Hi,
this issue should be already solved on trunk. So I guess you are
using 3.x version, aren't you?
Regards,
Kai
--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium
28 апр. 2014 г., в 14:51, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com написал(а):
Hi,
this issue should be already solved on trunk. So I guess you are
using 3.x version, aren't you?
Yes, x86_64-4.9.0-release-win32-seh-rt_v3-rev0.7z have mingw-w64 v3 from trunk.
Regards,
Alexey.
Regards,
Kai
Hi,
mingw-w64 may migrate from svn to git in the future, seeing that sf can
now do multiple repos per project.
Structure wise, everything under trunk will still stay together in the
new repo, but any externals, /experimental/* and /web may move into its
own repo.
Discuss.
signature.asc
Hi,
as JonY said, do we think about switching to git. Of couse such a
step might shows side-effects to our users. So we would like to get
your opinion and thoughts for this step.
As svn-repository works a bit different as git, we will need to
restructure our branches, tags, trunk, and
-Original Message-
From: JonY [mailto:jo...@users.sourceforge.net]
Hi,
mingw-w64 may migrate from svn to git in the future, seeing that sf can now
do multiple repos per project.
Structure wise, everything under trunk will still stay together in the new
repo,
but any
2014-04-28 13:30 GMT+02:00 Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com:
Hi,
as JonY said, do we think about switching to git. Of couse such a
step might shows side-effects to our users. So we would like to get
your opinion and thoughts for this step.
As svn-repository works a bit different as git,
On 4/28/2014 19:53, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
Different repositories may sound like a nice idea, but keeping them in sync
can be a pain, depending on the complexity of the subprojects. I believe
stuff like ironcrate, winpthreads and perhaps the mingw-w64-tools folder
deserve their own repo, as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.04.2014 17:04, JonY wrote:
On 4/28/2014 19:53, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
Different repositories may sound like a nice idea, but keeping them in
sync can be a pain, depending on the complexity of the subprojects. I
believe stuff like ironcrate,
On 4/28/2014 5:17 AM, JonY wrote:
mingw-w64 may migrate from svn to git in the future, seeing that sf can
now do multiple repos per project.
*snip*
Discuss.
I'm a bit surprised at the choice of Git -- in my experience, Windows
developers usually prefer Mercurial
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, LRN wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.04.2014 17:04, JonY wrote:
On 4/28/2014 19:53, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
Different repositories may sound like a nice idea, but keeping them in
sync can be a pain, depending on the complexity of the
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:04 AM, John E. / TDM tdra...@tdragon.net wrote:
On 4/28/2014 5:17 AM, JonY wrote:
mingw-w64 may migrate from svn to git in the future, seeing that sf can
now do multiple repos per project.
*snip*
Discuss.
I'm a bit surprised at the choice of Git -- in my
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, LRN lrn1...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.04.2014 17:04, JonY wrote:
On 4/28/2014 19:53, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
Different repositories may sound like a nice idea, but keeping them in
sync can be a pain, depending
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, JonY wrote:
Hi,
mingw-w64 may migrate from svn to git in the future, seeing that sf can
now do multiple repos per project.
Structure wise, everything under trunk will still stay together in the
new repo, but any externals, /experimental/* and /web may move into its
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Jon wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, LRN lrn1...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.04.2014 17:04, JonY wrote:
On 4/28/2014 19:53, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
Different repositories may sound like a nice idea, but keeping
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.04.2014 22:42, Adrien Nader wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:04 AM, John E. / TDM tdra...@tdragon.net
wrote:
On 4/28/2014 5:17 AM, JonY wrote:
mingw-w64 may migrate from svn to git in the
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:04 AM, John E. / TDM tdra...@tdragon.net wrote:
On 4/28/2014 5:17 AM, JonY wrote:
mingw-w64 may migrate from svn to git in the future, seeing
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, LRN wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.04.2014 22:42, Adrien Nader wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:04 AM, John E. / TDM tdra...@tdragon.net
wrote:
On 4/28/2014 5:17 AM, JonY wrote:
On 04/28/14 13:17, JonY wrote:
Discuss.
I will just add a huge YEAH from me. I'm happy to help with the migration.
Cheers,
Jacek
--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, LRN wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.04.2014 22:42, Adrien Nader wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:04 AM, John E. / TDM
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:04 AM, John E. / TDM tdra...@tdragon.net wrote:
On 4/28/2014 5:17 AM, JonY wrote:
One more note on the TODO: chose how commits are organized.
I like: feature branches (I think everyone does) and rebase on master
before merge provided the branch hasn't been merged elsewhere too.
This gives a linear history which is much nicer than octopuss-shaped
graphs. In case anyone doubts
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:04 AM, John E. / TDM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.04.2014 23:29, Matthew Brett wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, LRN wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 28.04.2014 22:42, Adrien Nader wrote:
On Mon, Apr
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:05 PM, LRN lrn1...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.04.2014 23:29, Matthew Brett wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, LRN wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
On 4/28/2014 12:11 PM, Jon wrote:
Regarding git vs. mercurial on windows, I use both on a daily basis,
like both, but prefer git. The only performance complaint I've had
relates to garbage collection. If you try to `git gc --aggressive
--prune=now` a large repo, you'll often find that the
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Jon wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, LRN lrn1...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.04.2014 17:04, JonY wrote:
On 4/28/2014 19:53, Ruben Van
Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org writes:
I quite dislike github and its UI in particular. Uses flash on every
page (no idea what for) and lots of javascript which makes my laptop
heat and get noisy when displaying something as small as a 3-lines diff.
I see no flash at all on Github (it is
27 matches
Mail list logo
