Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-21 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: +checking for package bera [bera]... yes This says it has found the

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-21 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: +checking for package bera [bera]... yes This says it has found the

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-21 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Richard Talley wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley >> wrote: >> > >> > +checking for package bera [bera]... yes >> >> This

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-18 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 18 mar 2010, at 00.33, Richard Talley wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: +checking for package bera [bera]... yes This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-18 Thread Richard Talley
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Anders Ekberg a...@mac.com wrote: On 18 mar 2010, at 00.33, Richard Talley wrote: Thanks for your help. I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just a symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-18 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 18 mar 2010, at 00.33, Richard Talley wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: +checking for package bera [bera]... yes This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-18 Thread Richard Talley
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Anders Ekberg a...@mac.com wrote: On 18 mar 2010, at 00.33, Richard Talley wrote: Thanks for your help. I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just a symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-18 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 18 mar 2010, at 00.33, Richard Talley wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley >> wrote: >>> >>> +checking for package bera [bera]... yes >> >> This says it has found the bera fonts.

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-18 Thread Richard Talley
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Anders Ekberg wrote: > On 18 mar 2010, at 00.33, Richard Talley wrote: > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just > a > > symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: I had been running LyX 1.6.3 with MacTeX 2008 under OS X 10.5.x and created a number of documents using the three Bera fonts. Recently, I downloaded, installed and updated MacTeX 2009. I also grabbed the MacTeXtras;

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
Yes, I did reconfigure LyX. -=- Rich On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:43 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: I had been running LyX 1.6.3 with MacTeX 2008 under OS X 10.5.x and created a number of documents using the

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX Preferences Paths PATH Prefix) 2. From within Terminal.app, try: kpsewhich bera.sty Does it return the path to your installation of bera? (If

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I did reconfigure LyX. -=- Rich 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX Preferences Paths PATH Prefix)

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: +checking for package bera [bera]... yes This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to them in Document Settings Fonts. (Are

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: I had been running LyX 1.6.3 with MacTeX 2008 under OS X 10.5.x and created a number of documents using the three Bera fonts. Recently, I downloaded, installed and updated MacTeX 2009. I also grabbed the MacTeXtras;

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
Yes, I did reconfigure LyX. -=- Rich On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:43 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: I had been running LyX 1.6.3 with MacTeX 2008 under OS X 10.5.x and created a number of documents using the

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX Preferences Paths PATH Prefix) 2. From within Terminal.app, try: kpsewhich bera.sty Does it return the path to your installation of bera? (If

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I did reconfigure LyX. -=- Rich 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX Preferences Paths PATH Prefix)

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote: +checking for package bera [bera]... yes This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to them in Document Settings Fonts. (Are

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Talley wrote: > I had been running LyX 1.6.3 with MacTeX 2008 under OS X 10.5.x and created > a number of documents using the three Bera fonts. > > Recently, I downloaded, installed and updated MacTeX 2009. I also grabbed > the

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
Yes, I did reconfigure LyX. -=- Rich On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:43 PM, BH wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Talley > wrote: > > I had been running LyX 1.6.3 with MacTeX 2008 under OS X 10.5.x and > created > > a number of documents

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley wrote: > Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX > Preferences > Paths > PATH Prefix) 2. From within Terminal.app, try: kpsewhich bera.sty Does it return the path to your installation of

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, BH wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley > wrote: > > Yes, I did reconfigure LyX. -=- Rich > > 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX > Preferences > Paths > PATH Prefix) >

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, BH wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley >> wrote: >> > Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich >> >> 1. What is

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley > wrote: > > > > +checking for package bera [bera]... yes > > This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to > them in Document > Settings

Re: lyx 1.6.5 will not open lyx 2 docs

2010-03-05 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-03-04, William Seager wrote: On Thursday 04 March 2010 at 10:05, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: Yes, it works. There should be a .lyx16 file next to the original .lyx file, which can be opened by LyX 1.6.5. Vincent thanks - that works perfectly (I just didn't see the

Re: lyx 1.6.5 will not open lyx 2 docs

2010-03-05 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-03-04, William Seager wrote: On Thursday 04 March 2010 at 10:05, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: Yes, it works. There should be a .lyx16 file next to the original .lyx file, which can be opened by LyX 1.6.5. Vincent thanks - that works perfectly (I just didn't see the

Re: lyx 1.6.5 will not open lyx 2 docs

2010-03-05 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-03-04, William Seager wrote: > On Thursday 04 March 2010 at 10:05, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: >> Yes, it works. >> There should be a .lyx16 file next to the original .lyx file, which can >> be opened by LyX 1.6.5. >> Vincent > thanks - that works perfectly (I just didn't

RE: lyx 1.6.5 will not open lyx 2 docs

2010-03-04 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
Now I cannot open that document in 1.6.5 - I just get an error message about lyx2lyx failure: the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it The option to export to lyx-1.6.5 does nothing that I can discern (is it supposed to work?) Yes, it works. There should be a .lyx16 file next to the original

Re: lyx 1.6.5 will not open lyx 2 docs

2010-03-04 Thread William Seager
On Thursday 04 March 2010 at 10:05, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: Yes, it works. There should be a .lyx16 file next to the original .lyx file, which can be opened by LyX 1.6.5. Vincent thanks - that works perfectly (I just didn't see the file which is created without any notice

Re: lyx 1.6.5 will not open lyx 2 docs

2010-03-04 Thread Uwe Stöhr
William Seager schrieb: Sorry if this is a duplicate but ... I made the mistake of installing lyx 2 svn and changing a document that I should not have. Now I cannot open that document in 1.6.5 - I just get an error message about lyx2lyx failure: the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it The

RE: lyx 1.6.5 will not open lyx 2 docs

2010-03-04 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
Now I cannot open that document in 1.6.5 - I just get an error message about lyx2lyx failure: the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it The option to export to lyx-1.6.5 does nothing that I can discern (is it supposed to work?) Yes, it works. There should be a .lyx16 file next to the original

Re: lyx 1.6.5 will not open lyx 2 docs

2010-03-04 Thread William Seager
On Thursday 04 March 2010 at 10:05, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: Yes, it works. There should be a .lyx16 file next to the original .lyx file, which can be opened by LyX 1.6.5. Vincent thanks - that works perfectly (I just didn't see the file which is created without any notice

Re: lyx 1.6.5 will not open lyx 2 docs

2010-03-04 Thread Uwe Stöhr
William Seager schrieb: Sorry if this is a duplicate but ... I made the mistake of installing lyx 2 svn and changing a document that I should not have. Now I cannot open that document in 1.6.5 - I just get an error message about lyx2lyx failure: the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it The

RE: lyx 1.6.5 will not open lyx 2 docs

2010-03-04 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
>Now I cannot open that document in 1.6.5 - I just get an error message >about lyx2lyx failure: "the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it" > >The option to export to lyx-1.6.5 does nothing that I can discern (is it supposed to work?) > Yes, it works. There should be a .lyx16 file next to the

Re: lyx 1.6.5 will not open lyx 2 docs

2010-03-04 Thread William Seager
On Thursday 04 March 2010 at 10:05, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: > Yes, it works. > > There should be a .lyx16 file next to the original .lyx file, which can > be opened by LyX 1.6.5. > > Vincent thanks - that works perfectly (I just didn't see the file which is created without any

Re: lyx 1.6.5 will not open lyx 2 docs

2010-03-04 Thread Uwe Stöhr
William Seager schrieb: Sorry if this is a duplicate but ... I made the mistake of installing lyx 2 svn and changing a document that I should not have. Now I cannot open that document in 1.6.5 - I just get an error message about lyx2lyx failure: "the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it" The

Re: lyx 1.6.5 can't load pdf images on Mac OS X 10.6.2

2010-02-16 Thread Stephen Buonopane
On Feb 16, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Francesco Turci wrote: Hallo, i’m using Lyx on Mac OS X 10.6.2. Everything seems to work properly, but the image converters don’t seem to work: i’ve included some pdf images in my document (i tried with sme ps too) but Lyx doesn’t load them (it says “Error

Re: lyx 1.6.5 can't load pdf images on Mac OS X 10.6.2

2010-02-16 Thread Stephen Buonopane
On Feb 16, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Francesco Turci wrote: Hallo, i’m using Lyx on Mac OS X 10.6.2. Everything seems to work properly, but the image converters don’t seem to work: i’ve included some pdf images in my document (i tried with sme ps too) but Lyx doesn’t load them (it says “Error

Re: lyx 1.6.5 can't load pdf images on Mac OS X 10.6.2

2010-02-16 Thread Stephen Buonopane
On Feb 16, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Francesco Turci wrote: Hallo, i’m using Lyx on Mac OS X 10.6.2. Everything seems to work properly, but the image converters don’t seem to work: i’ve included some pdf images in my document (i tried with sme ps too) but Lyx doesn’t load them (it says “Error

Re: Lyx 1.6.5

2010-01-18 Thread E. Kaplan
Thanks. I was following the advice I got here, and it is good to know about the incompatibility between *ubuntu and Debian. EK Sven Hoexter wrote: On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 09:22:42PM -0500, rgheck wrote: Hi, You should report this kind of issue to the debian lists. Though I think the

Re: Lyx 1.6.5

2010-01-18 Thread E. Kaplan
Thanks. I was following the advice I got here, and it is good to know about the incompatibility between *ubuntu and Debian. EK Sven Hoexter wrote: On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 09:22:42PM -0500, rgheck wrote: Hi, You should report this kind of issue to the debian lists. Though I think the

Re: > Lyx 1.6.5

2010-01-18 Thread E. Kaplan
Thanks. I was following the advice I got here, and it is good to know about the incompatibility between *ubuntu and Debian. EK Sven Hoexter wrote: On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 09:22:42PM -0500, rgheck wrote: Hi, You should report this kind of issue to the debian lists. Though I think the

Re: lyx 1.6.5 for linux 64

2010-01-17 Thread Liviu Andronic
On 1/16/10, EK ehud.kap...@mssm.edu wrote: Where can I find lyx 1.6.5 for linux 64, preferably as a .deb package? Kubuntu only sports 1.6.4 On Debian [1]? Liviu [1] http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages

Re: Lyx 1.6.5

2010-01-17 Thread rgheck
On 01/17/2010 08:06 PM, E. Kaplan wrote: What am I doing wrong? I tried to install Lyx 1.6.5.1 for Kubuntu 64 bits using the deb package from Debian. I uninstalled 1.6.4, and installed the two deb packages: lyx 1.6.5.1 and lyx-common 1.6.5.1. I kept getting an error message: Dependency is not

Re: lyx 1.6.5 for linux 64

2010-01-17 Thread Liviu Andronic
On 1/16/10, EK ehud.kap...@mssm.edu wrote: Where can I find lyx 1.6.5 for linux 64, preferably as a .deb package? Kubuntu only sports 1.6.4 On Debian [1]? Liviu [1] http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages

Re: Lyx 1.6.5

2010-01-17 Thread rgheck
On 01/17/2010 08:06 PM, E. Kaplan wrote: What am I doing wrong? I tried to install Lyx 1.6.5.1 for Kubuntu 64 bits using the deb package from Debian. I uninstalled 1.6.4, and installed the two deb packages: lyx 1.6.5.1 and lyx-common 1.6.5.1. I kept getting an error message: Dependency is not

Re: lyx 1.6.5 for linux 64

2010-01-17 Thread Liviu Andronic
On 1/16/10, EK wrote: > Where can I find lyx 1.6.5 for linux 64, preferably as a .deb package? > Kubuntu only sports 1.6.4 > On Debian [1]? Liviu [1] http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages

Re: > Lyx 1.6.5

2010-01-17 Thread rgheck
On 01/17/2010 08:06 PM, E. Kaplan wrote: What am I doing wrong? I tried to install Lyx 1.6.5.1 for Kubuntu 64 bits using the deb package from Debian. I uninstalled 1.6.4, and installed the two deb packages: lyx 1.6.5.1 and lyx-common 1.6.5.1. I kept getting an error message: Dependency is not

Re: LyX 1.6.5 freeze

2009-12-16 Thread rgheck
On 12/16/2009 11:40 AM, lyxtex wrote: Hello everybody When I try to open a LyX-Document on a network drive LyX opens very slowly and then freezes. All other documents on the drive (pdf, word and such) can be opened without a problem. And LyX documents on other drives can also be opened without

Re: LyX 1.6.5 freeze

2009-12-16 Thread rgheck
On 12/16/2009 11:40 AM, lyxtex wrote: Hello everybody When I try to open a LyX-Document on a network drive LyX opens very slowly and then freezes. All other documents on the drive (pdf, word and such) can be opened without a problem. And LyX documents on other drives can also be opened without

Re: LyX 1.6.5 freeze

2009-12-16 Thread rgheck
On 12/16/2009 11:40 AM, lyxtex wrote: Hello everybody When I try to open a LyX-Document on a network drive LyX opens very slowly and then freezes. All other documents on the drive (pdf, word and such) can be opened without a problem. And LyX documents on other drives can also be opened without

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-14 Thread Olivier Ripoll
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 13.12.2009 14:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: LyX is programmed in a way that a console is always started. My and also the standard installer hides it immediately. The standard installer doesn't open this console window. Ok, I see

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-14 Thread Olivier Ripoll
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 13.12.2009 14:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: LyX is programmed in a way that a console is always started. My and also the standard installer hides it immediately. The standard installer doesn't open this console window. Ok, I see

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-14 Thread Olivier Ripoll
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 13.12.2009 14:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: LyX is programmed in a way that a console is always started. My and also the standard installer hides it immediately. The standard installer doesn't open this console window. Ok, I see

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-13 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Uwe Stöhr schreef: Murat Yildizoglu schrieb: I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents). This is how it should be. LyX is

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-13 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 13.12.2009 14:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: LyX is programmed in a way that a console is always started. My and also the standard installer hides it immediately. The standard installer doesn't open this console window. No, this installer does the same: Section -Launch # Start

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-13 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 13.12.2009 14:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: LyX is programmed in a way that a console is always started. My and also the standard installer hides it immediately. The standard installer doesn't open this console window. Ok, I see some extra movement in the task

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-13 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 13.12.2009 15:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Ok, I see some extra movement in the task bar when opening LyX, .. that's all. I believe that with your installer, one can really see a window popping up (or two). This is correct, but they are closed immediately -- takes a few

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-13 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Uwe Stöhr schreef: Murat Yildizoglu schrieb: I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents). This is how it should be. LyX is

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-13 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 13.12.2009 14:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: LyX is programmed in a way that a console is always started. My and also the standard installer hides it immediately. The standard installer doesn't open this console window. No, this installer does the same: Section -Launch # Start

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-13 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 13.12.2009 14:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: LyX is programmed in a way that a console is always started. My and also the standard installer hides it immediately. The standard installer doesn't open this console window. Ok, I see some extra movement in the task

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-13 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 13.12.2009 15:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Ok, I see some extra movement in the task bar when opening LyX, .. that's all. I believe that with your installer, one can really see a window popping up (or two). This is correct, but they are closed immediately -- takes a few

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-13 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Uwe Stöhr schreef: Murat Yildizoglu schrieb: I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents). This is how it should be. LyX is

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-13 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 13.12.2009 14:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: LyX is programmed in a way that a console is always started. My and also the standard installer hides it immediately. The standard installer doesn't open this console window. No, this installer does the same: Section -Launch # Start

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-13 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 13.12.2009 14:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: LyX is programmed in a way that a console is always started. My and also the standard installer hides it immediately. The standard installer doesn't open this console window. Ok, I see some extra movement in the task

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-13 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 13.12.2009 15:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Ok, I see some extra movement in the task bar when opening LyX, .. that's all. I believe that with your installer, one can really see a window popping up (or two). This is correct, but they are closed immediately -- takes a few

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Manveru
2009/12/12 Diego Queiroz queiroz.di...@gmail.com: Hello. Thanks for your reply. I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha. In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This

OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Florian Rubach
Am 12.12.2009 09:00, schrieb Manveru: 2009/12/12 Diego Queirozqueiroz.di...@gmail.com: Hello. Thanks for your reply. I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha. In general, I think the

Re: OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
I have recently adopted the AltInstaller and I really like the upgrade function and everything you need is in dimension of the complete version. I first do a complete Miktex install or update, then the upgrade through the AltInstaller and it works like a charm, even very quick. I find the console

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Diego Queiroz wrote: Someone knoes when Windows binaries for Lyx 1.6.5 will be available? It's available now. Jürgen

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Diego Queiroz schrieb: I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up an annoying console window when it opens. Really? This should only be visible for a few milliseconds. Only at the first start after an installation the console Windows is shown to indicate the

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Manveru schrieb: In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This is why I prefer it. :-) With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-) Why exactly? How can I improve a product without clear statements? regards Uwe

Re: OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Murat Yildizoglu schrieb: I find the console window slightly annoying, Me too but I don't get a console Window. Not on Win2000, WinXP, WinVista, Win7. Also not on 64bit systems, and also not with an English, German, or Japanese Windows. Do you always get this Window, also when

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents). Murat -- Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr Le 12 déc. 2009 à 21:49,

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Murat Yildizoglu schrieb: I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents). This is how it should be. LyX is programmed in a way that a

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Manveru
2009/12/12 Diego Queiroz queiroz.di...@gmail.com: Hello. Thanks for your reply. I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha. In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This

OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Florian Rubach
Am 12.12.2009 09:00, schrieb Manveru: 2009/12/12 Diego Queirozqueiroz.di...@gmail.com: Hello. Thanks for your reply. I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha. In general, I think the

Re: OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
I have recently adopted the AltInstaller and I really like the upgrade function and everything you need is in dimension of the complete version. I first do a complete Miktex install or update, then the upgrade through the AltInstaller and it works like a charm, even very quick. I find the console

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Diego Queiroz wrote: Someone knoes when Windows binaries for Lyx 1.6.5 will be available? It's available now. Jürgen

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Diego Queiroz schrieb: I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up an annoying console window when it opens. Really? This should only be visible for a few milliseconds. Only at the first start after an installation the console Windows is shown to indicate the

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Manveru schrieb: In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This is why I prefer it. :-) With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-) Why exactly? How can I improve a product without clear statements? regards Uwe

Re: OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Murat Yildizoglu schrieb: I find the console window slightly annoying, Me too but I don't get a console Window. Not on Win2000, WinXP, WinVista, Win7. Also not on 64bit systems, and also not with an English, German, or Japanese Windows. Do you always get this Window, also when

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents). Murat -- Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr Le 12 déc. 2009 à 21:49,

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Murat Yildizoglu schrieb: I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents). This is how it should be. LyX is programmed in a way that a

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Manveru
2009/12/12 Diego Queiroz : > Hello. > > Thanks for your reply. > > I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up > an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha. > > In general, I think the standalone installer is more

OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Florian Rubach
Am 12.12.2009 09:00, schrieb Manveru: 2009/12/12 Diego Queiroz: Hello. Thanks for your reply. I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha. In general, I think the

Re: OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
I have recently adopted the AltInstaller and I really like the upgrade function and "everything you need is in" dimension of the complete version. I first do a complete Miktex install or update, then the upgrade through the AltInstaller and it works like a charm, even very quick. I find the

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Diego Queiroz wrote: > Someone knoes when Windows binaries for Lyx 1.6.5 will be available? It's available now. Jürgen

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Diego Queiroz schrieb: I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up an annoying console window when it opens. Really? This should only be visible for a few milliseconds. Only at the first start after an installation the console Windows is shown to indicate the

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Manveru schrieb: In general, I think the standalone installer is more "clean". This is why I prefer it. :-) With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-) Why exactly? How can I improve a product without clear statements? regards Uwe

Re: OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Murat Yildizoglu schrieb: I find the console window slightly annoying, Me too but I don't get a console Window. Not on Win2000, WinXP, WinVista, Win7. Also not on 64bit systems, and also not with an English, German, or Japanese Windows. Do you always get this Window, also when

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents). Murat -- Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr Le 12 déc. 2009 à 21:49,

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Murat Yildizoglu schrieb: I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents). This is how it should be. LyX is programmed in a way that a

Re: lyx 1.6.5 + computer algebra (windows)

2009-12-11 Thread Yago
an expeiment - Original Message - From: Philip A. Viton vito...@osu.edu To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 9:44 PM Subject: lyx 1.6.5 + computer algebra (windows) I understand that now that lyx has implemented the server in the MS-Win edition, it should be

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-11 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Diego Queiroz schrieb: Someone knoes when Windows binaries for Lyx 1.6.5 will be available? (the standalone installer, not the alternative one) No, but the installer doesn't matter. Both will install LyX on Windows. Or do you have a certain reason why you don't want to use the alternative

Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-11 Thread Diego Queiroz
Hello. Thanks for your reply. I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha. In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This is why I prefer it. :-) Regards, --- Diego Queiroz

Re: lyx 1.6.5 + computer algebra (windows)

2009-12-11 Thread Yago
an expeiment - Original Message - From: Philip A. Viton vito...@osu.edu To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 9:44 PM Subject: lyx 1.6.5 + computer algebra (windows) I understand that now that lyx has implemented the server in the MS-Win edition, it should be

  1   2   >