Den 13. aug. 2015 22:53, skrev Hal Kierstead:
I do not think you understood me. Suppose a create a LyX file and use
it to generate a tex file. I send it to my coauthor who does not use
LyX. He makes modifications to the LaTex file without changing the
front material, and sends me his Tex
Den 13. aug. 2015 22:53, skrev Hal Kierstead:
I do not think you understood me. Suppose a create a LyX file and use
it to generate a tex file. I send it to my coauthor who does not use
LyX. He makes modifications to the LaTex file without changing the
front material, and sends me his Tex
Use include files.
Many and small ones. :-)-O
el
On 2015-08-13 21:53, Hal Kierstead wrote:
[...]
I do not think you understood me. Suppose a create a LyX file and
use it to generate a tex file. I send it to my coauthor who does
not use LyX. He makes modifications to the LaTex file without
Use include files.
Many and small ones. :-)-O
el
On 2015-08-13 21:53, Hal Kierstead wrote:
[...]
> I do not think you understood me. Suppose a create a LyX file and
> use it to generate a tex file. I send it to my coauthor who does
> not use LyX. He makes modifications to the LaTex file
On 2015-08-15, Georg Baum wrote:
...
There are some constructs in LyX that cannot be expressed in LaTeX or
are not exported (e.g. Notes). We discussed in the past how to get rid
of this limitation, but, but we do not have a consensus on a good
soluition yet.
Notes are not the best example:
On 2015-08-15, Georg Baum wrote:
...
> There are some constructs in LyX that cannot be expressed in LaTeX or
> are not exported (e.g. Notes). We discussed in the past how to get rid
> of this limitation, but, but we do not have a consensus on a good
> soluition yet.
Notes are not the best
On Aug 15, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de
wrote:
Hal Kierstead wrote:
First of all, tex2lyx already comes close to making a good LyX file. The
main problem is that there always seem to be a handful or errors that must
be fixed before the file will run.
Hal Kierstead wrote:
First of all, tex2lyx already comes close to making a good LyX file. The
main problem is that there always seem to be a handful or errors that must
be fixed before the file will run. For some reason the program cannot
handle options like \begin{thm}[Main Lemma], but
Hal Kierstead wrote:
> First of all, tex2lyx already comes close to making a good LyX file. The
> main problem is that there always seem to be a handful or errors that must
> be fixed before the file will run. For some reason the program cannot
> handle options like \begin{thm}[Main Lemma], but
> On Aug 15, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Georg Baum
> wrote:
>
> Hal Kierstead wrote:
>
>> First of all, tex2lyx already comes close to making a good LyX file. The
>> main problem is that there always seem to be a handful or errors that must
>> be fixed before the file
trip (even though as Steve rightly points out this
is useless in theory if we don't make any manual change). The reason
is simply that it is hard to import LaTeX, *even* LaTeX that LyX
produces. Sometimes one way is easier than the other way. tex2lyx is
actually a completely separate program from LyX
On Aug 13, 2015, at 2:31 PM, Steve Thompson scth...@gmail.com wrote:
Hal,
I think I did understand. You want your collaborator to be able to make
arbitrary changes to the .tex file, then have tex2lyx figure out how to
create a new .lyx file. But your collaborator could have done
If you used Lyx to create the LaTeX file, then you already have the helper
file to that would be needed to work with the LaTeX. It is just the
filename.lyx file that created it in the first place. For my own work, I
do this all the time. Create a document with Lyx, and send it to a journal
On Aug 13, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Steve Thompson scth...@gmail.com wrote:
If you used Lyx to create the LaTeX file, then you already have the “helper
file” to that would be needed to work with the LaTeX. It is just the
filename.lyx file that created it in the first place. For my own work, I do
Hal,
I think I did understand. You want your collaborator to be able to make
arbitrary changes to the .tex file, then have tex2lyx figure out how to create
a new .lyx file. But your collaborator could have done anything. That makes the
“modified” file no different from any other completely
Dear Lyx Users
I have written a very large article in Lyx for publication in a scientific
journal which will only accept the article as a latex file. Of course Lyx will
generate a Latex file as well as a pdf file. I wanted to check that the Latex
file is acceptable to Lyx. Unfortunately I
On Aug 13, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Mike Reeks mike.re...@newcastle.ac.uk wrote:
Dear Lyx Users
I have written a very large article in Lyx for publication in a scientific
journal which will only accept the article as a latex file. Of course Lyx
will generate a Latex file as well as a pdf
Dear Lyx Users
I have written a very large article in Lyx for publication in a scientific
journal which will only accept the article as a latex file. Of course Lyx will
generate a Latex file as well as a pdf file. I wanted to check that the Latex
file is acceptable to Lyx. Unfortunately I
> On Aug 13, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Mike Reeks <mike.re...@newcastle.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Dear Lyx Users
> I have written a very large article in Lyx for publication in a scientific
> journal which will only accept the article as a latex file. Of course Lyx
> will gener
If you used Lyx to create the LaTeX file, then you already have the "helper
file" to that would be needed to work with the LaTeX. It is just the
.lyx file that created it in the first place. For my own work, I
do this all the time. Create a document with Lyx, and send it to a journal
a
> On Aug 13, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Steve Thompson <scth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If you used Lyx to create the LaTeX file, then you already have the “helper
> file” to that would be needed to work with the LaTeX. It is just the
> .lyx file that created it in the first place.
Hal,
I think I did understand. You want your collaborator to be able to make
arbitrary changes to the .tex file, then have tex2lyx figure out how to create
a new .lyx file. But your collaborator could have done anything. That makes the
“modified” file no different from any other completely
> On Aug 13, 2015, at 2:31 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
>
> Hal,
> I think I did understand. You want your collaborator to be able to make
> arbitrary changes to the .tex file, then have tex2lyx figure out how to
> create a new .lyx file. But your collaborator could have done
LyX file back.
> Yes, I know there is no reason to do this, but it is a benchmark.
>
> Hal
Hal,
I think your reasoning is sound. I agree that it would be really nice
to have clean round trip (even though as Steve rightly points out this
is useless in theory if we don't make any manual cha
LB wrote:
Is it a good idea to avoid underscores and use hyphens instead?
Yes, underscores have tendency to confuse LaTeX (being a sign for subscript)
and they need to be protected. If you can, avoid them.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB
LB wrote:
Is it a good idea to avoid underscores and use hyphens instead?
Yes, underscores have tendency to confuse LaTeX (being a sign for subscript)
and they need to be protected. If you can, avoid them.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB
LB wrote:
> Is it a good idea to avoid underscores and use hyphens instead?
Yes, underscores have tendency to confuse LaTeX (being a sign for subscript)
and they need to be protected. If you can, avoid them.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB
Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2004 00:32 schrieb LB:
1) The graphics appear inserted with a latex commands so they don't
get
displayed in the document
relyx may have problems with some graphics, but in general it should
recognize them.
2) For no apparent reason I use a lot of underscores in
Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2004 00:32 schrieb LB:
1) The graphics appear inserted with a latex commands so they don't
get
displayed in the document
relyx may have problems with some graphics, but in general it should
recognize them.
2) For no apparent reason I use a lot of underscores in
Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2004 00:32 schrieb LB:
> 1) The graphics appear inserted with a latex commands so they don't
get
> displayed in the document
relyx may have problems with some graphics, but in general it should
recognize them.
> 2) For no apparent reason I use a lot of underscores
Hello
I'm working on a project with a few other people. So far I'm the only one
using LyX. I wrote the initial part of the document and then gave it to
the other people as a Latex file. They have edited it and gave it back to
me to make the final corrections and print out the final copy.
Hello
I'm working on a project with a few other people. So far I'm the only one
using LyX. I wrote the initial part of the document and then gave it to
the other people as a Latex file. They have edited it and gave it back to
me to make the final corrections and print out the final copy.
Hello
I'm working on a project with a few other people. So far I'm the only one
using LyX. I wrote the initial part of the document and then gave it to
the other people as a Latex file. They have edited it and gave it back to
me to make the final corrections and print out the final copy.
Carole Womeldorf wrote:
Quick question - will I be losing any functionality by doing this? Are
tetex-latex and tetex-dvips already in my version of teTeX (beta.20020207-70)
but just not registering as individual programs in the rpm database?
there is no problem
Herbert
--
Carole Womeldorf wrote:
Quick question - will I be losing any functionality by doing this? Are
tetex-latex and tetex-dvips already in my version of teTeX (beta.20020207-70)
but just not registering as individual programs in the rpm database?
there is no problem
Herbert
--
Carole Womeldorf wrote:
> Quick question - will I be losing any functionality by doing this? Are
> tetex-latex and tetex-dvips already in my version of teTeX (beta.20020207-70)
> but just not registering as individual programs in the rpm database?
there is no problem
Herbert
--
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I
get failed dependencies tetex-dvips and tetex-latex. I tried
installing the rpms from tetex but I must have gotten the wrong
versions. My current version of
Carole Womeldorf wrote:
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I
rpm -Uvh --nodeps
Also
1) Is there a good guide for a newbie to learn to turn a *.cls file
into something useful in Lyx
Herbert Voss wrote:
Carole Womeldorf wrote:
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I
rpm -Uvh --nodeps
Thanks for all the tips, Herbert.
Quick question - will I be losing any
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 03:59:45PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I
get failed dependencies tetex-dvips and tetex-latex. I tried
installing the rpms from
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:20:47PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
Herbert Voss wrote:
Carole Womeldorf wrote:
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I
rpm -Uvh --nodeps
Thanks
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I
get failed dependencies tetex-dvips and tetex-latex. I tried
installing the rpms from tetex but I must have gotten the wrong
versions. My current version of
Carole Womeldorf wrote:
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I
rpm -Uvh --nodeps
Also
1) Is there a good guide for a newbie to learn to turn a *.cls file
into something useful in Lyx
Herbert Voss wrote:
Carole Womeldorf wrote:
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I
rpm -Uvh --nodeps
Thanks for all the tips, Herbert.
Quick question - will I be losing any
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 03:59:45PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I
get failed dependencies tetex-dvips and tetex-latex. I tried
installing the rpms from
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:20:47PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
Herbert Voss wrote:
Carole Womeldorf wrote:
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I
rpm -Uvh --nodeps
Thanks
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
1.1.6fix4) - however when I run "rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm" I
get failed dependencies "tetex-dvips" and "tetex-latex." I tried
installing the rpms from tetex but I must have gotten the wrong
versions. My current
Carole Womeldorf wrote:
> On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
> 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run "rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm" I
rpm -Uvh --nodeps
> Also
> 1) Is there a good guide for a newbie to learn to turn a *.cls file
> into something useful
Herbert Voss wrote:
> Carole Womeldorf wrote:
> > On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
> > 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run "rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm" I
>
> rpm -Uvh --nodeps
Thanks for all the tips, Herbert.
Quick question - will I be losing any
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 03:59:45PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
> On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
> 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run "rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm" I
> get failed dependencies "tetex-dvips" and "tetex-latex." I tried
> installing the
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:20:47PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
> Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> > Carole Womeldorf wrote:
> > > On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently
> > > 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run "rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm" I
> >
> > rpm -Uvh --nodeps
Hi all!!
I'm having troubles with the Lyx-LaTeX export and the latex2HTML
converter.
1. I generate the .tex file ... OK
2. I try to generate the HTML version from the .tex file, and there are
some problems that I resolve deleting the lines about %%% LyX
specific LaTeX commands.
My question
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Adolfo Pachón wrote:
2. I try to generate the HTML version from the .tex file, and there are
some problems that I resolve deleting the lines about %%% LyX
specific LaTeX commands.
Which problems?
How can I generate LaTeX from Lyx whithout LyX
From: Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:54:49 +0200
To: Adolfo Pachón [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LyX to LaTeX without LyX code in .tex file
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Adolfo Pachón wrote:
2. I try to generate the HTML version
Hi all!!
I'm having troubles with the Lyx-LaTeX export and the latex2HTML
converter.
1. I generate the .tex file ... OK
2. I try to generate the HTML version from the .tex file, and there are
some problems that I resolve deleting the lines about %%% LyX
specific LaTeX commands.
My question
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Adolfo Pachón wrote:
2. I try to generate the HTML version from the .tex file, and there are
some problems that I resolve deleting the lines about %%% LyX
specific LaTeX commands.
Which problems?
How can I generate LaTeX from Lyx whithout LyX
From: Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:54:49 +0200
To: Adolfo Pachón [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LyX to LaTeX without LyX code in .tex file
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Adolfo Pachón wrote:
2. I try to generate the HTML version
Hi all!!
I'm having troubles with the Lyx->LaTeX export and the latex2HTML
converter.
1. I generate the .tex file ... OK
2. I try to generate the HTML version from the .tex file, and there are
some problems that I resolve deleting the lines about "%%% LyX
specific LaTeX comman
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Adolfo Pachón wrote:
> 2. I try to generate the HTML version from the .tex file, and there are
> some problems that I resolve deleting the lines about "%%% LyX
> specific LaTeX commands".
Which problems?
> How can I generate L
>>From: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:54:49 +0200
>>To: Adolfo Pachón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: LyX to LaTeX without LyX code in .tex file
>>
>>On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:51:29P
60 matches
Mail list logo