Surprisingly, LaTeX does compile; with a
bunch of errors in the .log, to be sure, but none of them fatal.
How can I find out what the compiler was doing when it stumbled upon the
things that LyX finds offending? The part of the .log file that seems
relevant is:
Dear list,
I am working right now with a long document that has chapters as
separate files, included in a master document. I'm having the following
problem: chapter 5 exports to pdf perfectly on its own but, when
included in the master document, this latter document does not export
-although
That's not the problem, apparently. I have moved everything to the
master document's preamble and the strange behaviour recurs. Chapter 5
compiles. Master document w/o Ch. 5 compiles, but Master document with
Ch. 5 does not.
Thanks for your help, Richard.
Manolo
rgheck escribió:
Is
Thanks for the suggestion. Surprisingly, LaTeX does compile; with a
bunch of errors in the .log, to be sure, but none of them fatal.
How can I find out what the compiler was doing when it stumbled upon the
things that LyX finds offending? The part of the .log file that seems
relevant is:
Dear list,
In a long document, is there any way to select a whole part, chapter or
section without having to drag the cursor through it?
Thanks,
Manolo
Thanks!
M
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW escribió:
In a long document, is there any way to select a whole part, chapter
or section without having to drag the cursor through it?
Not yet. But please open an enhancement request at
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
so that
Dear list,
In a long document, is there any way to select a whole part, chapter or
section without having to drag the cursor through it?
Thanks,
Manolo
Thanks!
M
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW escribió:
In a long document, is there any way to select a whole part, chapter
or section without having to drag the cursor through it?
Not yet. But please open an enhancement request at
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
so that
Dear list,
In a long document, is there any way to select a whole part, chapter or
section without having to drag the cursor through it?
Thanks,
Manolo
Thanks!
M
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW escribió:
In a long document, is there any way to select a whole part, chapter
or section without having to drag the cursor through it?
Not yet. But please open an enhancement request at
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
so that
Dear list,
There is a slightly annoying feature of the behaviour of my Lyx which, I
have just realised, may be seen as a bug. When I open a drop-down menu
-e. g., when choosing the language of a paragraph from the drop-down
list of possibilities- even if I navigate to my preferred option
That's the one I mean, yes. It's not working fine for me, though for
some reason I cannot seem to copy a screen snapshot while the menu is
displayed, so I cannot show you.
The way to replicate my problem is as follows. Open the text style
dialog, press the language drop-down menu to unfold it
Dear list,
There is a slightly annoying feature of the behaviour of my Lyx which, I
have just realised, may be seen as a bug. When I open a drop-down menu
-e. g., when choosing the language of a paragraph from the drop-down
list of possibilities- even if I navigate to my preferred option
That's the one I mean, yes. It's not working fine for me, though for
some reason I cannot seem to copy a screen snapshot while the menu is
displayed, so I cannot show you.
The way to replicate my problem is as follows. Open the text style
dialog, press the language drop-down menu to unfold it
Dear list,
There is a slightly annoying feature of the behaviour of my Lyx which, I
have just realised, may be seen as a bug. When I open a drop-down menu
-e. g., when choosing the language of a paragraph from the drop-down
list of possibilities- even if I navigate to my preferred option
That's the one I mean, yes. It's not working fine for me, though for
some reason I cannot seem to copy a screen snapshot while the menu is
displayed, so I cannot show you.
The way to replicate my problem is as follows. Open the text style
dialog, press the language drop-down menu to unfold it
What OS and Lyx version are you using?
goodkeys escribió:
Hello
I'm a noob and have just made my way through the references and tutorials of
Lyx. Now i'd like to use the Classic Thesis template found here
(http://www.soundsorange.net/resources/classic-thesis-for-lyx/) but i just
wasn't able to
What OS and Lyx version are you using?
goodkeys escribió:
Hello
I'm a noob and have just made my way through the references and tutorials of
Lyx. Now i'd like to use the Classic Thesis template found here
(http://www.soundsorange.net/resources/classic-thesis-for-lyx/) but i just
wasn't able to
What OS and Lyx version are you using?
goodkeys escribió:
Hello
I'm a noob and have just made my way through the references and tutorials of
Lyx. Now i'd like to use the Classic Thesis template found here
(http://www.soundsorange.net/resources/classic-thesis-for-lyx/) but i just
wasn't able to
OK, that can be done, indeed. But my installation does not seem to
understand \boxright. The pdf output simply shows pboxrightq where
the symbol should have been...
Manolo
Guenter Milde escribió: shows
On 2009-09-17, Manolo Martínez wrote:
I see. Reading the link below I've found out
: shows
On 2009-09-17, Manolo Martínez wrote:
I see. Reading the link below I've found out I need \boxright and
\boxleft from txfonts; but these do not appear in the equation dialogue
-although I do have txfonts installed. I cannot simply embed an ERT in
the middle of an equation, can I
OK, that can be done, indeed. But my installation does not seem to
understand \boxright. The pdf output simply shows pboxrightq where
the symbol should have been...
Manolo
Guenter Milde escribió: shows
On 2009-09-17, Manolo Martínez wrote:
I see. Reading the link below I've found out
: shows
On 2009-09-17, Manolo Martínez wrote:
I see. Reading the link below I've found out I need \boxright and
\boxleft from txfonts; but these do not appear in the equation dialogue
-although I do have txfonts installed. I cannot simply embed an ERT in
the middle of an equation, can I
OK, that can be done, indeed. But my installation does not seem to
understand \boxright. The pdf output simply shows "pboxrightq" where
the symbol should have been...
Manolo
Guenter Milde escribió: shows
On 2009-09-17, Manolo Martínez wrote:
I see. Reading the link below
: shows
On 2009-09-17, Manolo Martínez wrote:
I see. Reading the link below I've found out I need \boxright and
\boxleft from txfonts; but these do not appear in the equation dialogue
-although I do have txfonts installed. I cannot simply embed an ERT in
the middle of an equation, can I
Dear all,
Does anyone know a way to obtain the box arrow symbol that is used to
signal counterfactual conditionals in logic?
Thanks,
Manolo
, then?
Thanks!
Manolo
Paul Sutton escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manolo Martínez wrote:
Dear all,
Does anyone know a way to obtain the box arrow symbol that is used to
signal counterfactual conditionals in logic?
Thanks,
Manolo
Does this help
http://www.ucalgary.ca
Dear all,
Does anyone know a way to obtain the box arrow symbol that is used to
signal counterfactual conditionals in logic?
Thanks,
Manolo
, then?
Thanks!
Manolo
Paul Sutton escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manolo Martínez wrote:
Dear all,
Does anyone know a way to obtain the box arrow symbol that is used to
signal counterfactual conditionals in logic?
Thanks,
Manolo
Does this help
http://www.ucalgary.ca
Dear all,
Does anyone know a way to obtain the "box arrow" symbol that is used to
signal counterfactual conditionals in logic?
Thanks,
Manolo
, then?
Thanks!
Manolo
Paul Sutton escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manolo Martínez wrote:
Dear all,
Does anyone know a way to obtain the "box arrow" symbol that is used to
signal counterfactual conditionals in logic?
Thanks,
Manolo
Does this help
http://www.u
Hi,
Do you guys have opinions regarding which is the best place to add
explanations to a figure? A longish list of things such as the pointed
line means blah, and the blue square stands for blah...
The figure box in the float is too small for that -and everything you
put in there appears in
Hi,
Do you guys have opinions regarding which is the best place to add
explanations to a figure? A longish list of things such as the pointed
line means blah, and the blue square stands for blah...
The figure box in the float is too small for that -and everything you
put in there appears in
Hi,
Do you guys have opinions regarding which is the best place to add
explanations to a figure? A longish list of things such as "the pointed
line means blah, and the blue square stands for blah"...
The "figure" box in the float is too small for that -and everything you
put in there
Did you set up some more fonts or change things after the standard
installation of your TeX distribution (and which TeX distro do you use)?
It turns out I had too few fonts installed. After installing the ubuntu
package texlive-fonts-extra, the style works perfectly.
Thanks for helping
Did you set up some more fonts or change things after the standard
installation of your TeX distribution (and which TeX distro do you use)?
It turns out I had too few fonts installed. After installing the ubuntu
package texlive-fonts-extra, the style works perfectly.
Thanks for helping
Did you set up some more fonts or change things after the standard
installation of your TeX distribution (and which TeX distro do you use)?
It turns out I had too few fonts installed. After installing the ubuntu
package texlive-fonts-extra, the style works perfectly.
Thanks for helping
It most certainly is a font issue. Could you try if this happens
with every math formula,
only with sub- and superscripts,
maybe with formulae in headings or otherwise scaled?
Actually, you need no math formula for the error to show A title in an
otherwise empty file is enough. Say,
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
