Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker {KBD shortcut(s)}

On 06/14/2011 11:52 AM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > I may be a bit too dependent on > the various package management systems on my installed distros but most of > the time this saves me a lot of dependency headaches. I don't think I would fault anyone for being dependent upon package

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker {KBD shortcut(s)}

use a character NOT in it's label or give it the Alt+A shortcut, which would mean the "Replace All" button couldn't use the "A" anymore. And so on... A better solution would be perhaps to force the focus to switch to the spell checker window when F7 is pressed, and keep it there

spell checker not active

Hunspell (en fr) is installed on my system. It's configured as default spellchecker on LyX. Still the menu item for it stays greyed out. What can I do to activate it ? -- Alain DIDIERJEAN Puisque ces mystères nous dépassent

Re: spell checker not active

Am 11.06.2011 um 12:06 schrieb Alain DIDIERJEAN: Hunspell (en fr) is installed on my system. It's configured as default spellchecker on LyX. Still the menu item for it stays greyed out. What can I do to activate it ? You build LyX yourself? On what platform? You've installed the developer

Re: spell checker not active

- Mail Original - De: Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net À: LyX Users List lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Envoyé: Samedi 11 Juin 2011 13h11:12 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Re: spell checker not active Am 11.06.2011 um 12:06 schrieb Alain DIDIERJEAN

Re: spell checker not active

Op zaterdag 11 juni 2011 15:05:39 schreef Alain DIDIERJEAN: - Mail Original - De: Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net À: LyX Users List lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Envoyé: Samedi 11 Juin 2011 13h11:12 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Re: spell checker

spell checker not active

Hunspell (en fr) is installed on my system. It's configured as default spellchecker on LyX. Still the menu item for it stays greyed out. What can I do to activate it ? -- Alain DIDIERJEAN Puisque ces mystères nous dépassent

Re: spell checker not active

Am 11.06.2011 um 12:06 schrieb Alain DIDIERJEAN: Hunspell (en fr) is installed on my system. It's configured as default spellchecker on LyX. Still the menu item for it stays greyed out. What can I do to activate it ? You build LyX yourself? On what platform? You've installed the developer

Re: spell checker not active

- Mail Original - De: Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net À: LyX Users List lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Envoyé: Samedi 11 Juin 2011 13h11:12 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Re: spell checker not active Am 11.06.2011 um 12:06 schrieb Alain DIDIERJEAN

Re: spell checker not active

Op zaterdag 11 juni 2011 15:05:39 schreef Alain DIDIERJEAN: - Mail Original - De: Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net À: LyX Users List lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Envoyé: Samedi 11 Juin 2011 13h11:12 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Re: spell checker

spell checker not active

Hunspell (en & fr) is installed on my system. It's configured as default spellchecker on LyX. Still the menu item for it stays greyed out. What can I do to activate it ? -- Alain DIDIERJEAN Puisque ces mystères nous dépassent

Re: spell checker not active

Am 11.06.2011 um 12:06 schrieb Alain DIDIERJEAN: > Hunspell (en & fr) is installed on my system. It's configured as default > spellchecker on LyX. Still the menu item for it stays greyed out. What can I > do to activate it ? You build LyX yourself? On what platform? You've installed the

Re: spell checker not active

- Mail Original - De: "Stephan Witt" <st.w...@gmx.net> À: "LyX Users List" <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org> Envoyé: Samedi 11 Juin 2011 13h11:12 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Re: spell checker not active Am 11.06.2011 u

Re: spell checker not active

Op zaterdag 11 juni 2011 15:05:39 schreef Alain DIDIERJEAN: > - Mail Original - > De: "Stephan Witt" <st.w...@gmx.net> > À: "LyX Users List" <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org> > Envoyé: Samedi 11 Juin 2011 13h11:12 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne &g

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

. according to those Spellchecker preferences I do still have aspell selected as my spellchecker. but when (as I mentioned in my previous post) I couldn't get the spell checker to recognize “Avant-garde” as a word even after clicking on the add button I tested the add function with a repeated

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker {¿pwl_english.dict?}

couldn't get the spell checker to recognize “Avant-garde” as a word even after clicking on the add button I tested the add function with a repeated ridiculous spelling of “pulleese” And upon adding the first instance by clicking on the add button the spell checker skipped the second. And when

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker {KBD shortcut(s)}

to it every time I need to ADD, or IGNORE a word. Not to mention close the spell checker dialog... At least I don't have much use for the ‘Find Next’ button or I'm sure that shortcut conflict would bother me as well. Thanks anyway... Gosh! I surely do hope these shortcut problems are due to some

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker {¿pwl_english.dict?}

spellchecker. but when (as I mentioned in my previous post) I couldn't get the spell checker to recognize “Avant-garde” as a word even after clicking on the add button I tested the add function with a repeated ridiculous spelling of “pulleese” And upon adding the first instance by clicking on the add

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker {¿pwl_english.dict?}

It would appear that on Jun 6, Stephan Witt did say: Am 06.06.2011 um 18:23 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook: OK, whether or not my keyboard shortcut issues are resolved (or limited to the version that may have been modified by the PCLinuxOS maintainers) I'm going to need to understand

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

. according to those Spellchecker preferences I do still have aspell selected as my spellchecker. but when (as I mentioned in my previous post) I couldn't get the spell checker to recognize “Avant-garde” as a word even after clicking on the add button I tested the add function with a repeated

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker {¿pwl_english.dict?}

couldn't get the spell checker to recognize “Avant-garde” as a word even after clicking on the add button I tested the add function with a repeated ridiculous spelling of “pulleese” And upon adding the first instance by clicking on the add button the spell checker skipped the second. And when

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker {KBD shortcut(s)}

to it every time I need to ADD, or IGNORE a word. Not to mention close the spell checker dialog... At least I don't have much use for the ‘Find Next’ button or I'm sure that shortcut conflict would bother me as well. Thanks anyway... Gosh! I surely do hope these shortcut problems are due to some

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker {¿pwl_english.dict?}

spellchecker. but when (as I mentioned in my previous post) I couldn't get the spell checker to recognize “Avant-garde” as a word even after clicking on the add button I tested the add function with a repeated ridiculous spelling of “pulleese” And upon adding the first instance by clicking on the add

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker {¿pwl_english.dict?}

It would appear that on Jun 6, Stephan Witt did say: Am 06.06.2011 um 18:23 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook: OK, whether or not my keyboard shortcut issues are resolved (or limited to the version that may have been modified by the PCLinuxOS maintainers) I'm going to need to understand

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker & user interface Eeeeeek!

ble checked and that option wasn't checked. So I tried checking it and > *saving the changes. No change in behavior. Then I set it back to unchecked > and again *saves the changes. Still no change... Thanks anyway! > > ... > I've also notices another oddness. according to those Spellchecke

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker & {¿pwl_english.dict?}

tioned in my previous post) I couldn't get the spell > > checker to recognize “Avant-garde” as a word even after clicking on the add > > button I tested the add function with a repeated ridiculous spelling of > > “pulleese” And upon "adding the first instance by clicking on

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker & {KBD shortcut(s)}

? Since to me the mouse in an uncomfortable, non-intuitive, & sometimes problematical control interface I really detest having to resort to it every time I need to ADD, or IGNORE a word. Not to mention close the spell checker dialog... At least I don't have much use for the ‘Find Next

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker & {¿pwl_english.dict?}

s I do still have aspell selected as my spellchecker. >>> but when (as I mentioned in my previous post) I couldn't get the spell >>> checker to recognize “Avant-garde” as a word even after clicking on the add >>> button I tested the add function with a repeated ridiculous sp

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker & {¿pwl_english.dict?}

It would appear that on Jun 6, Stephan Witt did say: > Am 06.06.2011 um 18:23 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook: > > OK, whether or not my keyboard shortcut issues are resolved (or limited to > > the version that may have been modified by the PCLinuxOS maintainers) I'm > > going to need to

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the issue that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word and it's immediate context when it opened. And I'll admit that as much as I totally loath all sidebars «I like my entire window width to always

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say: 2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the issue that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word and it's immediate context when it opened. And I'll admit

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

On 5-6-2011 16:23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say: 2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the issue that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word and

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the issue that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word and it's immediate context when it opened. And I'll admit that as much as I totally loath all sidebars «I like my entire window width to always

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say: 2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the issue that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word and it's immediate context when it opened. And I'll admit

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

On 5-6-2011 16:23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say: 2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the issue that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word and

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker & user interface Eeeeeek!

> > > 2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the issue > that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word and > it's immediate context when it opened. And I'll admit that as much as I > totally loath all sidebars «I like my entire window width to

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker & user interface Eeeeeek!

It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say: > 2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the > issue > that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word > and > it's immediate context when it opened. And I'll

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker & user interface Eeeeeek!

On 5-6-2011 16:23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > > It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say: > >> 2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the >> issue >> that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word >>

LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

) closing spell checker via keyboard «getting it completely out of sight»: It used to be that when I was done with spell check I could dismiss it with the escape key. Now escape only returns the focus to the editing window, while the spellchecker sidebar stays open. This is worse than those

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400 Joe(theWordy)Philbrook jtw...@ttlc.net wrote: This is worse than those distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting under unrecognized words. I don't like those because they distract me from the natural flow of my writing. I may be

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

still have aspell selected as my spellchecker. but when (as I mentioned in my previous post) I couldn't get the spell checker to recognize “Avant-garde” as a word even after clicking on the add button I tested the add function with a repeated ridiculous spelling of “pulleese” And upon adding

LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

) closing spell checker via keyboard «getting it completely out of sight»: It used to be that when I was done with spell check I could dismiss it with the escape key. Now escape only returns the focus to the editing window, while the spellchecker sidebar stays open. This is worse than those

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400 Joe(theWordy)Philbrook jtw...@ttlc.net wrote: This is worse than those distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting under unrecognized words. I don't like those because they distract me from the natural flow of my writing. I may be

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker user interface Eeeeeek!

still have aspell selected as my spellchecker. but when (as I mentioned in my previous post) I couldn't get the spell checker to recognize “Avant-garde” as a word even after clicking on the add button I tested the add function with a repeated ridiculous spelling of “pulleese” And upon adding

LyX 2.0.0 spell checker & user interface Eeeeeek!

spell checker via keyboard «getting it completely out of sight»: It used to be that when I was done with spell check I could dismiss it with the escape key. Now escape only returns the focus to the editing window, while the spellchecker sidebar stays open. This is worse than those distracting

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker & user interface Eeeeeek!

On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400 "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" wrote: > This is worse than those > distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting > under unrecognized words. I don't like those because they distract me > from the natural flow of my writing. I

Re: LyX 2.0.0 spell checker & user interface Eeeeeek!

ons starts acting like this I'm gonna cry for real... I've also notices another oddness. according to those Spellchecker preferences I do still have aspell selected as my spellchecker. but when (as I mentioned in my previous post) I couldn't get the spell checker to recognize “Avant-garde” as a wo

Re: Spell checker on Mac not working

to solve this would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks, Dennis -- View this message in context: http://lyx.475766.n2.nabble.com/Spell-checker-on-Mac-not-working-tp478113p5747096.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Spell checker on Mac not working

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:26 AM, dextasupreme dextasupr...@web.de wrote: Hi, Sorry for posting in this old thread. I've had the very same issue that Graham reported. After having followed Bennett's instructions, I now get the following error message: The file /Library/Application

Re: Spell checker on Mac not working

No, actually I don't. There's no file with that name on my computer. However, I do have a file called en-common.cwl in that location. I am logged in with admin rights, thus should be able to read anything that is there... Thanks, Dennis On 17.11.2010, at 13:54, BH wrote: On Wed, Nov 17, 2010

Re: Spell checker on Mac not working

to solve this would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks, Dennis -- View this message in context: http://lyx.475766.n2.nabble.com/Spell-checker-on-Mac-not-working-tp478113p5747096.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Spell checker on Mac not working

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:26 AM, dextasupreme dextasupr...@web.de wrote: Hi, Sorry for posting in this old thread. I've had the very same issue that Graham reported. After having followed Bennett's instructions, I now get the following error message: The file /Library/Application

Re: Spell checker on Mac not working

No, actually I don't. There's no file with that name on my computer. However, I do have a file called en-common.cwl in that location. I am logged in with admin rights, thus should be able to read anything that is there... Thanks, Dennis On 17.11.2010, at 13:54, BH wrote: On Wed, Nov 17, 2010

Re: Spell checker on Mac not working

ideas how to solve this would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks, Dennis -- View this message in context: http://lyx.475766.n2.nabble.com/Spell-checker-on-Mac-not-working-tp478113p5747096.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Spell checker on Mac not working

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:26 AM, dextasupreme wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry for posting in this old thread. I've had the very same issue that > Graham reported. After having followed Bennett's instructions, I now get the > following error message: > The file "/Library/Application

Re: Spell checker on Mac not working

No, actually I don't. There's no file with that name on my computer. However, I do have a file called "en-common.cwl" in that location. I am logged in with admin rights, thus should be able to read anything that is there... Thanks, Dennis On 17.11.2010, at 13:54, BH wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17,

Spell checker

Hi I have installed Lyx 1.6.7 for windows, and noticed that there is no spell checker. Downloaded Aspell and reconfigured Lyx. However, I have not been able to make it work (i.e. I press the button and get an error stating the spellchecker could not be started). Will appreciate your help

Spell checker

Hi I have installed Lyx 1.6.7 for windows, and noticed that there is no spell checker. Downloaded Aspell and reconfigured Lyx. However, I have not been able to make it work (i.e. I press the button and get an error stating the spellchecker could not be started). Will appreciate your help

Spell checker

Hi I have installed Lyx 1.6.7 for windows, and noticed that there is no spell checker. Downloaded Aspell and reconfigured Lyx. However, I have not been able to make it work (i.e. I press the button and get an error stating the spellchecker could not be started). Will appreciate your help

Spell checker

Hi I have installed Lyx 1.6.7 for windows, and noticed that there is no spell checker. Downloaded Aspell and reconfigured Lyx. However, I have not been able to make it work.Everything else works just fine. Will appreciate your help Regards Alberto

Re: Spell checker

Alberto, I am also using LyX 1.6.7 on Windows, and have no trouble with the spell checker. Can you provide a bit more information? What installer did you use? What os (Vista, XP, W7)? Do you know how to start a spell-check, and you get a message? What exactly? Please explain. Jacob On Fri, Sep

Spell checker

Hi I have installed Lyx 1.6.7 for windows, and noticed that there is no spell checker. Downloaded Aspell and reconfigured Lyx. However, I have not been able to make it work.Everything else works just fine. Will appreciate your help Regards Alberto

Re: Spell checker

Alberto, I am also using LyX 1.6.7 on Windows, and have no trouble with the spell checker. Can you provide a bit more information? What installer did you use? What os (Vista, XP, W7)? Do you know how to start a spell-check, and you get a message? What exactly? Please explain. Jacob On Fri, Sep

Spell checker

Hi I have installed Lyx 1.6.7 for windows, and noticed that there is no spell checker. Downloaded Aspell and reconfigured Lyx. However, I have not been able to make it work.Everything else works just fine. Will appreciate your help Regards Alberto

Re: Spell checker

Alberto, I am also using LyX 1.6.7 on Windows, and have no trouble with the spell checker. Can you provide a bit more information? What installer did you use? What os (Vista, XP, W7)? Do you know how to start a spell-check, and you get a message? What exactly? Please explain. Jacob On Fri, Sep

Re: Spell checker problem

Hello, I can confirm this issue also on my site (same configuration). First I 'added' Gärdenfors in the spell checker dialog then suddenly it complains about correct words like 'with'. Secondly the added word does not appear in any of my personal aspell dictionaries (~/.aspell.*) I tried also

Re: Spell checker problem

Hello, I can confirm this issue also on my site (same configuration). First I 'added' Gärdenfors in the spell checker dialog then suddenly it complains about correct words like 'with'. Secondly the added word does not appear in any of my personal aspell dictionaries (~/.aspell.*) I tried also

Re: Spell checker problem

Hello, I can confirm this issue also on my site (same configuration). First I 'added' Gärdenfors in the spell checker dialog then suddenly it complains about correct words like 'with'. Secondly the added word does not appear in any of my personal aspell dictionaries (~/.aspell.*) I tried also

Spell checker problem

Hello I am using LyX 1.6.6.1 on a Mac. I am setting the document encoding to Unicode (utf8), and I use aspell as the spell checker. On my system if an article contains non-English letters, e.g. Gärdenfors, spell checker gets confused. That is, after reaching Gärdenfors, if I hit Add so

Spell checker problem

Hello I am using LyX 1.6.6.1 on a Mac. I am setting the document encoding to Unicode (utf8), and I use aspell as the spell checker. On my system if an article contains non-English letters, e.g. Gärdenfors, spell checker gets confused. That is, after reaching Gärdenfors, if I hit Add so

Spell checker problem

Hello I am using LyX 1.6.6.1 on a Mac. I am setting the document encoding to Unicode (utf8), and I use aspell as the spell checker. On my system if an article contains non-English letters, e.g. Gärdenfors, spell checker gets confused. That is, after reaching "Gärdenfors", if I hi

Re: Spell checker

flicker for the briefest moment but never appear. Command line tests of aspell showed it was installed and working fine. Indeed, if I changed the LyX preference to ispell -- not installed -- spell checker would complain, so LyX *was* able to locate aspell. Anyway. I just installed the latest

Re: Spell checker

for the briefest moment but never appear. Command line tests of aspell showed it was installed and working fine. Indeed, if I changed the LyX preference to ispell -- not installed -- spell checker would complain, so LyX *was* able to locate aspell. Anyway. I just installed the latest

Re: Spell checker

the LyX preference to ispell -- not installed -- spell checker would complain, so LyX *was* able to locate aspell. Anyway. I just installed the latest cocoAspellhttp://people.ict.usc.edu/%7Eleuski/cocoaspell/(v2.1, with Snow Leopard updates), which I haven't tried before, and it now works fine

Re: Spell checker

the LyX preference to ispell -- not installed -- spell checker would complain, so LyX *was* able to locate aspell. Anyway. I just installed the latest cocoAspellhttp://people.ict.usc.edu/%7Eleuski/cocoaspell/(v2.1, with Snow Leopard updates), which I haven't tried before, and it now works

Re: Spell checker

I also noticed there are dictionaries marked as *with* and *without* accents -- do you have the accented one installed and activated? ~:Justin Wood:~ On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 16:03, Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr wrote: Hi Julio, I have just checked again to be sure and it

Re: Spell checker

I would test them tonight. Thanks for the advice. - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Justin Wood justin.w...@murdoch.edu.au wrote: I also noticed there are dictionaries marked as with and without accents -- do

Re: Spell checker

For information, I use the following dictionaries for French (they have been chosen by cocoAspell when I have checked French(France) in the dictionaries tab): fr-40-only.rws fr-60-only.rws 2010/3/18 Justin Wood justin.w...@murdoch.edu.au: I also noticed there are dictionaries marked as *with*

Re: Spell checker

I have checked and there are two dictionaries available for download: aspell-es-0.50-2.tar.bz2 aspell6-es-1.9a-1.tar.bz2 The second one is the one I have installed. In french there is only one dictionary: aspell-fr-0.50-3.tar.bz2 I cannot find, as you have said, one with and one without

Re: Spell checker

I see a more recent version (.53) at the following address: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/fr/ This is the address given on the cocAS page, following the Dictionaries link. Sincerely, I do not remember from where I have downloaded my aspell dictionaries. I have first tried the Fink version of

Re: Spell checker

I've actually found MacPorts http://www.macports.org/ far more reliable than Fink. I think I read Fink is not being maintained properly anymore? Porticus is also a nice GUI package manager for MacPorts too. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 16:42, Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr wrote:

Re: Spell checker

I'm back at home so let's see the procedure I used to install CocoAspell: 1- Removed aspell via: make remove (I installed it with macports, then removed it. Afterwards I installed the version working in my computer compiling from source.) 2- Downloaded and installed CocoAspell. 3- Test it with

Re: Spell checker

flicker for the briefest moment but never appear. Command line tests of aspell showed it was installed and working fine. Indeed, if I changed the LyX preference to ispell -- not installed -- spell checker would complain, so LyX *was* able to locate aspell. Anyway. I just installed the latest

Re: Spell checker

for the briefest moment but never appear. Command line tests of aspell showed it was installed and working fine. Indeed, if I changed the LyX preference to ispell -- not installed -- spell checker would complain, so LyX *was* able to locate aspell. Anyway. I just installed the latest

Re: Spell checker

the LyX preference to ispell -- not installed -- spell checker would complain, so LyX *was* able to locate aspell. Anyway. I just installed the latest cocoAspellhttp://people.ict.usc.edu/%7Eleuski/cocoaspell/(v2.1, with Snow Leopard updates), which I haven't tried before, and it now works fine

Re: Spell checker

the LyX preference to ispell -- not installed -- spell checker would complain, so LyX *was* able to locate aspell. Anyway. I just installed the latest cocoAspellhttp://people.ict.usc.edu/%7Eleuski/cocoaspell/(v2.1, with Snow Leopard updates), which I haven't tried before, and it now works

Re: Spell checker

I also noticed there are dictionaries marked as *with* and *without* accents -- do you have the accented one installed and activated? ~:Justin Wood:~ On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 16:03, Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr wrote: Hi Julio, I have just checked again to be sure and it

Re: Spell checker

I would test them tonight. Thanks for the advice. - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Justin Wood justin.w...@murdoch.edu.au wrote: I also noticed there are dictionaries marked as with and without accents -- do

Re: Spell checker

For information, I use the following dictionaries for French (they have been chosen by cocoAspell when I have checked French(France) in the dictionaries tab): fr-40-only.rws fr-60-only.rws 2010/3/18 Justin Wood justin.w...@murdoch.edu.au: I also noticed there are dictionaries marked as *with*

Re: Spell checker

I have checked and there are two dictionaries available for download: aspell-es-0.50-2.tar.bz2 aspell6-es-1.9a-1.tar.bz2 The second one is the one I have installed. In french there is only one dictionary: aspell-fr-0.50-3.tar.bz2 I cannot find, as you have said, one with and one without

Re: Spell checker

I see a more recent version (.53) at the following address: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/fr/ This is the address given on the cocAS page, following the Dictionaries link. Sincerely, I do not remember from where I have downloaded my aspell dictionaries. I have first tried the Fink version of

Re: Spell checker

I've actually found MacPorts http://www.macports.org/ far more reliable than Fink. I think I read Fink is not being maintained properly anymore? Porticus is also a nice GUI package manager for MacPorts too. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 16:42, Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr wrote:

Re: Spell checker

I'm back at home so let's see the procedure I used to install CocoAspell: 1- Removed aspell via: make remove (I installed it with macports, then removed it. Afterwards I installed the version working in my computer compiling from source.) 2- Downloaded and installed CocoAspell. 3- Test it with

Re: Spell checker

flicker for the briefest moment but never appear. Command line tests of aspell showed it was installed and working fine. Indeed, if I changed the LyX preference to ispell -- not installed -- spell checker would complain, so LyX *was* able to locate aspell. Anyway. I just installed the latest cocoAspell

Re: Spell checker

ing F7 -- it would > flicker for the briefest moment but never appear. Command line tests of > aspell showed it was installed and working fine. Indeed, if I changed the > LyX preference to ispell -- not installed -- spell checker would complain, > so LyX *was* able to locate aspell. &g

Re: Spell checker

d line tests of >> aspell showed it was installed and working fine. Indeed, if I changed the >> LyX preference to ispell -- not installed -- spell checker would complain, >> so LyX *was* able to locate aspell. >> >> Anyway. >> >> I just installed the latest

Re: Spell checker

ndow when frantically hitting F7 -- it would >>> flicker for the briefest moment but never appear. Command line tests of >>> aspell showed it was installed and working fine. Indeed, if I changed the >>> LyX preference to ispell -- not installed -- spell checker would compl

Re: Spell checker

I also noticed there are dictionaries marked as *with* and *without* accents -- do you have the accented one installed and activated? ~:Justin Wood:~ On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 16:03, Murat Yildizoglu < murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr> wrote: > Hi Julio, > > I have just checked again to be sure

Re: Spell checker

I would test them tonight. Thanks for the advice. - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Justin Wood wrote: > I also noticed there are dictionaries marked as with and without accents -- >

Re: Spell checker

For information, I use the following dictionaries for French (they have been chosen by cocoAspell when I have checked French(France) in the dictionaries tab): fr-40-only.rws fr-60-only.rws 2010/3/18 Justin Wood : > I also noticed there are dictionaries marked as

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >