script It will show something like:
Hit: 1660. Miss: 340. Total: 2000
--
Bill Moseley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent from my iMutt
not really
related to the method above.
Thanks,
--
Bill Moseley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent from my iMutt
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 05:15:58PM +0100, Henrik Schröder wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 15:44, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote:
Assuming we have a good reason for using the cache in the first place,
then a failed server isn't doing us any good in the server list.
So, the question
the application design that uses *hundreds* of gets in
parallel. Is that per web request?
I typically have just a few fetches per request, and they don't happen
in parallel -- in my code there isn't one place that knows about
everything that needs to be fetched at at once.
--
Bill Moseley
mose
to set a very long expires on the item and a short
expires on the cache item that tracks the real expires time?
IIRC, memcached will toss out expired items first, then items w/o an
expires time when memory is needed. Are there stats that will show the
difference?
Thanks,
--
Bill Moseley
mose
is
not needed?
Thanks,
--
Bill Moseley
mose...@hank.org
:yes
* Debug enabled: no
* Warnings as failure: no
--
Bill Moseley
mose...@hank.org
occur.
My concern is that the client may make multiple requests for additional
parts at the same time triggering multiple (duplicate) re-fetches and saves.
Anyone have a similar situation? Would you recommend use an atomic add
with a short timeout as a lock?
Thanks,
--
Bill Moseley
mose
and
highly available, yet fast and scalable session store for a high traffic
site.
Combine the two clusters into a single cluster and use Mysql and
replication? Memcachedb?
--
Bill Moseley
mose...@hank.org
at poor-man's HA with these two features. Looking at how
pulling the plug on one server won't result in get or set failures, and not
an increased amount of time (say waiting for a failed server to respond).
--
Bill Moseley
mose...@hank.org
= key 441 =
found in mem1
= key 178 =
found in mem1
One thing I always find odd is if I don't have Memcached running I get:
set failed SYSTEM ERROR Success'
Does that mean a successful system error? ;)
--
Bill Moseley
mose...@hank.org
.
This allows distributing read load to multiple servers with the expense of
more write traffic.
--
Bill Moseley
mose...@hank.org
chance the timeouts are somehow related?
--
Bill Moseley
mose...@hank.org
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
memcached group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
either under dev. But, I have a lot
more testing to do.
The timeouts on production are a much bigger concern at this time.
Thanks,
--
Bill Moseley
mose...@hank.org
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
memcached group.
To unsubscribe from
in this poll call:
if ((number_of= poll(fds, 1, server-root-connect_timeout)) == -1)
That is returning zero and connect_timeout is 4000ms. But, that's a much
more rare type of timeout.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote:
Just a quick follow up on this timeout
9
STAT items:40:evicted 69
STAT items:40:evicted_nonzero 69
STAT items:40:evicted_time 3446
STAT items:41:number 25
STAT items:41:age 12029015
STAT items:41:evicted 5911
STAT items:41:evicted_nonzero 5911
STAT items:41:evicted_time 3592
STAT items:42:number 42
STAT items:42:age 12028792
STAT it
lass 3, which
> has 5 pages assigned. Meanwhile slab class 2 has 5000 pages and never
> evicts.
>
> 1.4.4 isn't supported, so if you continue to have trouble I highly
> recommend trying the new code (and start options) first.
>
> -Dormando
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, Bill Moseley
connection.
We use libmemcached and have the MEMCACHED_BEHAVIOR_POLL_TIMEOUT set to 4
seconds. The web code didn't have a circuit breaker so you can imagine how
well that went.
Short of the whacky setup, just wondering what client timeout are commonly
used.
--
Bill Moseley
mose..
.
VERSION 1.4.25
--
Bill Moseley
mose...@hank.org
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"memcached" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For mo
ng -I
and do the chunking into parts (and maybe gzipping) in the client before
storing. So, we store one or more 1mb items and then the remainder in
another chunk based on its size.
If we use new large item support all of the split-up parts of the item we
are storing end up in the same chunk. Does that mean
page so that the page can be
reclaimed? Or do all items in a given page first need to expire before it
can be reclaimed?
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Bill Moseley <mose...@hank.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:32 PM, dormando <dorma...@rydia.net>
emcached as a general cache so our value sizes and set frequency varies
quite a bit. I suspect being able to reallocate slab space would be
helpful in our case.
We also have a need to store some larger (>1MB) items, too. (for example,
-I 4m)
Thanks,
>
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2016,
22 matches
Mail list logo