> Il 15/04/2022 17:55 Graeme Fowler via mailop ha scritto:
>
> Obviously we’ve had a great deal of discussion of OVH over the years, most of
> which wasn’t favourable. YMMV, obviously.
OVH is the second biggest hoster in Europe.
Unless we want to assume that Europe is a continent of spammers
> Il 15/04/2022 16:43 Laura Atkins via mailop ha scritto:
>
>
>
> All of the complaints I’ve seen about google track back to: the person was
> either actively sending spam (possibly unknowingly, but that doesn’t exactly
> reflect well on the sender) or they’re using a free service that is r
Hello,
I wish we could stop discussing about UCEPROTECT, but I just discovered that
they recently published on their website a disgusting "ad feminam" attack
against a person that dared to complain about their methods.
It is an incredibly sexist piece in which this person is publicly blamed for
> Il 14/02/2021 07:42 André Peters via mailop ha
> scritto:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Have you guys already read this?
> https://blog.sucuri.net/2021/02/uceprotect-when-rbls-go-bad.html
>
> I have seen the discussion and found it fits. Will you remove UCL from
> your servers?
>
I am w
> Il 21/01/2021 15:03 Jim Popovitch via mailop ha scritto:
>
> Neither of those situations describe the reality of what uceprotect is
> doing. They are saying that if you choose to operate in a shady area,
The problem here is that they are defining on their own the criteria to
identify a sha
> Il 20/01/2021 13:29 Hetzner Blacklist via mailop ha
> scritto:
>
> Looking back on my infrequent checking of UCEPROTECT, that means OVH
> will probably be permanently on level 3.
>
> In fact, a number of other large, well-known providers are now listed on
> level 3 as well.
I host my person
> Il 23/12/2020 13:13 Laura Atkins via mailop ha
> scritto:
>
>
> The discussion is simpler than that. Sendgrid owns their network.
> Sendgrid gets to make the rules about what is allowed on their network.
>
> Spam isn’t illegal, yet they prohibit it.
>
> Gambling related
> Il 22/12/2020 21:56 Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop ha
> scritto:
>
>
> There are clear, existing, unambiguous laws against this, and nobody
> questions any entity who not only declines to facilitate this but actively
> purges it from their platforms.
>
> Where I have a problem is
> Il 23/07/2020 03:24 Matt Corallo via mailop ha scritto:
>
>
> The standard appears to provide no protection whatsoever, but the specific
> implementation announced by Google relies on
> CAs to "authenticate" the domains' logo. Seems like there should be a
> standard for that, too.
It's i
> Il 08/07/2020 10:57 Laura Atkins via mailop ha
> scritto:
>
>
>
>
>
> > > On 7 Jul 2020, at 23:35, Brandon Long via mailop
> mailto:mailop@mailop.org > wrote:
> >
> > And I think this discussion is underestimating the number of users
> > already being tracke
> Il 06/07/2020 09:41 Andrew C Aitchison via mailop ha
> scritto:
>
> I have mixed feelings about Mozilla defaulting the world (or the USA) to DoH
> (technically I don't like it, but I sympathize with the philosophical
> idea) but that doesn't explain why DoH itself is a bad idea.
DoH is not
> Il 03/02/2020 06:03 Tom Wong-Cornall via mailop ha
> scritto:
>
> In the end I gave up and used a (hopefully reputable) smart host to
> handle delivery, as you can probably tell from my headers. This doesn't
> sit comfortably with me however; if nothing else, my engineer's
> efficiency it
> Il 06/12/2019 17:14 John Levine via mailop ha scritto:
>
> The BIMI group claims senders will have to validate their logos and
> get a certificate before recipient systems will display them. This
> always seemed to me the weakest part of the plan. It's easy enough to
> do for Paypal and a han
> Il 23 ottobre 2019 08:51 Sébastien Riccio via mailop ha
> scritto:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We also have a lot of trouble with mails being sent to the junk folder on
> Microsoft hosted accounts.
> We have no problems with gmail or yahoo.
>
> There is no apparent reason for this, we constantly moni
Il 12 ottobre 2019 01:31 Brandon Long via mailop ha scritto:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:09 AM Chris Woods via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
Has the prevailing method of deciding worthiness now bec
At this point, for mail sending, Gmail does not support DANE, though we do support STS and TLSRPT. I imagine DANE is somewhere on their TODO list, but couldn't give any time frame for that.
It is supported by a bunch of Europea
> Il 24 aprile 2019 alle 14.29 Mike Hammett ha scritto:
>
> I think a lot of the thought is that "everyone" uses Comcast, Google,
> Microsoft, Yahoo, etc. for the client side and the other side of the coin is
> Mailgun, SendGrid, Mandrill, SES, etc. The concept of there being a server
> w
17 matches
Mail list logo