Re: Harmattan discussions here - why not?

2011-07-25 Thread Ferenc Szekely
On 07/25/2011 06:25 PM, Felipe Crochik wrote:
 I suggest that we unofficially expand this list to include development
 for the harmattan. What do you think?
 
+1

I am sure many of you guys work on something cool for the N950. So who
does what?

 Felipe

Cheers,
ferenc
-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


changes to user shells on drop.maemo.org (how this relates to extras and the builder)

2010-06-02 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

We received reports about the autobuilder being stuck. Niels has fixed
the problem, but I needed to change the default shell settings on
drop.maemo.org. You may ask why? Well, the reason is simple:

If a person had __no__ extras invitation before, but opened a project
using git, then he / she suddenly got granted with extras upload
privileges. This is bad, because our intentions are to keep these two
services separated.

Luckily all uploads are traceable, since authentication happens with ssh
keys. So security wise it was not such a big deal.

Extras uploaders should request the upload rights via email, that's
the standard procedure. Git users can have git over ssh by simply
uploading their public ssh key via: https://garage.maemo.org/account/ .
(I know that git over ssh is not really working for all of us at the
moment. There is an other issue and I am working on it.)

In case you face problems while uploading to extras or to the builder,
then it might be due these latest changes. If so, then I apologize for
the inconvenience and kindly ask you to drop an email to Niels and
myself asap.

Thanks for your time.
Ferenc
-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org

ps: please feel free to spread this message
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: git over ssh access for garage projects - calling for brave testers

2010-05-06 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hi Philipp and all,

I received a couple of complaints about adding / updating the SSH keys
at the garage account page. Please see the reply below.

On 05/06/2010 11:04 AM, pHilipp Zabel wrote:

snip

 
 Login to garage.maemo.org, click on Account Maintenance, and there
 you are, last point above preferences is Your public SSH key(s).
 
 I tried this and I got exactly the same error message as Alberto.
 
I fixed it yesterday. Was a silly thing, which I did not check when
announced git+ssh. So only the extras maintainers (ie. people who have
rights to upload to extras) were able to add / change their SSH key(s).

Now the key changing is enabled for all garage users, although the
action (ie. putting the authorized_keys file to the proper place in the
filesystem) has a 15 minutes delay. The cron jon that checks for new
accounts runs in every 15 minutes. I could probably allow more frequent
runs though...

So please check the 'Account' page again and let me know if the SSH key
field is still missing.

 regards
 Philipp
Thanks,
ferenc
-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


git over ssh access for garage projects - calling for brave testers

2010-04-28 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

A long awaited feature has finally been landed: garage projects that
have git repositories can now use ssh to manipulate their data.

Our git over ssh support works side by side with the current WebDAV
access, so you can use both for reading / writing the repo.

Quick how-to

1. Upload your public SSH key to garage:
   https://garage.maemo.org/account/

2. Add an entry to your ~/.ssh/config file, like this:

   Host drop.maemo.org
 HostName drop.maemo.org
 User _garage_user_name_
 IdentityFile _path_to_your_private_ssh_key_

3. Clone your project's git repo:

  git clone ssh://drop.maemo.org/git/my_great_project


You can read the same instructions on the SCM page of your project. If
you wonder about ssh (and keys) then please refer to online ssh tutorials.

If you had a few minutes to spare please check it out and let me know
your findings. We may have some bugs here and there, so let's find and
fix them together.

Thanks,
ferenc

-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Developer challenge at XMPP Summit

2010-01-22 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Florian Jensen told me about a programming contest [1] at the upcoming
XMPP Summit #8 [2] in Brussels. The applications will have to be demoed
on Nokia phones and they have to use XMPP in some way.

If you are attending Fosdem 2010 [3] and feel like coding a bit then it
is your chance to win an N900 ;)

Cheers,
ferenc

[1] http://bit.ly/7135Iu
[2] http://xmpp.org/summit/summit8.shtml
[3] http://wiki.maemo.org/FOSDEM_2010
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Garage mailing lists still down?

2010-01-20 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hi,

Anderson Lizardo wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Ferenc Szekely fer...@maemo.org wrote:
 I made requests for a DNS change and an SMTP server config change. After
 these we should be able to send mails to lists hosted on garage.maemo.org.
 
 Now I'm getting a different error:
 
snip

 Any ideas?

Looks better now. The ISP uses yet another SMTP relay according to the
logs, which we denied previously.. Oh well, communication problems...

I was able to send a mail to a garage list. Please try again.

 
 Regards,
Br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Empty Admin list for garage project - how to put myself back there?

2010-01-20 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

nomrasco wrote:
 Hi all,
 
   yesterday i registered my project on garage.maemo.org
 http://garage.maemo.org and project was approved. Unfortunatelly I
 decided to play a little bit with it and tried to add myself also as a
 Developer to be not only Admin but also someone who 'really' do
 something within the project ;) 
snip

Thanks for registering at garage! It is way too easy to switch the
roles, and as you realized there is no feedback. We will have to figure
out something for that. But what matters now is that you are an admin
again.

 -- 
 nomrasco
 software development
 
 
Br,
ferenc
-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: upload invitations disabled?

2010-01-19 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Thomas Tanner wrote:
 Hi,
 
 who is responsible for processing the requests for an invitation for
 upload rights for Extras?
 https://garage.maemo.org/extras-assistant/index.php
 
 I've tried it a couple of times over past few weeks but I did not get
 any response so far.. :(
 
No, they are not disabled. There is an issue with account
synchronization between 3 servers. We have to resolve that first before
it makes sense to approve new requests. I would like to ask a little bit
more patience. I hope we can accept requests later today, or tomorrow.

 Thanks
Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Garage mailing lists still down?

2010-01-19 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Claudio Saavedra wrote:
 El mar, 19-01-2010 a las 16:55 +0200, Ferenc Szekely escribió:
 I wonder if the garage mailing lists are still offline due to the
 server migration? I remember reading that the maemo.org mailing
 lists
 were migrated some time ago, but how about the garage ones?

 I made requests for a DNS change and an SMTP server config change.
 After
 these we should be able to send mails to lists hosted on
 garage.maemo.org.
 
 May I ask why these kind of changes are not notified in advance?
 
Because I forgot to request them.

 Claudio
 
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: SVN moved permanently?

2010-01-15 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello Till,

Till Harbaum / Lists wrote:
 Hi,
 
 $ svn up
 svn: Repository moved permanently to 'https://vcs.maemo.org/svn/maep'; please 
 relocate
 
 Is there anything _i_ have to do about this or will this be fixed on server 
 side?
 
The repositories are handled by vcs.maemo.org from today onwards. You
get the message from your svn client, because we did an HTTP redirect on
the garage side. We will not do more. Unfortunately the previous
garage.* URLs could not be preserved.

Please check out your project's subversion repo using the new URL. It
should not take more than a couple of minutes (even less than that for
maep).

I hope that in the long run all garage projects will enjoy the benefits
of today's server move.

 Till
Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Where to find sources of gtk+ 2:2.14.7-1maemo15?

2010-01-06 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Jeff Moe wrote:
 On Wednesday 06 January 2010 15:36:36 Jeff Moe wrote:
 On Monday 04 January 2010 11:56:38 tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
 For others to know:

 https://stage.maemo.org/svn/maemo/projects/haf/trunk/gtk+/

 https://stage.maemo.org/svn/maemo/projects/haf/tags/gtk+/
 And as a pre-warning stage as a svn server will be history as soon as we 
 move the hardware. It was originally designed to be a temporary solution, 
 and it turned into a semi-permanent one. GTK+ is finding a home in most 
 likely gitorious.
 Could you clarify what is meant here? Does this affect other SVN repos on 
 garage (such as qstardict, as an example)?
 
 One second after sending this I saw on from feri IRC that
 
 stage svn != garage svn
 
 so presumably qstardict, etc. are fine.
 
Yes, just to reiterate for those who did not read it on IRC:

qstardict is fine and so are all the other garage projects.

Stage.maemo.org has been used by Nokia projects who have first opened up
their sources. They have since moved to gitorious or to our beloved
garage.maemo.org.

 -Jeff

Cheers,
ferenc
-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


maemo.org mailing moved to new servers

2010-01-05 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hi,

After a bit of unexpected struggle Niels and myself got the mail
services moved to the new servers. Thanks Niels for the help!

Some emails you sent during the last one hour or so might have got
lost. They are somewhere on a relay server (not in our hands) and may
never end up on the lists server. If this is the case then I would
kindly ask you to re-post those mails and I also apologize for the
inconvenience.

Otherwise hope the new servers will serve the mail traffic just fine.

ferenc
-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Garage maintenance break

2009-12-15 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hi,

Thomas Waelti wrote:
 And now we have rush-hour on garage... dog slow, four apps queued 
 inside 20 minutes. Is that new server slower or faster than the old 
 one :-)
 
 Thanks for keeping an eye on that infrastructure, it really becomes 
 critically important now.
 
We did not move to the new server yet. The maintenance break was a
pure mistake.

 Best regards -Tom
 
Br,
ferenc

 
 Hello,
 
 Marius Gedminas wrote:
 On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:34:57AM +, Andrew Flegg wrote:
 Apologies if such an announcement was made - but I didn't see 
 it, and can't find it if it was. So, if it *was* made; it needs
  to be made more clearly next time :-)
 I was unable to find an announcement either.  Since previous 
 maintenance breaks used to be announced, I can only assume this 
 downtime is unscheduled.  Some kind of emergency?
 
 There was no announcement, because there was no maintenance break 
 planned. What happened was a bad mistake from me. I changed the 
 PosgreSQL config file to do some db migration stuff to the new 
 server. After copying the database I forgot to revert the config 
 changes which caused that the web site went down.
 
 I am very sorry for inconveniences it has caused.
 
 Br, ferenc ___ 
 maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org 
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Garage maintenance break

2009-12-13 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Marius Gedminas wrote:
 On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:34:57AM +, Andrew Flegg wrote:

 Apologies if such an announcement was made - but I didn't see it, and
 can't find it if it was. So, if it *was* made; it needs to be made
 more clearly next time :-)
 
 I was unable to find an announcement either.  Since previous maintenance
 breaks used to be announced, I can only assume this downtime is
 unscheduled.  Some kind of emergency?
 
There was no announcement, because there was no maintenance break
planned. What happened was a bad mistake from me. I changed the
PosgreSQL config file to do some db migration stuff to the new server.
After copying the database I forgot to revert the config changes which
caused that the web site went down.

I am very sorry for inconveniences it has caused.

Br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Garage GPG

2009-12-09 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I don't know if this is the right place for a question related to
 Garage, but still...
 
You can ask the garage admin directly (garage at maemo dot org), but
this is of course a better forum to spread info.

 I received the invitation to upload to extras-devel, accepted it and
 added my public SSH key. I did not add my public GPG key at that
 moment.
 
 How can I add the public GPG key now? (I can't see any option for
 that, https://garage.maemo.org/account/ just lists my public SSH keys)
 
We don't make use of the GPG key, and that is why there is no UI offered
for changing it. This could be easily added to the account page you
mentioned. With the SSO (Single Sign On) approaching I would rather wait
and see how that system will manage keys (SSH and PGP/GPG). AFAIK we
will have a single UI (in Midgard) to manage account info, so the garage
account page will not be necessary anymore. The guys responsible for SSO
could perhaps comment on that.

Cheers
ferenc
-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Uploading homepage using GIT

2009-12-01 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Kees Jongenburger wrote:
 Hi Akshey
 
 On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Akshey Jawa aksheyj...@gmail.com
 mailto:aksheyj...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I need help in creating homepage for my project hosted at
 https://garage.maemo.org/projects/smartclassrooms/. For this I need
 to upload webpages using Version Control System. I have configured
 the project account at garage.maemo.org http://garage.maemo.org to
 use GIT but I am not able to figure out how I can push the webpages
 online. Kindly help me to do so. I do not have any experience in
 using Version Control Systems. I read somewhere that I need to
 create directory named 'www' in the my project's GIT repository and
 this directory should contain the webpages.
 
 I have created a local repository using following commands-
 git init
 git add .
 git commit
 
 I tried for 1/2 hour to find a place where  setting up git for garage
 was documented but did not find it yet so here is a more generic answer
 
 you need to add  a new remote repository and push the content to there
 something like this (but I dont' know the url)
 
   git remote add origin git.garage.maemo.org???/example.git 
 http://git.garage.maemo.org???/example.git
 
   git push origin master
 
Isn't the SCM page of the particular project helpful enough? In this
case: https://garage.maemo.org/scm/?group_id=1123

About setting up the web space:
http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2009-March/018717.html

Adding some text to the SCM page -or somewhere else- about the web
content creation would not harm though.

Br,
ferenc

-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Mails about ratings from Downloads

2009-11-11 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Cornelius Hald wrote:
 Hi,
 
 does anyone think those mails (see attachment) are actually useful? It
 does not say who rated my app (because it's almost always anonymous), it
 does not say how high this person rated my app nor what the total score
 is now.
 
 So basically it provides no information at all. I've got about 10 of
 those mails since yesterday. So I would have two suggestions: 1) Don't
 send out those mails or 2) Make them say something useful.
 
We have been wondering about the same. The component [1] that handles
comments and ratings are being reworked. Niels requested a bunch of
changes and new features [1]. Among those is the disabling outgoing
mails for ratings. I think the changes will not be online before he returns.

I will look at the component if we could do a temporary hack and save
the inboxes from these messages.

 What do you think?
 Conny
 
Cheers,
ferenc

[1]
https://svn.midgard-project.org/midgard/branches/ragnaroek/midcom/net.nehmer.comments/

[2]
http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-community/2009-November/003231.html

 
 
 Subject:
 page Conboy has been commented by (anonymous)
 From:
 maemo.org admin team gar...@maemo.org
 Date:
 Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:14:46 +0200 (EET)
 To:
 h...@icandy.de
 
 To:
 h...@icandy.de
 
 
 
 
 Link to page:
 http://maemo.org/midcom-permalink-9763a89cadaa11dea310251e31f6601a601a
 
 
 
 
 ___
 maemo-developers mailing list
 maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Mails about ratings from Downloads

2009-11-11 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Tim Teulings wrote:

snip

 I would be intersted in getting more information in the mails 
 (currently I walk the link to get more information). So please do not
  remove this feature (but possibly make it configurable per user if 
 other people are not interested) but enhance it!
 
OK, agreed. Making it configurable per user and beefing up the content
is probably the right way to go. Thanks Tim for the mail. Any other
comments?

 -- Gruß ... Tim

Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: git+ssh on garage.maemo.org

2009-11-09 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Cornelius Hald wrote:
 Hi,
 
 would it be possible to add ssh support to git on garage?
 
 I´m asking because transifex.net (the future maemo.org translation 
 platform) can only push changes to git repositories via ssh, not via https.
 If we want to use that service on garage/git we either need support for 
 ssh on garage/git or we need support for git+https in transfex.net.
 
 I don´t know what is more work and I have absolutely no technical 
 insights into both projects. Only I think we should someone bridge the gap.
 
 What do you think?

Yes, it will be possible. First we would like to complete the server
move and then I will work on git over ssh support. It has been on the
list for quite a while.

 Conny
 
 P.S.: tmo hreads about transifex.net:
 http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=27997
 http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=33382
 
Cheers,
ferenc
-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: SVN Access and Failures

2009-11-02 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Nathan Anderson wrote:
 I started a project on the Garage, I added a senior developer to the
 project.  He is attempting to check something in and it gives him one of two
 problems.
 
 If he uses a incorrect user/pw but then it will reprompt; but if he uses his
 Garage account it spits back:
 
 
 svn: Commit failed (details follow):
 svn: MKACTIVITY of
 '/svn/katana/!svn/act/2d6db847-5a77-0410-a29f-b87779591664': 403 Forbidden
 (https://garage.maemo.org)
 
 
 Any ideas, I can submit my changes fine.
 
I need to kick a cron job that is supposed to update the access rights
when a new user joins a project. The job left over its pid file, hence
no new job could start. The access rights should be OK for your team now.

 Nathan.
 
Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: More Git/Garage issues...

2009-10-28 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Tim Samoff wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I was using Git with Garage just fine...until yesterday. Now, every time 
 I try to push files to the project, I get this output:
 
 ---
 tims-macbook:hermes tim$ git push origin master
 error: Cannot access URL https://git.maemo.org/projects/hermes/, return 
 code 22
 error: failed to push some refs to 'https://git.maemo.org/projects/hermes'
 ---
 
 Anyone know why this might be happening?
 
Yes, anonymous pushes are no longer possible. They were allowed due to a
misconfiguration, but we have fixed that. The 'SCM page' [1] of each
projects tells what do you need for committing to the central repo. In a
nutshell:

Please make sure you have filled in your garage credentials to ~/.netrc.
The info that needs to be added there is the following:

machine git.maemo.org
login __garage user name__
password __garage password__

 Andrew Flegg tested this on his end and was able to push. I didn't do 
 anything to my config since it was working.
 
Andrew probably has a proper ~/.netrc on his workstation.

Sorry for the inconveniences it may have caused.

 Thanks!
 Tim
 
 
 
Cheers,
ferenc
-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org

[1] Hermes SCM page
https://garage.maemo.org/scm/?group_id=1071
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Spam in comments to news section of garage

2009-10-20 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

ds wrote:
 Sorry, but I could not find how to remove spam from my news section
 
 The comment is spam, and I can remove my entry, but can not find how to
 remove the comment.
 
 https://garage.maemo.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=forum_id=3931
 
There is no way to remove or edit comments in the current UI. I can
remove it from the database. I will think about how to add a Delete
comment feature for project admins.

 
 Detlef
 
Cheers,
ferenc

-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


all garage projects: svn repos go read-only

2009-10-15 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

In order to complete today's actions with the disk rearrangements on
garage we need to disable write access to the svn repos. This will last
until the repos are mirrored to the new disk which is expected to take a
couple of hours.

Full access will be turned on as soon as rsync finished the job.

I am very sorry for the inconvenience.

Cheers,
ferenc
-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: git push problem at git.maemo.org

2009-09-28 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hi,

Alberto Mardegan wrote:
 Ferenc Szekely wrote:
 Apologies for the inconvenience if you and your project are affected.
 
 In the meantime are there any workarounds to this problem?
 
No workaround as we speak. I took a couple of problematic repositories
from the server and tried accessing them via WebDAV on a different
machine. I can confirm that push works to those repos. I will now check
the diff between the two setups and hope to get come clue from that
investigation.

 Ciao,
   Alberto
 
Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: git push problem at git.maemo.org

2009-09-28 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Ferenc Szekely wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Alberto Mardegan wrote:
 Ferenc Szekely wrote:
 Apologies for the inconvenience if you and your project are affected.
 In the meantime are there any workarounds to this problem?

 No workaround as we speak. I took a couple of problematic repositories
 from the server and tried accessing them via WebDAV on a different
 machine. I can confirm that push works to those repos. I will now check
 the diff between the two setups and hope to get come clue from that
 investigation.
 
I found the problem regarding git push failures. Unfortunately this is
related to my attempts fixing a sechole in our gitweb setup a few days ago.

For those who are interested: git always sends a PROPFIND request first
when you do a git push (this is over HTTP, remember). The server replies
with the git.maemo.org frontpage, which is obviously not the content
what git would expect.

Now wondering about a quick fix, so that the repos and gitweb could
happily live together again.

-ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: git push problem at git.maemo.org

2009-09-28 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hi again,

git push works again on git.maemo.org. I don't even want to say what the
problem was... shame on me, but I forgot to turn DAV on for the
project repositories. The web server did its job to serve the content as
is, not giving a chance to the webdav module to chew on the requests
from git. What a lame sysadmin, you may say.

Sorry to all who got some bad days because of this. I owe you a beer on
the summit. ;)

Cheers,
ferenc


Ferenc Szekely wrote:
 Hello,
 
 Ferenc Szekely wrote:
 Hi,

 Alberto Mardegan wrote:
 Ferenc Szekely wrote:
 Apologies for the inconvenience if you and your project are affected.
 In the meantime are there any workarounds to this problem?

 No workaround as we speak. I took a couple of problematic repositories
 from the server and tried accessing them via WebDAV on a different
 machine. I can confirm that push works to those repos. I will now check
 the diff between the two setups and hope to get come clue from that
 investigation.

 I found the problem regarding git push failures. Unfortunately this is
 related to my attempts fixing a sechole in our gitweb setup a few days ago.
 
 For those who are interested: git always sends a PROPFIND request first
 when you do a git push (this is over HTTP, remember). The server replies
 with the git.maemo.org frontpage, which is obviously not the content
 what git would expect.
 
 Now wondering about a quick fix, so that the repos and gitweb could
 happily live together again.
 
 -ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


git push problem at git.maemo.org

2009-09-24 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

This will not be interesting to many of you, but I wanted to reach the
largest developer audience.

Members from the hildon and modest projects reported that git push fails
using the repositories on git.maemo.org.

After investigating for a few hours (thanks for help, Alberto [1]) I
have a strong feeling that these problems are related to the fact that
we use git over WebDAV. I do not know what is exactly causing that git
push fails, but tests confirmed that committing through SSH (to the same
repos) works flawlessly.

On the other hand I have also tested other repositories using our
standard push (over HTTPS; WebDAV; using libcurl) and did not
experience any problems. So this is -at least- weird..

These incidents and several requests from the past should raise the
priority of providing git access over SSH. However this needs careful
planning and time for implementation (ie. will not happen overnight).

Please let me know if you experienced problems (except speed) when
pushing code changes to git.maemo.org. Also please let me know if you
read or heard about workarounds in case git (or actually curl) returns
with error code 18 [2] following push.

Apologies for the inconvenience if you and your project are affected.

Cheers,
ferenc

[1] https://garage.maemo.org/users/agarcia/
[2] http://curl.haxx.se/libcurl/c/libcurl-errors.html

-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Building out garage's infrastructure

2009-08-28 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Jeremiah Foster wrote:
   Personally, I've recommended the separation of various processes onto  
 separate servers:
 
   * Package repositories (with a mirror on garage)
   * Web server
   * Mail server
   * Build system (already on separate host(s))
 
Good starting point!

Unless you meant the Build system to host the source repos I would add
this to your list:

   * SCM server (for subversion and git repositories)

   Warm regards,
 
   Jeremiah

Cheers,
ferenc
-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: fer...@maemo.org
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


svn2git conversion testing at garage.maemo.org

2009-06-09 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

I have finished the automated svn2git conversion support for garage
projects that are currently using subversion for revision control.

I am looking for project admins who would be willing to help me testing
the whole procedure in the live environment.

Please drop me an email if you are an administrator of a garage project
which has a subversion repository and you would consider using git in
the future.

Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: New home for Easy Debian?

2009-04-28 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Andrew Flegg wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 20:18, Ferenc Szekely fer...@maemo.org wrote:
 Ryan Abel wrote:
 Or just raising the limits. We can always beg hardware from Tero
 later. ;)

 Guys, the web place of garage projects (ie. the www dir in the version
 control's root) is NOT MEANT for debian repositories or 300 megs of
 image files.
 
 I don't think anyone was suggesting putting the image in Subversion,
 instead using the garage project's downloads facility.
 
Right. That is not subversion, true. But it is not a proper download
service either for such files.

 Other options:
   * Amazon S3 storage gives auto-torrent access, and direct downloads:
   http://aws.amazon.com/s3/
 
   * I've got lots of webspace and bandwidth.
 
   * maddler's got maemopeople.org - that may be suitable if he's
 asked nicely.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Andrew
 
Br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: New home for Easy Debian?

2009-04-27 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Ryan Abel wrote:
 On Apr 27, 2009, at 2:58 PM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
 
 ext Qole qole.tab...@gmail.com writes:

 At this point, garage.maemo.org doesn't allow file uploads of the  
 size
 I need (maximum 150MB files there).
 You could try asking for an exception.  Yours seems like a worthy  
 cause.
 
 
 Or just raising the limits. We can always beg hardware from Tero  
 later. ;)
 
Guys, the web place of garage projects (ie. the www dir in the version
control's root) is NOT MEANT for debian repositories or 300 megs of
image files. We made exceptions way too many imho by raising the upload
limits, instead of solving the problem and setting up a proper service.
What we need here is a similar infrastructure as extras has: a content
delivery network. There has been a project proposal 2 years ago for VIP
file sharing. The drafts are still somewhere on garage...

It is a pity we did not make it clear enough that the www place is for
simple, static web pages and nothing else.

 --
 Ryan Abel
 Maemo Community Council member
 
Br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


garage projects can publish web content from git repositories too

2009-03-26 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Some news for projects using (or planning to use) git on garage:
-the 'www' dir can finally be used to publish web content.

This feature has already been there for projects using subversion.

The publishing is done in a cron job, which is sub-optimal, but we can
not use git hooks, unless we get rid off the WebDAV based repository
updates.

The cronjob is running in every 20 minutes, so the content is not
refreshed right after git push.

Later on the web UI of the garage project will offer the possibility to
force the web publishing, but first I should finish the svn - git
migration support.

If you have questions please send me an email.

Cheers,
ferenc

ps: the source of he scripts can be found here
https://garage.maemo.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/trunk/bin/?root=ggit

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


public apology

2008-06-17 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

I fixed something on the svn post-commit hook script on garage today.
Just to be on the safe side I stoppped cron while doing the tests around
mid-day (GMT +3). I tested my fix and as you can all imagine I forgot to
restart cron.

I apologize for any delay it may have caused in picking up packages in
extras incoming queues, updating your garage pages, sending out commit
emails etc. Especially sorry for the work Ed and Niels are doing these
days for rebuilding the sources in extras, which is a great improvement
and help for those of you who develop and share applications/code with
the rest of us here in the community. I am really sorry folks.

Br,
ferenc





-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


garage upgrade is about to land

2008-06-03 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

An upgraded garage is soon to be launched (ie. in a few minutes). During
this upgrade we only changed the underlaying GForge to the latest (open
source, free) version: 4.5.20 and made sure that our custom changes can
be applied without much hassle. Well, all went fine, as far as I can tell :)

You should not notice any difference with garage after we switch. In
case a big trouble hits the fan we can revert to the old version in
a minute.

If you will experience minor glitches, then please file a bug report, or
just email me.

Cheers,
ferenc
-- 
maemo.org sysadmin, developer
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ps: all the custom code we made during the years will land to a
subversion repo, check later: https://garage.maemo.org/projects/garage
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


farewell

2008-02-08 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello list,

Some of you already know that I have left Nokia. I thought I owe you a
short mail about this. Thanks for all the help and co-operation since
the birth of the platform. Without you guys maemo would be nowhere
near where it is today. I hope it will keep this momentum, so we have
a long and bright future ahead of us.

I will keep close ties to maemo and I'm willing to help the guys who
keep on running the infrastructure and web services. Beside that I
will hopefully spend more time on other projects I am involved with.

Keep on hacking!

Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: explanations of the recent download problems

2008-01-17 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

On Jan 16, 2008 7:18 PM, Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 As a techie, I'd like to know more about how the content distribution
 network happened to cache HTML error pages for many of the packages on
 repository.maemo.org.  Did the error pages come with long cache
 expiration headers by mistake, or does the CDN tend to assume URLs
 ending in .deb never change?

No, there is no special expiration header set for the index page of
tablets-dev.nokia.com. It seems that the CDN never realized that the
file size has changed, although I have reverted the normal index page
for a long time. I requested the CDN admins to fix this issue.

About the debs: no, CDN should not assume that a deb never changes.
The file names are always unique for newly uploaded packages. I can't
tell you why new debs are not picked up by the CDN properly, if this
was also part of your question.

Thanks Marius for the questions. Please shoot more and I try to answer
as much as I know.

 Marius Gedminas
 --
 Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.

Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: explanations of the recent download problems

2008-01-17 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello Thomas,

If you don't mind I cc: the dev list. You might not be the only one
experiencing this problem.

On Jan 16, 2008 11:25 PM, Thomas J. Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello Ferenc,

 I still regularly have problems with Maemo Extras. Here's an example:

 apt-get  install pidgin-extprefs

snip

 Get:1 http://repository.maemo.org chinook/free pidgin-extprefs 0.7-0nix2
 [12.4kB]
 Fetched 12.4kB in 0s (25.4kB/s)
 Failed to fetch
 http://repository.maemo.org/extras/pool/chinook/free/p/pidgin-extprefs/pidgin-extprefs_0.7-0nix2_armel.deb
   Size mismatch

snip


 The strange thing is that just using wget to get the package seems to
 work. Could be a metadata problem?

When apt-get update talks to our repository it actually fetches a
package database [1] first. From that file apt-get knows that it
supposed to receive 12380 bytes for the
pidgin-extprefs_0.7-0nix2_armel.deb package. If you go to the pool's
index [2] you can see that the file is actually 12382 bytes long. This
could explain the size mismatch error.

Wget will not match the file size with a package db, so it will just
fetch it without a problem.

Question:
why the Packages have the wrong size. Well, frankly I don't know. It
can only be because our repo manager tool had a hiccup, though it has
been working quite well in the past years.

Anyways, I try to rebuild that package database and see if that will help.

 Thanks,

 tjb
 --

Thanks to you.

-ferenc

[1] http://repository.maemo.org/extras/dists/chinook/free/binary-armel/Packages
[2] http://repository.maemo.org/extras/pool/chinook/free/p/pidgin-extprefs/


 ===
 | Thomas Baker  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
 | Systems Programmer  |
 | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 |
 | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 |
 | 332 Morse Hall  |
 | Durham, NH 03824 USA  http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb |
 ===


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: explanations of the recent download problems

2008-01-17 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello again,

 Question:
 why the Packages have the wrong size. Well, frankly I don't know. It
 can only be because our repo manager tool had a hiccup, though it has
 been working quite well in the past years.

 Anyways, I try to rebuild that package database and see if that will help.

Rebuilding the Packages file helped. I suspect it is our tool which
made the mistake. We will have to look into that.

In the meantime please report all size-mismatch errors, so I can
collect test cases.

Cheers,
ferenc


 [1] 
 http://repository.maemo.org/extras/dists/chinook/free/binary-armel/Packages
 [2] http://repository.maemo.org/extras/pool/chinook/free/p/pidgin-extprefs/

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


explanations of the recent download problems

2008-01-16 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

I owe you an explanation about the problems we faced with the firmware
downloads, repository.maemo.org and the windows update wizard server
backend since Xmas till the beginning of Jan.

The infrastructure is built so that the content from
repository.maemo.org is served thru a huge caching network. We were
supposed to use the same network for the firmware downloads as well,
but due to a misconfiguration and _my negligence_ all the requests
ended up at our origin server (stage.maemo.org).

Soon after the N810 launch the traffic dramatically increased and the
server could not handle it anymore. It was actually never meant to
handle such load.

We first realized the problem with tablets-dev.nokia.com where it took
ages to get any firmware. This was the time when somebody started a
torrent for the new OS 2008 image which helped a lot. We could talk
about why Nokia did not offer this, but I am not the person who will
tell you the reasons.
So the firmware images from tablets-dev could have never been served
from the caching network properly, because our backend scripts did not
send the correct HTTP headers back to the caches and the caches were
not configured either to fulfill our authentication requirements. I
take all the blame for this, so this is why I spoke about negligence
above. I must admit that fixing this was on my todo list for ages.

Almost at the same when tablets-dev broke down we started to receive
complaints about the update wizard on windows failing to fetch images
from our server. Well, what a coincidence... Making this backend work
properly with the caching network required a one liner change in a
script. This was done pretty quickly by the developers and the patch
was applied a week ago. Right now I am confident that the requests
coming form windows users end up at the caching network.

Beside that I am pretty sure we also got some DOS attacks at the same
time, which we clearly see at garage.maemo.org. I never went and
checked logs at stage.maemo.org, but I suspect that we were hit on all
fronts. We have taken the necessary measures to avoid these things in
the future.

I must thank my fellow Nokia colleagues (the file delivery platform
and our team here), our ISP crew and our cache providers to help and
find solutions for the problems. I believe if it was not a holiday
season we could have solved these much faster.

Never the less the problems should be over by now. If you still
experience long delays, or weird HTTP responses then please mail me
with the exact URL you're trying to access.

Thanks for the patience, and apologies for the inconvenience we caused.

Best regards,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


memory upgrade on maemo.org

2007-12-10 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hi,

maemo.org will have a short, 15 mins maintenance break starting in a
few minutes. The server will get some more RAM.

br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


sorry for spamming many of you

2007-12-05 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hi,

The ISP just started up the boxes after moving them to the new place.
Unfortunately the test setup of our bugzilla was misconfigured and it
started to spam half the world in my name.

I hope some of you did not put me on spam list yet. Still, it is a
pity that we can't count these mails in the karma. I could probably be
no. 1. by now ;)

Sorry again folks!

Br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


maemo servers going down on the 5th of December

2007-12-03 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Our  ISP has informed us that the maemo servers will all go down
on the __5th of December__ due to a major server relocation at their data
center.

The break will last from 09:00AM till 01:00PM (UTC/GMT+2).

Sorry for the inconvenience it may cause.

Br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: OS2008 download?

2007-11-14 Thread Ferenc Szekely
On Nov 13, 2007 9:14 PM, Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Will this be changed soon?

 I expect the OS2008 image for the N800 to appear at
 http://tablets-dev.nokia.com/nokia_N800.php once the N810 finally
 appears in the shops.

Yep, Marius is right. Nokia will release an image for N800 soon. The
image for N810 (or parts of it) is (are) not meant for N800.

 Marius Gedminas

Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Changing GPG key

2007-11-14 Thread Ferenc Szekely
On Nov 14, 2007 5:09 PM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 13:23 +0100, Johannes Schmid wrote:
  Because I revoked my old GPG key, I wanted to change the key stored for
  the Maemo extras repository. After my mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] remained
  unreplied I would like to ask whom I should contact to change the key.

 Please. This is really slowing us down. Can't someone let Johannes upload 
 packages again?

A new invitation is sent to Johannes. That's the only way until we
have an interface for changing the gpg keys online. Btw. you can
change the ssh keys on this page:
https://garage.maemo.org/account/index2.php

 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Interest groups

2007-11-14 Thread Ferenc Szekely
On Nov 14, 2007 6:28 PM, Darius Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Any good job should be paid.
 So third party discussions on ongoing projects have no sense.
 What makes sense is to donate and support best developers.

I wrote a simple bounty plugin [1] for garage back then.  Anybody
can open a project at garage, can start hiring coders and throw in
bounties if he/she wishes so.
If you have a garage project then go to the Admin section of the
project and click on Edit Public Info. Among the plugins tick the
box Use Bounties plugin and click the Update button. You will get
an extra tab for your project (similar to Admin, Trackers, Lists
etc) and you can start managing bounties. The documentation is
missing for this small tool, but I am ready to answer questions.

Who will offer the 1st bounty at garage? ;)

 Darius

Cheers,
ferenc

[1] https://garage.maemo.org/projects/gbounty/
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Repositories mess: conclusions and actions

2007-11-08 Thread Ferenc Szekely
On Nov 8, 2007 8:04 PM, Simon Pickering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes, so this means we definitely need extras-devel as a first step then.

The extras-devel repo is created with 3 different incoming queues
(gregale, bora, chinook).

You need the following entries in your /etc/dput.cf config file:

[extras-devel-gregale]
login = your maemo.org user name
method = scp
hash = md5
fqdn = garage
allow_unsigned_uploads = 0
incoming = /var/www/extras-devel/incoming/gregale

[extras-devel-bora]
login = your maemo.org user name
method = scp
hash = md5
fqdn = garage
allow_unsigned_uploads = 0
incoming = /var/www/extras-devel/incoming/bora

[extras-devel-chinook]
login = your maemo.org user name
method = scp
hash = md5
fqdn = garage
allow_unsigned_uploads = 0
incoming = /var/www/extras-devel/incoming/chinook

Check if you have an entry for garage in your ~/.ssh/config file.
Below is a skeleton:

  Host garage
 HostName garage.maemo.org
 User your maemo.org user name
 IdentityFile /home/user_name/.ssh/id_rsa

Please also make sure that you __use the right queue__ for uploading packages.

Just a reminder about our SDK naming convention:

  gregale is for OS2006 based development
  bora is for OS2007 based development
  chinook is for OS2008 based development

I will create a new page about extras-devel in the wiki and will
also update the extras page [1] at some point.

 (This is probably repeating what others have said): Perhaps one way to
 deal with this is to use an automatic rating application (or simple bug
 filing) for applications which are placed in the extras-devel repo. If
 there are no bugs filed, or the ratings are positive, then it's
 promoted to the main extras repo where normal people will see it and
 install it. If there are any negative ratings/bugs at that point it's
 pushed back down into the extras-devel repo.

 There's still the problem of getting enough people to actually rate an
 app (in a positive sense), or conversely to file bugs rather than just
 uninstalling it and moving on. The developers group is (and it is us
 who would presumably be the ones doing these ratings of things in the
 extras-devel repo) not all that large, and of that group not everyone
 will be interested in every app.


I like the idea of the automatic app rating based on bugs. IMO it
would only work if we agree that all apps use the same bug reporting
system, e.g. garage tracker, or maemo bugzilla. If we let the projects
to use their own favorite system then setting up automation would be
very tricky.

 To get back onto what to do with regards to repos now. We're all
 reasonably trustworthy, there's no reason to think we'd produce shoddy
 .debs on purpose, so why not (until the auto-builder/rating apps/etc.
 are ready) let people upload (on an individual basis) their .debs to
 the extras-devel repo. If there's no complaints about a package in some
 time period (2 weeks for example) then it's automatically pushed into
 extras.

I agree. The uploaders are carefully chosen. I know, since I have been
doing that in 99% of the cases so far. I hope this will change now and
we can really gather a group of extras maintainers who would
actually administrate the repository and also grant rights for others.
After all extras was created for contributions. Some of you may
remember that 1st time we actually called it contrib repo :)

 I'm not sure how the complaints would best be handled (or how people
 could know where to complain about a given library). Perhaps leave it
 up to the authors to keep an eye on ITT/the mailing lists to see
 whether anything comes up?

Perhaps it is a good practice to keep the maintainer's email address
of the package up-to-date. The package maintainer is often not the
same person as the developer, but he/she must have contact(s) to the
upstream project.

 Anyway, I'm sure that's gone round in circles and repeated what
 everyone else has said :)

 Cheers,

 Si


Please let me know if you have problems with the uploads to extras-devel.

Misha, let's test the package promoter UI some day. If we get it
work then the next step will be to create a separate garage group
(e.g. extras admins or extras promoters) whose members could
actually use that tool.

Cheers,
ferenc

[1] http://maemo.org/community/application-catalog/extras_repository.html
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Repositories mess: conclusions and actions

2007-11-06 Thread Ferenc Szekely
On 11/6/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi, this sounds like a good plan.

 On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 19:05 +0300, ext Mikhail Sobolev wrote:

  Step 1: Create the repository itself

 We can consider this agreed already. extras-devel is a good name. Ferenc
 to decide timing and details.

We finally got the disk space to garage, so let me just have a
pieceful night and I will create the repo. IMHO the repo could be
opened asap, we don't have to wait Step 2 to be completed. Right?


  Step 2: Create promotion interface
 
  A simple web based interface would allow package owners/dedicated
  'administrators' (chosen by community) to promote packages from
  'extras-devel' to 'extras'.  Basically the idea could be to present
  a list of packages that are in 'extras-devel' and are not in
  'extras', then click on a few checkbox, press Promote button and
  voila.
 
  IMPORTANT: At this stage direct upload to 'extras' might might be
  limited to a selected people or removed all together.
 
  DIFFICULTY: Should not be too difficult, but it requires
  implementation of such a web (or other) interface.  Any takers?

Good idea Misha!

 The idea overall makes sense but we need to get into details in order to
 implement. We have different things:

 - Who are the admins and how they get admin rights.
 - What are the criteria admins use to promote a package to extras.
 - What are the tools used to do so.

 Please agree on a proposal and tell us where we can help.

I believe we should stick to the group or project concept of
GForge. I can come up with a plugin that is only visible for that
special group who are the extras admins. Only garage admins and
existing extras admins could grant rights to the group, ie. they could
hire new admins.

Criteria of promoting apps? Good point, I have no idea atm.

Tools: gforge plugin, but by using a special group these guys could
have a special playground on maemo.org as well.. Later we can develop
a midgard component for repo management, but that's not going to
happen soon :)


  Step 3: Add building facility

 Also makes sense. Again, what is the specific proposal and how can we
 help.

This is gonna be tough and has been on the garage agenda for years.
I would love to see hardcore Debian gurus to setup a nice infra.


 Once these 3 steps are completed we can discuss more, if you want.

Yeah, i agree.


 Quim Gil - http://maemo.org


Br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


maintenance break on stage.maemo.org and garage.maemo.org next Tuesday

2007-10-30 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

We are going to have a maintenance break on stage.maemo.org and
garage.maemo.org next Tuesday morning from 0800 until 1200 (UTC/GMT
+2).

During the break the system administrators will upgrade the
virtualization environment and will also install a large disk to
garage.

The break will also affect:
-all Debian repositories hosted at repository.maemo.org
-all Debian repositories under catalogue.tableteer.nokia.com
-subversion source code repositories hosted on stage.maemo.org

This break is absolutely necessary to ensure smooth operation of the
above mentioned services in the future.

On behalf of the maemo.org sysadmin team I apologize for the
inconveniences it may cause.

Best regards,
Ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: maemo.org scrambled...

2007-08-14 Thread Ferenc Szekely
On 8/14/07, Tony Maro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Still seeing errors on several pages, for instance:

 http://maemo.org/development/documentation/how-tos/

 Notice: Trying to get property of non-object in
 /usr/share/midgard/svn/midcom/trunk/src/midcom.core/midcom/helper/_styleloader.php(532)
 : eval()'d code on line 31

We are working on it. Unfortunately some changes for the coming app
catalog revamp were also published, though they should have remeined
in the svn only. Well, software happens :)

Cheers,
ferenc


 On 8/14/07, Henri Bergius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 8/14/07, Tony Maro  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Looks like large chunks are currently missing (404) or generating script
   errors inside Midgard.  I hope someone is in the middle of a revamp or
   something...
 
  The server was upgraded from EOLd PHP4 to PHP 5.2, which caused some
  issues for a while.
 
  Things are good now, next we need to invalidate Squid caches.
 
 
  --
  Henri Bergius
  Motorcycle Adventures and Free Software
  http://bergie.iki.fi/
 
  Skype: henribergius
  Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Jaiku: http://bergie.jaiku.com/
 


 ___
 maemo-developers mailing list
 maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: do we need garage sandbox repos?

2007-08-10 Thread Ferenc Szekely
On 8/9/07, Vlad Vasiliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ed Bartosh wrote:
  extras-testing would be even better. It's clearly says that this
  repository is for testing applications on their way to extras.
 
 

 This is a good idea. I need such mechanism for wide testing the my deb
 packets.

Thanks for the replies. It looks like that some of us would benefit
from this repository, so let's go for it..

The name proposal extras-testing is more down to the point. Although
it may confuse people who are familiar with Debian processes. The name
may also suggest there is some QA for extras etc. Well, we can have QA
and all that together as a community effort. I mean that we can not
expect that Nokia will do quality checks for extras packages.

Neil raised a very important point in his mail: categories and control
of the repository. We could experiment with the categories in this
extras-testing repository. First we would need a proposal of
categories. The best would be to write this on a wiki page. Neil,
would you mind coming up with a draft?

Then we should document how to make use of the categories, ie. how to
prepare your debs to belong to a certain cat. This is not a big deal,
I could write a page on that (adding it to the current
ExtrasRepository page [1].

The tricky part is how to enforce the categories. We need to change
the tool that processes the packages and here I may need Ed's help.
Ed, you are probably familiar enough with the queue-manager, right? If
not, then I can do the changes, but I have to look some free slot in
the calendar for that.

How does it sound?

-ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


do we need garage sandbox repos?

2007-08-08 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hi,

It has been a long time, so time to write to all of you :)

We had a good chat with some of the microb folks here in my room
yesterday. The conclusion was that we should perhaps offer a 'sandbox'
repository for garage projects. This would be a place where any
project could upload packages, make sure that they are installable on
the environment they are targeting for (like stock Nokia N800) etc.
The sandbox would serve as a staging environment before pushing the
packages to extras.

The repo will not be on repository.maemo.org, but on garage. This
would hopefully hide it enough from users who could accidentally run
into troubles using this sandbox on their tablets.

The repo maintenance would be done with volunteers. I could establish
the basic environment, make sure that your uploaded packages are
processed etc, but I would like to get your help cleaning up the
sandbox every now and then.

Yeah, it is yet another repository, I know. But it could perhaps take
away some work from those of you who are running an own repo today. So
what do you think?

-ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: extras packages for sardine

2007-07-02 Thread Ferenc Szekely
On 6/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks Ferenc :)

The sardine extras repo is ready. Please try to upload something
there. The lines to your dput.cf are as follows:

 [sardine-extras]
 login = your_garage_login_name
 fqdn = garage
 method = scp
 hash = md5
 allow_unsigned_uploads = 0
 incoming = /var/www/extras/incoming/sardine

Let me know if you run into troubles.

-ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Mailing list archive link...

2007-07-01 Thread Ferenc Szekely
On 7/1/07, John Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 All,

 I found the following when I tried to use the list archives link
 on http://maemo.org/community/mailing-lists.html :

 Forbidden

 You don't have permission to access /pipermail// on this server.

 Someone doing maintenance or did an admin slip with some bad perms maybe?

Strange. There is no maintenance atm. Are you sure you tried a valid
link? The mail archives are available here (copied from the page you
mentioned):

 http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-announce/
 http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-users/
 http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/

All links seem to work for me.

 --
 John P. Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: extras packages for sardine

2007-06-25 Thread Ferenc Szekely
On 6/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Shouldn't this be simply a matter of adding a sardine distro in
 http://repository.maemo.org/extras/dists/ and the
 configuring the upload mechanism?

  An auto builder work be great to but that can come later.

  Ferenc, am I missing something?

Carlos, you are right. It would be very simple to add sardine to
extras. People who have an extras account  could easily upload stuff
there.

I just wonder if anybody is thinking about our current repo
structure.. It is still based on ideas we had 2 yrs ago. Maybe some
fresh thoughts would help to rationalize the current situation.

Anyways, i can enable the sardine extras if that's OK for everybody...

-ferenc


  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of ext
 Murray Cumming
  Sent: Wed 6/20/2007 11:00 AM
  To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
  Subject: Re: extras packages for sardine

  Is this possible yet? Assuming that the sardine repository is the future
  Maemo Chinook version, I will want to upload and test packages before
  Maemo Chinook is actually released.

  On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 23:18 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
   Is there any way I can upload extras (previously contrib, from
   garage.maemo.org projects) packages for use with sardine, instead of
   just mistral?
  
   This would help us to make sure our packages work with the latest code,
   before it is actually released as stable, and help us to adapt to any
   changes.

  --
  Murray Cumming
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  www.murrayc.com
  www.openismus.com

  ___
  maemo-developers mailing list
  maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers




 ___
 maemo-developers mailing list
 maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


maemo.org gets some power today

2007-06-13 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hi,

We are moving the entire server from the XEN node to a brand new and
powerful machine. There will be ups and downs during today's
operation, but we hope that by the end of the day our performance
problems will be history. Cross your fingers.

Sorry for the inconvenience we will cause today.

-ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: maemo.org is down

2007-05-11 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hi,

On 5/11/07, Neil MacLeod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The Maemo site has been down for several hours.

 This affects bugzilla and more importantly several of the essential Maemo 
 repositories are now offline.

 Are there moves afoot to make maemo.org more resiliant? I appreciate that 
 there are ongoing updates at the moment, but if the Internet Tablets are 
 going to become more popular it's essential that the internet infrastructure 
 supporting them is available 24x7.

I appreciate your concerns, and can ensure you that we were/are more
than unhappy because of last night events. There was a service break
somewhere in the network of our provider's provider. We have no
control over such events.
We could not communicate to the list either for obvious reasons. The
servers were totally cut off from the world. Anyway we will get a
detailed report later today and if you are interested I can share the
reasons with you.

Br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: CIA.vc tracking broken

2007-05-07 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

On 5/7/07, Jonny Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 12:31 +0200, Niels Breet wrote:
  Can somebody take a look at this? CIA tracking is really a great feature.

 I have added https://stage.maemo.org/svn/maemo/ to the repository URL in
 cia.vc, however things may change with the big upgrade that's been
 happening recently. I also can't test whether it's working for obvious
 reasons!

We have some issues sending out mails from stage.maemo.org. I will
look at it today/tomorrow and hope to provide a solution soon.

Thanks guys for reporting it!

 --
 Jonny Lamb, UK   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://jonnylamb.com GPG: 0x2E039402

 ___
 maemo-developers mailing list
 maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: CIA.vc tracking broken

2007-05-07 Thread Ferenc Szekely
On 5/7/07, Ferenc Szekely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 12:31 +0200, Niels Breet wrote:
   Can somebody take a look at this? CIA tracking is really a great feature.
 
 
 We have some issues sending out mails from stage.maemo.org. I will
 look at it today/tomorrow and hope to provide a solution soon.

 Thanks guys for reporting it!

I checked our side and the svn post commit hook that uses the cia bot
has not changed at all. I saw that the last commit message was sent on
the 24th of April, so long before we started to do the changes at
maemo.org. We are submitting the commit message via XML-RPC, so the
email thingy I referred to in my 1st mail was a wrong lead. I wonder
whether the cia server side (the receiving end) has changed. I did not
find any information about that though :(

The investigation will continue tomorrow.

Br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: CIA.vc tracking broken

2007-05-07 Thread Ferenc Szekely
On 5/8/07, Ferenc Szekely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The investigation will continue tomorrow.

Well, sometimes you just can't go to sleep with unresolved problems in
your head, right? I changed our cia bot to use email instead of
XML-RPC and voila, the latest commit message from Johan has arrived
there:
http://cia.vc/stats/project/maemo

No more spam tonight ;)

-ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


new site launch - status update

2007-05-04 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Well, it looks like we got a new web site :) Below is the summary of
the current status.

# General - maemo.org

Midgard is safe and sound. The static web pages look reasonable OK. If
you don't like them please contact Quim, who is the owner of the web
content and design.

# moi moi moinmoin! - wiki.maemo.org

The old wiki is imported and available at wiki.maemo.org. The layout
of the imported pages are pretty descent. I did not have time to edit
all the pages, but if you feel like helping please let me/us know.
The old wiki remains read-only at http://test.maemo.org/maemowiki. You
can copy-paste content from there if you wish, keeping in mind the
syntax differences between moinmoin and markdown extra.
We know that there are bugs in the wiki, like this wiki killer [1].
Please be nice to our new site ;)

# bugzilla - bugs.maemo.org

I upgraded our old friend to the latest Debian stable version and made
the layout slightly different than the previous installation. You
still need a separate account (what a shame), but I put the account
synchronization on the project's TODO list. We will do this before our
summer holidays.
The service may seem to be slow every now and then. We will improve
the performance next week, when the database engine will be upgraded.

# planet - planet.maemo.org

We have a new planet as well. Unfortunately we are missing the
international (ie. non-english) edition, but I will take care of that
during the weekend. I hope the non english bloggers would excuse us.
The new planet is a bit different. We are requesting all the writers
to create a garage account [2] so that their names can be displayed
properly. I hope soon we will also have the possibility to upload
small images (aka hackergotchis) giving the planet a more human touch.

# Application Catalog - downloads.maemo.org

Works as usual, except the link (URL) is rewritten. It will be fixed
next week (DNS update, which -quite frankly- I forgot to request in
time).

# Nokia provided binaries - tablets-dev.nokia.com

A new site has been created to serve the Nokia provided binaries to
our community. We have the tablet OS releases, the SDK rootstraps,
root filesystems, Nokia addon binaries, linux and mac flasher tools at
tablets-dev.nokia.com.
The old links referring to any of these tools are supposed to work. If
not then please drop me an email.

# lxr, viewcvs

They are coming next week. Update will follow.

# kudos

The list would be pretty long if I started to write down all the names
who participated in this web site renewal action, so let me just do it
briefly:
First of all many thanks to the Midgard guys [3]. Without their
enthusiasm and professionalism we would be nowhere near this event.
Thanks to TigerT and Quim for the new frontpage design. I agree now
that it was good to delay the launch. The frontpage looks great, and I
also know that it offers us pretty cool dynamic update possibilities.
I hope that everybody got it bookmarked already!
Thanks to the DP crew at Nokia for testing and giving valuable
feedback about the site while it was still under construction. You
guys have been pretty patient with us/me, which also helped a lot!

Last but not least, many thanks to all the friends in the maemo
community. You are constantly giving us ideas, inspiration and energy.
We are planning more services for you. In the following weeks we are
going to publish these plans, so that you could comment them or even
get involved with them.

If you wish to learn more about the web site project please click to
our garage page [3]. We are updating bugs, tasks, feature requests and
plans over there.

On behalf of the website renewal crew I wish you pleasant surfing at maemo.org:
Ferenc

[1] 
https://garage.maemo.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=819group_id=106atid=457

[2] http://www.midgard-project.org/community/whoswho/

[3] http://garage.maemo.org/projects/maemo2midgard/
___
maemo-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-announce
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


maemo.org maintenance break today (2007-05-04)

2007-05-03 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

We are in the final phase of the website migration. It means we will
switch over from the old maemo.org server to the shiny, new Midgard
powered site today.

This switch will affect all maemo.org services: bugzilla, mailing
lists, wiki, planet, lxr, viewcvs...  We try to keep the services
online, but there might be some breaks. As some of you have noticed
the wiki is already in read-only mode. Wiki editors have to wait till
the new site is online.

Anyway the goal is to launch the site today. Please bear with us if
you experience problems at maemo.org. It will not take long, I hope.

Cheers,
ferenc

ps for the impatient:
Sneak peek of the renewed bugzilla UI: https://test.maemo.org/bugzilla.
NOTE! This is just a preview. The database will be overwritten, so
don't bother filing bugs here, please.
___
maemo-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-announce
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


transferring to the new wiki

2007-04-30 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

Sorry for cross posting, but I'd like to reach as many wiki editors as
possible with this single email.

We are about to launch the new web site as you have probably heard
from here and there. One of the most important service at maemo is the
public wiki. We had a dilemma what to do in order to make the transfer
as smooth as possible. A few months ago I asked the wiki authors to
create garage accounts, so that they can continue their work under
Midgard. I hope the time was enough to complete this action.

Now comes the second request. I would like to do a final import from
the current wiki to the new site. I would like to know all the pages
where the authors would like to keep all change history. IMHO most of
the pages do not need the change history, but I am aware of a few
projects who would like to keep that.

Please let me know if you would like to retain the history of your
wiki page(s) by __Wednesday 1500 (GMT+3)__. I will make sure that the
history is kept after  the import.

I would like to perform the final import on Wednesday afternoon. If
all goes fine than we can start using the new wiki and the new site on
Friday. This is not a promise for releasing the site, although it will
be Friday ;)

After all these the old wiki will be available READ ONLY at a
different URL. I will let you know about that later.

Thanks for your time. I am looking forward your mails.

Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: downloads.maemo.org

2007-04-05 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

On 4/5/07, Kees Jongenburger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello

I am trying to update entries on http://downloads.maemo.org/
I still cannot login but I see that somebody else added some entries,
What kind of trick they used to log in I don't know.


Tricks may exist, but those are not solutions. Admins are always admins :)


I know the old Wiki was not the best solution but at least it worked,
is there any way I can help fix this. downloads.maemo.org is directly
linked from maemo.org , I just would like to be able to update the
xmoto entry and create some wiki pages around  it becasue the
information field is so small (255 chars).


As you see the wiki is still open and you are able to update it. I am
sure that many site on the net link to that page. If someone wants to
get famous then place a link there.

I don't want to tell you why the login doesn't work and I don't want
to estimate when the new maemo.org will be launched either. It happens
when everybody at Nokia feels like that the new site is ready. :)
However we will have a workaround for the login problem at t.m.o. or
d.m.o. after Easter (I could not find a proper solution yet). It does
not mean that you will be able to login at Tuesday 8AM (EET). I hope
to get it fixed on week 15.


and perhaps a little quiz for fun
what is this ?
https://downloads.maemo.org/product/bora_sdk_repo/
The install file for maemo 3.0 'bora' SDK repository.


I don't even dare to answer this... click and install :)

Soon you can rate and comment on every single entry... Have you tried
to shift-reload a page at d.m.o. ?
We have a tag cloud on the frontpage of d.m.o. We also have pagination
for all pages.We have a new design [1] for the app catalog frontpage
and we are looking for comments [2]. Phase 2.2 has just been completed
[3].
As you see the migration project is not only about migration anymore.
It would be wise to rephrase the goals of the project...


greetings


Happy easter,
ferenc

[1] 
https://garage.maemo.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/maemo2007/design/application_catalog_frontpage.png?root=maemo2midgardrev=199view=markup
[2] 
https://garage.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo2midgard-discussion/2007-March/000114.html
[3] 
https://garage.maemo.org/plugins/wiki/index.php?Phase2IterationPlanid=106type=g
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Problem with log in on New application catalog

2007-03-31 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

On 3/31/07, Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 05:16:10PM +0200, Jean-Luc Biord wrote:
 I want to connect on http://downloads.maemo.org/ to create a new entry.
 For this I use my garage user ID (or name login) and password but I am
 rejected.

Yup, same here.


Yes, we have problems with the login, see garage bug [1]. I hope I can
provide a workaround tonight.

-ferenc

[1] 
https://garage.maemo.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=657group_id=106atid=457
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] New list spin-off?

2007-02-16 Thread Ferenc Szekely

On 2/16/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

No objections. Let's consider this as an agreement.

Ferenc, can you remove the flags? I will update the descriptions in
test.maemo.org.



done

-ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] important message for maemo.org wiki users

2007-02-15 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Dear maemo.org wiki Editors and Readers,

We are in the middle of converting the old documentation to our new Midgard
Content Management System. As part of this activity we have created a tool that
will import the existing wiki pages to Midgard's Markdown [1] syntax. The
documents written by you will be integrated with the other maemo documentation.
So, how-tos will go to a how-to section, tutorials will be placed among
official maemo tutorials. We try to unite the community by integrating your
contributions properly.

In order to retain editing rights you must have a valid garage account.
Unfortunately we are not able to transfer your wiki accounts to garage, but we
will send a reminder to every wiki editors separately. If you have a garage
account already then you don't need to take any action.

I plan to import the current wiki pages during the coming weekend and beginning
of next week. This process can be followed at test.maemo.org. I will inform you
once the import has finished.

We would like to encourage all of you to start using the new pages as soon as
the wiki import has been completed. However the current maemo wiki will be
available for some time, but we will do __no more__ automated page conversion.
We could be radical and disable editing of the old pages, but this may cause
too much harm. We try to add a note to each old page about the transition
though. So please stay tuned.

Cheers,
ferenc

[1] http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] New list spin-off?

2007-02-05 Thread Ferenc Szekely

On 2/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

New iteration:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Renamed maemo-developers@maemo.org, no change in subscribers.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New list, interested people need to join.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Renamed maemo-users@maemo.org, no change in subscribers.


I don't really understand why don't you want to give us some extra
headache with list renaming? :) See:
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/faq.html
The admins can do this of course, but I am not sure if the pain is
really worth it. We should create an online survey service and get the
opinion of the mass. A few emails that were sent as reply do not
convince me.


PS: Re-reading this thread and also
http://www.maemopeople.org/index.php/keesj/2007/02/02/developers_develop
ers_developers I have second thoughts about the convenience of this
proposal. I mean, I think it definitely makes sense and will improve
things here but if this is not a shared thought the better (and the
easiest) is to leave the lists as they are.


I am not against any good changes, on the contrary... But in this case
I would like to hear to hear 100s of opinions! Come on, we have ~1000
people on this list!


--
Quim Gil
Maemo team


Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] [maemo-announce] New Application Catalog

2007-02-02 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

We proudly announce that the new Application Catalog is officially
available at http://downloads.maemo.org. We kindly ask the developers to
start using the new catalog for registering applications, instead of the
wiki pages.

This is a major step in the maemo.org facelift project [1]. There are
probably problems and questions related to this new service. We would
appreciate if all these are reported in our issue tracker [2].

We hope the community will like and enjoy the new catalog!

On behalf of the team,
Ferenc

[1] http://test.maemo.org
[2] https://garage.maemo.org/tracker/?group_id=106

___
maemo-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-announce
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] [maemo-announce] maemo 2.2 'gregale' is released

2007-02-02 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

The maemo team proudly announce the newest development environment for
Nokia 770 Internet Tablets: maemo 2.2 'gregale'.
This release supports development for the latest OS 2006 Software
Edition. Maemo 2.2 is based on the latest Scratchbox Apophis R4
cross-compilation environment.

For installation instructions please see the tutorial:
http://www.maemo.org/platform/docs/tutorials/Maemo_tutorial.html

More info on the release:
http://maemo.org/downloads/releases.html#maemo22
http://repository.maemo.org/stable/2.2/Maemo_Dev_Platform_v2.2_relnotes.txt

Wishing you happy hacking on behalf of the team:
Ferenc



___
maemo-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-announce
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] [maemo-announce] stage.maemo.org will go down at 1200 (EET); break for 20 mins

2007-01-30 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Due to a hardware error stage.maemo.org will be down for approx. 20 minutes
today, starting at 1200 (UTC/GMT +2 hours).

We are sorry for the inconvinience it may cause.

Regards,
Ferenc
___
maemo-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-announce
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] [maemo-announce] New Scratchbox installer for maemo 3.0 'bora' now available

2007-01-28 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

A new Scratchbox installer script that installs and configures the
Scratchbox cross-compilation toolkit for maemo 3.0 'bora' is now available.

The script and the updated INSTALL.txt file can be downloaded from:

http://repository.maemo.org/stable/bora/

The name of the script is: maemo-scratchbox-install_3.0.sh

Before starting the installation please read first the updated INSTALL.txt file.

This installer script simplifies the process of setting up the
maemo 3.0 'bora' development environment especially for new developers. The
script automatically downloads Scratchbox from scratchbox.org and takes
care of various SB related configurations for the developer thus
minimizing manual work and potential Scratchbox misconfiguration.

Happy Hacking!

On behalf of the maemo SDK team:
Ferenc
___
maemo-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-announce
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] New Application catalogue

2007-01-27 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

On 1/27/07, Nicolas FR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

For some time I was feeling the current Application Catalogue was a
bit too limited. I have seen a new one is ready here:
http://test.maemo.org/applications

Is the source code for this web app is available? I would like to
propose/submit some improvements (what's new, user votes, sort apps by
popularity, by rank, ...). Maybe we can open a wiki page with
suggestions?


Yes, it is available of course. We use Midgard as a framework and the
app catalog sources are in our subversion repo:
https://garage.maemo.org/svn/maemo2midgard/maemo2007/applicationcatalog/


I like this kind of site: http://www.gnomefiles.org, maybe it would be
nice to imitate its features?


Sure, please send us proposals or even better: patches :)


Nicolas.


Thank you,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] [maemo-announce] New OS 2006 firmware released

2007-01-26 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

The latest OS 2006 Edition for Nokia 770 tablets is available at:
http://maemo.org/downloads/nokia_770

The release notes:

   * Improved quality of WLAN connections
   * Wi-Fi certification included

On behalf of the team,
ferenc

ps:
flashing instructions are in the wiki:
http://maemo.org/maemowiki/HOWTO_FlashLatestNokiaImageWithLinux

official Nokia support pages:
http://europe.nokia.com/A4144786
___
maemo-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-announce
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] change ssh key

2007-01-24 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

On 1/24/07, Levi Bard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi! I'm trying to upload to garage but...

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/scratchbox/users/luogni/home/luogni$ dput
 scirocco-extras maemofuse-gui_0.4.2-1_armel.changes
 Checking Signature on .changes
 gpg: Signature made gio 18 gen 2007 20:44:55 CET using DSA key ID 12435F07
 gpg: Good signature from Luca Ognibene  [send email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] via gmail] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 gpg: aka Luca Ognibene  [send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 via gmail] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Good signature on
 /scratchbox/users/luogni/home/luogni/maemofuse-gui_0.4.2-1_armel.changes.
 Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive).
 lost connection
 Warning: The execution of '/usr/bin/scp' as
  'scp -p /scratchbox/users/luogni/home/luogni/maemofuse-gui_0.4.2-1_armel.deb
 /scratchbox/users/luogni/home/luogni/maemofuse-gui_0.4.2-1_armel.changes
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/www/extras/incoming/scirocco'
  returned a nonzero exit code.
 Error while uploading.

 maybe i made a mistake while copying/pasting keys? when can i change
 my garage ssh/gpg key? i don't find anything on garage admin...

Hah, I had this issue also.  Change garage to garage.maemo.org in your
fqdn line[s] in dput.cf.


Thanks Levi for helping Luca.

Yes, you should try to avoid uploading maemo packages to Debian :) The
proper dput config entries are documented here:
http://maemo.org/maemowiki/ExtrasRepository?highlight=%28extras%29

You have also received this information after accepting the extras invitation ;)

Luca, in case you would still get an error message pls let me know.

Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Re: [maemo-developers] bounty program?

2007-01-11 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

On 1/11/07, Andrew Flegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 1/11/07, Mathias Uebelacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If you host a project in the maemo garage you can activte a bounty
 plugin.

Interesting. Something for Ferenc to investigate?


Hmm, sounds good :)


It's kind of backwards, though as often the bounty will be for a
project to be created (e.g. Kees' gcompriz bounty) or for some random
hack rather than tied to an existing project.

It could make an interesting starting point. I suppose at the worst
case we could have a bounty project with the moderation team being
the admins which exists solely to co-ordinate bounties.


Actually I wrote that simple plugin for garage (GForge) and the idea was that
a) either single project can use it or
b) we could open 1 single project, e.g. maemo bounties which project
will only use this plugin as a garage resource.


Cheers,

Andrew


Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] for extras uploaders: incoming queue changes now!

2007-01-11 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

This mail mainly concerns those developers who have upload privileges
to the current maemo extras repository (that is for mistral extras).
I am creating the new incoming queues for scirocco and bora. Till the
new queues are ready you are not able to upload to mistral extras :(
I will announce the new dput.cf config entries for each extras queues
within an hour or so.

I apologize for the short notice.

Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] for extras uploaders: new upload queues available

2007-01-11 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

The new upload queues for maemo extras are available. Please update
your dput.cf configuration file with the following entries:

[mistral-extras]
login = your_garage_login_name
fqdn = garage
method = scp
hash = md5
allow_unsigned_uploads = 0
incoming = /var/www/extras/incoming/mistral

[scirocco-extras]
login = your_garage_login_name
fqdn = garage
method = scp
hash = md5
allow_unsigned_uploads = 0
incoming = /var/www/extras/incoming/scirocco

[bora-extras]
login = your_garage_login_name
fqdn = garage
method = scp
hash = md5
allow_unsigned_uploads = 0
incoming = /var/www/extras/incoming/bora

As you see we have 3 different queues for the three latest maemo releases:
-bora
-scirocco
-mistral

Please make sure to pick the right queue for your upload! E.g.
uploading a package for bora goes like this:
dput bora-extras my_great_N800_application_0.1_armel.changes

Implicitly there are new lines now to the /etc/apt/sources.list
configuration file. These are the following:

#scirocco extras
deb http://repository.maemo.org/extras/ scirocco free
deb-src http://repository.maemo.org/extras/ scirocco free

#bora extras
deb http://repository.maemo.org/extras/ bora free
deb-src http://repository.maemo.org/extras/ bora free

All this is documented at:
http://maemo.org/maemowiki/ExtrasRepository


Please let me know if you have questions, comments or something goes
wrong with the upload.

Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] garage/extras repository for bora?

2007-01-09 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

On 1/9/07, Levi Bard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 When can we expect to have a new garage/extras repository for bora (and
 instructions for posting a package to this repository)?  Some of the
 applications at the extras mistral repository may not work on bora, and it
 would be nice to have a separate repository for applications that are
 known to work on bora (or at least are supposed to work on bora).

Seconded.  It would also give a good way to branch apps that have to
be code-nonidentical for the two releases (e.g. xv vs xsp pixel
doubling) without silly package name hacks.


I wish I know when we can offer extras for receiving your apps for
bora. Some of us at nokia had an idea to setup a automated build
system which accepts source uploads only and delivers the binaries for
all our releases (mistral, scirocco, bora, etc).
For some reason we need to clarify thousand+1 things (mainly legal)
before we can offer such service. I had an idea back in December that
maybe maemo could finally co-operate with OpenEmbedded and see if we
could get the extras packages from their build system. It should be
technically possible. I promised to send a mail to Koen and Florian about this
trial, but never got there yet. Perhaps this could kick off the
discussion here, on the maemo dev list.

Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] garage/extras repository for bora?

2007-01-09 Thread Ferenc Szekely

On 1/10/07, Aaron Levinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 I wish I know when we can offer extras for receiving your apps for
 bora. Some of us at nokia had an idea to setup a automated build
 system which accepts source uploads only and delivers the binaries for
 all our releases (mistral, scirocco, bora, etc).
 For some reason we need to clarify thousand+1 things (mainly legal)
 before we can offer such service. I had an idea back in December that
 maybe maemo could finally co-operate with OpenEmbedded and see if we
 could get the extras packages from their build system. It should be
 technically possible. I promised to send a mail to Koen and Florian about this
 trial, but never got there yet. Perhaps this could kick off the
 discussion here, on the maemo dev list.

Well, perhaps we can have a temporary solution for the time being and
discussion on a more permanent solution for the future.  A temporary
solution could probably just entail adding a new directory to the existing
extras repository for bora.  I'm not sure about the upload process and
distinguishing bora packages from mistral packages, but I imagine that
something can be worked out.


The only temp solution I can imagine is to open other upload queues
(like you, Aaron said) where you could upload scirocco and bora
versions. So there will be one upload queue for each maemo release.
This could be done fairly quickly, though people who uploaded to
mistral should change their dput configurations, because the mistral
queue will also change.

It is not nice at all... Imagine if you have an app and have to
compile it with 3 SDKs and upload it 3 times, just to make it
available for everyone. But as for temporary solution.. I don't know.
Tell me your opinions pls.


Aaron


Cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] garage/extras repository for bora?

2007-01-09 Thread Ferenc Szekely

On 1/10/07, Aaron Levinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Ferenc Szekely wrote:
 The only temp solution I can imagine is to open other upload queues
 (like you, Aaron said) where you could upload scirocco and bora
 versions. So there will be one upload queue for each maemo release.
 This could be done fairly quickly, though people who uploaded to
 mistral should change their dput configurations, because the mistral
 queue will also change.

 It is not nice at all... Imagine if you have an app and have to
 compile it with 3 SDKs and upload it 3 times, just to make it
 available for everyone. But as for temporary solution.. I don't know.
 Tell me your opinions pls.

Actually, one package may work fine.  Mistral packages will work in
scirocco, and many mistral packages will also work on bora.  If there is
no reason to build using the maemo 3.0 SDK, it probably just makes sense
to build using the 2.0 SDK and upload the same package to the mistral,
scirocco, and bora repositories.  Actually, it seems that we probably
don't need a scirocco repository, as I think all mistral packages will
work on scirocco (although the reverse isn't necessarily the case as a
result of some new APIs in scirocco, but I doubt that they are being used
very much).

I'm personally fine with this as a temporary solution.  It would be nice
if N800 users had a bora garage repository option as soon as possible,
since there are quite a few garage projects.  Also, the existence of a new
bora garage repository may encourage developers to ensure that their
packages work on 3.0 (a little difficult without an N800, but at least the
package can be tested in the SDK environment... I think).


I agree with you, but I am not really a fun of such temporary and
improper solutions (I guess nobody really is). Opening an extras queue
to scirocco and one for bora does not require any special deals and
decisions from our side. We could -in theory- go ahead with this right
now. However I would like to hear the opinion of my fellow Nokia
colleagues and let them comment on the topic (right now it is 3AM
there in Helsinki). Let's wait 24 hours at least before we go on with
this, OK?


On a separate note, regarding the new application catalog at
test.maemo.org, I see that it is possible to indicate which OS versions an
application supports.  However, there is only one download option, even if
the application is supported on both IT2006 and IT2007.  A single download
option may not be enough for some applications.


True, but you can add the same application 3 times with 3 different
versions (or even with the same version, if you wish). The only
limitation at the moment is that you __must use__ a different Project
ID (unix name) for all 3 entries, as described in the User Manual.

Btw. many thanks for checking the new catalog ;)


Aaron


Br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] [maemo-announce] Nokia Developer Device Program

2007-01-07 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

Nokia is launching a Developer Device Program to provide
open source developers with Nokia N800 Internet Tablets at
a discount. Maemo.org will be providing 500 devices at a
price of 99 Euros per device to selected open source
developers. Eligible developers will be provided a
discount code to be used at the Nokia N800 online shop.

Please visit http://www.maemo.org/ for details.

On behalf of the maemo team,
Ferenc
___
maemo-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-announce
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] [maemo-announce] Maemo 3.0 'bora' is released

2007-01-07 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

We proudly announce our latest SDK release: maemo 3.0 'bora'.

Maemo 3.0 'bora' supports application development for the latest
Nokia N800 Internet Tablet. In maemo 3.0 we have upgraded to
the latest Scratchbox Apophis R4 as a cross-compiling
development environment.

For more information please visit http://www.maemo.org/downloads/releases.html

On behalf of the maemo team,
Ferenc
___
maemo-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-announce
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] root image scripts appear to be unavailable

2006-12-17 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

ext Aaron Levinson wrote:
 The root image scripts that are referenced by the Using the flasher
 utility and creating the referencfe root file system how-to no longer
 appear to be available.  According to this Web page, they can be retrieved
 at https://stage.maemo.org/svn/integration/trunk/rootimagescripts/ , but
 this link does not work at the moment.  I also looked for the scripts in
 the maemo SVN tree but didn't locate them there as well.
 
Thanks for the report. The underlaying Berkeley DB had to be
recovered. The scripts are available again.

 Thanks,
 Aaron
 
cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] extras repository

2006-12-07 Thread Ferenc Szekely
 How does it handle the extras components without source code? E.g. (bad
 example) Canola? Sources will not come but why not having it in the
 extras in future?
 
good point. my proposal is that extras is meant only for open source
software. we can have a non-free component in each repo for canola and co.

 Br,
 
 --jakub
br,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] extras repository

2006-12-06 Thread Ferenc Szekely
ext Marius Vollmer wrote:
 ext Carlos Guerreiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Yeah. That's the way to go: proper archive management with something
 like DAK (we'll look into that at least for sardine and herring once
 there's some time) and a build system to go with it.
 
 I think we are more in need of a clue than in need of proper
 tools. :-)
 
Absolutely correct! I read Marius email [1] at least 5-6 times, and I
wanted to keep almost all the sentences in my reply too. But just to
return back to the topic let me update you about the situation:

snip

 
 The distributions would be divided into components, and extras would
 simply be one of those components.
 
I agree. The maemo distros must have a fine grained component breakdown
and to start with I second Marius and propose to add 'extras' to each of
our distros:
-mistral extras -- currently the only one available :(
-scirocco extras -- the next one to implement
-sardine extras -- comes later (or should this be done 1st?)
-herring extras -- after sardine perhaps

My proposal about the next steps:

We have to setup an intelligent build environment. The rough plan for
this is:
-get a descent hardware
-install Scratchbox 1.x
-setup sbuild together with our existing queue-manager (no DAK for now)

If all is done then the package_maintainers/developers don't have to
bother with compiling their sw for the various maemo releases. They only
need to upload the signed Debian source package(s) to the current
extras queue, like some of you do it today.

The build environment should be clever to spot the problems and send
reports to the package_maintainer/developer in case an uploaded source
does not build.
The cause of the build failure can be anything from an error in the
code, error in the Debian specific files to a missing build dependency.

Upon successful compilation the queue-manager will install the package
to the archive and inform all of us (RSS feed, mailing list, whatever).

I think for the time being we will skip checking if the newly installed
package have all its runtime dependencies in the same archive. The
ultimate goal (as Marius stated) is to have self contained repositories.
So let's go for it, but let's take one step at a time ;)

Timeline? Well, if this looks sane to you, then a testing environment
could be established still this year (I am always optimistic ;).

Any comments on this proposal?

 The existing 'Tableteer' catalogue would turn into a component as well
 (but it might continue to be hosted in a different way than extras.)
 
Yes, I will suggest that to the Tableteer owners. However I do not
think that the content of Tableteer will be built by the build system I
drafted above, because we got no sources from there :(

Cheers,
Ferenc

[1]http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2006-November/006480.html
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: garage upload policy Re: [maemo-developers] Java on 770

2006-11-27 Thread Ferenc Szekely
ext Frantisek Dufka wrote:
 Just to clarify this, there is no policy that each package needs to have
 project (and sources) in garage? Once I have one project may I upload
 other (unrelated) packages?
 
Yes, you may. Currently there is no policy which would say otherwise.

 I'm asking because I'd like to put scummvm [1] into extras repository
 but think that duplicating scummvm svn repository and creating project
 is not needed. It is straight recompile from upstream repository
 configured for SDL backend only with few key remapping patches. I
 already have one unrelated project (bootmenu) so I can upload (not tried
 yet).  So far was not sure about this policy. Or do you prefer many
 almost empty projects for each port? Such scummvm project can maybe host
 nice pages made by Tomas [2] or maybe few diffs to upstream version
 until there is proper maemo port but still I think it is not enough to
 satisfy garage project.
 
You are right. There is absolutely no point to have empty projects, just
because of the upload rights to extras. In practice one only needs a
garage account to get these rights, you don't even need a project.

I think we should refine or define the upload policy together. Maybe we
need to write something formal to the garage wiki [1] first and
discuss the matter in a separate mail thread.

 Frantisek
 
Cheers,
ferenc

[1] https://maemo.org/maemowiki/MaemoGarageStartUp
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] extras repository

2006-11-27 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

I think it would be time to think about the extras repository a little
bit. Those who are not familiar with extras please find some info on the
ExtrasRepository [1] wiki page.

Those who are interested in extras and have a few minutes please read on:

We have launched this service during mistral (maemo 2.0) and the
primary goal was to offer a common place for developers to store and
redistribute their applications. The initial idea also included that we
would like that maemo hackers settle down with their projects at
garage.maemo.org.

We thought extras will help to spread the word about maemo as well as
help developers to reach a wider audience for their applications.

The idea was not too bad, I would say, but we have to revise it now.

Right now we reached a point when a single extras repository might not
be suitable to handle all the needs. We have several stable distros: 1.0
(compatible with IT OS2005); mistral (version 2.0; works with IT OS
2006), scirocco (version 2.1; works with IT OS 2006).
Then we have sardine, which is meant for the leading edge application
framework components. It is supposed to help those who want to follow
the daily maemo development and want to keep their apps really up-to-date.
Carlos and his team is also working hard on an other repository that is
called herring [2]. The main intention here to integrate the stable
components of sardine into a single, self contained repository.

Here comes the dilemma: I am hacking on a maemo application using the
mistral (2.0) baseline and SDK. I'd like to wrap up my release and share
it with the rest of the world. Shall I upload it to extras? Well, sounds
good, since extras came with mistral. But what about other developers?
Will it compile using the scirocco SDK? How about sardine? I have no
clue, but unfortunately I have no time to test it now...

To cut the long story short I think we need to come up with a solution
that is logical, clear and sort of sustainable in the long run.

One idea is to have an extras component within each repository. The
current extras would move under mistral. Scirocco will have a separate
extras and sardine and perhaps herring will get one too.
This would require more work from the developers, or from the package
maintainers. They need to recompile their applications and upload them
to separate places.
Getting the upload rights will still require a garage account and the
invitation from the garage admins.

What is your opinion? We could discuss the real objectives of extras and
 then derived from those we could revise the repository structure and
also the policy regarding uploads etc etc.

Cheers,
Ferenc

[1] http://maemo.org/maemowiki/ExtrasRepository
[2] http://sardine.garage.maemo.org/about.html (bottom of page)
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Java on 770

2006-11-24 Thread Ferenc Szekely
ext Murray Cumming wrote:
 Currently the only way to upload packages to extras (previously contrib)
 is to create a garage project. But that doesn't force you to use the svn
 repository in garage or otherwise fork anyone's source code.
 
 If there's a better way to get packages into extras, I'd like to know
 about it.
 
yes, this is all true. you need an account on garage first. then you
need an invitation from us. you can always send a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if you'd like to have the upload rights. with this
procedure we would like to ensure some level of quality, so we do some
reference checking before granting the access.

after receiving the invite and completing a simple web form you are
ready to go. what can be then more simple than using dput for uploading
packages? :)

Regards,
Ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] Re: [maemo-users] NFS on Nokia 770 IT2006?

2006-11-10 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

ext Marius Gedminas wrote:


Could Nokia at least provide some sort of estimate when this legal
review is going to be done?


The kernel sources are available here:
http://repository.maemo.org/pool/scirocco/free/source/k/kernel-source-2.6.16/kernel-source-2.6.16_2.6.16.rel-osso26.tar.gz

The rest of the repo will be updated on Monday.

Have a nice weekend,
Ferenc

ps: sorry for cross posting
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Unresolved issues (Week 44)

2006-11-06 Thread Ferenc Szekely
ext Tommi Komulainen wrote:
 Here is a list of issues raised on this list I think have not been
 concluded so far, in no particular order. The easiest way to get off the
 list is to provide answers, but you can also try convincing me other
 ways.
 
snip
 
   * http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2006-October/005787.html
 End-user roadmap?
 3rd mention
 
 What's the future with the 770? When is the next Maemo or IT
 (2006) OS release planned? When are end users going to see an
 update?
 
 (Software update was released 2nd November. No mention of
 roadmap.)
 
   * http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2006-October/005827.html
 spam at maemo wiki
 3rd mention
 
 Any news on getting spam at maemo wiki under control?
 
I believe this has been solved. The FrontPage is now editable only by
registered users. The HowDoiBecomeRoot page also needs registered users
to edit. We have not got spam on the wiki last week :)

   * http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2006-October/005947.html
 Not getting bugzilla notifications
 
 Is bugzilla sending notifications?
 
Bugzilla had some problems last week. I verified that I am getting
notifications about my bugs. Murray, could you please check the
situation again?

Br,
ferenc



___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] maemo wiki will have a maintenance break today

2006-11-03 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

As you know maemo's wiki got some serious performance problems recently. 
Therefore we would like to have a maintenance break today at 4:30PM 
(UTC/GMT +2 hours). During this time the administrators will integrate 
moinmoin with fastcgi, and we hope it will improve the situation.


The break will last for 1 hour. The static pages, as well as the Nokia 
770 OS 2006 software image download will be still available.


Again, we do apologize for any inconvenience it may cause.

Regards,
Ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] garage maintenance break tomorrow at 4PM (UTC/GMT+2)

2006-11-02 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

We are going to have a short (about 15 mins) maintenance break at
garage.maemo.org tomorrow 4PM (UTC/GMT +2 hours). Garage will get more
RAM and also more disk space.

Hope the break will not disturb your work. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Regards,
Ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] garage is down

2006-10-29 Thread Ferenc Szekely

Hello,

Garage.maemo.org is unavailable due to an unexpected technical
problem. We are working on it and hope to have the server back in
normal soon.

Sorry for the inconvenience,
Ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] locked myself out of garage

2006-10-26 Thread Ferenc Szekely
ext Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
[...]
 I locked myself out of the Admin section...
 (Curiousity got the better of me and I touched buttons I shouldn't have) 
 
Don't worry, this happens often ;). Teemu has updated your account
already, as you probably noticed.
In case you need help on garage related issues then please drop an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead. All the admins are eagerly waiting for
request like yours ;)

 cheers,
   Danny
 
cheers,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] maemo.org and Midgard

2006-10-24 Thread Ferenc Szekely
ext Kalle Vahlman wrote:
 2006/10/24, Ferenc Szekely [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 The project also aims to modularize and contribute back to GForge the
 current garage hacks we made. These are the tag cloud, the
 Debian-maintainer account registration parts, or the new bounty
 plugin [2]. The Midgard project will also benefit (hopefully :) from
 some of the work we will do.
 
 Btw, as some people (including me) will want to see a screenshot of
 any given app before giving it a whirl (or just to judge the UI ;),
 are screenshots planned to be  included in garage?
 
 No app can be succesful without pretty screenshots you know!
 
Screenshots? Hmm, why not? We could actually have a section at the
project's homepage [1]. It only requires a 'www' directory in the
subversion repo as described in the MaemoGarageStartupUp how-to [2].

But before that we really need to do some work. Perhaps TigerT could
also draw us some fancy new layout graphics if we ask him nicely ;)

-ferenc

[1] http://maemo2midgard.garage.maemo.org/
[2] https://maemo.org/maemowiki/MaemoGarageStartUp
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] maemo-apps.org application catalog

2006-10-03 Thread Ferenc Szekely
ext VLG wrote:
 It seems that GTK community (as well as KDE) had faced at some point
 similar problems - their solution was GnomeFiles (KDE Apps)
 (http://gnomefiles.org/index.php, http://www.kde-apps.org/).
 
Thanks Vlad for the link. This engine is different from the one used by
kde-apps.org and unfortunately it isn't open source. However I contacted
the developer and owner. Hope we will get a response about the licensing
terms.

 -Vlad
 
-ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] garage is going down for a few minutes

2006-09-20 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

We have to reboot garage, because a lot of zombie processes started to
overtake the box. This break should not last more than a few minutes.

We are very sorry for the inconvenience it may cause.

Regards,
ferenc
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Re: Proposal for streamline maemo repositories

2006-09-15 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

ext Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
 
 However what I am still missing in this proposal is a clear definition
 of what repository is supposed to do what and to contain what type of
 apps/updates:
 
I will give it a try to express my views on these:

 E.g.
 
 - what will come through the tableteer repositories? Critical system
 updates, new functionality? http://catalogue.tableteer.nokia.com/certified/
 
AFAIK the plan is to publish certified applications developed by
Nokia. At this moment I do not think that the Tableteer repo will be
used to host critical system updates, security updates etc. I might be
wrong on this, though, so I would welcome if someone from the tableteer
repo maintainers would share their thoughts here.

 - http://repository.maemo.org/ Is this still only applicable for
 scratchbox and not the 770? 
Well, the address above is only a URL :) We started to host SDK
repositories here which are only meant to be used in/with Scratchbox.
Like the mistral repo, it was never meant to be used as device upgrading
as we have stated earlier. Our message was perhaps not clear enough and
that is why the SDK repositories became the source repos of device
upgrades recently.

We are investigating how could we extend our internal rd and support
devices upgrade from the SDK repos. It is not a simple thing to achieve
and we should not be so irresponsible in this team to state that yes,
the maemo SDK repositories will never brake your tablets...

If this is not thought directly for the 770
 why should the http://repository.maemo.org/contribs (to be renamed
 extras) repository be for the 770? Also what will this contain if Maemo2
 is considered a stable snapshot? System updates? New functionality?
 
When we opened garage we thought to __provide__ a chance for maemo
developers to upload their apps and share them with the rest of the
community. It is obvious that most of the maemo hackers do not want toi
maintain a Debian repo on their own. It would not make sense anyway. So
we just opened the contrib repository and we invite developers
(through garage) to join and share their stuff here.

We wanted to do it fast and did not think about the name too much.
Whether it is professional or not, I do not want to discuss it. I
believe it is a good initiative and the name should not matter for
serious people.

Maemo contrib or -if we all agree- extras is meant for extra
applications or any other piece of software that is hosted at garage.

I am not aware of any Maemo2, so can not comment on it.

 -  http://maemo-hackers.org/apt/ Is this a semi-official repository?
 
We have no connection to this repository, so from our stand point it is
not even semi official. Would be nice to consolidate these efforts, but
that's one of the beauty in OSS: everybody is free to do almost anything
and I -personally like this a lot. So, I do not mind having 100s of
maemo repos around the globe. Time will tell which are the useful ones
and maybe some day the repo maintainers will start talking to each other ;)

Hope the things I wrote made some sense. If not, then please let me know.

Have a nice weekend,
Ferenc

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] project cloud @ garage

2006-09-13 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Thanks to TigerT we have a wonderful Project Cloud, instead of the
standard Project Tree at garage.maemo.org.

Please check it out:

 https://garage.maemo.org/softwaremap/

We are more than happy to receive your comments, critics etc :)

Br,
Ferenc

ps:
for those who do not like tag clouds: the tree view is still available
at: https://garage.maemo.org/softwaremap/trove_list.php
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] spam at maemo wiki

2006-09-12 Thread Ferenc Szekely
Hello,

Every now and then we have some nasty edits at maemo's wiki. To avoid
this I have been thinking to disable anonymous edits till we have a
solution which:
-either detects spam and reverts a page if necessary, or
-provides a challenge-response test (captcha [1]) before submitting a
page (Thanks Adam L for proposing it)

Disabling anonymous edits would be temporary only, since it is against
the idea of the wikis.

Before doing anything I would be interested in your opinion. Does
somebody have an idea which could be easily integrated into moinmoin
(the wiki engine maemo.org uses)? Or shall we just leave the situation
as is and revert the pages manually?

I would appreciate your thoughts and comments on this issue.

-ferenc

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captcha


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


  1   2   >