Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

Den 13. aug. 2015 22:53, skrev Hal Kierstead: I do not think you understood me. Suppose a create a LyX file and use it to generate a tex file. I send it to my coauthor who does not use LyX. He makes modifications to the LaTex file without changing the front material, and sends me his Tex

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

Den 13. aug. 2015 22:53, skrev Hal Kierstead: I do not think you understood me. Suppose a create a LyX file and use it to generate a tex file. I send it to my coauthor who does not use LyX. He makes modifications to the LaTex file without changing the front material, and sends me his Tex

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

Use include files. Many and small ones. :-)-O el On 2015-08-13 21:53, Hal Kierstead wrote: [...] I do not think you understood me. Suppose a create a LyX file and use it to generate a tex file. I send it to my coauthor who does not use LyX. He makes modifications to the LaTex file without

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

Use include files. Many and small ones. :-)-O el On 2015-08-13 21:53, Hal Kierstead wrote: [...] > I do not think you understood me. Suppose a create a LyX file and > use it to generate a tex file. I send it to my coauthor who does > not use LyX. He makes modifications to the LaTex file

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

On 2015-08-15, Georg Baum wrote: ... There are some constructs in LyX that cannot be expressed in LaTeX or are not exported (e.g. Notes). We discussed in the past how to get rid of this limitation, but, but we do not have a consensus on a good soluition yet. Notes are not the best example:

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

On 2015-08-15, Georg Baum wrote: ... > There are some constructs in LyX that cannot be expressed in LaTeX or > are not exported (e.g. Notes). We discussed in the past how to get rid > of this limitation, but, but we do not have a consensus on a good > soluition yet. Notes are not the best

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

On Aug 15, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Hal Kierstead wrote: First of all, tex2lyx already comes close to making a good LyX file. The main problem is that there always seem to be a handful or errors that must be fixed before the file will run.

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

Hal Kierstead wrote: First of all, tex2lyx already comes close to making a good LyX file. The main problem is that there always seem to be a handful or errors that must be fixed before the file will run. For some reason the program cannot handle options like \begin{thm}[Main Lemma], but

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

Hal Kierstead wrote: > First of all, tex2lyx already comes close to making a good LyX file. The > main problem is that there always seem to be a handful or errors that must > be fixed before the file will run. For some reason the program cannot > handle options like \begin{thm}[Main Lemma], but

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

> On Aug 15, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Georg Baum > wrote: > > Hal Kierstead wrote: > >> First of all, tex2lyx already comes close to making a good LyX file. The >> main problem is that there always seem to be a handful or errors that must >> be fixed before the file

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Hal Kierstead hal.kierst...@me.com wrote: On Aug 13, 2015, at 2:31 PM, Steve Thompson scth...@gmail.com wrote: Hal, I think I did understand. You want your collaborator to be able to make arbitrary changes to the .tex file, then have tex2lyx figure out how to

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

On Aug 13, 2015, at 2:31 PM, Steve Thompson scth...@gmail.com wrote: Hal, I think I did understand. You want your collaborator to be able to make arbitrary changes to the .tex file, then have tex2lyx figure out how to create a new .lyx file. But your collaborator could have done

RE: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

sufficient imagination. From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] On Behalf Of Hal Kierstead Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 3:54 PM To: Mike Reeks mike.re...@newcastle.ac.uk Cc: Lyx-users lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx On Aug 13, 2015

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

13, 2015 3:54 PM To: Mike Reeks mike.re...@newcastle.ac.uk mailto:mike.re...@newcastle.ac.uk Cc: Lyx-users lyx-users@lists.lyx.org mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx On Aug 13, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Mike Reeks mike.re...@newcastle.ac.uk mailto:mike.re

RE: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

Hal, I think I did understand. You want your collaborator to be able to make arbitrary changes to the .tex file, then have tex2lyx figure out how to create a new .lyx file. But your collaborator could have done anything. That makes the “modified” file no different from any other completely

RE: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

Dear Lyx Users I have written a very large article in Lyx for publication in a scientific journal which will only accept the article as a latex file. Of course Lyx will generate a Latex file as well as a pdf file. I wanted to check that the Latex file is acceptable to Lyx. Unfortunately I

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

On Aug 13, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Mike Reeks mike.re...@newcastle.ac.uk wrote: Dear Lyx Users I have written a very large article in Lyx for publication in a scientific journal which will only accept the article as a latex file. Of course Lyx will generate a Latex file as well as a pdf

RE: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

Dear Lyx Users I have written a very large article in Lyx for publication in a scientific journal which will only accept the article as a latex file. Of course Lyx will generate a Latex file as well as a pdf file. I wanted to check that the Latex file is acceptable to Lyx. Unfortunately I

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

> On Aug 13, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Mike Reeks wrote: > > Dear Lyx Users > I have written a very large article in Lyx for publication in a scientific > journal which will only accept the article as a latex file. Of course Lyx > will generate a Latex file as well as a

RE: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

sufficient imagination. From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] On Behalf Of Hal Kierstead Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 3:54 PM To: Mike Reeks <mike.re...@newcastle.ac.uk> Cc: Lyx-users <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org> Subject: Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

lto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>] On Behalf > Of Hal Kierstead > Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 3:54 PM > To: Mike Reeks <mike.re...@newcastle.ac.uk > <mailto:mike.re...@newcastle.ac.uk>> > Cc: Lyx-users <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org <mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx

RE: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

Hal, I think I did understand. You want your collaborator to be able to make arbitrary changes to the .tex file, then have tex2lyx figure out how to create a new .lyx file. But your collaborator could have done anything. That makes the “modified” file no different from any other completely

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

> On Aug 13, 2015, at 2:31 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: > > Hal, > I think I did understand. You want your collaborator to be able to make > arbitrary changes to the .tex file, then have tex2lyx figure out how to > create a new .lyx file. But your collaborator could have done

Re: Lyx to Latex to Lyx

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: > > On Aug 13, 2015, at 2:31 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: > > Hal, > I think I did understand. You want your collaborator to be able to make > arbitrary changes to the .tex file, then have tex2lyx figure

Re: Lyx to Latex backto Lyx

LB wrote: Is it a good idea to avoid underscores and use hyphens instead? Yes, underscores have tendency to confuse LaTeX (being a sign for subscript) and they need to be protected. If you can, avoid them. Matej -- Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB

Re: Lyx to Latex backto Lyx

LB wrote: Is it a good idea to avoid underscores and use hyphens instead? Yes, underscores have tendency to confuse LaTeX (being a sign for subscript) and they need to be protected. If you can, avoid them. Matej -- Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB

Re: Lyx to Latex backto Lyx

LB wrote: > Is it a good idea to avoid underscores and use hyphens instead? Yes, underscores have tendency to confuse LaTeX (being a sign for subscript) and they need to be protected. If you can, avoid them. Matej -- Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB

Re: Lyx to Latex backto Lyx

Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2004 00:32 schrieb LB: 1) The graphics appear inserted with a latex commands so they don't get displayed in the document relyx may have problems with some graphics, but in general it should recognize them. 2) For no apparent reason I use a lot of underscores in

Re: Lyx to Latex backto Lyx

Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2004 00:32 schrieb LB: 1) The graphics appear inserted with a latex commands so they don't get displayed in the document relyx may have problems with some graphics, but in general it should recognize them. 2) For no apparent reason I use a lot of underscores in

Re: Lyx to Latex backto Lyx

Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2004 00:32 schrieb LB: > 1) The graphics appear inserted with a latex commands so they don't get > displayed in the document relyx may have problems with some graphics, but in general it should recognize them. > 2) For no apparent reason I use a lot of underscores

Re: Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files

Carole Womeldorf wrote: Quick question - will I be losing any functionality by doing this? Are tetex-latex and tetex-dvips already in my version of teTeX (beta.20020207-70) but just not registering as individual programs in the rpm database? there is no problem Herbert --

Re: Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files

Carole Womeldorf wrote: Quick question - will I be losing any functionality by doing this? Are tetex-latex and tetex-dvips already in my version of teTeX (beta.20020207-70) but just not registering as individual programs in the rpm database? there is no problem Herbert --

Re: Lyx upgrade & Latex to Lyx & *.cls files

Carole Womeldorf wrote: > Quick question - will I be losing any functionality by doing this? Are > tetex-latex and tetex-dvips already in my version of teTeX (beta.20020207-70) > but just not registering as individual programs in the rpm database? there is no problem Herbert --

Re: Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files

Carole Womeldorf wrote: On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I rpm -Uvh --nodeps Also 1) Is there a good guide for a newbie to learn to turn a *.cls file into something useful in Lyx

Re: Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files

Herbert Voss wrote: Carole Womeldorf wrote: On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I rpm -Uvh --nodeps Thanks for all the tips, Herbert. Quick question - will I be losing any

Re: Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 03:59:45PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote: On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I get failed dependencies tetex-dvips and tetex-latex. I tried installing the rpms from

Re: Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:20:47PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote: Herbert Voss wrote: Carole Womeldorf wrote: On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I rpm -Uvh --nodeps Thanks

Re: Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files

Carole Womeldorf wrote: On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I rpm -Uvh --nodeps Also 1) Is there a good guide for a newbie to learn to turn a *.cls file into something useful in Lyx

Re: Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files

Herbert Voss wrote: Carole Womeldorf wrote: On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I rpm -Uvh --nodeps Thanks for all the tips, Herbert. Quick question - will I be losing any

Re: Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 03:59:45PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote: On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I get failed dependencies tetex-dvips and tetex-latex. I tried installing the rpms from

Re: Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:20:47PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote: Herbert Voss wrote: Carole Womeldorf wrote: On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I rpm -Uvh --nodeps Thanks

Re: Lyx upgrade & Latex to Lyx & *.cls files

Carole Womeldorf wrote: > On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently > 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run "rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm" I rpm -Uvh --nodeps > Also > 1) Is there a good guide for a newbie to learn to turn a *.cls file > into something useful

Re: Lyx upgrade & Latex to Lyx & *.cls files

Herbert Voss wrote: > Carole Womeldorf wrote: > > On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently > > 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run "rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm" I > > rpm -Uvh --nodeps Thanks for all the tips, Herbert. Quick question - will I be losing any

Re: Lyx upgrade & Latex to Lyx & *.cls files

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 03:59:45PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote: > On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently > 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run "rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm" I > get failed dependencies "tetex-dvips" and "tetex-latex." I tried > installing the

Re: Lyx upgrade & Latex to Lyx & *.cls files

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:20:47PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote: > Herbert Voss wrote: > > > Carole Womeldorf wrote: > > > On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently > > > 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run "rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm" I > > > > rpm -Uvh --nodeps

Re: LyX to LaTeX without LyX code in .tex file

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Adolfo Pachón wrote: 2. I try to generate the HTML version from the .tex file, and there are some problems that I resolve deleting the lines about %%% LyX specific LaTeX commands. Which problems? How can I generate LaTeX from Lyx whithout LyX

Re: LyX to LaTeX without LyX code in .tex file

From: Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:54:49 +0200 To: Adolfo Pachón [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LyX to LaTeX without LyX code in .tex file On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Adolfo Pachón wrote: 2. I try to generate the HTML version

Re: LyX to LaTeX without LyX code in .tex file

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Adolfo Pachón wrote: 2. I try to generate the HTML version from the .tex file, and there are some problems that I resolve deleting the lines about %%% LyX specific LaTeX commands. Which problems? How can I generate LaTeX from Lyx whithout LyX

Re: LyX to LaTeX without LyX code in .tex file

From: Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:54:49 +0200 To: Adolfo Pachón [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LyX to LaTeX without LyX code in .tex file On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Adolfo Pachón wrote: 2. I try to generate the HTML version

Re: LyX to LaTeX without LyX code in .tex file

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Adolfo Pachón wrote: > 2. I try to generate the HTML version from the .tex file, and there are > some problems that I resolve deleting the lines about "%%% LyX > specific LaTeX commands". Which problems? > How can I generate LaTeX from Lyx whithout

Re: LyX to LaTeX without LyX code in .tex file

>>From: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:54:49 +0200 >>To: Adolfo Pachón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: LyX to LaTeX without LyX code in .tex file >> >>On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:51:29P