I am putting together a beamer presentation in which I alternate between a
running example and the theory behind the example. How can I get this to
reflect in the slides? Ideally I'd like something like Theory to appear on
theory slides and Example on example slides. Section headings won't
I am putting together a beamer presentation in which I alternate between a
running example and the theory behind the example. How can I get this to
reflect in the slides? Ideally I'd like something like Theory to appear on
theory slides and Example on example slides. Section headings won't
I am putting together a beamer presentation in which I alternate between a
running example and the theory behind the example. How can I get this to
reflect in the slides? Ideally I'd like something like "Theory" to appear on
theory slides and "Example" on example slides. Section headings won't
Hello, is there a way to get Lyx to use seperate numbering for these
different mathematical elements. ie, instead of Theorem 1, Def 2,
Example 3, Theorem 4, etc
I want
Theorem 1, Def 1, Example 1, Theorem 2, etc
Right now I'm hacking the generated Latex file removing the [thm] in
:
Srinivas Nedunuri nedun...@cs.utexas.edu wrote
in message news:hms5hh$ju...@dough.gmane.org...
Hello, is there a way to get Lyx to use seperate numbering for these
different mathematical elements. ie, instead of Theorem 1, Def 2,
Example 3, Theorem 4, etc
I want
Theorem 1, Def 1, Example
Hello, is there a way to get Lyx to use seperate numbering for these
different mathematical elements. ie, instead of Theorem 1, Def 2,
Example 3, Theorem 4, etc
I want
Theorem 1, Def 1, Example 1, Theorem 2, etc
Right now I'm hacking the generated Latex file removing the [thm] in
:
Srinivas Nedunuri nedun...@cs.utexas.edu wrote
in message news:hms5hh$ju...@dough.gmane.org...
Hello, is there a way to get Lyx to use seperate numbering for these
different mathematical elements. ie, instead of Theorem 1, Def 2,
Example 3, Theorem 4, etc
I want
Theorem 1, Def 1, Example
Hello, is there a way to get Lyx to use seperate numbering for these
different mathematical elements. ie, instead of Theorem 1, Def 2,
Example 3, Theorem 4, etc
I want
Theorem 1, Def 1, Example 1, Theorem 2, etc
Right now I'm hacking the generated Latex file removing the [thm] in
:
"Srinivas Nedunuri" <nedun...@cs.utexas.edu> wrote
in message news:hms5hh$ju...@dough.gmane.org...
> Hello, is there a way to get Lyx to use seperate numbering for these
> different mathematical elements. ie, instead of Theorem 1, Def 2,
> Example 3, Theorem 4, etc
>
re. my earlier message about trying to start lyx 1.6.1... it finally
started. Phew that was a long start up delay. Anyway all looks good. Sorry
for the bother
re. my earlier message about trying to start lyx 1.6.1... it finally
started. Phew that was a long start up delay. Anyway all looks good. Sorry
for the bother
re. my earlier message about trying to start lyx 1.6.1... it finally
started. Phew that was a long start up delay. Anyway all looks good. Sorry
for the bother
Hello, is there a way of shrinking the overall size of a math formula,
either displayed or inline? I am trying to stay within a page limit for a
paper, and I could do with shrinking the formulas (as they would appear in
the final output - I don't care too much what size they look in Lyx - so if
Hello, is there a way of shrinking the overall size of a math formula,
either displayed or inline? I am trying to stay within a page limit for a
paper, and I could do with shrinking the formulas (as they would appear in
the final output - I don't care too much what size they look in Lyx - so if
Hello, is there a way of shrinking the overall size of a math formula,
either displayed or inline? I am trying to stay within a page limit for a
paper, and I could do with shrinking the formulas (as they would appear in
the final output - I don't care too much what size they look in Lyx - so if
I used to have no problem setting my documents to “article (AMS)” but with
1.5.2 I get an error message saying that the AMS article class layout isn’t
usable, probably because a latex class is missing. I would check for the
missing class if I knew where to look. How does Lyx know where to find
I used to have no problem setting my documents to “article (AMS)” but with
1.5.2 I get an error message saying that the AMS article class layout isn’t
usable, probably because a latex class is missing. I would check for the
missing class if I knew where to look. How does Lyx know where to find
I used to have no problem setting my documents to “article (AMS)” but with
1.5.2 I get an error message saying that the AMS article class layout isn’t
usable, probably because a latex class is missing. I would check for the
missing class if I knew where to look. How does Lyx know where to find
-Original Message-
From: Richard Heck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 1:11 PM
To: Srinivas Nedunuri
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: problem adding a class/layout
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
Hello, I am running Lyx 1.4.3 on XP. I need to format
-Original Message-
From: Richard Heck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 1:11 PM
To: Srinivas Nedunuri
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: problem adding a class/layout
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
Hello, I am running Lyx 1.4.3 on XP. I need to format
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Heck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 1:11 PM
> To: Srinivas Nedunuri
> Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Subject: Re: problem adding a class/layout
>
> Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
> > Hello, I am r
Hello, I am running Lyx 1.4.3 on XP. I need to format a paper (by Monday!)
using the sig-alternate style. I have placed sig-alternate.cls in the Tex
distribution and added sig-alternate.layout to both my local lyx folder and
to the main lyx folder (..LyX 1.4.3-5\Resources\layouts). I also ran
Hello, I am running Lyx 1.4.3 on XP. I need to format a paper (by Monday!)
using the sig-alternate style. I have placed sig-alternate.cls in the Tex
distribution and added sig-alternate.layout to both my local lyx folder and
to the main lyx folder (..LyX 1.4.3-5\Resources\layouts). I also ran
Hello, I am running Lyx 1.4.3 on XP. I need to format a paper (by Monday!)
using the sig-alternate style. I have placed sig-alternate.cls in the Tex
distribution and added sig-alternate.layout to both my local lyx folder and
to the main lyx folder (..LyX 1.4.3-5\Resources\layouts). I also ran
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.13/998 - Release Date: 9/10/2007
8:48 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.13/998 - Release Date: 9/10/2007
8:48 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.13/998 - Release Date: 9/10/2007
8:48 AM
OK I installed the latest version (Lyx 1.4.3) but unf i still can't do what
i was originally trying to do, and the reason why i upgraded :-(
That is view the DraftDVI or DVI. When I try to view the DraftDVI i get an
error message:
File does not exist: temp dir/filename.
For some reason, its
./lyx.exe -dbg any/info/etc..
produces no debug output at all
I finally fixed this problem by commenting out an earlier binding to C-g
that was in cua.bind. So despite what the manual says, and the trace output
below says, later bindings do NOT necessarily override earlier ones. They
simply screw things up!
Srinivas Nedunuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
OK I installed the latest version (Lyx 1.4.3) but unf i still can't do what
i was originally trying to do, and the reason why i upgraded :-(
That is view the DraftDVI or DVI. When I try to view the DraftDVI i get an
error message:
File does not exist: temp dir/filename.
For some reason, its
./lyx.exe -dbg any/info/etc..
produces no debug output at all
I finally fixed this problem by commenting out an earlier binding to C-g
that was in cua.bind. So despite what the manual says, and the trace output
below says, later bindings do NOT necessarily override earlier ones. They
simply screw things up!
Srinivas Nedunuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
OK I installed the latest version (Lyx 1.4.3) but unf i still can't do what
i was originally trying to do, and the reason why i upgraded :-(
That is view the DraftDVI or DVI. When I try to view the DraftDVI i get an
error message:
File does not exist: /filename.
For some reason, its looking
./lyx.exe -dbg any/info/etc..
produces no debug output at all
I finally fixed this problem by commenting out an earlier binding to C-g
that was in cua.bind. So despite what the manual says, and the trace output
below says, later bindings do NOT necessarily override earlier ones. They
simply screw things up!
"Srinivas Nedunuri" <[EMAIL PROT
I am running Lyx 1.4.1 on Win XP.
I added the bind file sciword.bind to the bind files that cua.bind imports,
for the purpose of getting the key bindings for the greek letters that are
in that file. These all start with Ctrl G (eg. alpha is C-g a). However,
when I try to type this letter
I am running Lyx 1.4.1 on Win XP.
I added the bind file sciword.bind to the bind files that cua.bind imports,
for the purpose of getting the key bindings for the greek letters that are
in that file. These all start with Ctrl G (eg. alpha is C-g a). However,
when I try to type this letter
I am running Lyx 1.4.1 on Win XP.
I added the bind file sciword.bind to the bind files that cua.bind imports,
for the purpose of getting the key bindings for the greek letters that are
in that file. These all start with Ctrl G (eg. alpha is C-g a). However,
when I try to type this letter
Hello, I am running Lyx 1.4.1 on Windows XP. I am unable to view the
DraftDVI as suggested in the Tutorial. When I select View | DraftDVI I get
No information for viewing Draft DVI. Selecting View | PDF (either option)
produces similar messages.
If I try File | Export | DraftDVI I
get an error
..besides typing in some ERT?
Hello, I am running Lyx 1.4.1 on Windows XP. I am unable to view the
DraftDVI as suggested in the Tutorial. When I select View | DraftDVI I get
No information for viewing Draft DVI. Selecting View | PDF (either option)
produces similar messages.
If I try File | Export | DraftDVI I
get an error
..besides typing in some ERT?
Hello, I am running Lyx 1.4.1 on Windows XP. I am unable to view the
DraftDVI as suggested in the Tutorial. When I select View | DraftDVI I get
"No information for viewing Draft DVI". Selecting View | PDF (either option)
produces similar messages.
If I try File | Export | DraftDVI I
get an error
..besides typing in some ERT?
Hello, I am running Lyx 1.4.1 on Windows. The math symbols and greek letters
seem to be
all topsy turvy. e.g. I select phi from the math panel and I get a mu, or
I select Sigma and I get a (C) symbol. etc. Obviously my fonts are messed up
but how do i fix this? I see nothing unusual in the
Hello, I am running Lyx 1.4.1 on Windows. The math symbols and greek letters
seem to be
all topsy turvy. e.g. I select phi from the math panel and I get a mu, or
I select Sigma and I get a (C) symbol. etc. Obviously my fonts are messed up
but how do i fix this? I see nothing unusual in the
Hello, I am running Lyx 1.4.1 on Windows. The math symbols and greek letters
seem to be
all topsy turvy. e.g. I select phi from the math panel and I get a mu, or
I select Sigma and I get a (C) symbol. etc. Obviously my fonts are messed up
but how do i fix this? I see nothing unusual in the
hello, I downloaded the source for lyx lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz from
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/ but I see no source code. The config
directory has a bunch of .m4 files, and a handful of scripts. what have
i missed? I'm sure its something dumb...
thanks
I'm sorry but I dont see a configure. Nor do I see a INSTALL.scons you
referred to in your previous email. Also there is no src directory
Bo Peng wrote:
To build lyx, you should install
automake, autoconf, run autogen.sh, configure, make and make install;
Sorry, I just realize that
hello, I downloaded the source for lyx lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz from
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/ but I see no source code. The config
directory has a bunch of .m4 files, and a handful of scripts. what have
i missed? I'm sure its something dumb...
thanks
I'm sorry but I dont see a configure. Nor do I see a INSTALL.scons you
referred to in your previous email. Also there is no src directory
Bo Peng wrote:
To build lyx, you should install
automake, autoconf, run autogen.sh, configure, make and make install;
Sorry, I just realize that
hello, I downloaded the source for lyx lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz from
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/ but I see no source code. The config
directory has a bunch of .m4 files, and a handful of scripts. what have
i missed? I'm sure its something dumb...
thanks
I'm sorry but I dont see a "configure". Nor do I see a INSTALL.scons you
referred to in your previous email. Also there is no src directory
Bo Peng wrote:
To build lyx, you should install
automake, autoconf, run autogen.sh, configure, make and make install;
Sorry, I just realize that
hello, I am having trouble compiling the latex file generated by lyx. the
latex processor seems to try and iterate over the file several times, and in
the end produces some gibberish
The culprit seems to be the following command:
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
When I remove this command,
hello, I am having trouble compiling the latex file generated by lyx. the
latex processor seems to try and iterate over the file several times, and in
the end produces some gibberish
The culprit seems to be the following command:
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
When I remove this command,
hello, I am having trouble compiling the latex file generated by lyx. the
latex processor seems to try and iterate over the file several times, and in
the end produces some gibberish
The culprit seems to be the following command:
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
When I remove this command,
I tried exporting my lyx file as a latex file using File | Export | Latex.
It appears to be carrying out the export, at least according to the status
buffer, but I am unable to locate the file! Its not in the same directory. I
looked in the lyx/tmp directory, and while there appear to be old
I tried exporting my lyx file as a latex file using File | Export | Latex.
It appears to be carrying out the export, at least according to the status
buffer, but I am unable to locate the file! Its not in the same directory. I
looked in the lyx/tmp directory, and while there appear to be old
I tried exporting my lyx file as a latex file using File | Export | Latex.
It appears to be carrying out the export, at least according to the status
buffer, but I am unable to locate the file! Its not in the same directory. I
looked in the lyx/tmp directory, and while there appear to be old
Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
I did notice that under converters, there was no converter for Lyx to
Dvi,
in fact anything to Dvi...which might be the source of the problem
though
I'm baffled as to how it disappeared
Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
I did notice that under converters, there was no converter for Lyx to
Dvi,
in fact anything to Dvi...which might be the source of the problem
though
I'm baffled as to how it disappeared
"Paul A. Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
> > I did notice that under converters, there was no converter for Lyx to
Dvi,
> > in fact anything to Dvi...which might be the source of the problem
t
hello, this sounds really odd, but a variety of View options that were
previously available (in particular DVI) in Lyx are no longer available. The
only one that is available is pdflatex (and even that produces an error
message). The only change I made since those options used to be available
was
I did notice that under converters, there was no converter for Lyx to Dvi,
in fact anything to Dvi...which might be the source of the problem though
I'm baffled as to how it disappeared if indeed there ought to be one
Srinivas Nedunuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED
hello, this sounds really odd, but a variety of View options that were
previously available (in particular DVI) in Lyx are no longer available. The
only one that is available is pdflatex (and even that produces an error
message). The only change I made since those options used to be available
was
I did notice that under converters, there was no converter for Lyx to Dvi,
in fact anything to Dvi...which might be the source of the problem though
I'm baffled as to how it disappeared if indeed there ought to be one
Srinivas Nedunuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED
hello, this sounds really odd, but a variety of View options that were
previously available (in particular DVI) in Lyx are no longer available. The
only one that is available is pdflatex (and even that produces an error
message). The only change I made since those options used to be available
was
I did notice that under converters, there was no converter for Lyx to Dvi,
in fact anything to Dvi...which might be the source of the problem though
I'm baffled as to how it disappeared if indeed there ought to be one
"Srinivas Nedunuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
in message news:
Hello, I tried defining a macro as described in the User Guide (the
macrowarg example). However, I get the following erroe message:
Extra }, or forgotten $.
\newcommand{\macrowarg}[1]{2+\sqrt{#1}}
What is wrong here? The code looks identical to what the User Guide says is
produced.
Hello, I tried defining a macro as described in the User Guide (the
macrowarg example). However, I get the following erroe message:
Extra }, or forgotten $.
\newcommand{\macrowarg}[1]{2+\sqrt{#1}}
What is wrong here? The code looks identical to what the User Guide says is
produced.
Hello, I tried defining a macro as described in the User Guide (the
macrowarg example). However, I get the following erroe message:
Extra }, or forgotten $.
\newcommand{\macrowarg}[1]{2+\sqrt{#1}}
What is wrong here? The code looks identical to what the User Guide says is
produced.
I originally reported this difficuly with the case environment but have
since noticed the problem with lots of other environments, including Lemma,
Definition, etc. Essentially the problem is that Lyx wont let me create
adjacent Lemmas (without proofs), or adjacent Definitions, without some
I originally reported this difficuly with the case environment but have
since noticed the problem with lots of other environments, including Lemma,
Definition, etc. Essentially the problem is that Lyx wont let me create
adjacent Lemmas (without proofs), or adjacent Definitions, without some
I originally reported this difficuly with the "case" environment but have
since noticed the problem with lots of other environments, including Lemma,
Definition, etc. Essentially the problem is that Lyx wont let me create
adjacent Lemmas (without proofs), or adjacent Definitions, without some
I installed the spellchecker as per the instructions in
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/WindowsSetup but get the following error message
when I try Edit|SpellCheck...
The spell-checker has failed. []b*[]file c:/aspell/data/iso8859-1.dat can
not be opened for reading
followed by a core dump. (nice!)
I
please see my posting text over a symbol and Uwe Stohr's reply. Basically
you can get what you want with a \xleftarrow or \xrightarrow command.
cheers
Geoffrey Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I am trying to reproduce the following and wondered whether it was
I installed the spellchecker as per the instructions in
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/WindowsSetup but get the following error message
when I try Edit|SpellCheck...
The spell-checker has failed. []b*[]file c:/aspell/data/iso8859-1.dat can
not be opened for reading
followed by a core dump. (nice!)
I
please see my posting text over a symbol and Uwe Stohr's reply. Basically
you can get what you want with a \xleftarrow or \xrightarrow command.
cheers
Geoffrey Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I am trying to reproduce the following and wondered whether it was
I installed the spellchecker as per the instructions in
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/WindowsSetup but get the following error message
when I try Edit|SpellCheck...
The spell-checker has failed. []b*[]file "c:/aspell/data/iso8859-1.dat can
not be opened for reading
followed by a core dump. (nice!)
I
please see my posting "text over a symbol" and Uwe Stohr's reply. Basically
you can get what you want with a \xleftarrow or \xrightarrow command.
cheers
"Geoffrey Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I am trying to reproduce the following and wondered whether it
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
From: Georg Baum
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
I don't really care about the text box.
But you should, because it makes a big difference.
Oh a gotcha! I hate those. Still I've seen several
in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
so would \begin{equation}\frac{1}{2}\end{equation} be total nonsense?
:-)
equation is redefined by amsmath. However you should use
align instead of equation!
Herbert
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
Then please tell exactly what you did and what you got. If there is a
bug
in
LyX it should be fixed, but it can't be fixed if nobody knows about it.
I already did. But here it is again - insert
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
From: Georg Baum
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
I don't really care about the text box.
But you should, because it makes a big difference.
Oh a gotcha! I hate those. Still I've seen several
in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
so would \begin{equation}\frac{1}{2}\end{equation} be total nonsense?
:-)
equation is redefined by amsmath. However you should use
align instead of equation!
Herbert
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
Then please tell exactly what you did and what you got. If there is a
bug
in
LyX it should be fixed, but it can't be fixed if nobody knows about it.
I already did. But here it is again - insert
"Georg Baum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
>
> > From: "Georg Baum"
> >
> >> Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
> >>
> >> > I don't really care about the text box.
> >&
ECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
> > so would \begin{equation}\frac{1}{2}\end{equation} be total nonsense?
> > :-)
>
> equation is redefined by amsmath. However you should use
> align instead of equation!
>
> Herbert
>
>
"Georg Baum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
> >> Then please tell exactly what you did and what you got. If there is a
bug
> > in
> >> LyX it should be fixed, but it can't be fixed if nobody
- Original Message -
From: Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:52 AM
Subject: Re: problem with multline nested inside a eqnarray
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
I plonked down a simple eqnarray and then in one of the elements I need
thanks. I'll take a look at it
- Original Message -
From: Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: The AMS align environment
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
Georg.
Here's what I would like:
f(x)= 1+2+3
g(x,y) = 4
- Original Message -
From: Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: problem with multline nested inside a eqnarray
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
I don't really care about the text box.
But you should, because it makes
so would \begin{equation}\frac{1}{2}\end{equation} be total nonsense?
:-)
- Original Message -
From: Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: problem with multline nested inside a eqnarray
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote
test
Does anyone know how to use the case environment (note, not case*s* but
case - its available in the drop down menu under File). It *seems* like
something you could use for the different cases of a proof. However, I'm
having difficulty getting Lyx to seperate the cases without some text
between
- Original Message -
From: Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:52 AM
Subject: Re: problem with multline nested inside a eqnarray
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
I plonked down a simple eqnarray and then in one of the elements I need
thanks. I'll take a look at it
- Original Message -
From: Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: The AMS align environment
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
Georg.
Here's what I would like:
f(x)= 1+2+3
g(x,y) = 4
- Original Message -
From: Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: problem with multline nested inside a eqnarray
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote:
I don't really care about the text box.
But you should, because it makes
so would \begin{equation}\frac{1}{2}\end{equation} be total nonsense?
:-)
- Original Message -
From: Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: problem with multline nested inside a eqnarray
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
