Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:52:40PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Okay, maybe not export, but view as pdf (pdflatex) gives the correct
behaviour. And when I save and reopen, it's gone.
So it must be the read-in then. What does the .lyx look like?
Andre'
I have set
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:52:40PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Okay, maybe not export, but view as pdf (pdflatex) gives the correct
behaviour. And when I save and reopen, it's gone.
So it must be
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
I have set a small html page with screenshots to illustrate the problem.
Also there is a lyx file at the bottom:
http://olivier.ripoll.free.fr/lyx/lyx_limits.html
Aehm... I just noticed that you defined your own \oiint in the
Am Montag, 8. Juli 2002 17:14 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
The '\limit' iformation as implemented 'sticks' to the super/subscript.
So if that is deleted, the limit is lost as well.
But I don't delete anything. I toggle the style of
To everybody: I found a \oiint in some pxfonts.sty in my local LaTeX tree.
Is this widely used/sufficiently common that proper LyX support for these
things would count as nice feature?
From what I've seen on comp.text.tex, the txfont and pxfont packages are
strongly deprecated. There are
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
I have set a small html page with screenshots to illustrate the problem.
Also there is a lyx file at the bottom:
http://olivier.ripoll.free.fr/lyx/lyx_limits.html
Aehm... I just noticed that you defined
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
I have set a small html page with screenshots to illustrate the problem.
Also there is a lyx file at the bottom:
http://olivier.ripoll.free.fr/lyx/lyx_limits.html
Aehm... I just noticed that you defined
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/help/symbols/wasysym.php has a oiint also
Here is a better one
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/supported/esint/esint.readme
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 10:57:52AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%5Coiint+group:comp.text.texhl=enlr=ie=UTF-8selm=yfilmnl283a.fsf%40triumf.carnum=1
That's a bit above the level of LaTeX LyX understands
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
But the problem is also present for the \iiint and this is from a well known
package, isn't it?
Yes, but here the problem is that it is not a symbol (as in one char from
some font) but a macro that uses several symbols.
To
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Also, I have a bug that's really bothering me (I can live with this
limits bug, and also with the crash with E). It seems the mini
buffer does not answer when I click in it.
What happens if you type M-x? This is the short cut to access the
minibuffer.
I'll try
Andre Poenitz wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/help/symbols/wasysym.php has a oiint also
Ah... so we support wasysym by providing help?
no, as I said wasysym is not the best solution. the ints
are more upright than italic.
esint is a very new package and I do not look into
the code, to see how
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:10:49PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
Why don't we do Right it as we do with the AMS Fonts then?
something like this??
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=oiint+group:comp.text.texhl=enlr=ie=UTF-8selm=30SEP199723123880%40reg.triumf.carnum=6
I though it'd be nice
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:43:03PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
I though it'd be nice to support the symbols from wasy (but not really
the \oiint stuff)...
wasy is ok, but it uses a lot of memory for its symbols.
When run thruogh LaTeX or the font itself?
I'd go just for the screen
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:43:03PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
I though it'd be nice to support the symbols from wasy (but not really
the \oiint stuff)...
wasy is ok, but it uses a lot of memory for its symbols.
When run thruogh LaTeX or the font itself?
the font.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:52:40PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Okay, maybe not export, but view as pdf (pdflatex) gives the correct
behaviour. And when I save and reopen, it's gone.
So it must be the read-in then. What does the .lyx look like?
Andre'
I have set
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:52:40PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Okay, maybe not export, but view as pdf (pdflatex) gives the correct
behaviour. And when I save and reopen, it's gone.
So it must be
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
I have set a small html page with screenshots to illustrate the problem.
Also there is a lyx file at the bottom:
http://olivier.ripoll.free.fr/lyx/lyx_limits.html
Aehm... I just noticed that you defined your own \oiint in the
Am Montag, 8. Juli 2002 17:14 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
The '\limit' iformation as implemented 'sticks' to the super/subscript.
So if that is deleted, the limit is lost as well.
But I don't delete anything. I toggle the style of
To everybody: I found a \oiint in some pxfonts.sty in my local LaTeX tree.
Is this widely used/sufficiently common that proper LyX support for these
things would count as nice feature?
From what I've seen on comp.text.tex, the txfont and pxfont packages are
strongly deprecated. There are
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
I have set a small html page with screenshots to illustrate the problem.
Also there is a lyx file at the bottom:
http://olivier.ripoll.free.fr/lyx/lyx_limits.html
Aehm... I just noticed that you defined
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
I have set a small html page with screenshots to illustrate the problem.
Also there is a lyx file at the bottom:
http://olivier.ripoll.free.fr/lyx/lyx_limits.html
Aehm... I just noticed that you defined
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/help/symbols/wasysym.php has a oiint also
Here is a better one
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/supported/esint/esint.readme
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 10:57:52AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%5Coiint+group:comp.text.texhl=enlr=ie=UTF-8selm=yfilmnl283a.fsf%40triumf.carnum=1
That's a bit above the level of LaTeX LyX understands
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
But the problem is also present for the \iiint and this is from a well known
package, isn't it?
Yes, but here the problem is that it is not a symbol (as in one char from
some font) but a macro that uses several symbols.
To
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Also, I have a bug that's really bothering me (I can live with this
limits bug, and also with the crash with E). It seems the mini
buffer does not answer when I click in it.
What happens if you type M-x? This is the short cut to access the
minibuffer.
I'll try
Andre Poenitz wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/help/symbols/wasysym.php has a oiint also
Ah... so we support wasysym by providing help?
no, as I said wasysym is not the best solution. the ints
are more upright than italic.
esint is a very new package and I do not look into
the code, to see how
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:10:49PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
Why don't we do Right it as we do with the AMS Fonts then?
something like this??
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=oiint+group:comp.text.texhl=enlr=ie=UTF-8selm=30SEP199723123880%40reg.triumf.carnum=6
I though it'd be nice
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:43:03PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
I though it'd be nice to support the symbols from wasy (but not really
the \oiint stuff)...
wasy is ok, but it uses a lot of memory for its symbols.
When run thruogh LaTeX or the font itself?
I'd go just for the screen
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:43:03PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
I though it'd be nice to support the symbols from wasy (but not really
the \oiint stuff)...
wasy is ok, but it uses a lot of memory for its symbols.
When run thruogh LaTeX or the font itself?
the font.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:52:40PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
> > Okay, maybe not export, but "view as pdf (pdflatex)" gives the correct
> > behaviour. And when I save and reopen, it's gone.
>
> So it must be the read-in then. What does the .lyx look like?
>
> Andre'
>
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:52:40PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
> > > Okay, maybe not export, but "view as pdf (pdflatex)" gives the correct
> > > behaviour. And when I save and reopen, it's gone.
> >
>
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
> I have set a small html page with screenshots to illustrate the problem.
> Also there is a lyx file at the bottom:
> http://olivier.ripoll.free.fr/lyx/lyx_limits.html
Aehm... I just noticed that you defined your own \oiint in the
Am Montag, 8. Juli 2002 17:14 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
> > > The '\limit' iformation as implemented 'sticks' to the super/subscript.
> > > So if that is deleted, the limit is lost as well.
> >
> > But I don't delete anything. I toggle
> To everybody: I found a \oiint in some pxfonts.sty in my local LaTeX tree.
> Is this widely used/sufficiently common that proper LyX support for these
> things would count as "nice feature"?
>From what I've seen on comp.text.tex, the txfont and pxfont packages are
strongly deprecated. There
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
>
>>I have set a small html page with screenshots to illustrate the problem.
>>Also there is a lyx file at the bottom:
>>http://olivier.ripoll.free.fr/lyx/lyx_limits.html
>>
>
> Aehm... I just noticed that
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
> > I have set a small html page with screenshots to illustrate the problem.
> > Also there is a lyx file at the bottom:
> > http://olivier.ripoll.free.fr/lyx/lyx_limits.html
>
> Aehm... I just noticed that
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
>
> http://www.lyx.org/help/symbols/wasysym.php has a oiint also
Here is a better one
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/supported/esint/esint.readme
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 10:57:52AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%5Coiint+group:comp.text.tex=en==UTF-8=yfilmnl283a.fsf%40triumf.ca=1
That's a bit above the level of LaTeX LyX understands
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
> But the problem is also present for the \iiint and this is from a "well known"
> package, isn't it?
Yes, but here the problem is that it is not a symbol (as in "one char from
some font") but a macro that uses several symbols.
> >
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Also, I have a bug that's really bothering me (I can live with this
> > "limits" bug, and also with the "crash with E"). It seems the mini
> > buffer does not answer when I click in it.
>
> What happens if you type M-x? This is the short cut to access the
> minibuffer.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>http://www.lyx.org/help/symbols/wasysym.php has a oiint also
>>
>
> Ah... so we "support" wasysym by providing help?
no, as I said wasysym is not the best solution. the ints
are more upright than italic.
esint is a very new package and I do not look into
the code, to
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:10:49PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >Why don't we do "Right" it as we do with the AMS Fonts then?
>
>
> something like this??
>
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=oiint+group:comp.text.tex=en==UTF-8=30SEP199723123880%40reg.triumf.ca=6
I though it'd be nice to
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:43:03PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >I though it'd be nice to support the symbols from wasy (but not really
> >the \oiint stuff)...
>
> wasy is ok, but it uses a lot of memory for its symbols.
When run thruogh LaTeX or the font itself?
I'd go just for the screen
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:43:03PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>>I though it'd be nice to support the symbols from wasy (but not really
>>>the \oiint stuff)...
>>>
>>wasy is ok, but it uses a lot of memory for its symbols.
>>
>
> When run thruogh LaTeX or the font
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
is it true that the \lim\limits problem is still there in 1.2.0?
What '\lim\limits problem'?
What is the problem? (I guess it must be a problem with my installation).
By the way, can't we have a switch that tells lyx to place the limits
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
is it true that the \lim\limits problem is still there in 1.2.0?
What '\lim\limits problem'?
The \limits command is not saved. When you write something like
\lim\limits _{x\rightarrow\infinity}
in inline formulas the subscript will be
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:16:17PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
The \limits command is not saved. When you write something like
\lim\limits _{x\rightarrow\infinity}
in inline formulas the subscript will be under the \lim. When you save the
file an reopen it, the \limits is gone, so that the
Ralf wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
is it true that the \lim\limits problem is still there in 1.2.0?
What '\lim\limits problem'?
The \limits command is not saved. When you write something like
\lim\limits _{x\rightarrow\infinity}
in inline formulas
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:21:43PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
I'll have a look. There is certainly something fishy there
I could live with that. I had to before (defining something like
\Lim=\lim\limits), but as I said in version 1.2.0 I can't even change the
position of the limits not even
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:31:56PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
this applies to non inline formulas for me here, with some integrals (\iiint
maybe) I can type the coomands, export or view correctly, but cannot save it
export and save use exactly the same code.
I would be surprised if they
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:31:56PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
this applies to non inline formulas for me here, with some integrals (\iiint
maybe) I can type the coomands, export or view correctly, but cannot save it
export and save use exactly the same code.
I
M-m l cycles between the three options '\limits', '\nolimits' and '', so
maybe you just have to press M-m l twice to see some effect. It seems to
work in 1.3.0cvs and I think there have been no change in this area since
1.2.0
Nothing happens. I will now try 1.3.0cvs. I will give a progress
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:52:40PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Okay, maybe not export, but view as pdf (pdflatex) gives the correct
behaviour. And when I save and reopen, it's gone.
So it must be the read-in then. What does the .lyx look like?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:01:31PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
M-m l cycles between the three options '\limits', '\nolimits' and '', so
maybe you just have to press M-m l twice to see some effect. It seems to
work in 1.3.0cvs and I think there have been no change in this area since
1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:52:40PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Okay, maybe not export, but view as pdf (pdflatex) gives the correct
behaviour. And when I save and reopen, it's gone.
So it must be the read-in then. What does the .lyx look like?
Andre'
I'll have
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:01:31PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
The cursor must be directly behind the \lim (not behind the subscript).
Maybe this has changed from 1.1.6.
Okay, now it works for integrals and sums but not for limits (in 1.1.6 you had
to put the cursor in front of \lim, \sum
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:35:11PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
Okay, now it works for integrals and sums but not for limits (in 1.1.6
you had to put the cursor in front of \lim, \sum \int). Although I can
now toggle the limits for \lim on screen, there is no \limits in the
LaTeX file.
The
Am Montag, 8. Juli 2002 15:43 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:35:11PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
Okay, now it works for integrals and sums but not for limits (in 1.1.6
you had to put the cursor in front of \lim, \sum \int). Although I can
now toggle the limits for \lim on
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
The '\limit' iformation as implemented 'sticks' to the super/subscript. So
if that is deleted, the limit is lost as well.
But I don't delete anything. I toggle the style of the limit using M-m l, but
that does not affect the
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
is it true that the \lim\limits problem is still there in 1.2.0?
What '\lim\limits problem'?
What is the problem? (I guess it must be a problem with my installation).
By the way, can't we have a switch that tells lyx to place the limits
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
is it true that the \lim\limits problem is still there in 1.2.0?
What '\lim\limits problem'?
The \limits command is not saved. When you write something like
\lim\limits _{x\rightarrow\infinity}
in inline formulas the subscript will be
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:16:17PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
The \limits command is not saved. When you write something like
\lim\limits _{x\rightarrow\infinity}
in inline formulas the subscript will be under the \lim. When you save the
file an reopen it, the \limits is gone, so that the
Ralf wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
is it true that the \lim\limits problem is still there in 1.2.0?
What '\lim\limits problem'?
The \limits command is not saved. When you write something like
\lim\limits _{x\rightarrow\infinity}
in inline formulas
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:21:43PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
I'll have a look. There is certainly something fishy there
I could live with that. I had to before (defining something like
\Lim=\lim\limits), but as I said in version 1.2.0 I can't even change the
position of the limits not even
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:31:56PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
this applies to non inline formulas for me here, with some integrals (\iiint
maybe) I can type the coomands, export or view correctly, but cannot save it
export and save use exactly the same code.
I would be surprised if they
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:31:56PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
this applies to non inline formulas for me here, with some integrals (\iiint
maybe) I can type the coomands, export or view correctly, but cannot save it
export and save use exactly the same code.
I
M-m l cycles between the three options '\limits', '\nolimits' and '', so
maybe you just have to press M-m l twice to see some effect. It seems to
work in 1.3.0cvs and I think there have been no change in this area since
1.2.0
Nothing happens. I will now try 1.3.0cvs. I will give a progress
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:52:40PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Okay, maybe not export, but view as pdf (pdflatex) gives the correct
behaviour. And when I save and reopen, it's gone.
So it must be the read-in then. What does the .lyx look like?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:01:31PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
M-m l cycles between the three options '\limits', '\nolimits' and '', so
maybe you just have to press M-m l twice to see some effect. It seems to
work in 1.3.0cvs and I think there have been no change in this area since
1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:52:40PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Okay, maybe not export, but view as pdf (pdflatex) gives the correct
behaviour. And when I save and reopen, it's gone.
So it must be the read-in then. What does the .lyx look like?
Andre'
I'll have
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:01:31PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
The cursor must be directly behind the \lim (not behind the subscript).
Maybe this has changed from 1.1.6.
Okay, now it works for integrals and sums but not for limits (in 1.1.6 you had
to put the cursor in front of \lim, \sum
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:35:11PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
Okay, now it works for integrals and sums but not for limits (in 1.1.6
you had to put the cursor in front of \lim, \sum \int). Although I can
now toggle the limits for \lim on screen, there is no \limits in the
LaTeX file.
The
Am Montag, 8. Juli 2002 15:43 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:35:11PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
Okay, now it works for integrals and sums but not for limits (in 1.1.6
you had to put the cursor in front of \lim, \sum \int). Although I can
now toggle the limits for \lim on
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
The '\limit' iformation as implemented 'sticks' to the super/subscript. So
if that is deleted, the limit is lost as well.
But I don't delete anything. I toggle the style of the limit using M-m l, but
that does not affect the
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
> is it true that the \lim\limits problem is still there in 1.2.0?
What '\lim\limits problem'?
> What is the problem? (I guess it must be a problem with my installation).
> By the way, can't we have a switch that tells lyx to place the
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
> > is it true that the \lim\limits problem is still there in 1.2.0?
>
> What '\lim\limits problem'?
>
The \limits command is not saved. When you write something like
\lim\limits _{x\rightarrow\infinity}
in inline formulas the subscript
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:16:17PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
> The \limits command is not saved. When you write something like
>
> \lim\limits _{x\rightarrow\infinity}
>
> in inline formulas the subscript will be under the \lim. When you save the
> file an reopen it, the \limits is gone, so that the
Ralf wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
> > > is it true that the \lim\limits problem is still there in 1.2.0?
> >
> > What '\lim\limits problem'?
> >
>
> The \limits command is not saved. When you write something like
>
> \lim\limits _{x\rightarrow\infinity}
>
> in
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:21:43PM +0200, Ralf wrote:
> > I'll have a look. There is certainly something fishy there
>
> I could live with that. I had to before (defining something like
> \Lim=\lim\limits), but as I said in version 1.2.0 I can't even change the
> position of the limits not
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:31:56PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
> this applies to non inline formulas for me here, with some integrals (\iiint
> maybe) I can type the coomands, export or view correctly, but cannot save it
export and save use exactly the same code.
I would be surprised if they
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:31:56PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
> > this applies to non inline formulas for me here, with some integrals (\iiint
> > maybe) I can type the coomands, export or view correctly, but cannot save it
>
> export and save use exactly the same code.
>
> M-m l cycles between the three options '\limits', '\nolimits' and '', so
> maybe you just have to press M-m l twice to see some effect. It seems to
> work in 1.3.0cvs and I think there have been no change in this area since
> 1.2.0
Nothing happens. I will now try 1.3.0cvs. I will give a
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:52:40PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
> Okay, maybe not export, but "view as pdf (pdflatex)" gives the correct
> behaviour. And when I save and reopen, it's gone.
So it must be the read-in then. What does the .lyx look like?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:01:31PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
> > M-m l cycles between the three options '\limits', '\nolimits' and '', so
> > maybe you just have to press M-m l twice to see some effect. It seems to
> > work in 1.3.0cvs and I think there have been no change in this area since
> >
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:52:40PM +0200, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
> > Okay, maybe not export, but "view as pdf (pdflatex)" gives the correct
> > behaviour. And when I save and reopen, it's gone.
>
> So it must be the read-in then. What does the .lyx look like?
>
> Andre'
>
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:01:31PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
>
> The cursor must be directly behind the \lim (not behind the subscript).
> Maybe this has changed from 1.1.6.
Okay, now it works for integrals and sums but not for limits (in 1.1.6 you had
to put the cursor in front of \lim,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:35:11PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
> Okay, now it works for integrals and sums but not for limits (in 1.1.6
> you had to put the cursor in front of \lim, \sum \int). Although I can
> now toggle the limits for \lim on screen, there is no \limits in the
> LaTeX file.
The
Am Montag, 8. Juli 2002 15:43 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:35:11PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
> > Okay, now it works for integrals and sums but not for limits (in 1.1.6
> > you had to put the cursor in front of \lim, \sum \int). Although I can
> > now toggle the limits for
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Ralf Goertz wrote:
> > The '\limit' iformation as implemented 'sticks' to the super/subscript. So
> > if that is deleted, the limit is lost as well.
>
> But I don't delete anything. I toggle the style of the limit using M-m l, but
> that does not affect
90 matches
Mail list logo
