Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes:
> I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the
> equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive
> between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.3.3) and a
> (2.3.3)DELTA.
>
> Create a math
Le 16/12/2015 23:05, Franci Žižek a écrit :
Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes:
I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the
equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive
between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.3.3)
> Use \tag* instead: \stepcounter{equation}\tag*{(\theequation)\Delta}
>
> Guillaume
>
Beautiful! Thank you Guillaume!
Best regards
Franci Žižek gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> Can someone give me a hint how I could create a different equation numbering
> variant?
>
> Currently all my equations are numbered like: (2.3.2)
>
> For some select equations I would like this to change to: (2.3.3)Δ
> The counting is continuous,
alpking alpking at hotmail.com writes:
Hello,
I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question :
Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section
before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like
that : (4.13),
alpking alpking at hotmail.com writes:
Hello,
I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question :
Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section
before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like
that : (4.13),
alpking hotmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question :
>
> Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section
> before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like
> that : (4.13),
Am 17.05.2010 21:49, schrieb Nosrat Maghsoudi:
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers
change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help
if you have a solution.
Can you please provide a LyX example file?
I tried to reproduce with the
Am 17.05.2010 21:49, schrieb Nosrat Maghsoudi:
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers
change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help
if you have a solution.
Can you please provide a LyX example file?
I tried to reproduce with the
Am 17.05.2010 21:49, schrieb Nosrat Maghsoudi:
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers
change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help
if you have a solution.
Can you please provide a LyX example file?
I tried to reproduce with the
HI Paula
Piece of cake. In LyX, go into Document - Settings. On the Document
Class page there is an area for class options. Put leqno in the
custom options box and it will use the leqno LaTeX option which puts
equations on the left.
-Neil
=
HI Paula
Piece of cake. In LyX, go into Document - Settings. On the Document
Class page there is an area for class options. Put leqno in the
custom options box and it will use the leqno LaTeX option which puts
equations on the left.
-Neil
=
HI Paula
Piece of cake. In LyX, go into Document -> Settings. On the "Document
Class" page there is an area for class options. Put leqno in the
custom options box and it will use the leqno LaTeX option which puts
equations on the left.
-Neil
Right click and choose Toggle Labeling/Numbering
On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 AM, FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the
equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
Normally (Insert Math numberedformula) gives the equation number,
right justified, applicable in many journals and books.
Maybe this is not what you want ?
WAS
FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
If you're getting equation numbers on the left side, try adding 'reqno'
as a class option in Document - Settings... - Document Class.
/Paul
Right click and choose Toggle Labeling/Numbering
On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 AM, FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the
equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
Normally (Insert Math numberedformula) gives the equation number,
right justified, applicable in many journals and books.
Maybe this is not what you want ?
WAS
FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
If you're getting equation numbers on the left side, try adding 'reqno'
as a class option in Document - Settings... - Document Class.
/Paul
Right click and choose "Toggle Labeling/Numbering"
On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 AM, FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the
equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad de Ciencias
> How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
> LyX 1.6?
Normally (Insert > Math > numberedformula) gives the equation number,
right justified, applicable in many journals and books.
Maybe this is not what you want ?
WAS
FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
If you're getting equation numbers on the left side, try adding 'reqno'
as a class option in Document -> Settings... -> Document Class.
/Paul
David Hewitt wrote:
This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for display formula
numbering and you'll get what you want.
bigblop wrote:
All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown
correctly in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in
You got it.
bigblop wrote:
David Hewitt wrote:
This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for display
formula numbering and you'll get what you want.
bigblop wrote:
All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown
correctly in the pdf. But why the
David Hewitt wrote:
This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for display formula
numbering and you'll get what you want.
bigblop wrote:
All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown
correctly in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in
You got it.
bigblop wrote:
David Hewitt wrote:
This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for display
formula numbering and you'll get what you want.
bigblop wrote:
All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown
correctly in the pdf. But why the
David Hewitt wrote:
>
> This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for "display formula
> numbering" and you'll get what you want.
>
>
> bigblop wrote:
>>
>> All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown
>> correctly in the pdf. But why the same number for all
You got it.
bigblop wrote:
>
>
>
> David Hewitt wrote:
>>
>> This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for "display
>> formula numbering" and you'll get what you want.
>>
>>
>> bigblop wrote:
>>>
>>> All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown
>>>
This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for display formula
numbering and you'll get what you want.
bigblop wrote:
All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly
in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX?
-
David Hewitt
This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for display formula
numbering and you'll get what you want.
bigblop wrote:
All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly
in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX?
-
David Hewitt
This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for "display formula
numbering" and you'll get what you want.
bigblop wrote:
>
> All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly
> in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX?
>
-
David
Gary wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing my thesis using lyx.
I'm not exactly sure what class to use. The problem is this:
If I use the book class, the top level sectioning environment is chapter and
the numbering of the equations inherit the chapter number. Equation's on
chapter 1 will be numbered: 1.1,
Gary wrote:
I'm writing my thesis using lyx.
I'm not exactly sure what class to use.
All of the things you mention can be redefined fairly easily. You might
want to look at the koma-script classes, which have a lot of built-in
customization possibilities. The documentation is very complete.
Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David, Richard thanks.
David your suggestion worked like a charm.
Richard, maybe I didn't understand what you were saying.
\renewcommand{\chaptername}{}
Where am I supposed to add this line? In an ERT box?
Gary wrote:
Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard, maybe I didn't understand what you were saying.
\renewcommand{\chaptername}{}
Where am I supposed to add this line? In an ERT box?
You can put it in the preamble.
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
This is even
Gary wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing my thesis using lyx.
I'm not exactly sure what class to use. The problem is this:
If I use the book class, the top level sectioning environment is chapter and
the numbering of the equations inherit the chapter number. Equation's on
chapter 1 will be numbered: 1.1,
Gary wrote:
I'm writing my thesis using lyx.
I'm not exactly sure what class to use.
All of the things you mention can be redefined fairly easily. You might
want to look at the koma-script classes, which have a lot of built-in
customization possibilities. The documentation is very complete.
Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David, Richard thanks.
David your suggestion worked like a charm.
Richard, maybe I didn't understand what you were saying.
\renewcommand{\chaptername}{}
Where am I supposed to add this line? In an ERT box?
Gary wrote:
Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard, maybe I didn't understand what you were saying.
\renewcommand{\chaptername}{}
Where am I supposed to add this line? In an ERT box?
You can put it in the preamble.
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
This is even
Gary wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing my thesis using lyx.
I'm not exactly sure what class to use. The problem is this:
If I use the book class, the top level sectioning environment is chapter and
the numbering of the equations inherit the chapter number. Equation's on
chapter 1 will be numbered: 1.1,
Gary wrote:
> I'm writing my thesis using lyx.
> I'm not exactly sure what class to use.
All of the things you mention can be redefined fairly easily. You might
want to look at the koma-script classes, which have a lot of built-in
customization possibilities. The documentation is very complete.
Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David, Richard thanks.
David your suggestion worked like a charm.
Richard, maybe I didn't understand what you were saying.
\renewcommand{\chaptername}{}
Where am I supposed to add this line? In an ERT box?
Gary wrote:
> Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Richard, maybe I didn't understand what you were saying.
> \renewcommand{\chaptername}{}
> Where am I supposed to add this line? In an ERT box?
>
You can put it in the preamble.
> \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
>
Nick Kuzmik schrieb:
Is there any way to get section/subsection reflected in equation numbering?
For example, I have a study guide that chapter 13.1 to 17.5, thats 36 pages
long with some 228 lines of equations. It would be more concise to be able
to reference equation 14.3.3, rather than
Nick Kuzmik schrieb:
Is there any way to get section/subsection reflected in equation numbering?
For example, I have a study guide that chapter 13.1 to 17.5, thats 36 pages
long with some 228 lines of equations. It would be more concise to be able
to reference equation 14.3.3, rather than
Nick Kuzmik schrieb:
Is there any way to get section/subsection reflected in equation numbering?
For example, I have a study guide that chapter 13.1 to 17.5, thats 36 pages
long with some 228 lines of equations. It would be more concise to be able
to reference equation 14.3.3, rather than
) becomes
Eq.(2) but the removefromreset has had no effect.
Any ideas.
Mike
From: Richard Heck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 14/08/2006 19:16
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Richard Heck; Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
You'll
) becomes
Eq.(2) but the removefromreset has had no effect.
Any ideas.
Mike
From: Richard Heck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 14/08/2006 19:16
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Richard Heck; Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
You'll
) becomes
Eq.(2) but the removefromreset has had no effect.
Any ideas.
Mike
From: Richard Heck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 14/08/2006 19:16
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Richard Heck; Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
You'll
: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section? If so, then the only way to do this, short of modifying
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 09/08/2006 15:51
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section
Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
You'll need to \usepackage{remreset}.
Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Richard, Jens and Uwe
In the process of installing remreset.sty I noticed that it is already
installed in Miktex in texmf/tex/latex/carlisle so I am assuming
: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section? If so, then the only way to do this, short of modifying
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 09/08/2006 15:51
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section
Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
You'll need to \usepackage{remreset}.
Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Richard, Jens and Uwe
In the process of installing remreset.sty I noticed that it is already
installed in Miktex in texmf/tex/latex/carlisle so I am assuming
: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section? If so, then the only way to do this, short of modifying
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 09/08/2006 15:51
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section
Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
You'll need to \usepackage{remreset}.
Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Richard, Jens and Uwe
In the process of installing remreset.sty I noticed that it is already
installed in Miktex in texmf/tex/latex/carlisle so I am assuming
Thanks Jens.
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command in preamble numbers the equation in each
section .without the section
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command in preamble
Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command in preamble numbers the equation in each
section .without the section number. I want the equation number in
ascending order
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section? If so, then the only way to do this, short
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command in preamble
Mike Reeks wrote:
In my preamble after the line
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
I added the line
@addtoreset{equation}{section}
which had nor effect. Have I followed your suggestion correcty, have I mispelt
it. What next?
You missed the preceding \: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But
Thanks Jens.
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command in preamble numbers the equation in each
section .without the section
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command in preamble
Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command in preamble numbers the equation in each
section .without the section number. I want the equation number in
ascending order
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section? If so, then the only way to do this, short
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command in preamble
Mike Reeks wrote:
In my preamble after the line
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
I added the line
@addtoreset{equation}{section}
which had nor effect. Have I followed your suggestion correcty, have I mispelt
it. What next?
You missed the preceding \: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But
Thanks Jens.
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
> Dear Uwe
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
> Dear Uwe
> Nearly there. The command in preamble numbers the equation in each
> section .without th
ext?
Mike
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command i
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
> To: Mike Reeks
> Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Equation numbering
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
>
>
>> Dear Uwe
>> Nearly there. The co
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section? If so, then the only way to do this, short
,
> have I mispelt it. What next?
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
> To: Mike Reeks
> Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Equation numbering
>
>
next?
Mike
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command i
Mike Reeks wrote:
In my preamble after the line
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
I added the line
@addtoreset{equation}{section}
which had nor effect. Have I followed your suggestion correcty, have I mispelt
it. What next?
You missed the preceding "\": [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you use amsmath explicitely in the document preferences
/08/2006 21:23
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to
absolute numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you use amsmath explicitely in the document preferences
/08/2006 21:23
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to
absolute numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
Mike Reeks wrote:
> Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
> numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you use amsmath explicitely in the document prefe
/08/2006 21:23
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to
absolute numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you
Use the remreset package, available on CTAN.
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
numbering?
Mike
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you use amsmath explicitely in the document preferences):
Use the remreset package, available on CTAN.
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
numbering?
Mike
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you use amsmath explicitely in the document preferences):
Use the remreset package, available on CTAN.
Mike Reeks wrote:
> Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
> numbering?
> Mike
>
>
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you use amsmath explicitely in the document preferences):
Ares wroteb:
I tried
\numberwithin{equation}{chapter}
but i get the error messages:
1) Missing \begin{document}
2) Undefined control sequence.
\numberwithin
{equation}{chapter}
What else should I know?
You have to use AMS-math. Enable it in the menu Document - Settings -
Ares wroteb:
I tried
\numberwithin{equation}{chapter}
but i get the error messages:
1) Missing \begin{document}
2) Undefined control sequence.
\numberwithin
{equation}{chapter}
What else should I know?
You have to use AMS-math. Enable it in the menu Document - Settings -
Ares wroteb:
I tried
\numberwithin{equation}{chapter}
but i get the error messages:
1) Missing \begin{document}
2) Undefined control sequence.
\numberwithin
{equation}{chapter}
What else should I know?
You have to use AMS-math. Enable it in the menu Document -> Settings ->
Liu Feng wrote:
It is great, I got it after set 'reqno' in option by Document class-class
setting.
But I use 'book' class when I start my manuscript, but now it displays
'book(AMS)', what is different between 'book' and 'book(AMS)', I know AMS
presents American Math. Soc., But I wonder if
Liu Feng wrote:
It is great, I got it after set 'reqno' in option by Document class-class
setting.
But I use 'book' class when I start my manuscript, but now it displays
'book(AMS)', what is different between 'book' and 'book(AMS)', I know AMS
presents American Math. Soc., But I wonder if
Liu Feng wrote:
It is great, I got it after set 'reqno' in option by Document class->class
setting.
But I use 'book' class when I start my manuscript, but now it displays
'book(AMS)', what is different between 'book' and 'book(AMS)', I know AMS
presents American Math. Soc., But I wonder if
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
