On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Nathan Goldbaum nathan12...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm a big fan of option D. So much so that when I needed to make a
movie of
ony my galaxy simulations today I went ahead and used it:
In our group I also recieved quite mixed responses:
- C B A (2 x)
- B A C
- A B C
- C
- B
One collegue having anomalous color vision
(something between protanomaly and protanopia)
called *all* three versions harsh to his eye (like looking into a cars
lights at night) and rather unpleasant.
A brief poll of my office gave
3 A's and a B.
One of the A's came from someone who can't remember their distinct flavor
of color blindness, but definitely gets tripped up by reds and greens.
-p
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Arnd Baecker arnd.baec...@web.de wrote:
In our group I also recieved
On 2015/06/02 7:58 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Paul Ivanov p...@berkeley.edu wrote:
That said, if you want to play around with the editor tool, it's
linked on the webpage :-).
This is a really nice tool!
Attached is an example of a map that circles the other
On 2015/06/03 12:27 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
We also tried tweaking it a bit to end on a more saturated yellow,
which I think helps increase contrast in the deuteranomalous version
in particular, and put this on the website as an option D:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Nathan Goldbaum nathan12...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a big fan of option D. So much so that when I needed to make a movie of
ony my galaxy simulations today I went ahead and used it:
https://youtu.be/bnm554et0T8
Beautiful! How hard would it be to also do this for
May I suggest an update to the code showing the 3d sRGB colorspace? Can you
add a shade=False to it? Currently, in pycam02ucs.viscm.py, around line
279, it calls the 3d scatter function without the kwarg. This means that
mplot3d will apply an alpha transparancy to dots that are farther away to
I'm really digging option D too -- it has the bonus of being unambiguously
distinct from GNUPlot,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
May I suggest an update to the code showing the 3d sRGB colorspace? Can
you add a shade=False to it? Currently, in
I'm a big fan of option D. So much so that when I needed to make a movie
of ony my galaxy simulations today I went ahead and used it:
https://youtu.be/bnm554et0T8
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
Ooooh, I am liking D a lot. It is almost like what Parula
I prefer C, but am not too fond of any of them :(
I wonder if it would be beneficial to give up a little on the quantitative
properties of the cm in favor of moving towards something that is a bit
more aesthetic and pleasant to look at.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Paul Hobson
Ooooh, I am liking D a lot. It is almost like what Parula should have
been. Still not quite perfect, but I can't put my finger on it.
Ben Root
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 2015/06/02 7:58 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Paul Ivanov p...@berkeley.edu wrote:
That said, if you want to play around with the editor tool, it's
linked on the webpage :-).
This is a
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi all,
As was hinted at in a previous thread, Stéfan van der Walt and I have
been using some Fancy Color Technology to attempt to design a new
colormap intended to become matplotlib's new default. (Down with jet!)
Andreas, sure, it would only be available in colour. But there's other ways
to mark NaNs, which, after all, should be exceptional, not a major chunk of
your data. I don't know enough about your use-case to comment on an exact
solution but I do think that NaN display should not drive design.
I
Personally, just looking at the images I think B looks more
professional, the others look faded. With A and B I see more of
contrast in the core of the radial image (though that might arise from
a combination of my monitor/eyes, though I usually do quite well in
colour perception tests).
I
On 03.06.2015 08:54, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
You can always use green for NaN with any of these maps...
In grayscale that then wouldn't be distinguishable at all ...
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Andreas Hilboll li...@hilboll.de
mailto:li...@hilboll.de wrote:
I particularly like
I particularly like that A ends on the white end of the spectrum
That's exactly why I don't like A that much.
In many plots, I need a color for NaN results. This color should not
fall within the normal range of the colormap. In case of B and C, it
would be possible to use white as NaN color.
You can always use green for NaN with any of these maps...
—
Sent from Mailbox
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Andreas Hilboll li...@hilboll.de wrote:
I particularly like that A ends on the white end of the spectrum
That's exactly why I don't like A that much.
In many plots, I need a color
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm also in the B A C camp, FWIW. I agree with OceanWolf in that B
looks most professional. It looks much crisper than the others as well.
On 6/3/2015 08:50, Tony Yu wrote:
It doesn't sound like this is going to be decided by email votes, but
It doesn't sound like this is going to be decided by email votes, but just
so the arguments for C don't dominate, my vote would be:
B A C
C has the least perceptual range (that's quantifiable, right?). Also, I
find A and B much more aesthetically pleasing (that's obviously debatable).
In
One of the big advantage of jet as evidenced by these graphs is that for
most of its range, the perceptual delta is above 200 (although it loses
that advantage in blackwhite). Parula sacrafices a fair amount of
perceptual delta, but stays mostly above 100. All of the options beat or
matches Parula
Just want to chime in and say that they colorblind versions of the maps are
pretty nice too. Can those be made available?
It also occurs to me that these are pretty similar to the existing colormap
GNUPlot. I don't know if that's good or bad, but something to keep in mind
if the desire is for
Great work! Very nice post describing the methodology. I especially like
the choice of images you used to expose differences between colormaps.
My ranking is:
1. C
2. A
3. B
To my eyes, C has the highest dynamic range (somehow the opposite of Eric!)
and I like the purple/blue undertone in the
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Olga Botvinnik obotv...@ucsd.edu wrote:
Great work! Very nice post describing the methodology. I especially like the
choice of images you used to expose differences between colormaps.
Thanks!
My ranking is:
1. C
2. A
3. B
To my eyes, C has the highest
Sorry for send you two emails, Nathaniel.
I'm going to vote for A with C as a close second.
Of the three, B looks the most bandy to me (but not overly so).
-p
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi all,
As was hinted at in a previous thread, Stéfan van der
On 2015/06/02 3:46 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Hi all,
As was hinted at in a previous thread, Stéfan van der Walt and I have
been using some Fancy Color Technology to attempt to design a new
colormap intended to become matplotlib's new default. (Down with jet!)
Unfortunately, while our Fancy
1. C
2. B
3. A
But I wouldn't call them aesthetic - the purple in there just looks off -
I'd prefer something like hot, afmhot, or gist_heat - or variations on
those.
Since this thread is bound to get plenty of attention (I suggest getting
feedback from -users, too), we would be remiss if we
It's astonishing how many different opinions we have!
Anyway, first of all, a big thank you to Nathaniel and Stéfan for some
kick-ass work. I'm amazed at the perceptual delta results for Parula... 8-O
Good to know that MPL will not make the same mistake.
Second, my preferences:
A B C.
I
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Paul Ivanov p...@berkeley.edu wrote:
1. C
2. B
3. A
But I wouldn't call them aesthetic - the purple in there just looks off -
I'd prefer something like hot, afmhot, or gist_heat - or variations on
those.
It turns out that it's very difficult to go ~blue to
29 matches
Mail list logo
