Re: LyX 1.6.7

Kornel Benko berlin.de> writes: > > Am Donnerstag 19 August 2010 schrieb Mukhtar Ullah: > > Dear LyX users and developers, > > I am facing serious issues with LyX 1.6.7 (both installers) on Windows x64. > > Nothing happens when you hit (or use the keyboard short

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Mukhtar Ullah wrote: > Dear LyX users and developers, > I am facing serious issues with LyX 1.6.7 (both installers) on Windows x64. looks like http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6831 pavel

Re: LyX 1.6.7

> I am facing serious issues with LyX 1.6.7 (both installers) on > Windows x64. > Nothing happens when you hit (or use the keyboard short-cut for) the > following: > File -> Open I cannot reproduce this. I'm developing the alternative Windows installer on a 64bit Wind

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Uwe Stöhr web.de> writes: > > > I am facing serious issues with LyX 1.6.7 (both installers) on > > Windows x64. > > Nothing happens when you hit (or use the keyboard short-cut for) the > > following: > > File -> Open > > I cannot reproduce

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

On 08/19/2010 04:24 AM, Ignacio García wrote: > I wanted to provide a bit of an update to my adventures with Ubuntu packaging > (insofar as they are related to LyX). > I've spoken with the Ubuntu developers, and they have granted our request to > include 1.6.7 in the next version of Ubuntu

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Hi Fareed, Does this new LyX package depend on the the TexLive in Ubuntu's repositories? Ubuntu's version of TexLive was out-of-date for a long time, so I installed TexLive 2009 directly from its net installer, to use its latex package manager. As a result I've had to install any latex related

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

On 19/08/2010 7:28 PM, Rob Oakes wrote: However, Ubuntu updated the version of LaTeX to TeXLive 2009 in 10.04. FYI> Although this is true, you cannot use the texlive 2009 package manager when texlive 2009 is installed from the ubuntu repository. -- Julien

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

2010/8/17 Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org: Rob Oakes wrote:  Dear LyX Users and Developers, firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users

LyX 1.6.7 not saving document

Dear all, I have a strange problem with LyX 1.6.7 on windows 7 x64. I cannot save any lyx document. Neither Save nor Save-as buttons work. Can anyone confirm this behavior or is there something wrong with my installation. I switched back to LyX 1.6.6 and everything is working fine. Thank you

Re: LyX 1.6.7 not saving document

On 17 August 2010 20:37, Mukhtar Ullah mukhtar.ul...@informatik.uni-rostock.de wrote: Dear all, I have a strange problem with LyX 1.6.7 on windows 7 x64. I cannot save any lyx document. Neither Save nor Save-as buttons work. Can anyone confirm this behavior or is there something wrong

Re: LyX 1.6.7 not saving document

Tennessee Carmel-Veilleux tennessee.carmelveilleux at gmail.com writes: On 17 August 2010 20:37, Mukhtar Ullah mukhtar.ullah at informatik.uni-rostock.de wrote:  Dear all, I have a strange problem with LyX 1.6.7 on windows 7 x64. I cannot save any lyx document. Neither Save nor Save

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

2010/8/17 Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org: Rob Oakes wrote:  Dear LyX Users and Developers, firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users

LyX 1.6.7 not saving document

Dear all, I have a strange problem with LyX 1.6.7 on windows 7 x64. I cannot save any lyx document. Neither Save nor Save-as buttons work. Can anyone confirm this behavior or is there something wrong with my installation. I switched back to LyX 1.6.6 and everything is working fine. Thank you

Re: LyX 1.6.7 not saving document

On 17 August 2010 20:37, Mukhtar Ullah mukhtar.ul...@informatik.uni-rostock.de wrote: Dear all, I have a strange problem with LyX 1.6.7 on windows 7 x64. I cannot save any lyx document. Neither Save nor Save-as buttons work. Can anyone confirm this behavior or is there something wrong

Re: LyX 1.6.7 not saving document

Tennessee Carmel-Veilleux tennessee.carmelveilleux at gmail.com writes: On 17 August 2010 20:37, Mukhtar Ullah mukhtar.ullah at informatik.uni-rostock.de wrote:  Dear all, I have a strange problem with LyX 1.6.7 on windows 7 x64. I cannot save any lyx document. Neither Save nor Save

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

2010/8/17 Pavel Sanda : > Rob Oakes wrote: >>  Dear LyX Users and Developers, > > firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report > is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 & qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's > policies permit this but it would be great if all

LyX 1.6.7 not saving document

Dear all, I have a strange problem with LyX 1.6.7 on windows 7 x64. I cannot save any lyx document. Neither Save nor Save-as buttons work. Can anyone confirm this behavior or is there something wrong with my installation. I switched back to LyX 1.6.6 and everything is working fine. Thank you

Re: LyX 1.6.7 not saving document

On 17 August 2010 20:37, Mukhtar Ullah < mukhtar.ul...@informatik.uni-rostock.de> wrote: > Dear all, > I have a strange problem with LyX 1.6.7 on windows 7 x64. I cannot save any > lyx document. Neither Save nor Save-as buttons work. Can anyone confirm this > behavior or is the

Re: LyX 1.6.7 not saving document

Tennessee Carmel-Veilleux gmail.com> writes: > > > On 17 August 2010 20:37, Mukhtar Ullah informatik.uni-rostock.de> wrote: >  Dear all, > I have a strange problem with LyX 1.6.7 on windows 7 x64. I cannot save any lyx document. Neither Save nor Save-as buttons wor

LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Dear LyX Users and Developers, I wanted to provide a bit of an update to my adventures with Ubuntu packaging (insofar as they are related to LyX). I've spoken with the Ubuntu developers, and they have granted our request to include 1.6.7 in the next version of Ubuntu (Maverick Meerkat,

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Rob Oakes wrote: Dear LyX Users and Developers, firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6.7 automatically updated through

LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Dear LyX Users and Developers, I wanted to provide a bit of an update to my adventures with Ubuntu packaging (insofar as they are related to LyX). I've spoken with the Ubuntu developers, and they have granted our request to include 1.6.7 in the next version of Ubuntu (Maverick Meerkat,

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Rob Oakes wrote: Dear LyX Users and Developers, firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6.7 automatically updated through

LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Dear LyX Users and Developers, I wanted to provide a bit of an update to my adventures with Ubuntu packaging (insofar as they are related to LyX). I've spoken with the Ubuntu developers, and they have granted our request to include 1.6.7 in the next version of Ubuntu (Maverick Meerkat,

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Rob Oakes wrote: > Dear LyX Users and Developers, firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 & qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6.7 automatically updated through

Fwd: [Bug 618690] Re: Sync lyx 1.6.7-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)

It appears that the request for Feature Freeze exception has been granted. I'm now trying to whittle down the list of Launchpad bugs. Is it just me, or are the LyX website and trac down? Also, were the problems with platex solved per LyX 1.6.7? I remember some of the discussion, but haven't

Re: Fwd: [Bug 618690] Re: Sync lyx 1.6.7-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)

LyX 1.6.7? I remember some of the discussion, but haven't been able to check trac. No, but they will be solved in LyX 1.6.8 (the fix went in at r35132 last Friday). Jürgen

Fwd: [Bug 618690] Re: Sync lyx 1.6.7-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)

It appears that the request for Feature Freeze exception has been granted. I'm now trying to whittle down the list of Launchpad bugs. Is it just me, or are the LyX website and trac down? Also, were the problems with platex solved per LyX 1.6.7? I remember some of the discussion, but haven't

Re: Fwd: [Bug 618690] Re: Sync lyx 1.6.7-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)

LyX 1.6.7? I remember some of the discussion, but haven't been able to check trac. No, but they will be solved in LyX 1.6.8 (the fix went in at r35132 last Friday). Jürgen

Fwd: [Bug 618690] Re: Sync lyx 1.6.7-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)

It appears that the request for Feature Freeze exception has been granted. I'm now trying to whittle down the list of Launchpad bugs. Is it just me, or are the LyX website and trac down? Also, were the problems with platex solved per LyX 1.6.7? I remember some of the discussion, but haven't

Re: Fwd: [Bug 618690] Re: Sync lyx 1.6.7-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)

h platex solved per LyX 1.6.7? I remember some > of the discussion, but haven't been able to check trac. No, but they will be solved in LyX 1.6.8 (the fix went in at r35132 last Friday). Jürgen

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgouttes at lyx.org writes: Le 5 août 10 à 22:03, Joost Verburg a écrit : I understand that it's nice to support as many versions as possible, but I simply don't have the time to maintain all the dependencies ( 10 MSVC projects) for different compiler versions.

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Joost Verburg wrote: On 8/5/2010 3:34 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: It is not our responsibility to tell people what OS to use... Sure. I'm just saying that at some point it doesn't make sense to support an OS anymore. Windows 2000 is more than 10 years old and no longer supported by

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Joost Verburg wrote: The standard installer includes more recent version of external libraries, which have been compiled with Visual C++ 2010 and therefore don't run on Windows 2000. The alternative installer still uses the older ones. Then we have to update the homepage and the wiki,

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Jürgen Spitzmüller spitz at lyx.org writes: Joost Verburg wrote: On 8/5/2010 3:34 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: It is not our responsibility to tell people what OS to use... Sure. I'm just saying that at some point it doesn't make sense to support an OS anymore. Windows 2000 is

Lyx 1.6.7 Broken Keyboard Shortcut

To insert a matrix in math-mode, I use the shortcut alt+i then h then x. Now, I realize this may not be the most efficient way to insert a matrix, but that's how I do it. I recently upgraded to LyX 1.6.7 (on windows 7), and have found that alt + i then h does not bring up the math menu. The h

Re: Lyx 1.6.7 Broken Keyboard Shortcut

On 6 August 2010 12:38, Jacob Bishop bishop.ja...@gmail.com wrote: To insert a matrix in math-mode, I use the shortcut alt+i then h then x. Now, I realize this may not be the most efficient way to insert a matrix, but that's how I do it. The previous version I had was 1.6.5, and this problem

Re: Lyx 1.6.7 Broken Keyboard Shortcut

I failed to mention that I also used the altinstaller. You are right about the arrow-key workaround. Annoying. Thank you for the response. Anyone else?

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgouttes at lyx.org writes: Le 5 août 10 à 22:03, Joost Verburg a écrit : I understand that it's nice to support as many versions as possible, but I simply don't have the time to maintain all the dependencies ( 10 MSVC projects) for different compiler versions.

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Joost Verburg wrote: On 8/5/2010 3:34 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: It is not our responsibility to tell people what OS to use... Sure. I'm just saying that at some point it doesn't make sense to support an OS anymore. Windows 2000 is more than 10 years old and no longer supported by

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Joost Verburg wrote: The standard installer includes more recent version of external libraries, which have been compiled with Visual C++ 2010 and therefore don't run on Windows 2000. The alternative installer still uses the older ones. Then we have to update the homepage and the wiki,

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Jürgen Spitzmüller spitz at lyx.org writes: Joost Verburg wrote: On 8/5/2010 3:34 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: It is not our responsibility to tell people what OS to use... Sure. I'm just saying that at some point it doesn't make sense to support an OS anymore. Windows 2000 is

Lyx 1.6.7 Broken Keyboard Shortcut

To insert a matrix in math-mode, I use the shortcut alt+i then h then x. Now, I realize this may not be the most efficient way to insert a matrix, but that's how I do it. I recently upgraded to LyX 1.6.7 (on windows 7), and have found that alt + i then h does not bring up the math menu. The h

Re: Lyx 1.6.7 Broken Keyboard Shortcut

On 6 August 2010 12:38, Jacob Bishop bishop.ja...@gmail.com wrote: To insert a matrix in math-mode, I use the shortcut alt+i then h then x. Now, I realize this may not be the most efficient way to insert a matrix, but that's how I do it. The previous version I had was 1.6.5, and this problem

Re: Lyx 1.6.7 Broken Keyboard Shortcut

I failed to mention that I also used the altinstaller. You are right about the arrow-key workaround. Annoying. Thank you for the response. Anyone else?

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lyx.org> writes: > > Le 5 août 10 à 22:03, Joost Verburg a écrit : > > I understand that it's nice to support as many versions as possible, > > but I simply don't have the time to maintain all the dependencies (> > > 10 MSVC projects) for different compiler versions. I

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Joost Verburg wrote: > On 8/5/2010 3:34 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > It is not our responsibility to tell people what OS to use... > > Sure. I'm just saying that at some point it doesn't make sense to > support an OS anymore. Windows 2000 is more than 10 years old and no > longer

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Joost Verburg wrote: > The standard installer includes more recent version of external > libraries, which have been compiled with Visual C++ 2010 and therefore > don't run on Windows 2000. The alternative installer still uses the > older ones. Then we have to update the homepage and the wiki,

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Jürgen Spitzmüller lyx.org> writes: > > Joost Verburg wrote: > > On 8/5/2010 3:34 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > It is not our responsibility to tell people what OS to use... > > > > Sure. I'm just saying that at some point it doesn't make sense to > > support an OS anymore. Windows

Lyx 1.6.7 Broken Keyboard Shortcut

To insert a matrix in math-mode, I use the shortcut alt+i then h then x. Now, I realize this may not be the most efficient way to insert a matrix, but that's how I do it. I recently upgraded to LyX 1.6.7 (on windows 7), and have found that alt + i then h does not bring up the math menu. The h

Re: Lyx 1.6.7 Broken Keyboard Shortcut

On 6 August 2010 12:38, Jacob Bishop wrote: > To insert a matrix in math-mode, I use the shortcut alt+i then h then x. > Now, I realize this may not be the most efficient way to insert a matrix, > but that's how I do it. > > The previous version I had was 1.6.5, and this

Re: Lyx 1.6.7 Broken Keyboard Shortcut

I failed to mention that I also used the altinstaller. You are right about the arrow-key workaround. Annoying. Thank you for the response. Anyone else?

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

On 8/4/2010 1:43 PM, Jose Augusto wrote: This is an update and answer to myself :-) : I was able to install and RUN on Win 2K the last version of the Lyx alt-installer which can be retrieved at the link: http://prdownload.berlios.de/lyxwininstall/LyX-167-4-25-AltInstaller-Complete.exe The

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Le 5 août 10 à 20:05, Joost Verburg a écrit : On 8/4/2010 1:43 PM, Jose Augusto wrote: The standard installer includes more recent version of external libraries, which have been compiled with Visual C++ 2010 and therefore don't run on Windows 2000. The alternative installer still uses the

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

On 8/5/2010 2:17 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Do we gain something by compiling with the latest toolchain? Aren't we shuttig down windows 2000 arbitrarily? Not arbitrarily. Windows 2000 support has already been discontinued by Microsoft so it's highly unsafe to use. Security issues are not

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Le 5 août 10 à 21:06, Joost Verburg a écrit : Not arbitrarily. Windows 2000 support has already been discontinued by Microsoft so it's highly unsafe to use. Security issues are not being fixed. Most recent software doesn't support Windows 2000. It is not our responsibility to tell people

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

On 8/5/2010 3:34 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: It is not our responsibility to tell people what OS to use... Sure. I'm just saying that at some point it doesn't make sense to support an OS anymore. Windows 2000 is more than 10 years old and no longer supported by Microsoft. It's market

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Le 5 août 10 à 22:03, Joost Verburg a écrit : I understand that it's nice to support as many versions as possible, but I simply don't have the time to maintain all the dependencies ( 10 MSVC projects) for different compiler versions. I had to pick a version for the recent updates and

Thesaurus for Lyx 1.6.7 on Windows

Him Could someone please guide me on how to use the thesaurus feature in LyX 1.6.7 on Windows XP. I downloaded Aspell and Spell check works now, but no thesaurus. I used the Lyx Alternate installer to install. Thanks, Sachin

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

On 8/4/2010 1:43 PM, Jose Augusto wrote: This is an update and answer to myself :-) : I was able to install and RUN on Win 2K the last version of the Lyx alt-installer which can be retrieved at the link: http://prdownload.berlios.de/lyxwininstall/LyX-167-4-25-AltInstaller-Complete.exe The

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Le 5 août 10 à 20:05, Joost Verburg a écrit : On 8/4/2010 1:43 PM, Jose Augusto wrote: The standard installer includes more recent version of external libraries, which have been compiled with Visual C++ 2010 and therefore don't run on Windows 2000. The alternative installer still uses the

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

On 8/5/2010 2:17 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Do we gain something by compiling with the latest toolchain? Aren't we shuttig down windows 2000 arbitrarily? Not arbitrarily. Windows 2000 support has already been discontinued by Microsoft so it's highly unsafe to use. Security issues are not

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Le 5 août 10 à 21:06, Joost Verburg a écrit : Not arbitrarily. Windows 2000 support has already been discontinued by Microsoft so it's highly unsafe to use. Security issues are not being fixed. Most recent software doesn't support Windows 2000. It is not our responsibility to tell people

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

On 8/5/2010 3:34 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: It is not our responsibility to tell people what OS to use... Sure. I'm just saying that at some point it doesn't make sense to support an OS anymore. Windows 2000 is more than 10 years old and no longer supported by Microsoft. It's market

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Le 5 août 10 à 22:03, Joost Verburg a écrit : I understand that it's nice to support as many versions as possible, but I simply don't have the time to maintain all the dependencies ( 10 MSVC projects) for different compiler versions. I had to pick a version for the recent updates and

Thesaurus for Lyx 1.6.7 on Windows

Him Could someone please guide me on how to use the thesaurus feature in LyX 1.6.7 on Windows XP. I downloaded Aspell and Spell check works now, but no thesaurus. I used the Lyx Alternate installer to install. Thanks, Sachin

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

On 8/4/2010 1:43 PM, Jose Augusto wrote: This is an update and answer to myself :-) : I was able to install>> and RUN on Win 2K<< the last version of the Lyx alt-installer which can be retrieved at the link: http://prdownload.berlios.de/lyxwininstall/LyX-167-4-25-AltInstaller-Complete.exe

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Le 5 août 10 à 20:05, Joost Verburg a écrit : On 8/4/2010 1:43 PM, Jose Augusto wrote: The standard installer includes more recent version of external libraries, which have been compiled with Visual C++ 2010 and therefore don't run on Windows 2000. The alternative installer still uses the

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

On 8/5/2010 2:17 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Do we gain something by compiling with the latest toolchain? Aren't we shuttig down windows 2000 arbitrarily? Not arbitrarily. Windows 2000 support has already been discontinued by Microsoft so it's highly unsafe to use. Security issues are not

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Le 5 août 10 à 21:06, Joost Verburg a écrit : Not arbitrarily. Windows 2000 support has already been discontinued by Microsoft so it's highly unsafe to use. Security issues are not being fixed. Most recent software doesn't support Windows 2000. It is not our responsibility to tell people

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

On 8/5/2010 3:34 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: It is not our responsibility to tell people what OS to use... Sure. I'm just saying that at some point it doesn't make sense to support an OS anymore. Windows 2000 is more than 10 years old and no longer supported by Microsoft. It's market

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Le 5 août 10 à 22:03, Joost Verburg a écrit : I understand that it's nice to support as many versions as possible, but I simply don't have the time to maintain all the dependencies (> 10 MSVC projects) for different compiler versions. I had to pick a version for the recent updates and

Thesaurus for Lyx 1.6.7 on Windows

Him Could someone please guide me on how to use the thesaurus feature in LyX 1.6.7 on Windows XP. I downloaded Aspell and Spell check works now, but no thesaurus. I used the Lyx Alternate installer to install. Thanks, Sachin

Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Dear Lyx developers and Windows binaries' compilers First of all, thank you very much for your commitment and work in the development of this project. Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 windows binaries don't run under Windows 2000. The last version to run OK was 1.6.6-1. I suspect that the compiler

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Jose Augusto jaaugusto at fc.ul.pt writes: Dear Lyx developers and Windows binaries' compilers First of all, thank you very much for your commitment and work in the development of this project. Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 windows binaries don't run under Windows 2000. The last version

Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Dear Lyx developers and Windows binaries' compilers First of all, thank you very much for your commitment and work in the development of this project. Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 windows binaries don't run under Windows 2000. The last version to run OK was 1.6.6-1. I suspect that the compiler

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Jose Augusto jaaugusto at fc.ul.pt writes: Dear Lyx developers and Windows binaries' compilers First of all, thank you very much for your commitment and work in the development of this project. Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 windows binaries don't run under Windows 2000. The last version

Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Dear Lyx developers and Windows binaries' compilers First of all, thank you very much for your commitment and work in the development of this project. Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 windows binaries don't run under Windows 2000. The last version to run OK was 1.6.6-1. I suspect that the compiler

Re: Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 don't run in Windows 2000 (aka win 2K)

Jose Augusto fc.ul.pt> writes: > > Dear Lyx developers and Windows binaries' compilers > > First of all, thank you very much for your commitment > and work in the development of this project. > > Lyx 1.6.7-3 and 1.6.7-4 windows binaries don't run under Windows 2000. &

Re: [announce] LyXWinInstaller for LyX 1.6.7

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Hello LyXers, the alternative Windows installer for LyX 1.6.7 is now available. [...] Installer Changelog: - Version 4.25 - LyX 1.6.7 - updated to eLyXer 0.99 - updated to ImageMagick 6.6.3-0 - updated Qt libraries to version 4.6.3 - happy LyXing Uwe Hi

Re: [announce] LyXWinInstaller for LyX 1.6.7

Am 21.07.2010 11:27, schrieb Olivier Ripoll: Just a quick question though: The 4.25 installer is dated July 11th, while 1.6.7 was announced on July 15th. Is it the same, or am I using a wrong version ? It is the same version. LyX 1.6.7 was build on July 11th. Doe to some problems with build

Re: [announce] LyXWinInstaller for LyX 1.6.7

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Hello LyXers, the alternative Windows installer for LyX 1.6.7 is now available. [...] Installer Changelog: - Version 4.25 - LyX 1.6.7 - updated to eLyXer 0.99 - updated to ImageMagick 6.6.3-0 - updated Qt libraries to version 4.6.3 - happy LyXing Uwe Hi

Re: [announce] LyXWinInstaller for LyX 1.6.7

Am 21.07.2010 11:27, schrieb Olivier Ripoll: Just a quick question though: The 4.25 installer is dated July 11th, while 1.6.7 was announced on July 15th. Is it the same, or am I using a wrong version ? It is the same version. LyX 1.6.7 was build on July 11th. Doe to some problems with build

Re: [announce] LyXWinInstaller for LyX 1.6.7

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Hello LyXers, the alternative Windows installer for LyX 1.6.7 is now available. [...] Installer Changelog: - Version 4.25 - LyX 1.6.7 - updated to eLyXer 0.99 - updated to ImageMagick 6.6.3-0 - updated Qt libraries to version 4.6.3 - happy LyXing Uwe Hi

Re: [announce] LyXWinInstaller for LyX 1.6.7

Am 21.07.2010 11:27, schrieb Olivier Ripoll: Just a quick question though: The 4.25 installer is dated July 11th, while 1.6.7 was announced on July 15th. Is it the same, or am I using a wrong version ? It is the same version. LyX 1.6.7 was build on July 11th. Doe to some problems with build

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.7 is released!

James C. Sutherland wrote: Sorry all - false alarm. For whatever reason, when I installed 1.6.7, the default LyX switched to 2.0alpha4 on my system, and I did not notice this. So it turns out that scrolling and dialogue boxes work fine in 1.6.7. Glad to hear that. Jürgen

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.7 is released!

James C. Sutherland wrote: Sorry all - false alarm. For whatever reason, when I installed 1.6.7, the default LyX switched to 2.0alpha4 on my system, and I did not notice this. So it turns out that scrolling and dialogue boxes work fine in 1.6.7. Glad to hear that. Jürgen

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.7 is released!

James C. Sutherland wrote: > Sorry all - false alarm. For whatever reason, when I installed 1.6.7, the > default LyX switched to 2.0alpha4 on my system, and I did not notice this. > > So it turns out that scrolling and dialogue boxes work fine in 1.6.7. Glad to hear that. Jürgen

[ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.7 is released!

Public release of LyX version 1.6.7 === We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.6.7. This is the eighth maintenance release in the 1.6.x series. From the list of fixes and improvements, we'd like to highlight particularly that this release irons out all

[announce] LyXWinInstaller for LyX 1.6.7

Hello LyXers, the alternative Windows installer for LyX 1.6.7 is now available. This installer comes again with an update installer to update existing LyX 1.6.6.1 installation to LyX 1.6.7. NOTE: To be able to use this update installer, LyX 1.6.6.1 must have been installed

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.7 is released!

It appears that mouse scrolling is broken on the Mac for LyX 1.6.7. This same problem is present in the alpha versions of 2.0 on the Mac, and it looks like it slipped through the cracks for this release. Any chance of a patch being released in the very near future to fix this serious regression

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.7 is released!

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:12 AM, James C. Sutherland james.sutherl...@utah.edu wrote: Another regression on Mac: some of the dialogue boxes (e.g. the spell check dialogue box) is not rendered properly.  See the attached image.  Resizing it does not help.  This was also a problem that I noticed

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.7 is released!

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:24 AM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:12 AM, James C. Sutherland james.sutherl...@utah.edu wrote: Another regression on Mac: some of the dialogue boxes (e.g. the spell check dialogue box) is not rendered properly. See the attached image.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.7 is released!

James C. Sutherland wrote: Bennett, The problem shows up for me when I undock the dialogue window. When docked, there is no problem. And yes, this problem is in 1.6.7. please go to Help-About LyX and report version. this dialog really looks from 2.0. it would alos nicely resolve the first

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.7 is released!

;) The screenshot is definitely LyX 2.x. The spellchecker of LyX 1.6.7 does not have a language combo. Jürgen

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.7 is released!

I installed Lyx 1.6.7 on my mac running OSX 10.6.4 and encounter no problems with mouse scrolling. I have not experimented with Lyx 2.0 as yet. bill On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, James C. Sutherland james.sutherl...@utah.edu wrote: It appears that mouse scrolling is broken on the Mac

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.7 is released!

, William Bray b...@math.umaine.edu wrote: I installed Lyx 1.6.7 on my mac running OSX 10.6.4 and encounter no problems with mouse scrolling. I have not experimented with Lyx 2.0 as yet. bill On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, James C. Sutherland james.sutherl...@utah.edu wrote: It appears

[ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.7 is released!

Public release of LyX version 1.6.7 === We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.6.7. This is the eighth maintenance release in the 1.6.x series. From the list of fixes and improvements, we'd like to highlight particularly that this release irons out all

[announce] LyXWinInstaller for LyX 1.6.7

Hello LyXers, the alternative Windows installer for LyX 1.6.7 is now available. This installer comes again with an update installer to update existing LyX 1.6.6.1 installation to LyX 1.6.7. NOTE: To be able to use this update installer, LyX 1.6.6.1 must have been installed

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.7 is released!

It appears that mouse scrolling is broken on the Mac for LyX 1.6.7. This same problem is present in the alpha versions of 2.0 on the Mac, and it looks like it slipped through the cracks for this release. Any chance of a patch being released in the very near future to fix this serious regression

<    1   2   3   4   >