Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-28 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
ct: Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf > Curly wrote: > > VW could beat that in the 70s.  my 79 wabbit got 45+.  The > audi 4000 got 45 or better > > Where is the improvement for 35 years of better technology? Curt's car is a lot heavier, I'll bet.  Air bags, noise insul

Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-28 Thread fmiser via Mercedes
> Curly wrote: > > VW could beat that in the 70s. my 79 wabbit got 45+. The > audi 4000 got 45 or better > > Where is the improvement for 35 years of better technology? Curt's car is a lot heavier, I'll bet. Air bags, noise insulation, copper wire for the big stereo speakers, etc. Did your

Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-28 Thread fmiser via Mercedes
> Curt wrote: > > ...what are the odds an alignment would help mileage? I > think new calipers will help. Once mileage gets to that level, it sure could. The higher the efficiency, the more significant the small factors. With an efficient engine, mileage is all about drag. Aerodynamic,

Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-28 Thread archer75--- via Mercedes
I take out the tie rod(s) before loosening the adjusters, scribe center points on their ends, measure the distance between centers, scribe center points on the new link, transfer the measurement, tighten the adjuster, and install. I've never had to have a re-alignment. Before that, I made a

Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-28 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes
fmiser via Mercedes wrote: Remember, a 5% loss at 40 MPG is 2 MPG, while the same 5% loss at 10 MPG is 0.5 MPG Another way of looking at it: In a car that uses 10hp at 60mph and gets 40 mpg, .5hp of drag from brakes or alignment is 5% or 2mpg. A truck that uses 40hp to cruise 60mph and gets

Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-28 Thread Peter Frederick via Mercedes
Brake drag will definitely lower milage in your Golf -- I've picked up about 2 mpg since the rear brakes quit dragging and the pedal regained it's normal feel. I'm sure the issue was related to being parked for six months or so over the winter, but drag is drag. I'll be having the tires

Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-28 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
lacking in soul) at least for the first 10-15 years. -Curt From: OK Don via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com> To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Cc: OK Don <okd...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 11:26 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by

Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-27 Thread Curly McLain via Mercedes
VW could beat that in the 70s. my 79 wabbit got 45+. The audi 4000 got 45 or better Where is the improvement for 35 years of better technology? 42 mpg... I can get 42 mpg in my '87 wagon, if I go about 40 mpg... downhill... with a tailwind - Max Charleston SC On Sun,

[MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-27 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
Took my '05 Golf to Hannibal, New York Friday for a "True North Lantern Enthusiast" weekend. About 550 miles round trip. Averaged 42mpg which is lower than I'd like but on the NY Throughway I held it right to 80mph and as we came through Vermont on Rt 9 the hills and lower speeds would have

Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-27 Thread Meade Dillon via Mercedes
ile when reversing. I'll put new rear > brakes on the to-do list. > -Curt > From: Meade Dillon <dillonm...@gmail.com> > To: Curt Raymond <curtlud...@yahoo.com>; Mercedes Discussion List < > mercedes@okiebenz.com> > Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 9:43 PM >

Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-27 Thread Meade Dillon via Mercedes
I'm about 1/2 way through my first tank on my wagon after adjusting the injection pump timing. I'm hoping I will at least get back to 26-27 mpg around town. I also still need to have the front end aligned after replacing a tie-rod, I did my best with string and the affected wheel sitting on two

Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-27 Thread OK Don via Mercedes
I've gotten 53 mpg with the 2012 Passat - there's your improvement (not much, but - -). The cars are heavier now so not as many people die in crashes as they did in the '70's, hence even maintaining the fuel economy is an improvement. Comparing a '70's car to one today is apples to oranges. I

Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-27 Thread Meade Dillon via Mercedes
42 mpg... I can get 42 mpg in my '87 wagon, if I go about 40 mpg... downhill... with a tailwind - Max Charleston SC On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Curt Raymond via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > Took my '05 Golf to Hannibal, New York Friday for a "True North

Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-27 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
be hard on mileage. -Curt From: Meade Dillon <dillonm...@gmail.com> To: Curt Raymond <curtlud...@yahoo.com>; Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 9:59 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf I don't think an

Re: [MBZ] OT: Trial by fire for the Golf

2015-09-27 Thread Meade Dillon via Mercedes
Less pollution! Well, no, they've got to cheat to get less pollution - Max Charleston SC On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Curly McLain via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > VW could beat that in the 70s. my 79 wabbit got 45+. The audi 4000 got > 45 or better > >