Donald Snook wrote:
What are you talking about with Reagan?
In 1986, President Reagan signed a federal law banning the manufacture of
machine guns for the
civilian market and banning the transfer and possession of machine guns not
lawfully possessed
before May 19, 1986. These firearms, if
You're apparently still young enough to believe that Repugnants
are different from Demonrats. Reagan and GWB have done more to
grow government and shrink individual liberties than FDR, LBJ,
and WJC put together.
Together both parties have run a pretty impressive good cop,
bad cop scam for
Jim Cathey wrote:
Together both parties have run a pretty impressive good cop,
bad cop scam for years. All anyone really does is argue about
which party is which cop. Doesn't change the game any.
I'm beginning to think the real scam is in convincing us that there are two
different
parties
Mitch wrote: In 1986, President Reagan signed a federal law banning the
manufacture of machine guns for the civilian market and banning the transfer
and possession of machine guns not lawfully possessed before May 19, 1986.
You're apparently still young enough to believe that Repugnants are
Donald Snook wrote:
In fact, the NRA lobbied on behalf of its passage.
Just one of many reasons that NRA stands for Negotiates Rights Away.
An alternative meaning is National Republican Association.
The NRA supports gun control much the same as the NAACP supports racial strife.
In both cases,
yeah, but realize that mitch also believes the nra is anti-gun as well.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Donald Snook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mitch wrote: In 1986, President Reagan signed a federal law banning the
manufacture of machine guns for the civilian market and banning the transfer
Gary Hurst wrote:
yeah, but realize that mitch also believes the nra is anti-gun as well.
That pretty much sums up my opinion. They lobbied for NFA '34 GCA '68, they
wrote the provisions
for the National Instant Check System (AKA prior restraint on civil rights),
they helped Carolyn
Sorry guys, I don't understand some of this stuff.
How can Mercedes owners disparage about BMW owners?
My little secret confession - I own an old MBZ diesel for comfort and
utility.
And I own an old BMW .. for fun.
The first time I drove one of those nimble little rockets, I decided that
some day
Reason is that around here all the yuppie poseurs (and their wives or
girlfriends) buy one, usually a 3 series, when they get a bit of money
and then proceed to drive them like jerks, aux lights on all the time,
yapping on their cell phones, and generally annoying me (and I presume
lots of
Oh come on, tell us about those porsh owners??? lol. ;-)
Ed
300E
2008/6/15 Rich Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Reason is that around here all the yuppie poseurs (and their wives or
girlfriends) buy one, usually a 3 series, when they get a bit of money
and then proceed to drive them like jerks,
Mitch wrote: And how do you place (thanks, Ron Reagan) a total ban on the
licensing of constitutionally guaranteed property that wasn't previously
licensed and taxed?
What are you talking about with Reagan?
Donald H. Snook
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For
It's like the rivalry between GM and Fraud, each thinks the other are a
bunch of wallys.
Obviously I am biased but generally money waster drivers tend to be
worse drivers, displaying a lot of bad habits.
I don't think so much prestige driven (specially not with bargain bin
Mercs) but more the
Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)
You are such a buzz killer.
--R
LarryT wrote:
You can probably mount one - and it'll be ok until you use it *once* as
the
police will hunt you down like a dog
PORSCHE POSTERS! youroil.net
800-583-8601
Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
- Original Message -
From: Mitch Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order
I put a pair of 100W Dick Cepek off-road pencil beams (you get a mile or
so of reach on the beach, like daylight) on my old Blazer, had them
aimed right into the windshield of that oncoming BMW that always has its
aux driving lights on, and aimed right at my eyes. Blink the brights a
few
Rich Thomas wrote:
I have pointed out to various dimwits occasionally that their lights are
inappropriate and offensive when pointed at another driver, I usually
get told to FO or something similar by the good citizens.
That's why I always carry a pocket knife. Copper wire cuts easy, unless
, June 12, 2008 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)
LarryT wrote:
Speaking of the ACLU - snip lots of nasty cases They fight for all
those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
Amendment.
http://www.aclu.org/police/gen
POSTERS! youroil.net
800-583-8601
Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
- Original Message -
From: John Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june
-
From: John Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)
LarryT wrote:
Speaking of the ACLU - snip lots of nasty cases They fight for all
those
andrew strasfogel wrote:
My s.o. using suggested paintball on these traffic anarchists...
Didn't somebody on this list suggest dart guns, and if a car has two darts on
it the cops get to pull him over and write him a ticket?
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For
] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)
LarryT wrote:
Speaking of the ACLU - They fight for all
those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
Amendment.
http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)
andrew strasfogel wrote:
My s.o. using suggested paintball on these traffic anarchists...
Didn't somebody on this list suggest dart guns, and if a car has two darts
on
it the cops get to pull him over and write him
Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)
John Robbins wrote:
I didn't much care for that either, but what about the last paragraph?
The historical definition of arms
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)
For those who missed it:
If indeed the Second Amendment provides an absolute, constitutional
protection for the right to bear arms in order to preserve the power of
the
people to resist government tyranny, then it must allow
://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
- Original Message -
From: Rich Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)
I would like a high-powered UV laser to mount on my truck
! youroil.net
800-583-8601
Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
- Original Message -
From: Rich Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944
LarryT wrote:
Ya'll probably know there are people who own awesome fully auto weapons
already - all needed is a license which comes with a background check and
fee.
But how do you license and tax a constitutionally guaranteed civil right? Is it
OK if I make you
pass a background check and
PROTECTED]
To: 'Mercedes Discussion List' mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)
and even got a soapbox moment
regarding religion.
Many good issues raised, but I'll let more qualified folk address them. I
couldn't
PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)
Geez Larry,
You even managed to rant about gun ownership in your dissertation
about our education system thread and even got a soapbox moment
regarding religion.
Amazing...
On 6/11/08, LarryT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
LarryT wrote:
Speaking of the ACLU - snip lots of nasty cases They fight for all
those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
Amendment.
http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts
John Robbins wrote:
http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html
Yep, it's absurd. The ACLU believes that in all the BOR, people means you and
I, except for
the 2A, in which people means standing army.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see
Mitch Haley wrote:
John Robbins wrote:
http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html
Yep, it's absurd. The ACLU believes that in all the BOR, people means you
and I, except for
the 2A, in which people means standing army.
I didn't much care for that either, but what about the last
John Robbins wrote:
I didn't much care for that either, but what about the last paragraph?
The historical definition of arms in the 2A would best be described as
all the terrible implements of the soldier. Although private ownership of
field pieces and ship's cannon was commonplace at the time,
] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)
LarryT wrote:
Speaking of the ACLU - snip lots of nasty cases They fight for all
those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
Amendment.
http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html
Mitch wrote I don't know who/what to blame for the
apparent changes in our culture, but the public education system
I believe there is a multi-pronged attack on the capitalist system.
Education is high on the list as our youth are moved away from basic
education and spend more time
Geez Larry,
You even managed to rant about gun ownership in your dissertation
about our education system thread and even got a soapbox moment
regarding religion.
Amazing...
On 6/11/08, LarryT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mitch wrote I don't know who/what to blame for the
apparent
and even got a soapbox moment
regarding religion.
Many good issues raised, but I'll let more qualified folk address them. I
couldn't help but notice your religion section was conspicuously
circumscribed in speaking of what was banned and more than a bit short on
why. .
BillR, been going to
Larry,
I'm hip to alot of what you wrote but consider the other side of the equation.
Nearly all of the fresh surface water in the world is polluted.
More people have breathing disorders now than ever.
Don't even get me started on places like Centralia...
The religious right wants the theory of
38 matches
Mail list logo
