(Apologies for the slow reply.) I've tried adding the \AtBeginDocument{} as
you suggest but while the error goes away, the cross ref formatting is not
honoured.
I think I might try to get my head around *refstyle* as this is the way LyX
is moving for cross ref formatting, correct?
On 10 December
Justin Wood wrote:
> The template files do actually have this embrace, but it doesn't prevent
> the parsing error.
No. \addto\extrasenglish is not embraced by \AtBeginDocument{}
> Or do you mean the next release will do something else
> that will fix the problem? Thanks Jürgen.
No. Look below.
On 2010-12-09, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> I am glad you found the core of the problem.
>> (BTW: the current version of fontspec does no longer load xunicode, but
>> we should care for users with older versions.)
> I have fontspec v2.1e (2010/11/17), which is the most rece
> However, I also found that even if I do not check any of the AMS math
> options, LyX 2 behaves as if the "Load AMS math automatically" option
> were set:
>
> a) the "AMS symbols" toolbox is enabled.
> b) inserting a symbol from it inserts \usepackage{amssymb} in the preamble.
> c) even writing \R
On 10 December 2010 12:37, wrote:
> >
> > The reason for this is that XeTeX now uses polyglossia, which does not
> > know these \addto commands (which are from babel). Are these templates
> > shipped with LyX? If so, we need to embrace these calls in
> >
> > \...@ifpackageloaded{babel}{%
> > ...
On 10 December 2010 12:37, wrote:
> > 2. conflict in thesis template
> > Beyond that, changing to the automatic AMS math package in the thesis
> > document introduces new errors. In a brand new, entirely unmodified
> > chapter template file, XeTeX compilation now complains about the use of '
> >
Guenter Milde wrote:
> I am glad you found the core of the problem.
> (BTW: the current version of fontspec does no longer load xunicode, but
> we should care for users with older versions.)
I have fontspec v2.1e (2010/11/17), which is the most recent version on
CTAN. The documentation states:
On 2010-12-08, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Justin Wood wrote:
>>> 1. conflict with AMS package
>>> I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings –
>>> Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has
>>> *Math Options – Use AMS mat
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Justin Wood wrote:
>> 1. conflict with AMS package
>> I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings –
>> Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has
>> *Math Options – Use AMS math package* checked; eg, LaTeX Error: Command
>>
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> 2. conflict in thesis template
>> Beyond that, changing to the automatic AMS math package in the thesis
>> document introduces new errors. In a brand new, entirely unmodified
>> chapter template file, XeTeX compilation now complains about the use of '
>> \addto \extras
On 12/08/2010 05:58 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Justin Wood wrote:
1. conflict with AMS package
I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings –
Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has
*Math Options – Use AMS math package* checked; eg, LaTeX Er
Justin Wood wrote:
> 1. conflict with AMS package
> I've found that simply activating XeTeX under *Document Settings –
> Fonts*will cause parsing errors on viewing if the document also has
> *Math Options – Use AMS math package* checked; eg, LaTeX Error: Command
> `\Finv' already defined, etc. I th
12 matches
Mail list logo
