Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

(Apologies for the slow reply.) I've tried adding the \AtBeginDocument{} as you suggest but while the error goes away, the cross ref formatting is not honoured. I think I might try to get my head around *refstyle* as this is the way LyX is moving for cross ref formatting, correct? On 10 December

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

(Apologies for the slow reply.) I've tried adding the \AtBeginDocument{} as you suggest but while the error goes away, the cross ref formatting is not honoured. I think I might try to get my head around *refstyle* as this is the way LyX is moving for cross ref formatting, correct? On 10 December

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

(Apologies for the slow reply.) I've tried adding the \AtBeginDocument{} as you suggest but while the error goes away, the cross ref formatting is not honoured. I think I might try to get my head around *refstyle* as this is the way LyX is moving for cross ref formatting, correct? On 10 December

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 2010-12-09, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: I am glad you found the core of the problem. (BTW: the current version of fontspec does no longer load xunicode, but we should care for users with older versions.) I have fontspec v2.1e (2010/11/17), which is the most recent

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Justin Wood wrote: The template files do actually have this embrace, but it doesn't prevent the parsing error. No. \addto\extrasenglish is not embraced by \AtBeginDocument{} Or do you mean the next release will do something else that will fix the problem? Thanks Jürgen. No. Look below.

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 2010-12-09, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: I am glad you found the core of the problem. (BTW: the current version of fontspec does no longer load xunicode, but we should care for users with older versions.) I have fontspec v2.1e (2010/11/17), which is the most recent

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Justin Wood wrote: The template files do actually have this embrace, but it doesn't prevent the parsing error. No. \addto\extrasenglish is not embraced by \AtBeginDocument{} Or do you mean the next release will do something else that will fix the problem? Thanks Jürgen. No. Look below.

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 2010-12-09, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> I am glad you found the core of the problem. >> (BTW: the current version of fontspec does no longer load xunicode, but >> we should care for users with older versions.) > I have fontspec v2.1e (2010/11/17), which is the most

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Justin Wood wrote: > The template files do actually have this embrace, but it doesn't prevent > the parsing error. No. \addto\extrasenglish is not embraced by \AtBeginDocument{} > Or do you mean the next release will do something else > that will fix the problem? Thanks Jürgen. No. Look below.

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Guenter Milde wrote: I am glad you found the core of the problem. (BTW: the current version of fontspec does no longer load xunicode, but we should care for users with older versions.) I have fontspec v2.1e (2010/11/17), which is the most recent version on CTAN. The documentation states:

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 10 December 2010 12:37, lyx-users-h...@lists.lyx.org wrote: 2. conflict in thesis template Beyond that, changing to the automatic AMS math package in the thesis document introduces new errors. In a brand new, entirely unmodified chapter template file, XeTeX compilation now complains

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 10 December 2010 12:37, lyx-users-h...@lists.lyx.org wrote: The reason for this is that XeTeX now uses polyglossia, which does not know these \addto commands (which are from babel). Are these templates shipped with LyX? If so, we need to embrace these calls in

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

However, I also found that even if I do not check any of the AMS math options, LyX 2 behaves as if the Load AMS math automatically option were set: a) the AMS symbols toolbox is enabled. b) inserting a symbol from it inserts \usepackage{amssymb} in the preamble. c) even writing \Rrightarrow

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Guenter Milde wrote: I am glad you found the core of the problem. (BTW: the current version of fontspec does no longer load xunicode, but we should care for users with older versions.) I have fontspec v2.1e (2010/11/17), which is the most recent version on CTAN. The documentation states:

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 10 December 2010 12:37, lyx-users-h...@lists.lyx.org wrote: 2. conflict in thesis template Beyond that, changing to the automatic AMS math package in the thesis document introduces new errors. In a brand new, entirely unmodified chapter template file, XeTeX compilation now complains

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 10 December 2010 12:37, lyx-users-h...@lists.lyx.org wrote: The reason for this is that XeTeX now uses polyglossia, which does not know these \addto commands (which are from babel). Are these templates shipped with LyX? If so, we need to embrace these calls in

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

However, I also found that even if I do not check any of the AMS math options, LyX 2 behaves as if the Load AMS math automatically option were set: a) the AMS symbols toolbox is enabled. b) inserting a symbol from it inserts \usepackage{amssymb} in the preamble. c) even writing \Rrightarrow

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Guenter Milde wrote: > I am glad you found the core of the problem. > (BTW: the current version of fontspec does no longer load xunicode, but > we should care for users with older versions.) I have fontspec v2.1e (2010/11/17), which is the most recent version on CTAN. The documentation states:

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 10 December 2010 12:37, wrote: > > 2. conflict in thesis template > > Beyond that, changing to the automatic AMS math package in the thesis > > document introduces new errors. In a brand new, entirely unmodified > > chapter template file, XeTeX compilation now

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 10 December 2010 12:37, wrote: > > > > The reason for this is that XeTeX now uses polyglossia, which does not > > know these \addto commands (which are from babel). Are these templates > > shipped with LyX? If so, we need to embrace these calls in > > > >

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

> However, I also found that even if I do not check any of the AMS math > options, LyX 2 behaves as if the "Load AMS math automatically" option > were set: > > a) the "AMS symbols" toolbox is enabled. > b) inserting a symbol from it inserts \usepackage{amssymb} in the preamble. > c) even writing

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Justin Wood wrote: 1. conflict with AMS package I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings – Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has *Math Options – Use AMS math package* checked; eg, LaTeX Error: Command `\Finv' already defined, etc. I think

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 12/08/2010 05:58 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Justin Wood wrote: 1. conflict with AMS package I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings – Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has *Math Options – Use AMS math package* checked; eg, LaTeX

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2. conflict in thesis template Beyond that, changing to the automatic AMS math package in the thesis document introduces new errors. In a brand new, entirely unmodified chapter template file, XeTeX compilation now complains about the use of ' \addto \extrasenglish{'

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Justin Wood wrote: 1. conflict with AMS package I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings – Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has *Math Options – Use AMS math package* checked; eg, LaTeX Error: Command `\Finv'

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 2010-12-08, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Justin Wood wrote: 1. conflict with AMS package I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings – Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has *Math Options – Use AMS math package*

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Justin Wood wrote: 1. conflict with AMS package I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings – Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has *Math Options – Use AMS math package* checked; eg, LaTeX Error: Command `\Finv' already defined, etc. I think

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 12/08/2010 05:58 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Justin Wood wrote: 1. conflict with AMS package I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings – Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has *Math Options – Use AMS math package* checked; eg, LaTeX

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2. conflict in thesis template Beyond that, changing to the automatic AMS math package in the thesis document introduces new errors. In a brand new, entirely unmodified chapter template file, XeTeX compilation now complains about the use of ' \addto \extrasenglish{'

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Justin Wood wrote: 1. conflict with AMS package I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings – Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has *Math Options – Use AMS math package* checked; eg, LaTeX Error: Command `\Finv'

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 2010-12-08, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Justin Wood wrote: 1. conflict with AMS package I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings – Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has *Math Options – Use AMS math package*

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Justin Wood wrote: > 1. conflict with AMS package > I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings – > Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has > *Math Options – Use AMS math package* checked; eg, LaTeX Error: Command > `\Finv' already defined, etc. I

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 12/08/2010 05:58 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Justin Wood wrote: 1. conflict with AMS package I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings – Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has *Math Options – Use AMS math package* checked; eg, LaTeX

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> 2. conflict in thesis template >> Beyond that, changing to the automatic AMS math package in the thesis >> document introduces new errors. In a brand new, entirely unmodified >> chapter template file, XeTeX compilation now complains about the use of ' >> \addto

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Justin Wood wrote: >> 1. conflict with AMS package >> I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings – >> Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has >> *Math Options – Use AMS math package* checked; eg, LaTeX Error: Command >>

Re: LyX 2.0: problems using XeTeX and thesis template

On 2010-12-08, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> Justin Wood wrote: >>> 1. conflict with AMS package >>> I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings – >>> Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has >>> *Math Options – Use AMS