Re: what is a connection refused(111) error?

2008-09-05 Thread dormando
in the foreground. So you can see why it doesn't start, but you'll have to remember to restart it with -d once you're sure it works. -Dormando On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, pedalpete wrote: Thanks Steve, I am kinda new to admining my own server, so no, I hadn't tried telnet. And you are correct, I can't telnet

Re: memcache stats

2008-09-05 Thread dormando
The -u option is for specifying the user to drop privileges to? If you see mentions of managed instances - that's unfinished code, which we should silence. You can safely ignore that. -Dormando On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, TK wrote: thanks, steve. Was looking at the help section of the memcached

Re: Test code coverage

2008-09-09 Thread dormando
Percent of the file executed memcached.c : 8.15 Percent of the file executed slabs.c : 15.65 Percent of the file executed stats.c : 1.72 Percent of the file executed -Victor dormando wrote: Hey, Think this could be modified to not spit coverage on files not in the source tree? File '/usr/include

Re: save/restore memcache db?

2008-09-11 Thread dormando
Almost everybody who initially asks for this feature later figures out that restarting a memcached with stale date doesn't work for their application. So at least with the dozens of people I've talked with about this subject, the demand drops quickly. No big push, no follow up. I guess one or

Re: Memcache 1.3.0 ETA?

2008-10-25 Thread dormando
1.3.0 binary preview happened a while ago ;) 1.3.1 is real soon now. It's been reviewed. -Dormando On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Nick Le Mouton wrote: I notice that 1.2.7 is being prepared for release, but is there a time frame for a 1.3.0 release with the binary protocol?

Re: Memcached Hackathon Report(s)

2008-10-25 Thread dormando
bugs in the tree. Thoughts? -Dormando

Re: Session state in memcached without database backup

2008-11-02 Thread dormando
I wrote a rant on this a while ago: http://dormando.livejournal.com/495593.html If you really must do it, keep a super careful eye on your eviction rate... but I believe whatever session handler you're using should use the design pattern I describe in this post, if it's not already. -Dormando

Re: Memcache serving 24gig a node?

2008-11-03 Thread dormando
be addressing it as one large pool anyway, use larger instances in order to make multiget more efficient. -Dormando On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Andy Hawkins wrote: Currently they run across 6 machines already. My real question is should I run multiple memcached's with smaller memory caches on seperate ports

Re: Release QA process

2008-11-06 Thread dormando
adding for the last three. If I can get my head out of my ass we'll even be able to move faster and release more often :) have fun, -Dormando On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Victor wrote: Hi, I'm wondering if anyone can tell me which QA activities are in involved everytime we release a new memcached version

Re: Generic protocol for message queues

2008-11-07 Thread dormando
it a separate project :) -Dormando On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Aaron Stone wrote: I didn't realize that gearman is a binary protocol -- are you just now defining one? Aaron On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Brian Aker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Just something else to throw into the equation

Re: Generic protocol for message queues

2008-11-08 Thread dormando
, but implemented as an independent project? On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:02 PM, dormando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's always been a binary-ish protocol. Brian and a few others are writing a C implementation the client/server. Initially I was weakly expecting to add gearman's commands

Re: facebook memcached

2008-12-12 Thread dormando
+1. I'm not up for a lecture on how to post patches to a public project right now, but that isn't the way to go, nor what we've discussed in the past. -Dormando I think the results speak for themselves, but I don't know that a merge can actually occur. The tree the published is entirely

Re: facebook memcached

2008-12-12 Thread dormando
be required in the GPL/whatever license memcached is under? memcached is BSD licensed... no goodwill is technically required. it's just considered anti-goodwill to code dump and stalk off. -Dormando

Re: facebook memcached on github

2008-12-13 Thread dormando
on the way, and many of the other changes are unmergable. Will you work with us to get the most beneficial performance changes upstream and adopt the main tree, or continue to use your internal tree? We have to decide what work will be merged at all before flocking to a merge-a-thon. have fun, -Dormando

Re: Does memcached implement any connection scheduling policy?

2008-12-15 Thread dormando
. That change was a facebook patch, and only happens if you do a lot of bulk loading/fetching over tcp. Most folks don't do this. -Dormando On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, mcuser wrote: Hi, Referring to Connection Scheduling in Web Servers http://www.cs.bu.edu/faculty/crovella/paper-archive/usits99.pdf

Re: why track free items in an array

2008-12-26 Thread dormando
Hey, 'memslap' in the libmemcached library can be used to help load test. There're no standard set of test though. -Dormando On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Mike Lambert wrote: Thanks for the answer, the argument about trying to cleanly separate slabs and items makes sense. (Though yes, I would have

retiring socialtext wiki

2008-12-26 Thread dormando
existing content, to prevent it from being indexed as stale information. This also means preserving all of the pages so inbound links to existing pages still work, they just lack content and redirect to the new wiki. Thoughts? -Dormando

Re: Wiki overhauled and updated

2008-12-29 Thread dormando
will land when starting to look/learn about memcached.? I switched that sometime yesterday already. The FAQ / Wiki link at the top goes to the new wiki. -Dormando

Re: Memcache set and get command. Are they atomic?

2008-12-29 Thread dormando
Yeah, other search results are probably about get+set sequence, so seems that i have somewhat exaggerated confusion about memcache atomicity, sorry. Still, i think this simple question should be in memcached faq. Agreed -- it needs to be clear. Is now:

Further wiki work / bug reports.

2008-12-31 Thread dormando
as easy historical reference for us devs. happy new year, -Dormando

Re: Wiki overhauled and updated

2009-01-02 Thread dormando
cute ;) Noted. Anyone want to catalogue what distros have memcached at what version? I intend to get on the PPA bandwagon for ubuntu, gentoo seems to be up to date, but who else needs a kick in the pants after the next release? -Dormando On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Boris Partensky wrote: Thanks

Forwarded mail....

2009-01-31 Thread dormando
a chance of upselling or hindering community feedback and open participation. We appreciate your contributions to memcached, but some of us still prefer neutrality where possible. -Dormando -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:04:51 +0100 From: Lenz Grimmer l

Re: Memcache with UNIX socket.

2009-01-31 Thread dormando
recent benchmark I've done has shown identical performance for sockets against 127.0.0.1 compared to UNIX domain sockets. The enefit of unix domain sockets is more to avoid ... I dunno. Allow a daemon to be restricted by a particular user via file ownership permissions. have fun, -Dormando On Fri, 30

Re: UNSUBSCRIBE

2009-02-01 Thread dormando
Guys, please don't respond to these e-mails anymore. One of the list maintainers will unsubscribe them eventually. I know I know, the Everyone shut up e-mail, but the list is getting a little chatty recently. It's a big list, please stay on topic if you can. Thanks, -Dormando On Fri, 30 Jan

Re: stats subcommands in memcached...

2009-02-01 Thread dormando
on that debate. -Dormando On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Toru Maesaka wrote: Hi, 'stats maps' imho, isn't so useful since we can get the same information with commands like ldd(1). This doesn't need to be in the server since low layer folks that are interested in this information would know what to do

Re: binary noreply commands

2009-02-01 Thread dormando
Yeah, my main complaint about the original 'noreply' code is that the error handling was completely FUBAR. I'm sure someone somewhere will want a noreply command that never gives them errors, but that's really really broken. +1 to having it crap back errors. -Dormando On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Toru

Re: memcache memory limit

2009-03-20 Thread dormando
It's at least a couple megs. It depends on how many parallel connections you have, and the typical size of your read buffers. If you do a lot of large multi-gets, you'll use more ram than otherwise. Future releases will probably track this memory more closely? It's not hard to do. -Dormando

Re: For review: Issue 37

2009-03-23 Thread dormando
maybe copy/paste the bug subject into the e-mail subject? :P Sometimes I wake up to a list of numbers to review. hard to keep in order until I use the actual issue viewer :P -Dormando On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Trond Norbye wrote: Issue: http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=37

1.2.7 call for fixes

2009-03-25 Thread dormando
/memcached/downloads/list have fun, -Dormando

Broken commit: 5a44468 Use AI_ADDRCONFIG more selectively.

2009-03-25 Thread dormando
of the patch (make memcached start with no networking configured?). Before I back out the change, anyone else know how to fix it properly? Thanks, -Dormando

Re: For review: using git describe for version numbers

2009-03-26 Thread dormando
Initially I thought hey, that'll probably break shipit, then I remembered shipit's just used for every other project I ship. Seems fine to me. Maybe add the git steps into the HACKING or README or whatever file somewhere? -Dormando On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Dustin wrote: Oh, patch might be good

1.2.7-rc tree for final review.

2009-03-28 Thread dormando
this simmer through tomorrow, maybe monday, then if there're no major complaints it'll become 1.2.7-rc. We'll try to keep the 1.2.7-rc process short since the tree's been settled for so long. Fanks, -Dormando commit c607401efd030d019a47bb100fc4d397801143ce Author: dormando dorma...@rydia.net Date

Re: 1.2.7-rc tree for final review.

2009-03-28 Thread dormando
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, dormando wrote: Yo, http://consoleninja.net/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=memcached.git;a=shortlog;h=1.2.7-rc In addition to the changes dustin posted, I'm proposing the following changes. ... I guess it's worth noting I haven't updated the changelog or bumped the version

memcached 1.2.7-rc1

2009-04-01 Thread dormando
bug in the next few hours ;) All of the patches in here have been up for review for a few days now. have fun, -Dormando

Re: New Memcached Releases Today: 1.2.7 and 1.3.3

2009-04-03 Thread dormando
Yay to everyone involved! -Dormando On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Dustin wrote: Two new memcached releases are available today. Stable 1.2.7 The new stable release which is a maintenance release of the 1.2 series containing several bugfixes and a few features. This version is recommended

Re: 1.2.7-rc tree for final review.

2009-04-06 Thread dormando
Hey, I see some warnings but no compilation errors. (1.2.7 was build-tested on openbsd 4.3). Does make test fail for you? -Dormando On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Artur wrote: Hi, I have got a problem with compilation of last release 1.2.7 under OpenBSD 4.3. Messages form ./configure

Re: For review: Stats slabs should include the number of requested bytes

2009-04-08 Thread dormando
. That said ... I don't have any great alternative ideas offhand. -Dormando On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Eric Lambert wrote: Looks fine to me. Although perhaps we could use a better description. The text 'mem_requested' is a little unclear to me. May be we call it bytes_used_in_slab but that's

Re: segmentation fault from stats slabs

2009-04-13 Thread dormando
Shouldn't be ... the allocation is the same, but no new stats have been added into stats slabs under 1.2.8, so the allocation is still correct. -Dormando On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Evan Weaver wrote: Is this bug present in 1.2.8? Evan On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Dustin dsalli...@gmail.com

pecl memcache/memcached

2009-04-16 Thread dormando
, -Dormando

Re: Max length incr integer

2009-04-19 Thread dormando
incr values are 64-bit. -Dormando On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, Abdul-Rahman Advany wrote: Hi guys, I am abusing memcached as a message queue. But I realized that there must be an maximum length for the integer stored when using incr. How can I determine what the maximum value is? I use memcache

Re: Max length incr integer

2009-04-19 Thread dormando
Yes. On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, Abdul-Rahman Advany wrote: Even on a 32bit machine? On Apr 20, 12:38 am, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote: incr values are 64-bit. -Dormando On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, Abdul-Rahman Advany wrote: Hi guys, I am abusing memcached as a message queue

Re: memcache-top

2009-04-22 Thread dormando
of these out there would be fantastic. I really don't want to discourage either poster from doing work, I just like to encourage that this list tend to hold up its reputation of being cordial and helpful. -Dormando On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Jozef Sevcik wrote: Hi, I would usually stay out of things like

Re: segfaults

2009-05-26 Thread dormando
. -Dormando On Tue, 26 May 2009, Gavin Hamill wrote: This seems to have been memory related after all. When I reduce the memory usage with -m 3000 rather than -m 3200 then the machines are stable :/ These are running on 32-bit Debian lenny without any 'large mem' patches, so is the maximum RAM per

List pseudo moderation.

2009-06-15 Thread dormando
google account/e-mail/whatever if you're up to it. (I hear people like work too, we're still doing that;) stay tuned) Thanks, -Dormando

Memcached 1.4.0 (stable) Released!

2009-07-10 Thread dormando
1.4.0 in production at Six Apart. We'll be completing the full rollout over the next few business days. Report bugs, give us feedback, let us know if you've tried it. It'll be a big help. Thanks, -Dormando

Release schedule for 1.4.1 and beyond

2009-07-10 Thread dormando
on august 6th. Thoughts? -Dormando

Re: What happened to --enable-threads

2009-07-13 Thread dormando
Yup. There's no more a single threaded mode. If you want to emulate the old behavior you can start it with a single thread via -t 1 -Dormando On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, NICK VERBECK wrote: Was working on upgrading some servers from 1.2 to 1.4 and noticed that the --enable-threads config option

Re: Opinions on default UDP binding?

2009-07-15 Thread dormando
versa). #2. We keep disabling/re-enabling the UDP stuff since folks want to write clients that assume it's there sometimes. Think the follow rules just need to be: if only one setting has been overridden, the other one follows? Or is there need for something weirder? -Dormando

Re: Cant make another instance of memcached to run on another port

2009-07-15 Thread dormando
print the exact error already... -Dormando

Re: Vendors, the project

2009-07-16 Thread dormando
week, and stuff them onto the wiki. Then there shouldn't be any weird drama without someone clearly being at fault, which is the even ground we thoroughly enjoy as an open source project. -Dormando On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, luciano11 wrote: Good comments Brian. I don't know what sort of personal

OSCON booth reboot.

2009-07-16 Thread dormando
have a pass but want to help with the booth, that's fine, just let me know. For those of you attending OSCON, please drop by to see us in the exhibit hall. Ask goofy questions, blame us for all your earthly problems, or just say hello :) Thanks, -Dormando

Re: What does the options -b means

2009-07-20 Thread dormando
Unfinished feature - it was removed in later versions. You'd do yourself a favor in upgrading to something much newer than that, as well :) -Dormando On Sun, 19 Jul 2009, jacky wrote: Hi all: I'm running the memcached 1.2.4 version, and it has one option -b, -brun a managed

Re: 1.3.3 marked stable in portage

2009-07-23 Thread dormando
of memcached, we want people to be extra educated when we put out something that is experimental, since the downside of any bug can be catastrophic. Thanks, -Dormando On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Brian Moon wrote: Hi guys, I was not sure who was on the memcached mailing list, so I picked some of the folks

Re: Patch to allow -F option to disable flush_all

2009-07-24 Thread dormando
Hey, We've rejected a few similar patches in the past. Usually if folks need this they have bigger problems... What is your particular use case? I could see this going in though. It squicks me out but I'm open to opinions from the others :) -Dormando On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Adrian Otto wrote

Re: Connection timed out

2009-08-02 Thread dormando
Use 1.2.8 or 1.4.0... If your 'listen_disabled_num' stat is increasing, you need to increase the connection limit. Otherwise, you should post more information about how you specifically ran the test. Code examples/etc. -Dormando On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, fredrik wrote: I have a question about

Re: Is clearing out the cache necessary?

2009-08-03 Thread dormando
of popular or high value keys. -Dormando

Re: Memcache Question

2009-08-03 Thread dormando
rate limiting if you ever need it - google around and check the FAQ. -Dormando On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Beyza wrote: Hi, This is not an important question, but I wonder the answer. When I develop websites by using memcache, I also use it for spam checking. For example; When someone post

Re: memcached - expire (again)

2009-08-03 Thread dormando
I wouldn't recommend anyone use the ALLOW_SLABS_REASSIGN code as it is - it is unproven and we probably should have removed it a long time ago. It'll come back as a proper implementation soon enough. -Dormando On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Mike Lambert wrote: Werner you never mentioned which version

Issue tracker now set to spam the mailing list

2009-08-03 Thread dormando
over there. This solves that problem :) If it gets too spammy I'll separate it out into a -bugs mailing list. Since we used to do all bug discussions on the ML anyway, this should be no big deal. -Dormando

Re: Patch to allow -F option to disable flush_all

2009-08-03 Thread dormando
situation. We should revisit that as the engine work comes in, since we'd need a set of extended options we could pass into the engines? -Dormando On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Adrian Otto wrote: Dormando, Thanks for your reply. The use case is for using memcached from a hosting environment where multiple

Re: Update / Populate cache in the background

2009-08-05 Thread dormando
of milliseconds or less, and make them typically run in 0.1ms. If they take 20+ seconds something is horribly wrong. Even 1 full second is something you should be taking very seriously. -Dormando On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Edward Goldberg wrote: I use the term Cache Warmer for task like this, where I keep a key

Re: Update / Populate cache in the background

2009-08-05 Thread dormando
making sure you at least have 2-4 instances and that you can survive the loss of one, even if you end up running multiple on one box. -Dormando On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Josef Finsel wrote: Or, to put it another way, memcached is *not a persistent data store nor should it be treated as one. If your

Re: Fwd: [Bug 516489] CVE-2009-2415 memcached: heap-based buffer overflow

2009-08-12 Thread dormando
put whatever random trash they want into the system. The only reason why we consider this a notable bug is due to the potential for deliberate memory corruption. There are still many ways to DoS memcached if you have full and unfettered access to it. -Dormando On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Paul Lindner

Stable release 1.4.1

2009-08-29 Thread dormando
tentatively scheduled for september 19th, in three weeks. Send bug reports to our issue tracker: http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/list ... or to the mailing list if you're not sure if it's a bug or not :) have fun, -Dormando

Re: Problem with memcache(d)

2009-09-02 Thread dormando
I don't see the cmd_flush stat, can you telnet to the port and run the raw command? (pretty sure it's in 1.2.8...) no, that's not too much for memcached. nobody in the world can overwhelm the thing to the point where it does that. Can you post a real code snippit that doesn't work for you? Not

Re: Problem with memcache(d)

2009-09-02 Thread dormando
foo 0 60 13 for no flags, 60 second timeout, 13 bytes, etc. Explaining the script won't help, since this is probably a code bug, you'll need to either share the whole program or just iterate your way down through the code until you make it work :) -Dormando Well a snippts :) Let me explain

Re: Setting far distant expiry weirdness on new install

2009-09-02 Thread dormando
Willing to bet your clock was off? And/or it adjusted while you were setting some values. On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, roger.moffatt wrote: I have been completely stumped by this one. I've had a windows install of memcached (1.2.6) running for months without incident in Amazon's compute cloud.

Re: Confused about slab/class allocation

2009-09-03 Thread dormando
expirations are lazy. I also forget what the side effects of setting -n so low are, but I doubt it's related. -Dormando On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Vladimir wrote: That makes sense however it doesn't explain what I have been seeing :-). I have a scenario where no matter how much memory I throw in maximum

Re: Confused about slab/class allocation

2009-09-03 Thread dormando
class map to a slab with most of your pages. If there aren't enough pages assigned to a heavily used class, that usually means the access pattern changed over time and you need to restart memcached to have it re-dish them out. -Dormando

Re: Fwd: [Bug 519375] New: rpmbuild of memcached-1.4.0-1 fails on RHEL-5

2009-09-04 Thread dormando
Ah, I missread, nevermind. On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Paul Lindner wrote: FYI - same issue recently reported also reported in fedora bugzilla. -- Forwarded message -- From: bugzi...@redhat.com Date: Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:55 AM Subject: [Bug 519375] New: rpmbuild of

Re: Range Spec Posted to Wiki

2009-09-16 Thread dormando
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Dustin wrote: On Sep 16, 3:11 pm, Brian Aker br...@tangent.org wrote:   a) Should we move other stuff out of doc/ and into the wiki? Yes, or better... put it in Wikipedia. That's a neat idea. Any objections to having the well-defined protocols live there?

Re: Range Spec Posted to Wiki

2009-09-16 Thread dormando
That's *kind* of what I thought. I'm unawrae of anyone having real authoritative specifications on wikipedia? Is there something to show otherwise? On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Adam Lee wrote: Am I confused or is it actually being proposed that documentation exist on Wikipedia? I see no problem

Re: Memcached Connection Failure

2009-09-22 Thread dormando
Wrong; for omg in `seq 1 30` ; do yes /dev/null done observe load hit 30. -Dormando On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: I don't think running CPU hard would explain. You could have 100% CPU utilization and load of one. Load of 35-40 is usually related to some type of IO. Most

Re: memcache on linux

2009-09-22 Thread dormando
libevent will try to use the best one available at runtime. If you're installing a linux OS that was released in the last 5ish years, it'll have epoll. Just build libevent as normal or install it via package. You don't need to think to ensure it's using it. -Dormando On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, jim

Re: pylibmc vs python-libmemcached vs cmemcache

2009-09-23 Thread dormando
I've not seen pylibmc yet, dunno which one is better... You can discount 'cmemcache' outright, since it's based off of the deprecated 'libmemcache' C library. Both were buggy. On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Jehiah Czebotar wrote: It seems there are 3 memcached libraries for python now that wrap the c

Re: Does memcached supports replicated caching?

2009-10-01 Thread dormando
stating this here, once, and we can get along so long as everyone's constructive. Lets just cut this here. -Dormando On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Mark Atwood wrote: On Sep 30, 2009, at 2:04 AM, Adi wrote:= Hi, Does memcached supports replicated caching between distributed caching servers? if 'Yes

Re: memcached hangs suddenly and slows down

2009-10-02 Thread dormando
Hey, What version are you on? Is the machine it's on swapping? how much memory is free? cpu free? what's the general load on the box? What's the commandline you're using to start memcached? -Dormando On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, rch wrote: I am using memcached in my production environment

Re: memcached hangs suddenly and slows down

2009-10-03 Thread dormando
Please upgrade; version 1.2.5 has a number of spin/crash bugs that have since been fixed. We highly recommend 1.4.1, but 1.2.8 is still available. -Dormando On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Ravi Chittari wrote: Version is 1.2.5 memcached -d -m 256 it is not going into swap or anything like

Re: memcached hangs suddenly and slows down

2009-10-03 Thread dormando
1.2.2 is even worse than 1.2.5. Please upgrade to 1.4.1 if possible. -Dormando On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Ravi Chittari wrote: Thanks Edward..  One last question. Actually the version we are using is 1.2.2, I believe 1.2.2 has similar issues as 1.2.5. You think 1.2.2 has similar issues as 1.2.5

Re: GET command returning strange data

2009-10-03 Thread dormando
Hey, Do you have a short script or any way of reproducing this? I can't reproduce it offhand, or see how it's possible :) What were you using to get that output? -Dormando On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, rwong wrote: Hello, I am using memcached 1.2.8 and on occasion I notice a GET command

Memcached user warnings

2009-10-06 Thread dormando
more twiddles that can be used for foot-shooting. Thoughts? I'll do up the patch tomorrow anyway but want to see if there's any discussion to this. -Dormando

Re: DNS vs IP

2009-10-07 Thread dormando
that does it. There's an open source one that works just fine, and is supported in a main library: http://blogs.sun.com/trond/date/20090625 -Dormando

Re: DNS vs IP

2009-10-07 Thread dormando
and easily. Don't have your app code pushes overwrite them either. -Dormando On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Edward M. Goldberg wrote: Yes, I use DNS Made Easy for this use: 1) Create an A Record for each Memcached server with the SAME name memcached.domain.com 2) Create an A Record for each Memcached

Memcached Release Candidate 1.4.2-rc1

2009-10-08 Thread dormando
;) -Dormando

Re: Download Links are getting redirected to http://www.mybikelane.com/

2009-10-08 Thread dormando
Hi. What links? from where? On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Samy Rengasamy wrote: The links to download binaries are getting redirected to http://www.mybikelane.com/;. Is there an alternative link ? Thanks, Sam.

Memcached 1.4.2 released

2009-10-12 Thread dormando
, and meatspace. -Dormando

Re: Memory/Item sizes in 1.4.2

2009-10-14 Thread dormando
to update the official wiki, just e-mail me privately with your google account. At any moment I'll be doing some significant damage to the wiki, so just let me know what you're working on first so we don't collide :) Thanks, -Dormando

Re: Memcached user warnings

2009-10-14 Thread dormando
This would help weed out the basic configuration blunders. Cloud these also show up in the stats display. At the end? Warnings: 100% Misses, keys may be wrong. Memory waste over 50%. Threads greater than CPUs. Connections at or near the limit. Process swapping, size set too large

Re: memcached failover solution?

2009-10-18 Thread dormando
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009, Henrik Schr?der wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 00:47, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote: Anyone interested in getting one of the windows clients to support libmemcached, or at least the same replication method that the windows client uses? What do

Re: memcached failover solution?

2009-10-19 Thread dormando
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 03:34, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote: http://blogs.sun.com/trond/date/20090625 ^ client side replication. I like this and feel it's more powerful, since tt scales past two severs implicitly, and you can enable/disable it per key or key type. So instead

Re: Memcached Questions

2009-10-21 Thread dormando
have a good number of evictions and some amount of slab overhead. You should look closer at `stats items` and `stats slabs` to get a better picture of what size items are causing the biggest issue. -Dormando

Re: Memcached Questions

2009-10-22 Thread dormando
You can figure based on your sysctl settings, how much memory a tcp socket will use by default or with stuff being written to it. There're lots of sites that explain those in more depth. An idle connection can use around 4-12k per. Would using UDP connections instead of TCP be a good

Re: noreply error

2009-10-23 Thread dormando
Try it without the '0' in there. The delete expiration was (the only?) incompatible change from 1.2.8 to 1.4.0. It's gone now. On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Brian Hawkins wrote: This is what the log shows 28 delete key 0 noreply 28 ERROR Not sure I can expand any further on that. Brian On Fri,

dormando's awesome memcached top v0.1

2009-10-29 Thread dormando
Yo, I couldn't sleep, so: http://github.com/dormando/damemtop (or: http://consoleninja.net/code/memcached/damemtop-0.1.tar.gz) Early release of a utility I've been working on in the last few days. Yes, sorry, I'm aware this makes /four/ memcached top programs. So, I had to make mine awesome

Last call for 1.4.3 (and apologies for the spam)

2009-10-29 Thread dormando
days while we empty the queue :) If you have any bugs, requests, etc, now's the time to speak up! -Dormando

Memcached 1.4.3-rc2

2009-11-02 Thread dormando
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/ReleaseNotes143rc2 Bug reported by Tomash, fixed by trond, reviewed by dustin, and now we have a new tarball. Thanks, and please continue testing :) -Dormando

Re: Using memcached as a distributed file cache

2009-11-02 Thread dormando
You could put something like varnish inbetween that final step and your client.. so key is pulled in, file is looked up, then file is fetched *through* varnish. Of course I don't know offhand how much work it would be to make your app deal with that fetch-through scenario. Since these files are

Re: Using memcached as a distributed file cache

2009-11-02 Thread dormando
You could also redirect the client to the proxy/cache after computing the filename, but that exposes the name in a way that might be reusable. perlbal is great for this... I think nginx might be able to do it too? Internal reproxy. Server returns headers for where the load balancer is to

Re: New memcached homepage!

2009-11-06 Thread dormando
Ah, I forgot to note. The users page is open for requests. If you're a bigish/notable site and would wish to be linked there, let me know by tomorrow! Otherwise I'm picking a bunch out of a hat. Thanks, -Dormando On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, dormando wrote: Coinciding with the release of 1.4.3

Re: New memcached homepage!

2009-11-07 Thread dormando
Rabbits :) (fast, `scalable`, stupid). On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Clint Webb wrote: I like it.   I really like the logo, and I like the banner image of the pack of animals (what are those things?). On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:39 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote: Ah, I forgot to note

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >