Re: Feature suggestion: Table/matrix toolbar button

, and there is also a menu item that shows that dialog. My suggestion is to bypass the dialog and utilize an existing button on the standard toolbar for two purposes depending on the context. I agree: It is somewhat different. You might file an enhancement request. It might not be that hard to do

Re: Feature suggestion: Table/matrix toolbar button

Sure, and there is also a menu item that shows that dialog. My suggestion is to bypass the dialog and utilize an existing button on the standard toolbar for two purposes depending on the context. Best, Fatihcan > Lorenzo Bertini (23 May 2024 22:48): > > Hi, > maybe you're a

Re: Feature suggestion: Table/matrix toolbar button

Hi, maybe you're already aware of this, but there is a matrix insert button that does exactly that. It appears in the math toolbar and you can drag the matrix to make it as big as you want, add parentheses, etc. See screenshot attached. Cheers, Lorenzo Il giorno gio 23 mag 2024 alle ore 21:36

Feature suggestion: Table/matrix toolbar button

LyX 2.4.0 has a cool toolbar button that makes it very easy to insert a table of any size into text. It is grayed out in math mode. It would be very useful to have the same button insert a matrix in math mode. Fatihcan Atay -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org

Re: Suggestion

On 12/7/23 14:38, Christopher Menzel wrote: On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:28 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 12/6/23 15:55, Christopher Menzel wrote: On Dec 6, 2023, at 2:05 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 12/6/23 05:24, Patrick Dupre via lyx-users wrote: Hello, Can I suggest to have in

Re: Suggestion

On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:28 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > On 12/6/23 15:55, Christopher Menzel wrote: >>> On Dec 6, 2023, at 2:05 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck >>> wrote: >>> On 12/6/23 05:24, Patrick Dupre via lyx-users wrote: Hello, Can I suggest to have in the "View" tab an

Re: Suggestion

On 12/7/23 03:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Don't the new controls for zoom show the bindings in their tooltip? They should. If you left-click on the zoom number itself, you get a little menu. But it's not easily discoverable. Right-clicking anywhere on the bottom bit gives you a choice of

Re: Suggestion

Don't the new controls for zoom show the bindings in their tooltip? They should. Jmarc Le 7 décembre 2023 05:28:06 GMT+01:00, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : >On 12/6/23 15:55, Christopher Menzel wrote: >>> On Dec 6, 2023, at 2:05 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck >>> wrote: >>> On 12/6/23 05:24,

Re: Suggestion

On 12/6/23 15:55, Christopher Menzel wrote: On Dec 6, 2023, at 2:05 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 12/6/23 05:24, Patrick Dupre via lyx-users wrote: Hello, Can I suggest to have in the "View" tab an option to zoom in, and zoom out? It could be also a short cut to generate these behaviors

Re: Suggestion

> On Dec 6, 2023, at 2:05 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 12/6/23 05:24, Patrick Dupre via lyx-users wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Can I suggest to have in the "View" tab an option to zoom in, and zoom out? >> It could be also a short cut to generate these behaviors like ctl -, and >> ctl + or Up

Re: Suggestion

> On 12/6/23 05:24, Patrick Dupre via lyx-users wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Can I suggest to have in the "View" tab an option to zoom in, and zoom out? > > It could be also a short cut to generate these behaviors like ctl -, and > > ctl + or Up ctl + > > Those shortcuts work here. You're on Fedora,

Re: Suggestion

On 12/6/23 05:24, Patrick Dupre via lyx-users wrote: Hello, Can I suggest to have in the "View" tab an option to zoom in, and zoom out? It could be also a short cut to generate these behaviors like ctl -, and ctl + or Up ctl + Those shortcuts work here. You're on Fedora, right? Me, too. Riki

Suggestion

Hello, Can I suggest to have in the "View" tab an option to zoom in, and zoom out? It could be also a short cut to generate these behaviors like ctl -, and ctl + or Up ctl + Long life time to lyx === Patrick DUPRÉ

Resource Suggestion

Dear Sir/Madam, Today I was browsing for "C++ Resources" and found your website with a list of useful links(https://www.lyx.org/DeveloperResources) related to C++ which is really useful for avid C++ programmers. We at Invensis Technologies have compiled a comprehensive list

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

Liviu Andronic wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: my case). I wonder if just having the option of opening an ERT itself in an external editor would help? As it happens, this is the subject of: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7404 Georg even

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

Liviu Andronic wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: my case). I wonder if just having the option of opening an ERT itself in an external editor would help? As it happens, this is the subject of: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7404 Georg even

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > >> my case). I wonder if just having the option of opening an ERT itself in >> an external >> editor would help? >> > As it happens, this is the subject of: > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7404 > >

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On 2015-06-10, Benedict Holland wrote: Since there are already excellent Latex editors, I don't understand why it would be desirable for Lyx to incorporate such features. I love LyX, because I can input math from the keyboard, without click and search in menus and dragging around - just using

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On 06/10/2015 04:42 AM, Madhusudan Singh wrote: TeXmacs is a good alternative. Hiding away preamble stuff has always been sufficiently problematic for me for me not to take to LyX. Do you mean that you can't see the preamble stuff in the LyX document? There is an easy solution to this, if

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On 06/10/2015 04:13 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote: On 2015-06-10, Benedict Holland wrote: Since there are already excellent Latex editors, I don't understand why it would be desirable for Lyx to incorporate such features. I

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 06/10/2015 04:13 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote: On 2015-06-10, Benedict Holland wrote: Since there are already excellent Latex editors, I don't

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote: On 2015-06-10, Benedict Holland wrote: Since there are already excellent Latex editors, I don't understand why it would be desirable for Lyx to incorporate such features. I love LyX, because I can input math from the

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

TeXmacs is a good alternative. Hiding away preamble stuff has always been sufficiently problematic for me for me not to take to LyX. I have not much used TeXmacs but it has a lot of this and more. For my documents, I stick to LaTeX with a live preview. Just can't beat that kind of power. On

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On 2015-06-10, Benedict Holland wrote: Since there are already excellent Latex editors, I don't understand why it would be desirable for Lyx to incorporate such features. I love LyX, because I can input math from the keyboard, without click and search in menus and dragging around - just using

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote: On 2015-06-10, Benedict Holland wrote: Since there are already excellent Latex editors, I don't understand why it would be desirable for Lyx to incorporate such features. I love LyX, because I can input math from the

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

TeXmacs is a good alternative. Hiding away preamble stuff has always been sufficiently problematic for me for me not to take to LyX. I have not much used TeXmacs but it has a lot of this and more. For my documents, I stick to LaTeX with a live preview. Just can't beat that kind of power. On

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On 06/10/2015 04:13 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote: On 2015-06-10, Benedict Holland wrote: Since there are already excellent Latex editors, I don't understand why it would be desirable for Lyx to incorporate such features. I

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On 06/10/2015 04:42 AM, Madhusudan Singh wrote: TeXmacs is a good alternative. Hiding away preamble stuff has always been sufficiently problematic for me for me not to take to LyX. Do you mean that you can't see the preamble stuff in the LyX document? There is an easy solution to this, if

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 06/10/2015 04:13 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote: On 2015-06-10, Benedict Holland wrote: Since there are already excellent Latex editors, I don't

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On 2015-06-10, Benedict Holland wrote: > Since there are already excellent Latex editors, I don't > understand why it would be desirable for Lyx to incorporate such features. I love LyX, because I can input math from the keyboard, without click and search in menus and dragging around - just

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2015-06-10, Benedict Holland wrote: > >> Since there are already excellent Latex editors, I don't >> understand why it would be desirable for Lyx to incorporate such features. > > I love LyX, because I can input math

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

TeXmacs is a good alternative. Hiding away preamble stuff has always been sufficiently problematic for me for me not to take to LyX. I have not much used TeXmacs but it has a lot of this and more. For my documents, I stick to LaTeX with a live preview. Just can't beat that kind of power. On

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On 06/10/2015 04:13 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2015-06-10, Benedict Holland wrote: Since there are already excellent Latex editors, I don't understand why it would be desirable for Lyx to incorporate such features.

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On 06/10/2015 04:42 AM, Madhusudan Singh wrote: TeXmacs is a good alternative. Hiding away preamble stuff has always been sufficiently problematic for me for me not to take to LyX. Do you mean that you can't see the preamble stuff in the LyX document? There is an easy solution to this, if

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 06/10/2015 04:13 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: >>> >>> On 2015-06-10, Benedict Holland wrote: >>> Since there are already excellent Latex

Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

Hi there, I am a new user of Lyx, but a not a beginner in LaTEX. I couldn’t find in the internet why Lyx doesn’t allow to edit the source LaTEX file. It would be an awesome feature and could make Lyx a great rival against the other LaTEX editors. I like the simplicity of Lyx and the features

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:00:25PM +0100, Ricardo Gaspar wrote: Hi there, I am a new user of Lyx, but a not a beginner in LaTEX. Hi Ricardo, and welcome! It's nice to have a fresh perspective. Please keep providing feedback and if you happen to have the time and interests, patches or (if you

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

Hi Ricardo, Can you provide an example of a situation where the feature in question would be useful? I composed in raw LaTeX for 20 years but since switching pretty much full-time to LyX several years ago I have yet to find a situation that LyX (plus perhaps a little ERT

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On 06/09/2015 06:13 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:00:25PM +0100, Ricardo Gaspar wrote: Hi there, I am a new user of Lyx, but a not a beginner in LaTEX. Hi Ricardo, and welcome! It's nice to have a fresh perspective. Please keep providing feedback and if you happen to

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

I have to plug emacs for native lyx support. That application is awesome at parsing raw Latex. As Richard said, this is the antithesis of why anyone would use Lyx. I have become a huge fan of seamlessly integrating my latex documents, mostly tables, using the input command and editing the .tex

Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

Hi there, I am a new user of Lyx, but a not a beginner in LaTEX. I couldn’t find in the internet why Lyx doesn’t allow to edit the source LaTEX file. It would be an awesome feature and could make Lyx a great rival against the other LaTEX editors. I like the simplicity of Lyx and the features

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:00:25PM +0100, Ricardo Gaspar wrote: Hi there, I am a new user of Lyx, but a not a beginner in LaTEX. Hi Ricardo, and welcome! It's nice to have a fresh perspective. Please keep providing feedback and if you happen to have the time and interests, patches or (if you

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

Hi Ricardo, Can you provide an example of a situation where the feature in question would be useful? I composed in raw LaTeX for 20 years but since switching pretty much full-time to LyX several years ago I have yet to find a situation that LyX (plus perhaps a little ERT

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On 06/09/2015 06:13 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:00:25PM +0100, Ricardo Gaspar wrote: Hi there, I am a new user of Lyx, but a not a beginner in LaTEX. Hi Ricardo, and welcome! It's nice to have a fresh perspective. Please keep providing feedback and if you happen to

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

I have to plug emacs for native lyx support. That application is awesome at parsing raw Latex. As Richard said, this is the antithesis of why anyone would use Lyx. I have become a huge fan of seamlessly integrating my latex documents, mostly tables, using the input command and editing the .tex

Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

Hi there, I am a new user of Lyx, but a not a beginner in LaTEX. I couldn’t find in the internet why Lyx doesn’t allow to edit the source LaTEX file. It would be an awesome feature and could make Lyx a great rival against the other LaTEX editors. I like the simplicity of Lyx and the features

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:00:25PM +0100, Ricardo Gaspar wrote: > Hi there, > > I am a new user of Lyx, but a not a beginner in LaTEX. Hi Ricardo, and welcome! It's nice to have a fresh perspective. Please keep providing feedback and if you happen to have the time and interests, patches or (if

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

Hi Ricardo, Can you provide an example of a situation where the feature in question would be useful? I composed in raw LaTeX for 20 years but since switching pretty much full-time to LyX several years ago I have yet to find a situation that LyX (plus perhaps a little ERT

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

On 06/09/2015 06:13 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:00:25PM +0100, Ricardo Gaspar wrote: Hi there, I am a new user of Lyx, but a not a beginner in LaTEX. Hi Ricardo, and welcome! It's nice to have a fresh perspective. Please keep providing feedback and if you happen to

Re: Suggestion to improve Lyx for LaTEX users

I have to plug emacs for native lyx support. That application is awesome at parsing raw Latex. As Richard said, this is the antithesis of why anyone would use Lyx. I have become a huge fan of seamlessly integrating my latex documents, mostly tables, using the input command and editing the .tex

Suggestion: text style toolbar like MS office (e.g. color palette)

suggestion: under the toolbar-font, there is already bold, italic, etc., but their effects are not visualized on the button, which in my opinion can be of great convenience (of course I can use keyboard shortcut for this, but...). Similar things should be useful also for font family, series, shape, size

Suggestion: text style toolbar like MS office (e.g. color palette)

suggestion: under the toolbar-font, there is already bold, italic, etc., but their effects are not visualized on the button, which in my opinion can be of great convenience (of course I can use keyboard shortcut for this, but...). Similar things should be useful also for font family, series, shape, size

Suggestion: text style toolbar like MS office (e.g. color palette)

suggestion: under the toolbar->font, there is already bold, italic, etc., but their effects are not visualized on the button, which in my opinion can be of great convenience (of course I can use keyboard shortcut for this, but...). Similar things should be useful also for font family, series, shape, s

Re: Colouring depth markers - Feature suggestion?

Op 27-6-2012 14:26, Rainer M Krug schreef: Hi I am working on a beamer presentation and having trouble with seeing the depth of the environments clearly. Is there a way of colouring these brackets on the left hand side in different colours, so that it is easier to see in which level I am?

Re: Colouring depth markers - Feature suggestion?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/06/12 10:59, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 27-6-2012 14:26, Rainer M Krug schreef: Hi I am working on a beamer presentation and having trouble with seeing the depth of the environments clearly. Is there a way of colouring these

Re: Colouring depth markers - Feature suggestion?

Op 28-6-2012 11:01, Rainer M Krug schreef: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/06/12 10:59, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 27-6-2012 14:26, Rainer M Krug schreef: Hi I am working on a beamer presentation and having trouble with seeing the depth of the environments clearly.

Re: Colouring depth markers - Feature suggestion?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/06/12 11:10, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 28-6-2012 11:01, Rainer M Krug schreef: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/06/12 10:59, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 27-6-2012 14:26, Rainer M Krug schreef: Hi I am

Re: Colouring depth markers - Feature suggestion?

Op 27-6-2012 14:26, Rainer M Krug schreef: Hi I am working on a beamer presentation and having trouble with seeing the depth of the environments clearly. Is there a way of colouring these brackets on the left hand side in different colours, so that it is easier to see in which level I am?

Re: Colouring depth markers - Feature suggestion?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/06/12 10:59, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 27-6-2012 14:26, Rainer M Krug schreef: Hi I am working on a beamer presentation and having trouble with seeing the depth of the environments clearly. Is there a way of colouring these

Re: Colouring depth markers - Feature suggestion?

Op 28-6-2012 11:01, Rainer M Krug schreef: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/06/12 10:59, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 27-6-2012 14:26, Rainer M Krug schreef: Hi I am working on a beamer presentation and having trouble with seeing the depth of the environments clearly.

Re: Colouring depth markers - Feature suggestion?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/06/12 11:10, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 28-6-2012 11:01, Rainer M Krug schreef: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/06/12 10:59, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 27-6-2012 14:26, Rainer M Krug schreef: Hi I am

Re: Colouring "depth markers" - Feature suggestion?

Op 27-6-2012 14:26, Rainer M Krug schreef: Hi I am working on a beamer presentation and having trouble with seeing the depth of the environments clearly. Is there a way of colouring these "brackets" on the left hand side in different colours, so that it is easier to see in which level I am?

Re: Colouring "depth markers" - Feature suggestion?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/06/12 10:59, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Op 27-6-2012 14:26, Rainer M Krug schreef: >> Hi >> >> I am working on a beamer presentation and having trouble with seeing the >> depth of the >> environments clearly. Is there a way of colouring

Re: Colouring "depth markers" - Feature suggestion?

Op 28-6-2012 11:01, Rainer M Krug schreef: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/06/12 10:59, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 27-6-2012 14:26, Rainer M Krug schreef: Hi I am working on a beamer presentation and having trouble with seeing the depth of the environments clearly.

Re: Colouring "depth markers" - Feature suggestion?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/06/12 11:10, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Op 28-6-2012 11:01, Rainer M Krug schreef: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 28/06/12 10:59, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >>> Op 27-6-2012 14:26, Rainer M Krug schreef:

Colouring depth markers - Feature suggestion?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I am working on a beamer presentation and having trouble with seeing the depth of the environments clearly. Is there a way of colouring these brackets on the left hand side in different colours, so that it is easier to see in which level I am?

Colouring depth markers - Feature suggestion?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I am working on a beamer presentation and having trouble with seeing the depth of the environments clearly. Is there a way of colouring these brackets on the left hand side in different colours, so that it is easier to see in which level I am?

Colouring "depth markers" - Feature suggestion?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I am working on a beamer presentation and having trouble with seeing the depth of the environments clearly. Is there a way of colouring these "brackets" on the left hand side in different colours, so that it is easier to see in which level I am?

Re: Feature suggestion: vertical ruler for word-count

On 07/11/2011 05:47, Xu Wang wrote: Hi Johannes! If you want the word count for a selection, can't you just select it, go to toolsstatistics ? Yeah that's what I do now. Having a ruler is just less clicks. It's not a killer feature but rather a nice-to-have gimmick. Best, Xu On

Re: Feature suggestion: vertical ruler for word-count

On 07/11/2011 05:47, Xu Wang wrote: Hi Johannes! If you want the word count for a selection, can't you just select it, go to toolsstatistics ? Yeah that's what I do now. Having a ruler is just less clicks. It's not a killer feature but rather a nice-to-have gimmick. Best, Xu On

Re: Feature suggestion: vertical ruler for word-count

On 07/11/2011 05:47, Xu Wang wrote: > Hi Johannes! > > If you want the word count for a selection, can't you just select it, go to > tools>statistics ? Yeah that's what I do now. Having a ruler is just less clicks. It's not a killer feature but rather a nice-to-have gimmick. > > Best, > > Xu

Feature suggestion: vertical ruler for word-count

Hi! What do you guys think about a vertical ruler that shows the word count along the text? Ruler for centimeters doesnt make much sense for Lyx, but I quite often wonder about word count in various sections of my documents... Johannes

Re: Feature suggestion: vertical ruler for word-count

Hi Johannes! If you want the word count for a selection, can't you just select it, go to toolsstatistics ? Best, Xu On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Johannes Totz jt...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: Hi! What do you guys think about a vertical ruler that shows the word count along the text? Ruler

Feature suggestion: vertical ruler for word-count

Hi! What do you guys think about a vertical ruler that shows the word count along the text? Ruler for centimeters doesnt make much sense for Lyx, but I quite often wonder about word count in various sections of my documents... Johannes

Re: Feature suggestion: vertical ruler for word-count

Hi Johannes! If you want the word count for a selection, can't you just select it, go to toolsstatistics ? Best, Xu On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Johannes Totz jt...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: Hi! What do you guys think about a vertical ruler that shows the word count along the text? Ruler

Feature suggestion: vertical ruler for word-count

Hi! What do you guys think about a vertical ruler that shows the word count along the text? Ruler for centimeters doesnt make much sense for Lyx, but I quite often wonder about word count in various sections of my documents... Johannes

Re: Feature suggestion: vertical ruler for word-count

Hi Johannes! If you want the word count for a selection, can't you just select it, go to tools>statistics ? Best, Xu On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Johannes Totz wrote: > Hi! > > What do you guys think about a vertical ruler that shows the word count > along the text?

Creating a new module : some questions and suggestion for the documentation

I continue not to have the optional short title in the contextual menu with my environments in the module. Moreover, for the \sage;{} command that can be used, I am trying to explore the insets avenue, trying to get inspired by the FixMe module. I have inserted the following element in my module

Re: Creating a new module : some questions and suggestion for the documentation

If someone from the documentation list is reading this, I'd kindly ask not to refer to the description of the options already mentioned, it adds to the confusion. I think it's better to repeat rather than force user to jump up and down. On 10/31/2011 12:05 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:

Re: Creating a new module : some questions and suggestion for the documentation

Hi Philip, The inset problem has been solved (see my previous mail, sorry for filling your mailboxes). The inline \sage command works nicely now, using Flex:sagecommand in the declaration of the InsetLayout Remains the problem with the option of \sageplot command, through the contextual menu +

Creating a new module : some questions and suggestion for the documentation

I continue not to have the optional short title in the contextual menu with my environments in the module. Moreover, for the \sage;{} command that can be used, I am trying to explore the insets avenue, trying to get inspired by the FixMe module. I have inserted the following element in my module

Re: Creating a new module : some questions and suggestion for the documentation

If someone from the documentation list is reading this, I'd kindly ask not to refer to the description of the options already mentioned, it adds to the confusion. I think it's better to repeat rather than force user to jump up and down. On 10/31/2011 12:05 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:

Re: Creating a new module : some questions and suggestion for the documentation

Hi Philip, The inset problem has been solved (see my previous mail, sorry for filling your mailboxes). The inline \sage command works nicely now, using Flex:sagecommand in the declaration of the InsetLayout Remains the problem with the option of \sageplot command, through the contextual menu +

Creating a new module : some questions and suggestion for the documentation

I continue not to have the optional short title in the contextual menu with my environments in the module. Moreover, for the \sage;{} command that can be used, I am trying to explore the insets avenue, trying to get inspired by the FixMe module. I have inserted the following element in my module

Re: Creating a new module : some questions and suggestion for the documentation

If someone from the documentation list is reading this, I'd kindly ask not to refer to the description of the options already mentioned, it adds to the confusion. I think it's better to repeat rather than force user to jump up and down. On 10/31/2011 12:05 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:

Re: Creating a new module : some questions and suggestion for the documentation

Hi Philip, The inset problem has been solved (see my previous mail, sorry for filling your mailboxes). The inline \sage command works nicely now, using Flex:sagecommand in the declaration of the InsetLayout Remains the problem with the option of \sageplot command, through the contextual menu +

Re: suggestion: searchbar for insert special character

). My suggestion is add a searchbar to the insert special character. BTW, I can use kcharselect to locate a unicode character. But, I don't think it would generally work to just paste in a unicode character to a LaTeX document, correct? Usually, you can freely copy/paste some unicode chars

Re: suggestion: searchbar for insert special character

). My suggestion is add a searchbar to the insert special character. BTW, I can use kcharselect to locate a unicode character. But, I don't think it would generally work to just paste in a unicode character to a LaTeX document, correct? Usually, you can freely copy/paste some unicode chars

Re: suggestion: searchbar for insert special character

st thing shown (on my machine). > > My suggestion is add a searchbar to the insert special character. > > BTW, I can use kcharselect to locate a unicode character. But, I don't > think it > would generally work to just paste in a unicode character to a LaTeX > document, > correct

Re: need suggestion on book

On 2011-06-26, Steve Litt wrote: On Sunday 26 June 2011 15:09:41 Shantanu N Kulkarni wrote: On my setup, Century Schoolbook is the least pale font. I use Century Schoolbook on all my books, although I'm looking for a more screen- readable font for my pure eBooks. Free screen-optimized fonts

Re: need suggestion on book

On 2011-06-26, Steve Litt wrote: On Sunday 26 June 2011 15:09:41 Shantanu N Kulkarni wrote: On my setup, Century Schoolbook is the least pale font. I use Century Schoolbook on all my books, although I'm looking for a more screen- readable font for my pure eBooks. Free screen-optimized fonts

Re: need suggestion on book

On 2011-06-26, Steve Litt wrote: > On Sunday 26 June 2011 15:09:41 Shantanu N Kulkarni wrote: > On my setup, Century Schoolbook is the least pale font. I use Century > Schoolbook on all my books, although I'm looking for a more screen- > readable font for my pure eBooks. Free screen-optimized

Re: need suggestion on book

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.comwrote: I couldn't have said it better myself. And because of what Marcelo said, I find LyX is a MUCH faster authoring environment than anything in which I need to see markup. As much as I agree with this, the one

Re: need suggestion on book

On Saturday 25 June 2011 22:09:36 Liviu Andronic wrote: On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote: On Saturday 25 June 2011 19:17:18 Marcelo Acuña wrote: 2. Yes, I remember this is a lyx list, but ... are there any advantages or writing this book in

Re: need suggestion on book

* Marcelo Acu?a mv...@yahoo.com.ar [110626 09:18]: 2. Yes, I remember this is a lyx list, but ... are there any advantages or writing this book in plain latex instead of lyx? If you work in plain latex, while you write it, you get a text pestered with commands. That makes difficult

Re: need suggestion on book

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.comwrote: I am interested in which font do I use, because usually lyx fonts are somewhat pale. On my setup, Century Schoolbook is the least pale font. I use Century Schoolbook on all my books, although I'm looking for a

Re: need suggestion on book

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Shantanu N Kulkarni m...@lists.shantanukulkarni.org wrote: I am interested in which font do I use, because usually lyx fonts are somewhat pale. In many cases the fonts pre-selected by default are indeed ghastly. Personally I tend to stick to Palatino Optima

Re: need suggestion on book

On Sunday 26 June 2011 17:38:12 Trevor Jenkins wrote: On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.comwrote: I am interested in which font do I use, because usually lyx fonts are somewhat pale. On my setup, Century Schoolbook is the least pale font. I use

Re: need suggestion on book

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.comwrote: I couldn't have said it better myself. And because of what Marcelo said, I find LyX is a MUCH faster authoring environment than anything in which I need to see markup. As much as I agree with this, the one

Re: need suggestion on book

On Saturday 25 June 2011 22:09:36 Liviu Andronic wrote: On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote: On Saturday 25 June 2011 19:17:18 Marcelo Acuña wrote: 2. Yes, I remember this is a lyx list, but ... are there any advantages or writing this book in

  1   2   3   4   5   >