Here's an interesting regression caused by Mesa commit
c76d4db25260dd68684bf784efacd7323c7cab8b
(http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=c76d4db25260dd68684bf784efacd7323c7cab8b).
It shows itself only when Mesa is configured with --enable-debug. In this case
the i965_dri.so driver
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 11:25 -0800, Jerome Glisse wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit puzzled, how a pipe driver should handle
draw callback failure ? On radeon (pretty sure nouveau
or intel hit the same issue) we can only know when one
of the draw_* context callback is call if we can do
the rendering or
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 21:35 -0800, Corbin Simpson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Joakim Sindholt b...@zhasha.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 20:25 +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit puzzled, how a
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 03:21 -0800, José Fonseca wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 11:25 -0800, Jerome Glisse wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit puzzled, how a pipe driver should handle
draw callback failure ? On radeon (pretty sure nouveau
or intel hit the same issue) we can only know when one
of the
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:46:08AM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 03:21 -0800, José Fonseca wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 11:25 -0800, Jerome Glisse wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit puzzled, how a pipe driver should handle
draw callback failure ? On radeon (pretty sure
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 03:55 -0800, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:46:08AM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 03:21 -0800, José Fonseca wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 11:25 -0800, Jerome Glisse wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit puzzled, how a pipe driver should
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:55:09PM +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
So you don't like the pipe_context::validate() of Jose ? My
taste goes to the pipe_context::validate() and having state
tracker setting the proper flag according to the API they
support (GL_OUT_OF_MEMORY for GL), this means just
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 04:07 -0800, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 03:55 -0800, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:46:08AM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 03:21 -0800, José Fonseca wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 11:25 -0800, Jerome Glisse wrote:
Falling back to CPU rendering, while respecting the OpenGL spec, is
likely going to be unusably slow in most cases and thus not really
better for real usage than just not rendering.
I think the only way to have an usable fallback mechanism is to do
fallbacks with the GPU, by automatically
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 20:46 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
Howdy
I'm hoping to merge the gallium-winsys-handle branch to master this
weekend or early next week. The branch adds two new pipe screen
functions to be used by the co state tracker (state tracker manger in
new st_api.h speak).
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 16:48 -0800, Mike Stroyan wrote:
The ifdef changes to allow building with older libdrm and glproto
header files are working.
But the configure.ac requirements are still aggressive, requiring
LIBDRM_REQUIRED=2.4.15
and
GLPROTO_REQUIRED=1.4.11
Could those back down now
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:55:09PM +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
So you don't like the pipe_context::validate() of Jose ? My
taste goes to the pipe_context::validate() and having state
tracker setting the proper flag according
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:24:19PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 04:07 -0800, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 03:55 -0800, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:46:08AM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 03:21 -0800, José Fonseca
On 1 mar 2010, at 13.05, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 20:46 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
Howdy
I'm hoping to merge the gallium-winsys-handle branch to master this
weekend or early next week. The branch adds two new pipe screen
functions to be used by the co state tracker
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 02:57:08PM +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
validate function i have in mind as virtualy a zero cost (it will
boil down to a bunch of add followed by a test) and what validate
would do would be done by draw operation anyway.
Not would, will. You have no way to be sure
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26820
Summary: Sharing contexts crashes on Windows
Product: Mesa
Version: 7.6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: high
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:24:51PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 02:57:08PM +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
validate function i have in mind as virtualy a zero cost (it will
boil down to a bunch of add followed by a test) and what validate
would do would be done by draw
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Jerome Glisse gli...@freedesktop.orgwrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:24:19PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 04:07 -0800, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 03:55 -0800, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:46:08AM
On 1 mar 2010, at 15.23, Jose Fonseca wrote:
Module: Mesa
Branch: gallium-format-cleanup
Commit: 4c3bfc9778d9a0a75bf93b15303a4839f971f695
URL:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=4c3bfc9778d9a0a75bf93b15303a4839f971f695
Author: José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com
Date: Mon
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:21:45PM +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Jerome Glisse gli...@freedesktop.orgwrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:24:19PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 04:07 -0800, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 03:55
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:08:32PM +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
Do you have solution/proposal/idea on how to handle the situation
i am describing ?
I've been looking at gallium from far away, but it seems to me you
have two independant issues:
- informing the caller of errors in atomic draw()
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 06:24 -0800, Olivier Galibert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 02:57:08PM +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
validate function i have in mind as virtualy a zero cost (it will
boil down to a bunch of add followed by a test) and what validate
would do would be done by draw
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 07:33 -0800, Olivier Galibert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:08:32PM +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
Do you have solution/proposal/idea on how to handle the situation
i am describing ?
I've been looking at gallium from far away, but it seems to me you
have two
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 07:32 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 1 mar 2010, at 15.23, Jose Fonseca wrote:
Module: Mesa
Branch: gallium-format-cleanup
Commit: 4c3bfc9778d9a0a75bf93b15303a4839f971f695
URL:
Wow, this really got a lot of discussion.
I don't really care *where* the sanity code is, but it just seems
horribly wrong that it's got to be duplicated between per-hook
per-driver in a library that purports simplified drivers with reduced
LOCs. I suppose it's unavoidable to a degree as long as
Hi,
This branch removes bypass_vs_clip_and_viewport flag from pipe
rasterizer state. The benefits of having this bit around were dubious
for everybody and burdensome for driver writers.
All the utility code that relied on this flag have been rewritten to
pass vertex positions in clip space
On 1 mar 2010, at 13.45, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 1 mar 2010, at 13.05, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 20:46 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
Howdy
I'm hoping to merge the gallium-winsys-handle branch to master this
weekend or early next week. The branch adds two new pipe
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 08:47 -0800, Jose Fonseca wrote:
Module: Mesa
Branch: master
Commit: 9beb302212a2afac408016cbd7b93c8b859e4910
URL:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=9beb302212a2afac408016cbd7b93c8b859e4910
Author: José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com
Date: Fri Feb
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26820
José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jfons...@vmware.com
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 09:03 -0800, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 08:47 -0800, Jose Fonseca wrote:
Module: Mesa
Branch: master
Commit: 9beb302212a2afac408016cbd7b93c8b859e4910
URL:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=9beb302212a2afac408016cbd7b93c8b859e4910
Hi,
this branch turns vertex element into a cso, so instead of
set_vertex_elements there's now the triad of
create/bind/delete_vertex_elements_state. I have converted all the
drivers except nouveau (I didn't do it because Christoph Bumiller
already did nv50, but I can give the rest of them a
I see that PK2US and friends are being removed.
These would be necessary to implement NV_fragment_program_option,
NV_fragment_program2 and NV_gpu_program4.
Currently the no drivers (including Nouveau) support them, but since
we already have some support in Mesa (even parsers for the nVidia
On 01.03.2010 19:02, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Hi,
this branch turns vertex element into a cso, so instead of
set_vertex_elements there's now the triad of
create/bind/delete_vertex_elements_state. I have converted all the
drivers except nouveau (I didn't do it because Christoph Bumiller
R300 could benefit. I will push a patch to make it more useful after the
merge.
Posting from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
On Mar 1, 2010 11:32 AM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com wrote:
On 01.03.2010 19:02, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Hi,
this branch turns vertex element into a
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26820
Karl Schultz karl.w.schu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Hi.
I've got motherboard with Intel i855GME card.
I've build eagle (from krh's repository, commit
5af77e7525f42d7c5fa4429a633cf844d6b935f2) using:
1. drm-2.4.18
2. Mesa-7.7
3. linux kernel 2.6.33-rc8
And I was able to run demos fine (but gears with flicker sometimes).
After that I've started
Latest mesa does not compile.
Thanks.
Johannes
gcc -c -I../../include -I../../src/mesa -I../../src/gallium/include
-I../../src/gallium/auxiliary -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -std=c99
-ffast-math -fvisibility=hidden -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -DUSE_X86_ASM
-DUSE_MMX_ASM -DUSE_3DNOW_ASM
Bugzilla from johannesoberm...@gmx.de wrote:
Latest mesa does not compile.
Thanks.
Johannes
gcc -c -I../../include -I../../src/mesa -I../../src/gallium/include
-I../../src/gallium/auxiliary -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -std=c99
-ffast-math -fvisibility=hidden
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 19:02 +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Hi,
this branch turns vertex element into a cso, so instead of
set_vertex_elements there's now the triad of
create/bind/delete_vertex_elements_state. I have converted all the
drivers except nouveau (I didn't do it because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are a few places in Mesa where we check the GCC version and have
alternate code paths. It looks like almost all of the checks go away if
we require GCC version of at least 3.3.0. The last 3.2 (or earlier)
release was in April of 2003. It
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Johannes Obermayr
johannesoberm...@gmx.de wrote:
Latest mesa does not compile.
Thanks.
Johannes
gcc -c -I../../include -I../../src/mesa -I../../src/gallium/include
-I../../src/gallium/auxiliary -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -std=c99
-ffast-math
Hi Michal,
This branch breaks 2 piglit tests with r300g:
depthrange-clear
texdepth
However I haven't investigated these and won't get to them until the
weekend. I personally don't mind fixing the regressions after the merge (but
I'm not the maintainer of r300g). Anyway I'm glad to see
The recent changes to _glapi_check_table included building the full
version build every time. That broke builds for OpenGL ES1 and
OpenGL ES2. They don't have all of the table members that OpenGL
does.
This first broke in commit 42f3241e04b6cd74829dfb64b4a154ac8a4e6a48
in glapi/glapi.c.
But the
that was me, should compile now
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Mike Stroyan m...@lunarg.com wrote:
The recent changes to _glapi_check_table included building the full
version build every time. That broke builds for OpenGL ES1 and
OpenGL ES2. They don't have all of the table members that
Ahhh, I am a bad liar. The attached patch fixes the regressions.
-Marek
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michal,
This branch breaks 2 piglit tests with r300g:
depthrange-clear
texdepth
However I haven't investigated these and won't get to them until
On 02.03.2010 00:18, Joakim Sindholt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 19:02 +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Hi,
this branch turns vertex element into a cso, so instead of
set_vertex_elements there's now the triad of
create/bind/delete_vertex_elements_state. I have converted all the
drivers
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 04:02 +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
On 02.03.2010 00:18, Joakim Sindholt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 19:02 +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Hi,
this branch turns vertex element into a cso, so instead of
set_vertex_elements there's now the triad of
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26832
Summary: [bisected glx]: assert triggered by kwin, when
glxCreateWindow is called with NULL attrib_list
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26832
--- Comment #1 from Magnus Kessler magnus.kess...@gmx.net 2010-03-01
22:50:14 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=33677)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=33677)
proposed fix
On closer inspection it appears that the variable
В сообщении от Monday 01 March 2010 02:25:01 Francisco Jerez написал(а):
randrianas...@gmail.com writes:
Hello all!
After unsuccesfull battle with git-send-email I just send these two
patches from Kmail. Botch as attachments and inlin, but inline version
probably will be damaged in
From fa7842908e2109b5c976e0d7082f67dfe2437dc2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Randrianasulu rand...@mail.ru
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 03:29:51 +
Subject: [PATCH] nouveau: Trivially add GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat. Texwrap demo not working fully yet
---
Another trivial patch: nouveau classic driver has everything needed for
GL_NV_blend_square, just expose extension. Tested with tests/blendsquare
В сообщении от Monday 01 March 2010 02:25:01 вы написали:
randrianas...@gmail.com writes:
Hello all!
After unsuccesfull battle with
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26820
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Zerbst s.zer...@gom.com 2010-03-01 23:32:54 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=33681)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=33681)
Sample program to reproduce the crash
This sample program (simple
53 matches
Mail list logo
