Re: math macros via LaTex preamble

On 07/21/2012 11:34 PM, Allen Barker wrote: On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I

RE: math macros via LaTex preamble

From: Richard Heck [rgh...@lyx.org] Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:20 AM So the attached shows a way around this problem. The difference between \test and \lest doesn't show up inside LyX, but it does in the output. Is there any way to put these inside a preview inset? Scott

Re: math macros via LaTex preamble

On 2012-07-22, Allen Barker wrote: On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I \input

Re: math macros via LaTex preamble

On 07/21/2012 11:34 PM, Allen Barker wrote: On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I

RE: math macros via LaTex preamble

From: Richard Heck [rgh...@lyx.org] Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:20 AM So the attached shows a way around this problem. The difference between \test and \lest doesn't show up inside LyX, but it does in the output. Is there any way to put these inside a preview inset? Scott

Re: math macros via LaTex preamble

On 2012-07-22, Allen Barker wrote: On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I \input

Re: math macros via LaTex preamble

On 07/21/2012 11:34 PM, Allen Barker wrote: On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I

RE: math macros via LaTex preamble

From: Richard Heck [rgh...@lyx.org] Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:20 AM >So the attached shows a way around this problem. The difference between \test >and \lest >doesn't show up inside LyX, but it does in the output. Is there any way to put these inside a preview inset? Scott

Re: math macros via LaTex preamble

On 2012-07-22, Allen Barker wrote: > On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: >> Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one >> document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my >> documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I

Re: math macros via LaTex preamble

On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I \input a file with commonly used preamble

Re: math macros via LaTex preamble

On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I \input a file with commonly used preamble

Re: math macros via LaTex preamble

On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I \input a file with commonly used preamble

Re: math macros via LaTex preamble

On 2012-07-19, ralston wrote: I've got 10 years experience and 200 documents using LaTex with heavy math. Like everyone else I paste a clot of \newcommands into my Latex preamble without looking at it. My student has recommended Lyx, which I appreciate has many great features. I really

Re: math macros via LaTex preamble

On 2012-07-19, ralston wrote: I've got 10 years experience and 200 documents using LaTex with heavy math. Like everyone else I paste a clot of \newcommands into my Latex preamble without looking at it. My student has recommended Lyx, which I appreciate has many great features. I really

Re: math macros via LaTex preamble

On 2012-07-19, ralston wrote: > I've got 10 years experience and 200 documents using LaTex with heavy > math. Like everyone else I paste a clot of \newcommands into my Latex > preamble without looking at it. > My student has recommended Lyx, which I appreciate has many great > features. I

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 2011-05-10, Diego Queiroz wrote: For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone compilation of documents setting a master (except for included (vs. input) documents). This is a strong restriction. But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to

Re: Math macros inside child documents

But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to export stand-alone, uncheck the master setting. Even if the master setting is not set in the child, LyX still display all macros perfectly if the master document is open. My complaint is this: if LyX is able to interpret things

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 2011-05-11, Diego Queiroz wrote: [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to export stand-alone, uncheck the master setting. Even if the master setting is not set in the child, LyX still display all macros perfectly if the master

Re: Math macros inside child documents

A show output anyway button would be great. However, if LyX consistency were assured, there's no need for it (expect when using ERT). ... or the LaTeX preamble (1) or an outdated TeX distribution (2) or a package combination with conflicts (3) or ... (?) Günter I repeat: if, and

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 2011-05-10, Diego Queiroz wrote: For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone compilation of documents setting a master (except for included (vs. input) documents). This is a strong restriction. But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to

Re: Math macros inside child documents

But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to export stand-alone, uncheck the master setting. Even if the master setting is not set in the child, LyX still display all macros perfectly if the master document is open. My complaint is this: if LyX is able to interpret things

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 2011-05-11, Diego Queiroz wrote: [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to export stand-alone, uncheck the master setting. Even if the master setting is not set in the child, LyX still display all macros perfectly if the master

Re: Math macros inside child documents

A show output anyway button would be great. However, if LyX consistency were assured, there's no need for it (expect when using ERT). ... or the LaTeX preamble (1) or an outdated TeX distribution (2) or a package combination with conflicts (3) or ... (?) Günter I repeat: if, and

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 2011-05-10, Diego Queiroz wrote: >> >>> For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone >> >>> compilation of documents setting a master (except for "included" (vs. >> >>> "input") documents). > This is a strong restriction. But the only one for truly consistent

Re: Math macros inside child documents

> > But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to export > stand-alone, uncheck the master setting. > Even if the master setting is not set in the child, LyX still display all macros perfectly if the master document is open. My complaint is this: if LyX is able to interpret

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 2011-05-11, Diego Queiroz wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] >> But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to export >> stand-alone, uncheck the master setting. > Even if the master setting is not set in the child, LyX still display all > macros perfectly if the

Re: Math macros inside child documents

> > > A "show output anyway" button would be great. > > However, if LyX consistency were assured, there's no need for it (expect > > when using ERT). > > ... or the LaTeX preamble (1) or an outdated TeX distribution (2) or a > package > combination with conflicts (3) or ... (?) > > Günter > I

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 2011-05-09, Diego Queiroz wrote: But what if you really want to compile it as a standalone document? People do this. Richard But if it was really a standalone document, I would have to unset master document property, right? ... I am just looking for a more user oriented behavior. I

Re: Math macros inside child documents

Guenter Milde wrote: For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone compilation of documents setting a master (except for included (vs. input) documents). Why this? I have many documents with a master set that get compiled stand- alone from time to time and should _not_

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 2011-05-10, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone compilation of documents setting a master (except for included (vs. input) documents). Why this? I have many documents with a master set that get compiled stand-

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 05/10/2011 09:09 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2011-05-10, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone compilation of documents setting a master (except for included (vs. input) documents). Why this? I have many

Re: Math macros inside child documents

For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone compilation of documents setting a master (except for included (vs. input) documents). This is a strong restriction. With this, in a document with thousand of pages I will obligated to generate all pages? I do not agree.

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 2011-05-09, Diego Queiroz wrote: But what if you really want to compile it as a standalone document? People do this. Richard But if it was really a standalone document, I would have to unset master document property, right? ... I am just looking for a more user oriented behavior. I

Re: Math macros inside child documents

Guenter Milde wrote: For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone compilation of documents setting a master (except for included (vs. input) documents). Why this? I have many documents with a master set that get compiled stand- alone from time to time and should _not_

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 2011-05-10, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone compilation of documents setting a master (except for included (vs. input) documents). Why this? I have many documents with a master set that get compiled stand-

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 05/10/2011 09:09 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2011-05-10, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone compilation of documents setting a master (except for included (vs. input) documents). Why this? I have many

Re: Math macros inside child documents

For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone compilation of documents setting a master (except for included (vs. input) documents). This is a strong restriction. With this, in a document with thousand of pages I will obligated to generate all pages? I do not agree.

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 2011-05-09, Diego Queiroz wrote: >> But what if you really want to compile it as a standalone document? >> People do this. >> Richard > But if it was really a standalone document, I would have to unset master > document property, right? ... > I am just looking for a more "user oriented

Re: Math macros inside child documents

Guenter Milde wrote: > For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone > compilation of documents setting a master (except for "included" (vs. > "input") documents). Why this? I have many documents with a master set that get compiled stand- alone from time to time and should

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 2011-05-10, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone >> compilation of documents setting a master (except for "included" (vs. >> "input") documents). > Why this? I have many documents with a master set that get

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 05/10/2011 09:09 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2011-05-10, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> Guenter Milde wrote: >>> For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone >>> compilation of documents setting a master (except for "included" (vs. >>> "input") documents). >> Why this? I

Re: Math macros inside child documents

> > >>> For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone > >>> compilation of documents setting a master (except for "included" (vs. > >>> "input") documents). > This is a strong restriction. With this, in a document with thousand of pages I will obligated to generate all

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 05/09/2011 10:22 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote: I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the second one. In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and use it in

Re: Math macros inside child documents

If you ask to compile just the child, then you are asking to compile it as a standalone document, so it is no surprise that this does not work. Exactly. :-) If you want to compile just one chapter as part of a larger document, then you need to use the \includeonly support, accessible

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 05/09/2011 11:05 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote: If you want to compile just one chapter as part of a larger document, then you need to use the \includeonly support, accessible from DocumentSettings. I was not aware of this feature. Thanks for the hint. It's new in 2.0.0. But it is also

Re: Math macros inside child documents

But what if you really want to compile it as a standalone document? People do this. Richard But if it was really a standalone document, I would have to unset master document property, right? Anyway, in my case, the problem is that my child document with the macros also define

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 09/05/2011 10:22 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote: I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the second one. In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and use it in other

Re: Math macros inside child documents

So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child docs. -- Julien Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem. Otherwise you won't need to go after a workaround,

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 09/05/2011 1:44 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote: So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child docs. -- Julien Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem. Otherwise you

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 09/05/2011 1:44 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote: So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child docs. -- Julien Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem. Otherwise you

Re: Math macros inside child documents

Which workaround? You said math macros don't work within child docs, I say they work for me. No workaround necessary. Maybe I misunderstood you. I was citing your workaround to include bibtex in the childs. I use a branch named child only, which is activated in child docs but deactivated in

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 09/05/2011 2:23 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote: Which workaround? You said math macros don't work within child docs, I say they work for me. No workaround necessary. Maybe I misunderstood you. I was citing your workaround to include bibtex in the childs. I use a branch named child only, which

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 05/09/2011 02:38 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: Yes I am able to do what you describe in 1.6. In your example child doc, you did not set the master setting, did you? But anyway, I corrected it and still in 2.1.0svn the compilation of the child is broken: Undefined control sequence \anymacro A

Re: Math macros inside child documents

Yes I am able to do what you describe in 1.6. In your example child doc, you did not set the master setting, did you? Indeed. I was in a hurry and I forgot it. ;/ --- Diego Queiroz

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 05/09/2011 10:22 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote: I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the second one. In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and use it in

Re: Math macros inside child documents

If you ask to compile just the child, then you are asking to compile it as a standalone document, so it is no surprise that this does not work. Exactly. :-) If you want to compile just one chapter as part of a larger document, then you need to use the \includeonly support, accessible

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 05/09/2011 11:05 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote: If you want to compile just one chapter as part of a larger document, then you need to use the \includeonly support, accessible from DocumentSettings. I was not aware of this feature. Thanks for the hint. It's new in 2.0.0. But it is also

Re: Math macros inside child documents

But what if you really want to compile it as a standalone document? People do this. Richard But if it was really a standalone document, I would have to unset master document property, right? Anyway, in my case, the problem is that my child document with the macros also define

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 09/05/2011 10:22 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote: I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the second one. In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and use it in other

Re: Math macros inside child documents

So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child docs. -- Julien Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem. Otherwise you won't need to go after a workaround,

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 09/05/2011 1:44 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote: So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child docs. -- Julien Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem. Otherwise you

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 09/05/2011 1:44 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote: So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child docs. -- Julien Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem. Otherwise you

Re: Math macros inside child documents

Which workaround? You said math macros don't work within child docs, I say they work for me. No workaround necessary. Maybe I misunderstood you. I was citing your workaround to include bibtex in the childs. I use a branch named child only, which is activated in child docs but deactivated in

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 09/05/2011 2:23 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote: Which workaround? You said math macros don't work within child docs, I say they work for me. No workaround necessary. Maybe I misunderstood you. I was citing your workaround to include bibtex in the childs. I use a branch named child only, which

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 05/09/2011 02:38 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: Yes I am able to do what you describe in 1.6. In your example child doc, you did not set the master setting, did you? But anyway, I corrected it and still in 2.1.0svn the compilation of the child is broken: Undefined control sequence \anymacro A

Re: Math macros inside child documents

Yes I am able to do what you describe in 1.6. In your example child doc, you did not set the master setting, did you? Indeed. I was in a hurry and I forgot it. ;/ --- Diego Queiroz

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 05/09/2011 10:22 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote: > I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the > second one. > > In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a > child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and > use it

Re: Math macros inside child documents

> > If you ask to compile just the child, then you are asking to compile it > as a standalone document, so it is no surprise that this does not work. > Exactly. :-) > If you want to compile just one chapter as part of a larger document, > then you need to use the \includeonly support,

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 05/09/2011 11:05 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote: > >> If you want to compile just one chapter as part of a larger document, >> then you need to use the \includeonly support, accessible from >> Document>Settings. > I was not aware of this feature. Thanks for the hint. > It's new in 2.0.0. > But it is

Re: Math macros inside child documents

> > But what if you really want to compile it as a standalone document? > People do this. > > Richard > But if it was really a standalone document, I would have to unset master document property, right? Anyway, in my case, the problem is that my child document with the macros also define

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 09/05/2011 10:22 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote: I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the second one. In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and use it in other

Re: Math macros inside child documents

> > So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff > that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child > docs. > -- > Julien > Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem. Otherwise you won't need to go after a

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 09/05/2011 1:44 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote: So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child docs. -- Julien Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem. Otherwise you

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 09/05/2011 1:44 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote: So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child docs. -- Julien Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem. Otherwise you

Re: Math macros inside child documents

> > Which workaround? You said math macros don't work within child docs, I say > they work for me. No workaround necessary. > Maybe I misunderstood you. I was citing your workaround to include bibtex in the childs. >> "I use a branch named "child only", which is activated in child docs but

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 09/05/2011 2:23 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote: Which workaround? You said math macros don't work within child docs, I say they work for me. No workaround necessary. Maybe I misunderstood you. I was citing your workaround to include bibtex in the childs. "I use a branch named "child only",

Re: Math macros inside child documents

On 05/09/2011 02:38 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: > > Yes I am able to do what you describe in 1.6. In your example child > doc, you did not set the master setting, did you? But anyway, I > corrected it and still in 2.1.0svn the compilation of the child is > broken: > > Undefined control sequence

Re: Math macros inside child documents

> > Yes I am able to do what you describe in 1.6. In your example child doc, > you did not set the master setting, did you? > Indeed. I was in a hurry and I forgot it. ;/ --- Diego Queiroz

Re: Math Macros in grey note insets

Le 30 déc. 09 à 09:59, Murtaza Safri a écrit : I am typing in a lot of math macros. I wanted to group them together inside foldable box to improve readability and manageability afforded by folding the inset box. So I put in a lot of the macros inside Lyx grey note. However, the output has a lot

Re: Math Macros in grey note insets

Thanks. It works. Murtaza On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 30 déc. 09 à 09:59, Murtaza Safri a écrit : I am typing in a lot of math macros. I wanted to group them together inside foldable box to improve readability and manageability afforded

Re: Math Macros in grey note insets

Le 30 déc. 09 à 09:59, Murtaza Safri a écrit : I am typing in a lot of math macros. I wanted to group them together inside foldable box to improve readability and manageability afforded by folding the inset box. So I put in a lot of the macros inside Lyx grey note. However, the output has a lot

Re: Math Macros in grey note insets

Thanks. It works. Murtaza On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 30 déc. 09 à 09:59, Murtaza Safri a écrit : I am typing in a lot of math macros. I wanted to group them together inside foldable box to improve readability and manageability afforded

Re: Math Macros in grey note insets

Le 30 déc. 09 à 09:59, Murtaza Safri a écrit : I am typing in a lot of math macros. I wanted to group them together inside foldable box to improve readability and manageability afforded by folding the inset box. So I put in a lot of the macros inside Lyx grey note. However, the output has a lot

Re: Math Macros in grey note insets

Thanks. It works. Murtaza On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 30 déc. 09 à 09:59, Murtaza Safri a écrit : > >> I am typing in a lot of math macros. I wanted to group them together >> inside foldable box to improve readability and manageability

Re: Math macros don't show up in pdf output

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Dan Kilman dankil...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, I am using LyX 1.6.5 on Windows XP installed via the alternative installer. When I define math macros, they seem to be working just fine while editing the document (that is, I can use them). However, when I

Re: Math macros don't show up in pdf output

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Dan Kilman dankil...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, I am using LyX 1.6.5 on Windows XP installed via the alternative installer. When I define math macros, they seem to be working just fine while editing the document (that is, I can use them). However, when I

Re: Math macros don't show up in pdf output

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Dan Kilman wrote: > Hi there, > > I am using LyX 1.6.5 on Windows XP installed via the alternative installer. > > When I define math macros, they seem to be working just fine while editing > the document (that is, I can use them). > However,

Re: math-macros in included file

Am 07.04.2008 um 11:44 schrieb G. Milde: Dear LyX users, for my thesis, I define a set of about 20 math-macros that reside in a well commented file math-macros.lyx that is included by the document file(s). When I open the document file before opening the math-macro.lyx file, all macros will

Re: math-macros in included file

Am 07.04.2008 um 11:44 schrieb G. Milde: Dear LyX users, for my thesis, I define a set of about 20 math-macros that reside in a well commented file math-macros.lyx that is included by the document file(s). When I open the document file before opening the math-macro.lyx file, all macros will

Re: math-macros in included file

Am 07.04.2008 um 11:44 schrieb G. Milde: Dear LyX users, for my thesis, I define a set of about 20 math-macros that reside in a well commented file math-macros.lyx that is included by the document file(s). When I open the document file before opening the math-macro.lyx file, all macros will

Re: math macros

On Sunday 15 October 2006 19:56, Nick Kuzmik wrote: I do a lot of math in lyx, and I create a lot of macros on the fly. What's the best way to keep them organized? Maybe make it so every file I open has all the same macros? In .lyx/bind/ directory you will find a lot of files, there you can

Re: math macros

On Sunday 15 October 2006 19:56, Nick Kuzmik wrote: I do a lot of math in lyx, and I create a lot of macros on the fly. What's the best way to keep them organized? Maybe make it so every file I open has all the same macros? In .lyx/bind/ directory you will find a lot of files, there you can

Re: math macros

On Sunday 15 October 2006 19:56, Nick Kuzmik wrote: > I do a lot of math in lyx, and I create a lot of macros on the fly. What's > the best way to keep them organized? Maybe make it so every file I open > has all the same macros? In .lyx/bind/ directory you will find a lot of files, there you

Re: Math Macros

On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:05:54PM -0500, William O. Bray wrote: Hello, I am using Lyx 1.3 with qt frontend. suppose you want a macro for \a^{#1} where #1 is user input. In the doc mini-buffer one would type, e.g., math-macro ax 1 (enter) This brings up the macro box in the Lyx doc; in the

Re: Math Macros

On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:05:54PM -0500, William O. Bray wrote: Hello, I am using Lyx 1.3 with qt frontend. suppose you want a macro for \a^{#1} where #1 is user input. In the doc mini-buffer one would type, e.g., math-macro ax 1 (enter) This brings up the macro box in the Lyx doc; in the

Re: Math Macros

On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:05:54PM -0500, William O. Bray wrote: > Hello, I am using Lyx 1.3 with qt frontend. > suppose you want a macro for \a^{#1} where #1 is user input. > In the doc mini-buffer one would type, e.g., > math-macro ax 1 (enter) > This brings up the macro box in the Lyx doc; in

Re: Re: math-macros

On Sat, 9 Jun 2001 00:50:20 +0300 wrote Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:44:47AM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote: The math-macro definitions have the advantage that they are expanded and appear in WYSIWM mode (a LyX perk!). The LyX-math-macro has the

Re: Re: math-macros

On Sat, 9 Jun 2001 00:50:20 +0300 wrote Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:44:47AM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote: The math-macro definitions have the advantage that they are expanded and appear in WYSIWM mode (a LyX perk!). The LyX-math-macro has the

Re: Re: math-macros

On Sat, 9 Jun 2001 00:50:20 +0300 wrote Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:44:47AM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote: > > >>The math-macro definitions have the advantage that they are expanded and > > >>appear in WYSIWM mode (a LyX perk!). The LyX-math-macro has the

Re: math-macros

Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:41:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael P Friedlander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: math-macros I just started using LyX, and even after a few hours, it's clear that it's a great advance over using LaTeX directly, even with great packages like AucTeX under

  1   2   >