On 10/11/2009 05:11 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Right now, only bibtex
and bibtex8 are listed. But if biber works well, then we can list it as
a choice, too.
Actually, biber is already listed in 2.0, provided it is installed correctly.
Excellent.
rh
rgheck wrote:
> Right now, only bibtex
> and bibtex8 are listed. But if biber works well, then we can list it as
> a choice, too.
Actually, biber is already listed in 2.0, provided it is installed correctly.
Jürgen
Recently, I had the same problem. BibTeX generated wrong characters or
errors, due to bad encoding. It was complaining that it can not
understand \h{o} as a control sequence! Why? I thought it is a general
way to get accented letters.
I have switched in the .bib file from LateX encoding to UTF8 an
On 10/10/2009 01:19 PM, Stefano Franchi wrote:
I have installed it and it works fine from the command line after exporting
the lyx (UTF8-encoded) file to .tex. If I want to use it directly from Lyx, is
it sufficient to specify "biber" instead of "bibtex" in the preferences (i.e.
in Tools>>prefer
On Saturday 10 October 2009 11:41:39 am rgheck wrote:
> On 10/10/2009 11:38 AM, Stefano Franchi wrote:
> > Problem solved, but I am even more confused than before.
> >
> > I did install biber and tried it out (after a rather unpleasant time
> > spent fighting with perl dependencies..). The problem
On 10/10/2009 11:38 AM, Stefano Franchi wrote:
Problem solved, but I am even more confused than before.
I did install biber and tried it out (after a rather unpleasant time spent
fighting with perl dependencies..). The problem remained.
As Richard guessed, there was a problem with the encoding
Problem solved, but I am even more confused than before.
I did install biber and tried it out (after a rather unpleasant time spent
fighting with perl dependencies..). The problem remained.
As Richard guessed, there was a problem with the encoding of the LyX file.
Switching to Unicode UTF* in
