William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper directory that is to be browsed),
it happens that LyX
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper directory that is to be browsed),
it happens that LyX
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper directory that is to be browsed),
it happens that LyX
On 31.03.08, William R. Buckley wrote:
Well, the open source tool Maxima has no problem following a Windows
shortcut in its browsing function. So, your position is therefore that
LyX should be less than it might be, when other open source tools have
no problem with a simple if arcane
information. That is what you expect
to obtain from those who seek assistance with your product.
Give the same as you expect.
wrb
-Original Message-
From: G. Milde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 12:18 AM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: WRB - Observations
Joost Verburg wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
Well, the open source tool Maxima has no problem following
a Windows shortcut in its browsing function. So, your position
is therefore that LyX should be less than it might be, when other
open source tools have no problem with a simple if arcane
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
On my XP Home box, every program I've tested that uses the Windows file
open dialog can follow a shortcut (.lnk) to a directory. So either
something is amiss with your system, or maybe you have some registry
setting mucking things up.
If I remember correctly, there is
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper directory that is to be browsed),
it happens that LyX
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 05:53:57AM -0700, William R. Buckley wrote:
There was an assumption then, that I know what Qt is,
and therefore should have understood the mention.
Well, that's an assumption e.g. I rarely make.
However, I usually assume that literate people using the internet for
email
G. Milde wrote:
There was a suggestion to report the bug to where it belongs, i.e. the
QT library. QT is actively supported, tries to do the operating system
universality in a clean and sensible way. Maybe this bug is even fixed
in a current version of QT (or labelled as wontfix even there if
William R. Buckley wrote:
What really surprises me is the effort various members have
expended to encourage me not to help your project.
I quite think your efforts are misguided.
Well, I suspect this particular issue (the treatment of Windows
shortcuts in some of the LyX file-open dialogs,
On 31.03.08, William R. Buckley wrote:
Well, the open source tool Maxima has no problem following a Windows
shortcut in its browsing function. So, your position is therefore that
LyX should be less than it might be, when other open source tools have
no problem with a simple if arcane
information. That is what you expect
to obtain from those who seek assistance with your product.
Give the same as you expect.
wrb
-Original Message-
From: G. Milde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 12:18 AM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: WRB - Observations
Joost Verburg wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
Well, the open source tool Maxima has no problem following
a Windows shortcut in its browsing function. So, your position
is therefore that LyX should be less than it might be, when other
open source tools have no problem with a simple if arcane
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
On my XP Home box, every program I've tested that uses the Windows file
open dialog can follow a shortcut (.lnk) to a directory. So either
something is amiss with your system, or maybe you have some registry
setting mucking things up.
If I remember correctly, there is
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper directory that is to be browsed),
it happens that LyX
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 05:53:57AM -0700, William R. Buckley wrote:
There was an assumption then, that I know what Qt is,
and therefore should have understood the mention.
Well, that's an assumption e.g. I rarely make.
However, I usually assume that literate people using the internet for
email
G. Milde wrote:
There was a suggestion to report the bug to where it belongs, i.e. the
QT library. QT is actively supported, tries to do the operating system
universality in a clean and sensible way. Maybe this bug is even fixed
in a current version of QT (or labelled as wontfix even there if
William R. Buckley wrote:
What really surprises me is the effort various members have
expended to encourage me not to help your project.
I quite think your efforts are misguided.
Well, I suspect this particular issue (the treatment of Windows
shortcuts in some of the LyX file-open dialogs,
On 31.03.08, William R. Buckley wrote:
> Well, the open source tool Maxima has no problem following a Windows
> shortcut in its browsing function. So, your position is therefore that
> LyX should be less than it might be, when other open source tools have
> no problem with a simple if arcane
information. That is what you expect
to obtain from those who seek assistance with your product.
Give the same as you expect.
wrb
> -Original Message-
> From: G. Milde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 12:18 AM
> To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> S
Joost Verburg wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
Well, the open source tool Maxima has no problem following
a Windows shortcut in its browsing function. So, your position
is therefore that LyX should be less than it might be, when other
open source tools have no problem with a simple if arcane
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
On my XP Home box, every program I've tested that uses the Windows file
open dialog can follow a shortcut (.lnk) to a directory. So either
something is amiss with your system, or maybe you have some registry
setting mucking things up.
If I remember correctly, there is
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper directory that is to be browsed),
it happens that LyX
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 05:53:57AM -0700, William R. Buckley wrote:
> There was an assumption then, that I know what Qt is,
> and therefore should have understood the mention.
Well, that's an assumption e.g. I rarely make.
However, I usually assume that literate people using the internet for
G. Milde wrote:
There was a suggestion to report the bug to "where it belongs", i.e. the
QT library. QT is actively supported, tries to do the "operating system
universality" in a clean and sensible way. Maybe this bug is even fixed
in a current version of QT (or labelled as wontfix even there
William R. Buckley wrote:
What really surprises me is the effort various members have
expended to encourage me not to help your project.
I quite think your efforts are misguided.
Well, I suspect this particular issue (the treatment of Windows
"shortcuts" in some of the LyX file-open
Joost Verburg wrote:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I don't think so. Contrast the behavior of the Insert - Graphics
dialog with the File - Open dialog.
With both dialogs I get exactly the same behavior (the .lnk file is
opened). File - Open hides shortcuts by default because it's looking
for .lyx
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:57:47PM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote:
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, if you want to use open source applications built
to open standards, then understand that almost all of these were
originally
build for linux or one of the *BSDs, those are the platforms the
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, if you want to use open source applications built to open
standards, then understand that almost all of these were
originally
build for linux or one of the *BSDs, those are the platforms the
developers use, and making them available to the Windows
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:18:00PM -0700, William R. Buckley wrote:
LyX supports Windows, Linux/Unix and Mac OS X and it should work
fine on all these platforms. There is no reason why one of these
platform should get more support than others.
There surely is. There is no particular
rgheck wrote:
Michael Wojcik wrote:
I don't think this is a bug in Qt, though arguably it's a missing
feature. Shortcuts are not first-class filesystem objects in Windows.
They're files that are treated in a special manner by Windows Explorer.
LyX uses Qt for its file dialogs, etc, so if
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:45:30PM -0400, Michael Wojcik wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Michael Wojcik wrote:
I don't think this is a bug in Qt, though arguably it's a missing
feature. Shortcuts are not first-class filesystem objects in Windows.
They're files that are treated in a special manner by
-Original Message-
From: Michael Wojcik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 2:46 PM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: WRB - Observations
rgheck wrote:
Michael Wojcik wrote:
I don't think this is a bug in Qt, though arguably it's a missing
feature
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 7:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WRB - Observations
On Monday 31 March 2008 19:19, William R. Buckley wrote:
Please, it is not about how I would like things. Rather, it is not
what one would expect, given familiarity with Windows
William R. Buckley wrote:
Well, the open source tool Maxima has no problem following
a Windows shortcut in its browsing function. So, your position
is therefore that LyX should be less than it might be, when other
open source tools have no problem with a simple if arcane
function.
On my
using?
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joost Verburg
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 8:37 PM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: WRB - Observations
William R. Buckley wrote:
Well, the open source tool Maxima has no problem following
a Windows
Joost Verburg wrote:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I don't think so. Contrast the behavior of the Insert - Graphics
dialog with the File - Open dialog.
With both dialogs I get exactly the same behavior (the .lnk file is
opened). File - Open hides shortcuts by default because it's looking
for .lyx
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:57:47PM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote:
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, if you want to use open source applications built
to open standards, then understand that almost all of these were
originally
build for linux or one of the *BSDs, those are the platforms the
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, if you want to use open source applications built to open
standards, then understand that almost all of these were
originally
build for linux or one of the *BSDs, those are the platforms the
developers use, and making them available to the Windows
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:18:00PM -0700, William R. Buckley wrote:
LyX supports Windows, Linux/Unix and Mac OS X and it should work
fine on all these platforms. There is no reason why one of these
platform should get more support than others.
There surely is. There is no particular
rgheck wrote:
Michael Wojcik wrote:
I don't think this is a bug in Qt, though arguably it's a missing
feature. Shortcuts are not first-class filesystem objects in Windows.
They're files that are treated in a special manner by Windows Explorer.
LyX uses Qt for its file dialogs, etc, so if
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:45:30PM -0400, Michael Wojcik wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Michael Wojcik wrote:
I don't think this is a bug in Qt, though arguably it's a missing
feature. Shortcuts are not first-class filesystem objects in Windows.
They're files that are treated in a special manner by
-Original Message-
From: Michael Wojcik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 2:46 PM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: WRB - Observations
rgheck wrote:
Michael Wojcik wrote:
I don't think this is a bug in Qt, though arguably it's a missing
feature
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 7:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WRB - Observations
On Monday 31 March 2008 19:19, William R. Buckley wrote:
Please, it is not about how I would like things. Rather, it is not
what one would expect, given familiarity with Windows
William R. Buckley wrote:
Well, the open source tool Maxima has no problem following
a Windows shortcut in its browsing function. So, your position
is therefore that LyX should be less than it might be, when other
open source tools have no problem with a simple if arcane
function.
On my
using?
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joost Verburg
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 8:37 PM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: WRB - Observations
William R. Buckley wrote:
Well, the open source tool Maxima has no problem following
a Windows
Joost Verburg wrote:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I don't think so. Contrast the behavior of the Insert -> Graphics
dialog with the File -> Open dialog.
With both dialogs I get exactly the same behavior (the .lnk file is
opened). File -> Open hides shortcuts by default because it's looking
for
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:57:47PM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Rich Shepard wrote:
>> However, if you want to use open source applications built
>> to open standards, then understand that almost all of these were
>> originally
>> build for linux or one of the *BSDs, those are the platforms the
> > Rich Shepard wrote:
> >> However, if you want to use open source applications built to open
> >> standards, then understand that almost all of these were
> >> originally
> >> build for linux or one of the *BSDs, those are the platforms the
> >> developers use, and making them available to
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:18:00PM -0700, William R. Buckley wrote:
> > > LyX supports Windows, Linux/Unix and Mac OS X and it should work
> > > fine on all these platforms. There is no reason why one of these
> > > platform should get more support than others.
> >
> > There surely is. There is
rgheck wrote:
Michael Wojcik wrote:
I don't think this is a bug in Qt, though arguably it's a missing
feature. Shortcuts are not first-class filesystem objects in Windows.
They're files that are treated in a special manner by Windows Explorer.
LyX uses Qt for its file dialogs, etc, so if
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:45:30PM -0400, Michael Wojcik wrote:
> rgheck wrote:
>> Michael Wojcik wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think this is a bug in Qt, though arguably it's a missing
>>> feature. Shortcuts are not first-class filesystem objects in Windows.
>>> They're files that are treated in a
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Wojcik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 2:46 PM
> To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Subject: Re: WRB - Observations
>
> rgheck wrote:
> > Michael Wojcik wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't th
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 7:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: WRB - Observations
>
> On Monday 31 March 2008 19:19, William R. Buckley wrote:
>
> > Please, it is not about how I would like things. Rather, it is not
> > what
William R. Buckley wrote:
Well, the open source tool Maxima has no problem following
a Windows shortcut in its browsing function. So, your position
is therefore that LyX should be less than it might be, when other
open source tools have no problem with a simple if arcane
function.
On my
using?
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joost Verburg
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 8:37 PM
> To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Subject: Re: WRB - Observations
>
> William R. Buckley wrote:
> > Well, the open source tool Maxi
rgheck wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper directory that is to be browsed),
it
, but I digress). Otherwise, you have
a product that does not really work in the Windows world.
wrb
-Original Message-
From: Michael Wojcik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 11:24 AM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: WRB - Observations
rgheck wrote
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, William R. Buckley wrote:
It is unreasonable to expect the entire Windows using community to avoid a
mechanism that is part of the Windows operating system.
However, William, I think it's reasonable to expect the entire Windows
using community to defenestrate to linux,
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, if you want to use open source applications built
to open standards, then understand that almost all of these were originally
build for linux or one of the *BSDs, those are the platforms the developers
use, and making them available to the Windows world is a
Joost Verburg wrote:
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, if you want to use open source applications built
to open standards, then understand that almost all of these were
originally
build for linux or one of the *BSDs, those are the platforms the
developers
use, and making them available to the
William R. Buckley wrote:
It is unreasonable to expect the entire Windows using community
to avoid a mechanism that is part of the Windows operating system.
The proper solution, distasteful as it may be, is to implement code
which facilitates this *hack* (I always think of a hack as a desirable
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I don't think so. Contrast the behavior of the Insert - Graphics
dialog with the File - Open dialog.
With both dialogs I get exactly the same behavior (the .lnk file is
opened). File - Open hides shortcuts by default because it's looking
for .lyx files while Insert -
Michael Wojcik wrote:
rgheck wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper directory that is
rgheck wrote:
Michael Wojcik wrote:
rgheck wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper
am reminded of the biblical warning, of not casting pearls.
wrb
-Original Message-
From: Rich Shepard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 2:35 PM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: RE: WRB - Observations
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, William R. Buckley wrote
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:04:58 -0700
William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
I am reminded of the biblical warning, of not casting pearls.
I think that LyX is a pearl of great beauty.
Alan
wrb
SNIP
rgheck wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper directory that is to be browsed),
it
, but I digress). Otherwise, you have
a product that does not really work in the Windows world.
wrb
-Original Message-
From: Michael Wojcik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 11:24 AM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: WRB - Observations
rgheck wrote
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, William R. Buckley wrote:
It is unreasonable to expect the entire Windows using community to avoid a
mechanism that is part of the Windows operating system.
However, William, I think it's reasonable to expect the entire Windows
using community to defenestrate to linux,
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, if you want to use open source applications built
to open standards, then understand that almost all of these were originally
build for linux or one of the *BSDs, those are the platforms the developers
use, and making them available to the Windows world is a
Joost Verburg wrote:
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, if you want to use open source applications built
to open standards, then understand that almost all of these were
originally
build for linux or one of the *BSDs, those are the platforms the
developers
use, and making them available to the
William R. Buckley wrote:
It is unreasonable to expect the entire Windows using community
to avoid a mechanism that is part of the Windows operating system.
The proper solution, distasteful as it may be, is to implement code
which facilitates this *hack* (I always think of a hack as a desirable
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I don't think so. Contrast the behavior of the Insert - Graphics
dialog with the File - Open dialog.
With both dialogs I get exactly the same behavior (the .lnk file is
opened). File - Open hides shortcuts by default because it's looking
for .lyx files while Insert -
Michael Wojcik wrote:
rgheck wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper directory that is
rgheck wrote:
Michael Wojcik wrote:
rgheck wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper
am reminded of the biblical warning, of not casting pearls.
wrb
-Original Message-
From: Rich Shepard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 2:35 PM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: RE: WRB - Observations
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, William R. Buckley wrote
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:04:58 -0700
William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
I am reminded of the biblical warning, of not casting pearls.
I think that LyX is a pearl of great beauty.
Alan
wrb
SNIP
rgheck wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper directory that is to be browsed),
it
, but I digress). Otherwise, you have
a product that does not really work in the Windows world.
wrb
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Wojcik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 11:24 AM
> To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Subject: Re: WRB - Observati
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, William R. Buckley wrote:
It is unreasonable to expect the entire Windows using community to avoid a
mechanism that is part of the Windows operating system.
However, William, I think it's reasonable to expect the entire Windows
using community to defenestrate to linux,
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, if you want to use open source applications built
to open standards, then understand that almost all of these were originally
build for linux or one of the *BSDs, those are the platforms the developers
use, and making them available to the Windows world is a
Joost Verburg wrote:
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, if you want to use open source applications built
to open standards, then understand that almost all of these were
originally
build for linux or one of the *BSDs, those are the platforms the
developers
use, and making them available to the
William R. Buckley wrote:
It is unreasonable to expect the entire Windows using community
to avoid a mechanism that is part of the Windows operating system.
The proper solution, distasteful as it may be, is to implement code
which facilitates this *hack* (I always think of a hack as a desirable
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I don't think so. Contrast the behavior of the Insert -> Graphics
dialog with the File -> Open dialog.
With both dialogs I get exactly the same behavior (the .lnk file is
opened). File -> Open hides shortcuts by default because it's looking
for .lyx files while Insert
Michael Wojcik wrote:
rgheck wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper directory that is
rgheck wrote:
Michael Wojcik wrote:
rgheck wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper
am reminded of the biblical warning, of not casting pearls.
wrb
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich Shepard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 2:35 PM
> To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Subject: RE: WRB - Observations
>
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Wil
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:04:58 -0700
"William R. Buckley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am reminded of the biblical warning, of not casting pearls.
I think that LyX is a pearl of great beauty.
Alan
>
> wrb
William R. Buckley wrote:
Reminder - WindowsXP installation of LyX1.5.4/MikTeX2.7
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper
rgheck wrote:
Another difficulty is with the inclusion of a citation (\cite[]{})
in a caption of a figure placed with the Float:Figure insert
function of the LyX user interface. I can easily hardcode
the citation, and it may be that I just don't understand how
to package the citation in
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Minipages? Sure: Insert-Box (a frameless Box is a minipage).
However, as Richard said, LaTeX isn't designed for grid layout. It's not a DTP
application.
Box isn't very descriptive. I'd never have guessed this. Would there by
objections to making it Minipage? or
rgheck wrote:
Box isn't very descriptive. I'd never have guessed this. Would there by
objections to making it Minipage? or Text Box? or ???
Minipage is a LaTeXism. And it can contain more than just text.
Jürgen
rgheck schrieb:
LyX isn't that kind of program. It's not FrameMaker or Adobe Publisher
or whatever. But LaTeX does have so-called minipages that can be used
for this kind of purpose. As far as I know, LyX doesn't have any support
for this, but of course you can do it manually via LaTeX in
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The placement of figures is now accomplished, though I do have some
complaint about the *compliance* of LyX, vis-à-vis following directions
in the placement of graphics. I do use the Float:Figure mechanism, and
note that the options for placement are
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The placement of figures is now accomplished, though I do have some
complaint about the *compliance* of LyX, vis-à-vis following directions
in the placement of graphics. I do use the Float:Figure mechanism, and
note that the options for
rgheck wrote, On 12/23/-28158 02:59 PM:
div class=moz-text-flowed style=font-family: -moz-fixedJürgen
Spitzmüller wrote:
Minipages? Sure: Insert-Box (a frameless Box is a minipage).
However, as Richard said, LaTeX isn't designed for grid layout. It's
not a DTP application.
Box isn't very
Todd Denniston wrote:
Minipages? Sure: Insert-Box (a frameless Box is a minipage).
However, as Richard said, LaTeX isn't designed for grid layout. It's
not a DTP application.
Box isn't very descriptive. I'd never have guessed this. Would there
by objections to making it Minipage? or
William R. Buckley wrote:
Reminder - WindowsXP installation of LyX1.5.4/MikTeX2.7
I noticed that when trying to browse for the graphic file of
a figure inserted into a document via the LyX user interface,
and upon trying to utilise a shortcut (as the means to more
efficiently select the proper
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
