Re: [mailop] DMARC p=quarantine pct=0

On 2018-04-09 11:09:37 (-0500), Jesse Thompson wrote: The amount of DMARC data for a large decentralized university is daunting, so my approach is to compartmentalize issues that can be addressed. Thank you for collecting and analysing this data! Even on a much smaller scale than yours,

Re: [mailop] DMARC with broken DKIM (was: Re: DMARC p=quarantine pct=0)

In article

Re: [mailop] DMARC with broken DKIM (was: Re: DMARC p=quarantine pct=0)

In article you write: >Sometimes I'm thinking DMARC should have enforced DKIM, and not allowed >to have only a match in {SPF, DKIM}, because it leads to issues like >broken-DKIM working-SPF domains not noticing things are wrong even >though they

Re: [mailop] DMARC with broken DKIM

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:55 PM Leo Gaspard wrote: > On 04/10/2018 01:04 AM, Brandon Long wrote: > > We've also seen various banks and other large companies who seem to > > specifically only > > use SPF with DMARC, as a way of disallowing forwarding, I guess. > > > >

Re: [mailop] DMARC with broken DKIM

On 04/10/2018 01:04 AM, Brandon Long wrote: > We've also seen various banks and other large companies who seem to > specifically only > use SPF with DMARC, as a way of disallowing forwarding, I guess. > > With ARC, you can actually "pass" the SPF pass through the forwarder. > > Not that there's

Re: [mailop] DMARC with broken DKIM (was: Re: DMARC p=quarantine pct=0)

We've also seen various banks and other large companies who seem to specifically only use SPF with DMARC, as a way of disallowing forwarding, I guess. With ARC, you can actually "pass" the SPF pass through the forwarder. Not that there's anywhere near wide enough acceptance of ARC to make that

[mailop] DMARC with broken DKIM (was: Re: DMARC p=quarantine pct=0)

On 04/09/2018 08:45 PM, Jesse Thompson wrote:> Kinda, yes.  Anyone running a non-compliant list server should look to > how other list servers are making themselves compliant.  Could be... > 1) rewrite headers > 2) not break DKIM > 3) ARC? > I don't want to be overly prescriptive (no one in

Re: [mailop] question regarding support for international characters

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:54 PM John R Levine wrote: > > We announced that it was supported back in 2014: > > > https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/a-first-step-toward-more-global-email.html > > > > Were you referring to something else? > > No, I just wasn't paying attention.

Re: [mailop] question regarding support for international characters

We announced that it was supported back in 2014: https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/a-first-step-toward-more-global-email.html Were you referring to something else? No, I just wasn't paying attention. Oops. Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY

Re: [mailop] question regarding support for international characters

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 7:57 AM John Levine wrote: > In article < > ofc0fea11b.05dda05c-onc125826a.0038eb98-c125826a.0038f...@notes.na.collabserv.com> > you write: > >-=-=-=-=-=- > >-=-=-=-=-=- > >-=-=-=-=-=- > > > >Hello folks > > > >I've been tasked with finding out what the

[mailop] Anyone from Port 25 here?

If you are paying for support you can email them at supp...@port25.com. They are usually really quick to respond. Thanks, Alex Alex Burch ActiveCampaign / Deliverability Lead (800) 357-0402 abu...@activecampaign.com 1 N. Dearborn St., Chicago , Il 60602, United States

Re: [mailop] DMARC p=quarantine pct=0

On 4/9/2018 1:19 PM, Aaron Richton wrote: On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, Jesse Thompson wrote: 2) When people start seeing headers rewritten we can use that as an attention mechanism to make people aware of email authentication as a concept, and convince people to tackle the other indirect mail flow

Re: [mailop] DMARC p=quarantine pct=0

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, Jesse Thompson wrote: 2) When people start seeing headers rewritten we can use that as an attention mechanism to make people aware of email authentication as a concept, and convince people to tackle the other indirect mail flow issues. What / where are you intending to

[mailop] Anyone from Port 25 here?

Is anyone from Port 25 here, or have a contact? Please contact me offline. Thanks, Scot Berggren | Deliverability and Compliance Manager | Alterian US | +1 720 320-5365 | www.alterian.com ___ mailop mailing list

[mailop] Anyone from UOL here?

Please is someone from UOL here, or have a contact? Thanks, Udeme Postmaster at Wish ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC p=quarantine pct=0

I really appreciate your thoughts on this. The amount of DMARC data for a large decentralized university is daunting, so my approach is to compartmentalize issues that can be addressed. I'm looking at securing the second-level domain first, with the intention of encouraging campus entities

Re: [mailop] question regarding support for international characters

In article you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Hello folks > >I've been tasked with finding out what the general consensus is on the >support in email headers for International characters such

Re: [mailop] question regarding support for international characters

> Il 9 aprile 2018 alle 12.22 Annalivia Ford ha > scritto: > > Hello folks > > I've been tasked with finding out what the general consensus is on the > support in email headers for International characters such as UTF-8 > Charcacters and including things

Re: [mailop] question regarding support for international characters

On 09/04/18 11:22, Annalivia Ford wrote: > I've been tasked with finding out what the general consensus is on the > support in email headers for International characters such as UTF-8 > Charcacters and including things like accented characters like é and å and > can also include Asian and

Re: [mailop] question regarding support for international characters

The subject is fine. Email addresses have a very limited character set possible. Received headers had better stay pure ASCII. Would that work? From: mailop on behalf of Annalivia Ford Sent: Monday, April 9,

[mailop] question regarding support for international characters

Hello folks I've been tasked with finding out what the general consensus is on the support in email headers for International characters such as UTF-8 Charcacters and including things like accented characters like é and å and can also include Asian and Cyrillic characters. I know there's an

Re: [mailop] Rambler.ru 20 seconds connection delay

Thanks all for the feedback, Same as you Andris, nobody is complaining, I was just putting my nose in my stats of time messages spend in queues and the difference with other domains struck me. Cheers, -- Benjamin From: mailop On Behalf Of Andris Reinman Sent:

Re: [mailop] Rambler.ru 20 seconds connection delay

Hi, On our case I think we have always had a 20 sec delay between *every* SMTP command when sending to Rambler, so every message takes at least 60 seconds to deliver. Haven't been a problem, even though messages to Rambler might pile up temporarily if there's lot of trafic to this destination.

Re: [mailop] Rambler.ru 20 seconds connection delay

On 04/09/2018 04:23 AM, John Levine wrote: > Simple theory: there are similar delays after EHLO and MAIL FROM, so > they seem to be severly overloaded. Don't take it personally. That's > why your mail server can do a zillion connections at once. As I saw a bunch of joomla sites with unprotected