Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
No. Someone just acknowledges that it was a good idea and a missing
feature, but that's also where it ended.
Not quite:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-develm=122813284122303w=2
Jürgen
On 2009-03-13, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
No. Someone just acknowledges that it was a good idea and a missing
feature, but that's also where it ended.
Not quite:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-develm=122813284122303w=2
Also there is bug #3218
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
No. Someone just acknowledges that it was a good idea and a missing
feature, but that's also where it ended.
Not quite:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-develm=122813284122303w=2
Jürgen
On 2009-03-13, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
No. Someone just acknowledges that it was a good idea and a missing
feature, but that's also where it ended.
Not quite:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-develm=122813284122303w=2
Also there is bug #3218
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> No. Someone just acknowledges that it was a good idea and a missing
> feature, but that's also where it ended.
Not quite:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel=122813284122303=2
Jürgen
On 2009-03-13, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> No. Someone just acknowledges that it was a good idea and a missing
>> feature, but that's also where it ended.
> Not quite:
> http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel=122813284122303=2
Also there is bug #3218
On 2009-03-11, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Richard Heck schreef:
Axel Heim wrote:
Hi, on the lyx-webpage (see references below) it is recommended to use a
math macro file to collect all personal macros. When I do that, I
encounter the problem that lyx complains with popup windows upon
Guenter Milde wrote:
There is a request and patch from 2008-11-19 (bug #3218):
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3218
unfortunately that is not general solution.
pavel
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
No, no easy tweak. I think someone may have introduced a Don't show this
message again type thing, but I'm not sure if it'll make it into 1.6.2.
Vincent, did you do that? Or were we just talking about it?
rh
No. Someone just acknowledges that it was a good
On 2009-03-12, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
There is a request and patch from 2008-11-19 (bug #3218):
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3218
unfortunately that is not general solution.
What is missing?
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-03-12, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
There is a request and patch from 2008-11-19 (bug #3218):
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3218
unfortunately that is not general solution.
What is missing?
rewrite of the Alert class which could
On 2009-03-11, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Richard Heck schreef:
Axel Heim wrote:
Hi, on the lyx-webpage (see references below) it is recommended to use a
math macro file to collect all personal macros. When I do that, I
encounter the problem that lyx complains with popup windows upon
Guenter Milde wrote:
There is a request and patch from 2008-11-19 (bug #3218):
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3218
unfortunately that is not general solution.
pavel
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
No, no easy tweak. I think someone may have introduced a Don't show this
message again type thing, but I'm not sure if it'll make it into 1.6.2.
Vincent, did you do that? Or were we just talking about it?
rh
No. Someone just acknowledges that it was a good
On 2009-03-12, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
There is a request and patch from 2008-11-19 (bug #3218):
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3218
unfortunately that is not general solution.
What is missing?
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-03-12, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
There is a request and patch from 2008-11-19 (bug #3218):
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3218
unfortunately that is not general solution.
What is missing?
rewrite of the Alert class which could
On 2009-03-11, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Richard Heck schreef:
>> Axel Heim wrote:
>>> Hi, on the lyx-webpage (see references below) it is recommended to use a
>>> math macro file to collect all personal macros. When I do that, I
>>> encounter the problem that lyx complains with popup
Guenter Milde wrote:
> There is a request and patch from 2008-11-19 (bug #3218):
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3218
unfortunately that is not general solution.
pavel
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> No, no easy tweak. I think someone may have introduced a "Don't show this
>> message again" type thing, but I'm not sure if it'll make it into 1.6.2.
>> Vincent, did you do that? Or were we just talking about it?
>>
>> rh
>>
> No. Someone just acknowledges that
On 2009-03-12, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> There is a request and patch from 2008-11-19 (bug #3218):
>> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3218
> unfortunately that is not general solution.
What is missing?
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-03-12, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> There is a request and patch from 2008-11-19 (bug #3218):
> >> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3218
>
> > unfortunately that is not general solution.
>
> What is missing?
rewrite of the Alert class
Axel Heim wrote:
Hi, on the lyx-webpage (see references below) it is recommended to use a
math macro file to collect all personal macros. When I do that, I
encounter the problem that lyx complains with popup windows upon
compilation if the document class of the child document (which contains
my
Richard Heck schreef:
Axel Heim wrote:
Hi, on the lyx-webpage (see references below) it is recommended to use a
math macro file to collect all personal macros. When I do that, I
encounter the problem that lyx complains with popup windows upon
compilation if the document class of the child
Axel Heim wrote:
Hi, on the lyx-webpage (see references below) it is recommended to use a
math macro file to collect all personal macros. When I do that, I
encounter the problem that lyx complains with popup windows upon
compilation if the document class of the child document (which contains
my
Richard Heck schreef:
Axel Heim wrote:
Hi, on the lyx-webpage (see references below) it is recommended to use a
math macro file to collect all personal macros. When I do that, I
encounter the problem that lyx complains with popup windows upon
compilation if the document class of the child
Axel Heim wrote:
Hi, on the lyx-webpage (see references below) it is recommended to use a
math macro file to collect all personal macros. When I do that, I
encounter the problem that lyx complains with popup windows upon
compilation if the document class of the child document (which contains
my
Richard Heck schreef:
Axel Heim wrote:
Hi, on the lyx-webpage (see references below) it is recommended to use a
math macro file to collect all personal macros. When I do that, I
encounter the problem that lyx complains with popup windows upon
compilation if the document class of the child
Thanks for taking the time out . Please find a file attached .You wrote
'*Put the cursor in the first of the boxes, and type: \#1\times\#1, just as
written, then a space.
You should then see the second shot* .'
I do not get the second shot on typing \#1\times\#1 and then a space
On Thu, Oct 2,
I may mention that I have done
Lyx version 1.4.3
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:26 AM, anu saxena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for taking the time out . Please find a file attached .You wrote
'*Put the cursor in the first of the boxes, and type: \#1\times\#1, just
as written, then a space.
anu saxena wrote:
I may mention that I have done Lyx version 1.4.3
Oh, well, in that case, you should upgrade to a more recent version.
That's very old now.
Richard
Thanks for taking the time out . Please find a file attached .You wrote
'*Put the cursor in the first of the boxes, and type: \#1\times\#1, just as
written, then a space.
You should then see the second shot* .'
I do not get the second shot on typing \#1\times\#1 and then a space
On Thu, Oct 2,
I may mention that I have done
Lyx version 1.4.3
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:26 AM, anu saxena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for taking the time out . Please find a file attached .You wrote
'*Put the cursor in the first of the boxes, and type: \#1\times\#1, just
as written, then a space.
anu saxena wrote:
I may mention that I have done Lyx version 1.4.3
Oh, well, in that case, you should upgrade to a more recent version.
That's very old now.
Richard
Thanks for taking the time out . Please find a file attached .You wrote
'*Put the cursor in the first of the boxes, and type: \#1\times\#1, just as
written, then a space.
You should then see the second shot* .'
I do not get the second shot on typing \#1\times\#1 and then a space
On Thu, Oct 2,
I may mention that I have done
Lyx version 1.4.3
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:26 AM, anu saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for taking the time out . Please find a file attached .You wrote
> '*Put the cursor in the first of the boxes, and type: \#1\times\#1, just
> as written, then a
anu saxena wrote:
I may mention that I have done Lyx version 1.4.3
Oh, well, in that case, you should upgrade to a more recent version.
That's very old now.
Richard
anu saxena schrieb:
I am trying to create a math macro as described in the User's guide of the
documentation . when I execute the command math-macro name 3 in the
mini-buffer I do not get four red boxes instead I get only two .
The macro handling in LyX 1.5 is buggy, in the upcoming LyX 1.6
anu saxena schrieb:
I am trying to create a math macro as described in the User's guide
of the
documentation . when I execute the command math-macro name 3 in the
mini-buffer I do not get four red boxes instead I get only two .
You shouldn't get four boxes, just the two. Then you enter the
anu saxena schrieb:
I am trying to create a math macro as described in the User's guide of the
documentation . when I execute the command math-macro name 3 in the
mini-buffer I do not get four red boxes instead I get only two .
The macro handling in LyX 1.5 is buggy, in the upcoming LyX 1.6
anu saxena schrieb:
I am trying to create a math macro as described in the User's guide
of the
documentation . when I execute the command math-macro name 3 in the
mini-buffer I do not get four red boxes instead I get only two .
You shouldn't get four boxes, just the two. Then you enter the
anu saxena schrieb:
I am trying to create a math macro as described in the User's guide of the
documentation . when I execute the command math-macro name 3 in the
mini-buffer I do not get four red boxes instead I get only two .
The macro handling in LyX 1.5 is buggy, in the upcoming LyX 1.6
anu saxena schrieb:
I am trying to create a math macro as described in the User's guide
of the
documentation . when I execute the command math-macro name 3 in the
mini-buffer I do not get four red boxes instead I get only two .
You shouldn't get four boxes, just the two. Then you enter the
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:29 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make
these insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
However, I'd be tempted to take a different route. Pick a key
combination you don't have much use for and bind it to 'math-insert
\overrightarrow'. Then whack that key combo while you're in a math
inset and type whatever your vectorizing under the arrow.
/Paul
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
However, I'd be tempted to take a different route. Pick a key
combination you don't have much use for and bind it to 'math-insert
\overrightarrow'. Then whack that key combo while you're in a math
inset and type whatever your vectorizing under the
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:29 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make
these insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
However, I'd be tempted to take a different route. Pick a key
combination you don't have much use for and bind it to 'math-insert
\overrightarrow'. Then whack that key combo while you're in a math
inset and type whatever your vectorizing under the arrow.
/Paul
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
However, I'd be tempted to take a different route. Pick a key
combination you don't have much use for and bind it to 'math-insert
\overrightarrow'. Then whack that key combo while you're in a math
inset and type whatever your vectorizing under the
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:29 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make
these insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
However, I'd be tempted to take a different route. Pick a key
combination you don't have much use for and bind it to 'math-insert
\overrightarrow'. Then whack that key combo while you're in a math
inset and type whatever your vectorizing under the arrow.
/Paul
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
However, I'd be tempted to take a different route. Pick a key
combination you don't have much use for and bind it to 'math-insert
\overrightarrow'. Then whack that key combo while you're in a math
inset and type whatever your vectorizing under the
On 24.07.08, rgheck wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make these
insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten \overrightarrow by defining a quick math-macro,
rgheck wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make these
insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten \overrightarrow by defining a quick math-macro, e.g.:
On 24.07.08, rgheck wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make these
insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten \overrightarrow by defining a quick math-macro,
rgheck wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make these
insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten \overrightarrow by defining a quick math-macro, e.g.:
On 24.07.08, rgheck wrote:
> Bruce Pourciau wrote:
>> A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
>> \overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make these
>> insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
> Well, you can shorten \overrightarrow by defining a quick
rgheck wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make these
insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten \overrightarrow by defining a quick math-macro, e.g.:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make these
insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten \overrightarrow by defining a quick math-macro, e.g.:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make these
insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten \overrightarrow by defining a quick math-macro, e.g.:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make these
insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten \overrightarrow by defining a quick math-macro, e.g.:
Stefan == Stefan Schimanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stefan Everything looks great until I try to edit the arguments
Stefan of the macro: LyX jumps into a third representation with
Stefan several line prefixed with #1, #2 to enter the arguments. Is
Stefan it supposed to work like that?
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:24:23AM +, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Everything looks great until I try to edit the arguments of the
macro: LyX jumps into a third representation with several line
prefixed with #1, #2 to enter the arguments. Is it supposed to work
like that?
Sort of,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:54:06PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It used to do that, but this was changed in 1.3.x (I think).
1.2 with the math rewrite (I think)
One particular problem (which could be avoided) was to know what to do
when for example #1 is used twice.
This did not work
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why isn't LyX using my preview definition for the macro with some
placeholder boxes as the arguments?
Andre Navigation between the arguments is non-obvious. Macro
Andre arguments can be used more than once.
We could decide that only the first
Why isn't LyX using my preview definition for the macro with some
placeholder boxes as the arguments?
Navigation between the arguments is non-obvious.
Macro arguments can be used more than once.
But as I understand the second part of the macro is the editing template.
That uses a usual
Stefan == Stefan Schimanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stefan Everything looks great until I try to edit the arguments
Stefan of the macro: LyX jumps into a third representation with
Stefan several line prefixed with #1, #2 to enter the arguments. Is
Stefan it supposed to work like that?
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:24:23AM +, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Everything looks great until I try to edit the arguments of the
macro: LyX jumps into a third representation with several line
prefixed with #1, #2 to enter the arguments. Is it supposed to work
like that?
Sort of,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:54:06PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It used to do that, but this was changed in 1.3.x (I think).
1.2 with the math rewrite (I think)
One particular problem (which could be avoided) was to know what to do
when for example #1 is used twice.
This did not work
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why isn't LyX using my preview definition for the macro with some
placeholder boxes as the arguments?
Andre Navigation between the arguments is non-obvious. Macro
Andre arguments can be used more than once.
We could decide that only the first
Why isn't LyX using my preview definition for the macro with some
placeholder boxes as the arguments?
Navigation between the arguments is non-obvious.
Macro arguments can be used more than once.
But as I understand the second part of the macro is the editing template.
That uses a usual
> "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Everything looks great until I try to edit the arguments
Stefan> of the macro: LyX jumps into a third representation with
Stefan> several line prefixed with #1, #2 to enter the arguments. Is
Stefan> it supposed to work
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:24:23AM +, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Everything looks great until I try to edit the arguments of the
> macro: LyX jumps into a third representation with several line
> prefixed with #1, #2 to enter the arguments. Is it supposed to work
> like that?
Sort of,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:54:06PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It used to do that, but this was changed in 1.3.x (I think).
1.2 with the math rewrite (I think)
> One particular problem (which could be avoided) was to know what to do
> when for example #1 is used twice.
This did not
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Why isn't LyX using my preview definition for the macro with some
>> placeholder boxes as the arguments?
Andre> Navigation between the arguments is non-obvious. Macro
Andre> arguments can be used more than once.
We could decide that
>> Why isn't LyX using my preview definition for the macro with some
>> placeholder boxes as the arguments?
>
> Navigation between the arguments is non-obvious.
> Macro arguments can be used more than once.
But as I understand the second part of the macro is the editing template.
That uses a
Problem is that if I open this lyx document alone (with no lyx files
that use math-macros currently open), then the macros will not convert
to what they're supposed to look like.. they'll show up in ERT... is
there a workaround to this? (I'm currently making sure that I open
MathMacros.lyx
Thanks Andre' and Jean-Pierre.. should I file an enhancement request
on bugzilla?
I like the wrapper idea.. will use this for now..
nirmal
Problem is that if I open this lyx document alone (with no lyx files
that use math-macros currently open), then the macros will not convert
to what they're supposed to look like.. they'll show up in ERT... is
there a workaround to this? (I'm currently making sure that I open
MathMacros.lyx
Thanks Andre' and Jean-Pierre.. should I file an enhancement request
on bugzilla?
I like the wrapper idea.. will use this for now..
nirmal
>>> Problem is that if I open this lyx document alone (with no lyx files
>>> that use math-macros currently open), then the macros will not convert
>>> to what they're supposed to look like.. they'll show up in ERT... is
>>> there a workaround to this? (I'm currently making sure that I open
>>>
Thanks Andre' and Jean-Pierre.. should I file an enhancement request
on bugzilla?
I like the wrapper idea.. will use this for now..
nirmal
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 04:38:38PM -0500, Nirmal Govind wrote:
Hi.. is there a way to include math-macros anywhere else other than
in the main part of the lyx file?
Not really.
Maybe in the preamble or so?
Not there for sure.
I'm trying to have a global math-macros file that can be
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 04:38:38PM -0500, Nirmal Govind wrote:
Hi.. is there a way to include math-macros anywhere else other than
in the main part of the lyx file?
Not really.
Maybe in the preamble or so?
Not there for sure.
I'm trying to have a global math-macros file that can be
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 04:38:38PM -0500, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> Hi.. is there a way to include math-macros anywhere else other than
> in the main part of the lyx file?
Not really.
> Maybe in the preamble or so?
Not there for sure.
> I'm trying to have a global math-macros file that can be
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 03:44:10PM +0100, Vaclav Smidl wrote:
Hi,
I am using lyx for some years now, but I started to use math-macros quite
recently. However, as far as I know it always inserts \newcommand even if the
macro already exist. Is there any switch to use \renewcommand instead?
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 03:44:10PM +0100, Vaclav Smidl wrote:
Hi,
I am using lyx for some years now, but I started to use math-macros quite
recently. However, as far as I know it always inserts \newcommand even if the
macro already exist. Is there any switch to use \renewcommand instead?
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 03:44:10PM +0100, Vaclav Smidl wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using lyx for some years now, but I started to use math-macros quite
> recently. However, as far as I know it always inserts \newcommand even if the
> macro already exist. Is there any switch to use \renewcommand instead?
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 03:11:16PM +0200, Amir Seginer wrote:
> I couldn't figure how to use math-macro-arg
M-x math-macro-arg 2 is just a complicated way to say '#2' in a macro
definition.
> For example to create a macro \mysum for the sum, enter in the
> mini-buffer (M-x to reach it)
>
>
Hello,
hugh a. duguid wrote:
I have reviewed the sections on Math Macros, 5.1, etc and still need
help setting up a math macro with arguments.
Specifically, I'd like to have a summation with the upper and lower
limits, as well as the argument of the summation empty so that they can
be filled
Hello,
hugh a. duguid wrote:
I have reviewed the sections on Math Macros, 5.1, etc and still need
help setting up a math macro with arguments.
Specifically, I'd like to have a summation with the upper and lower
limits, as well as the argument of the summation empty so that they can
be filled
Hello,
hugh a. duguid wrote:
I have reviewed the sections on Math Macros, 5.1, etc and still need
help setting up a math macro with arguments.
Specifically, I'd like to have a summation with the upper and lower
limits, as well as the argument of the summation empty so that they can
be filled
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:53:35AM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
For the first problem, the learnign should be constrained to the active
buffer. (Well, I have too less insight into the LyX source (i.e. None) to
know how to implement this).
I think I won't touch this for 1.2 anymore.
For the
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:53:35AM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
For the first problem, the learnign should be constrained to the active
buffer. (Well, I have too less insight into the LyX source (i.e. None) to
know how to implement this).
I think I won't touch this for 1.2 anymore.
For the
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:53:35AM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
> For the first problem, the "learnign" should be constrained to the active
> buffer. (Well, I have too less insight into the LyX source (i.e. None) to
> know how to implement this).
I think I won't touch this for 1.2 anymore.
> For
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:00:31PM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
When defining a math-macro in a document, LyX uses this definition for all
other open documents as well (whether the macro is defined there or not)
I know this. The current definition mechanisn isplainly wrong.
OTOH, when I put
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 15:03:20 +0200 wrote Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:00:31PM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
When defining a math-macro in a document, LyX uses this definition for all
other open documents as well (whether the macro is defined there or not)
I
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:00:31PM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
When defining a math-macro in a document, LyX uses this definition for all
other open documents as well (whether the macro is defined there or not)
I know this. The current definition mechanisn isplainly wrong.
OTOH, when I put
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 15:03:20 +0200 wrote Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:00:31PM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
When defining a math-macro in a document, LyX uses this definition for all
other open documents as well (whether the macro is defined there or not)
I
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:00:31PM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
> When defining a math-macro in a document, LyX uses this definition for all
> other open documents as well (whether the macro is defined there or not)
I know this. The current definition mechanisn isplainly wrong.
> OTOH, when I
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 15:03:20 +0200 wrote Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:00:31PM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > When defining a math-macro in a document, LyX uses this definition for all
> > other open documents as well (whether the macro is defined there or not)
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
