On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 06:50:54PM +0200, Marcus Lindemann wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I must admit I never tried that before myself on OBSD, but did use BT
on phones on different occasions.
I see several points of potential failures here.
1.) Bluetooth connection
Are you sure you
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 09:15:58PM +0200, RedShift wrote:
I cannot see how this would be exploitable. root doesn't have . in it's
PATH. Other people were discussing cat and cta for example. For this to
work, one would have to be able to write to the victim's home directory,
$ cd /tmp
$
When would you NOT use OpenBSD?
When would you choose one of the other *nix over OpenBSD?
I'm NOT using OpenBSD on my laptop, it's powered by FreeBSD instead.
Basically this is due to lack of acpi and bluetooth support in OpenBSD.
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, chefren wrote:
We have found an 'interesting interaction' between the gcc compiler and
OpenBSD's inline assembly definition of ntohs().
The resulting bug in the generated assembly causes corrupted data under
the following circumstances:
* The 16-bit value from
Nick Guenther wrote:
The AR5212 cards are still buggy (for example, mine doesn't work). I
don't know what that means for the 5213 ones, but it's probably not
good. On the other hand, I know that the developers have been really
pushing on the vendors for support (yay!).
Ok, thanks.
I returned
Hi All,
Our router is humming along nicely, and my prev post re moving a mount
was answered perfectly and is scheduled for tonite - THANKS :)
One problem I am having is VPN issues. Firstly, I know a router
shouldn't also do VPNing, and we will setup another box to do specific
VPN hand off, but
I installed a route-collector in my test network to get a better view on
things.
Originator is backwards.
/Tony
quagga-bgpd# sh ip bgp 192.168.10.0
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.10.0/24
Paths: (11 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
Local
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#ppp myisp
Working in interactive mode
using interface: tun0
#dial
Warning:Chat script failed
here is what you need see your BT devices
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20050114160755mode=flat
Have a look at :
Essential C++, Stanley B. Lippman, Addison-Wesley, ISBN: 0-201-48518-4
Accelerated C++, Andrew Koenig Barbara E. Moo, Addison-Wesley, ISBN:
0-201-70353-X
They will get you programming faster than most books, which I personally
find is a good thing :-)
Good Luck.
Si
On
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
This has been spotted before. The PR was closed since we do not
support non-standard options to gcc, so it does not affect OpenBSD base.
On the other hand, I find this interesting, since it might be an
indication of other bugs lurking. Good that you
Hello,
I have just experienced the weird situation that I see a number of
pings show negative times:
$ ping 172.20.10.1
PING 172.20.10.1 (172.20.10.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 172.20.10.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=162.004 ms
64 bytes from 172.20.10.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=-3.-995 ms
64 bytes
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 03:25:24PM -0700, Miles Keaton wrote:
This is a serious question, for heavy users of OpenBSD in
big/production/heavy-traffic situations.
For years, our small company used OpenBSD for *EVERYTHING* because I
personally prefer it. (We run a pretty popular
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Karl Kopp wrote:
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr 3des
hash md5
authentication pre-share
group 2
Last time I tried, I had to specify an explicit lifetime for the
phase 1 policy here.
run isakmpd -K -d, then ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf and get:
170525.073348 Default
Hello Chris,
On Wed, 05.04.2006 at 04:55:39 +0200, Chris Alatakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
holding more than 30 domain names some with lot of traffic almost
what is a lot of traffic?
unpatched and unupdated (3.2 stable). I bet if I left it there unpatched
for the next 5 years I will not
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed a route-collector in my test network to get a better view on
things.
Originator is backwards.
Correction, I installed a route-collector in my openbgp network
which peers with all boxes. According the route-collector all
Oups yes ... sorry for that here it is. This chinese for me so I hope you
can help me on this
issue.
I see you've added debug to the pppd option file, have you
enabled the debugging to the logfile in syslog as well (pppd(8)
explains that). Your syslogd.conf should be configured to log
Sorry ... for previous post
Here it is:
Apr 5 09:30:12 nc6000 pppd[32382]: pppd 2.3.5 started by didier, uid 1000
Apr 5 09:30:15 nc6000 pppd[32382]: Serial connection established.
Apr 5 09:30:16 nc6000 pppd[32382]: Using interface ppp0
Apr 5 09:30:16 nc6000 pppd[32382]: Connect: ppp0 --
Hi,
I have the problem to set up an OpenBSD 3.8
VPN Router with the following Network configuration:
___
| |
10.0.0.0/8 ---| Box 1 |__ _
|___| | | |
___ |_|OBSD | 192.168.0.0/24
well, If you are not happy with the SMP performance in FreeBSD you
won't be in OpenBSD either.
Also, MySQL performance is worse in OpenBSD due to the threading
library used, I would suggest to wait at least until rthreads are
complete and stable if you must make the switch nevertheless.
I have a source tree for 3.8-stable, updated using cvsup. Have
successfully used this source tree to do a 'make build' for i386,
however, when I attempt the first step for cross compiling for mac68k:
( cd /usr/src; make TARGET=mac68k cross-distrib )
It hangs at the following:
(cd
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:27:03AM +0200, Ingbert Zan wrote:
Does anybody know how to distinguish between the two flows?
you can't.
Of course it would be possible to NAT the two 10/8 networks
on Box 1 and 2.
do that.
I did a dmesg trying to use a bluetooth adaptor to connect to the mobile
phone and use it as a modem, which I can't fully post here as the OBSD3.8
is installed in a laptop without internet access but I copied by hand the
lines relating to the bluetooth adaptor and this is what is says on the
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Karl Kopp wrote:
Hi Damien,
Firstly, do you think I will be able to do this with the
/etc/ipsec.conf setup, or will I have to go thru all the
/etc/isakmpd/* stuff?
I haven't yet used ipsecctl to set up a VPN, but in theory it
shouldn't matter which way you go.
Hi Damien,
Firstly, do you think I will be able to do this with the
/etc/ipsec.conf setup, or will I have to go thru all the
/etc/isakmpd/* stuff?
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr 3des
hash md5
authentication pre-share
group 2
Last time I tried, I had to specify an explicit lifetime
http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
Scroll down to the section 'Permissions - the flip side' and consider the
consequences of the statements in paragraph 4.
This section is probably the biggest one that supports my view that GPL
cannot be recinded and after initiation and that all GPL code should
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-05 10:44]:
OpenBSD just isn't the fastest around
actually, we are.
for quite some stuff.
we're not for some other stuff.
--
BS Web Services, http://www.bsws.de/
OpenBSD-based Webhosting, Mail Services, Managed Servers, ...
Unix is very simple, but
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 05:13:36PM +1000, Karl Kopp wrote:
Firstly, I thought I could just use /etc/ipsec.conf (right?) and a
line like this:
ike esp from 10.1.1.0/24 to 202.1.1.0/24 peer 202.1.1.30 main auth
hmac-md5 enc 3des psk shhhSecret
this looks correct.
Additionally to the debug
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 09:11:25AM +, Didier Wiroth wrote:
Apr 5 10:57:04 nc6000 pppd[29026]: IPCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Apr 5 10:57:04 nc6000 pppd[29026]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 No network
protocols running]
Apr 5 10:57:07 nc6000 pppd[29026]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x3 No
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed a route-collector in my test network to get a better view on
things.
Originator is backwards.
Correction, I installed a route-collector in my openbgp network
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, chefren wrote:
[snip]
How do you think that irritating recommendation will ever get away
without
debugging?
By getting rid of gcc.
; Sorry could not resist that one ;-)
Actually I bet ntohs16 is
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:36:52AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
ugen0 at uhub1 port 1
ugen0: Broadcom Belkin Bluetooth Device, rev 1.10/0.01 , addr2
syncing disks...
ugen(4) is a generic usb driver, for devices which doesn't have any
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:11:49PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
actually, we are.
for quite some stuff.
the install for one. i love the install. 8-)
tor
On 2006/04/05 10:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ugen0: Broadcom Belkin Bluetooth Device, rev 1.10/0.01 , addr2
ugen(4) says:
The ugen driver provides support for all USB devices that do not have a
special driver. It supports access to all parts of the device, but not
in a way that is as
GOT IT :) Love it when it all falls in place :)
Damiens advice of -D99 worked a treat - we saw that the quick and main
auths were not playing nice so I had to add the 'quick auth hmac-md5
enc 3des' bits as well - DOH!
I must say tho that /etc/ipsec.conf is MUCH easier than the old way so
nice
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:44:22AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/04/04 20:21, David Hill wrote:
Are you using floppyB, which supports RAID controllers?
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#MkInsMedia
OpenBSD 3.8 (RAMDISK_CD) #794: Sat Sep 10 15:58:32 MDT 2005
So does the CD -
David Diggles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a source tree for 3.8-stable, updated using cvsup. Have
successfully used this source tree to do a 'make build' for i386,
however, when I attempt the first step for cross compiling for mac68k:
( cd /usr/src; make TARGET=mac68k cross-distrib )
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:11:49PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-05 10:44]:
OpenBSD just isn't the fastest around
actually, we are.
for quite some stuff.
we're not for some other stuff.
Okay, that's true. Good correction.
Still, for MySQL and
After a jug of coffee I tried being a bit more methodical.
I took the entire network down and brought up one router at a time.
I monitored the prefix 192.168.30.0/24 from a route-collector sitting on
192.168.30.10,
the first router brought online was ar213-FRA which has 192.168.30.0/24 as
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After a jug of coffee I tried being a bit more methodical.
I took the entire network down and brought up one router at a time.
I monitored the prefix 192.168.30.0/24 from a route-collector sitting on
192.168.30.10,
the first router
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:45:22AM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
I installed a route-collector in my test network to get a better view on
things.
Originator is backwards.
/Tony
quagga-bgpd# sh ip bgp 192.168.10.0
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.10.0/24
Paths: (11 available, best #2,
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-05 13:22]:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:11:49PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-05 10:44]:
OpenBSD just isn't the fastest around
actually, we are.
for quite some stuff.
we're not for some other
Additionally, hardware support is not as good as from, say, Linux. Or
even FreeBSD. And if the hardware is not supported, an OpenBSD box
doesn't do a whole lot of good.
Really?
So having a crappy or blobbed driver is better than having nothing?
I disagree vehemently .
Give me something that
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:56PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
On a side note, at this stage I did:
cr211-FRA# bgpctl reload
reload request sent.
cr211-FRA#
on the neighbor cr212-FRA I get this:
Apr 5 13:13:39 cr212-FRA
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:56PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
On a side note, at this stage I did:
cr211-FRA# bgpctl reload
reload request sent.
cr211-FRA#
on
On Apr 5, 2006, at 8:04 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Additionally, hardware support is not as good as from, say, Linux. Or
even FreeBSD. And if the hardware is not supported, an OpenBSD box
doesn't do a whole lot of good.
Really?
So having a crappy or blobbed driver is better than having
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:45:22AM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
I installed a route-collector in my test network to get a better view on
things.
Originator is backwards.
/Tony
quagga-bgpd# sh ip bgp 192.168.10.0
BGP routing table
Hope this is OK to place this commercial:
Watch this nice and complete OpenBSD fan set from ixsoft:
http://www.ixsoft.de/cgi-bin/web_store.cgi?ref=Products/de/OOOB0390BU.html
--
Oliver Peter, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ# 113969174
Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The Queen is
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:19:44PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:56PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
On a side note, at this stage I did:
The Broadcom Blutonium chipset is a special case. It requires a firmware
download for the device to function as a Bluetooth device.
ubt currently does not support the download but will recognise the adaptor
once the firmware is downloaded. I do have a preliminary patch set that I
created (it's a
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:19:44PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:56PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:19:44PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:56PM +0100, tony sarendal
I taught from C++ How to Program by Deitel Deitel and found it to be
a good book.
Anything from O'Reilly is typically gold.
As has been mentioned, there is also the book written by the creator of
the language.
All in all, I recommend going to a book store and looking through the
suggested
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hello,
re
I have just experienced the weird situation that I see a number of
pings show negative times:
smp has issues wrt gettimeofday()...
$ ping 172.20.10.1
PING 172.20.10.1 (172.20.10.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from
Hello
I'm trying to build an AP with OpenBSD as for now I only have my MSI USB
WLAN you can see the products info here -
http://www.msicomputer.com/product/detail_spec/product_detail.asp?model=UB11B
but when I plug the usb to my openbsd it only detect is as generic usb
device (ugenc0) which
David Hill wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:44:22AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/04/04 20:21, David Hill wrote:
Are you using floppyB, which supports RAID controllers?
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#MkInsMedia
OpenBSD 3.8 (RAMDISK_CD) #794: Sat Sep 10 15:58:32
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 11:01:22 +0100 Andrew Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
Scroll down to the section 'Permissions - the flip side' and consider
the consequences of the statements in paragraph 4.
This section is probably the biggest one that supports my
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:04:45AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Additionally, hardware support is not as good as from, say, Linux. Or
even FreeBSD. And if the hardware is not supported, an OpenBSD box
doesn't do a whole lot of good.
Really?
So having a crappy or blobbed driver is better
Andrew Smith wrote:
http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
Scroll down to the section 'Permissions - the flip side' and consider the
consequences of the statements in paragraph 4.
This section is probably the biggest one that supports my view that GPL
cannot be recinded and after initiation and
On 4/5/06, Alexander Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Guenther wrote:
The AR5212 cards are still buggy (for example, mine doesn't work). I
don't know what that means for the 5213 ones, but it's probably not
good. On the other hand, I know that the developers have been really
pushing on
On 4/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to build an AP with OpenBSD as for now I only have my MSI USB
WLAN you can see the products info here -
http://www.msicomputer.com/product/detail_spec/product_detail.asp?model=UB11B
but when I plug the usb to my openbsd
On 4/5/06, Andrew Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
Scroll down to the section 'Permissions - the flip side' and consider the
consequences of the statements in paragraph 4.
This section is probably the biggest one that supports my view that GPL
cannot be
Actually, I agree. I originally had OpenBSD 3.6
installed on an i386 AT box with a SoundBlaster sound card.
The sound quality was rather soft, until I pumped the audio
to max (and I'm not hard of hearing).
However, the dvd drive worked perfectly under mplayer.
Having, never tried slackware, I
I'm not saying that having a blobbed driver in-tree would be an
improvement - however, a machine that runs is likely to be an
improvement over one that doesn't, at least for a while (because, as
pointed out, bugs like blobs).
bzzzt *wrong*
There is a whole market out there for this. It's
According to this site: http://broadcom.rapla.net/ it uses a Broadcom chipset,
its not supported.
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
According to this site: http://broadcom.rapla.net/ it uses a Broadcom chipset, its not supported.
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
I guess need to find a new one then too bad it will not work with openbsd
I run OpenBSD for almost anything that is exposed to insecure digital spaces,
like the
Internet, that needs to be seriously hardened. I run and Linux (or god forbid,
Windows) on
servers that can be a little soft because they are only exposed to trusted
access.
My company's main websites
http://www.hinterbergen.de/mala/min12xxw/
This is a userland driver (for cups, etc.) for Minolta winprinters,
e.g. 1350W. In theory it should work, but in practice I always get
device busy errors. I realize how such hardware fits in with the
OpenBSD stance on proprietary hardware, however given
On 4/5/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a user that is on WinXP. She uses Microsoft's Remote Desktop to
connect to a remote server (TCP port 3389). I have installed OpenBSD
3.8 to act as firewall for the office. She complains of serious
intermittent latency problems for this
Carmen GloriaNormalCarmen
Gloria3212006-04-03T13:01:00Z2006-04-03T13:05:00Z11327306186110.6626
150CleanClean21MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
www.montecatini.cl
!La Galerma de Arte Virtual Chilena!
Lo Eterno-Lo Efmmero
Marzo 2006
Claudia Penrroz
Antonios Anastasiadis wrote:
well, If you are not happy with the SMP performance in FreeBSD you
won't be in OpenBSD either.
Also, MySQL performance is worse in OpenBSD due to the threading
library used, I would suggest to wait at least until rthreads are
complete and stable if you must make the
Please guys, like I put in my original questions.
Quote
I don't want this to turn into a flame war however.
If that's where it might be going, don't answer.
Quote /
Lets stick to the essence of the question. So far I got one good answer
from Ted. Not sure yet that I fully understand it, or
On Apr 5, 2006, at 11:55 AM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I am of the opinion like many here that use what's for the job
This is something that can't be stressed enough -- always use the
tool that's most appropriate for the job.
OpenBSD can do everything other operating systems do. It's where I
Just wanted to let everyone know that I added monthly recurring donations to
the list of donation methods. Go sign up at:
http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html
http://www.openssh.org/donations.html
If it doesn't show up wait a little longer before all changes prorogate to
mirrors.
On Apr 5, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
If I see a GNU software that I like and the structure of it makes
sense, or I think it makes sense, but I don't want to correct the
bugs in it because it will stay under GNU. At what point, or how
can it be replace by a BSD one where
I'm not saying that having a blobbed driver in-tree would be an
improvement - however, a machine that runs is likely to be an
improvement over one that doesn't, at least for a while (because, as
pointed out, bugs like blobs).
I prefer looking at what's supported first and asked questions on the
On 4/5/06, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back to the original topic,
If what you are talking about is rather if you can replace some GPL
file by an equivalent one but BSD licensed file, the answer is yes (as
long as you don't copy-paste).
But what does that really mean. It
** Reply to message from Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed,
05 Apr 2006 15:25:52 -0400
Back to the original topic,
If what you are talking about is rather if you can replace some GPL
file by an equivalent one but BSD licensed file, the answer is yes (as
long as you don't copy-paste).
Donald J. Ankney wrote:
Vendor support is a sometimes criteria.
Well, if the Vendor support is so critical, then you will be better
served with OpenBSD for what they provide in their default system and
that's second to none! By far!
Anytime I had any problem that was specific to
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I'm not saying that having a blobbed driver in-tree would be an
improvement - however, a machine that runs is likely to be an
improvement over one that doesn't, at least for a while (because, as
pointed out, bugs like blobs).
I prefer looking at what's supported first
Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
For example, if you have a function that takes a string argument and
reverse the characters in it under GPL. You take what it does
(reverse character in a string) and re-implement it with your own
code. You can keep the same interface to the function (meaning name
and
As to the blobbed drivers, is it better to fail early when there are options
or later after you have committed? Makes a good open question.
Better not to run at all if it is wrong and not design properly. This
way, you don't waist many days trying to figure it out, or worst, loose
very
On Apr 5, 2006, at 3:41 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Just wanted to let everyone know that I added monthly recurring
donations to
the list of donation methods. Go sign up at:
http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html
http://www.openssh.org/donations.html
If it doesn't show up wait a little longer
On 05/04/06, Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 00:15:02 +0100 Andrew Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Linus faces this issue with future versions of Linux, he
doesn't like GPL 3 and won't accept it but he can't take GPL 2 off
Linux kernel since it is an evolving project and
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Donald J. Ankney wrote:
Vendor support is a sometimes criteria.
Well, if the Vendor support is so critical, then you will be better
served with OpenBSD for what they provide in their default system and
that's second to none! By far!
snip
Again do as you see
On Apr 5, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Donald J. Ankney wrote:
Vendor support is a sometimes criteria.
Well, if the Vendor support is so critical, then you will be better
served with OpenBSD for what they provide in their default system
and that's second to none! By far!
--- Don Boling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/5/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a user that is on WinXP. She uses Microsoft's Remote
Desktop to
connect to a remote server (TCP port 3389). I have installed
OpenBSD
3.8 to act as firewall for the office. She complains of serious
On 05/04/06, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It means that a file with only #include statements is hardly
copyrightable and can be copied at will.
Can it really? I guess if in the end you make it KNF compliant and the
order of the various includes are changed, but are the exact same
If you want a good insight on the issue of legal implications of
creating derivative/non-derivative works with functionality that is
present in existing implementations, I suggest that you follow the SCO
vs. Linux lawsuit, the arguments around the issue are very relevant to
your question.
For
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:00:56PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
There are very good reasons for not becoming a non-profit. Accounting
wise it would NOT help the project. Non-profits with such a small
amount of money are severely limited in what they can do. This
question has been answered at
Dan wrote:
While I generally agree with most of what Daniel says, I have to
disagree here. I believe Donald's approach is correct...the right tool
for the job. Sometimes the ability to call technical support for a
product is critical.
Just like I said. Yes use the right tools for the job.
Marco Peereboom wrote:
No it does not. It specifies very clearly which ones are supported.
I bet you are looking at the FAQ as-of 3.9.
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:17:44AM -0700, Smith wrote:
David Hill wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:44:22AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
--- Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the argument of Vendor support is a sometimes criteria. really
doesn't mean ANYTHING to me anymore and real life example proved it many
times over!
Paid vendor support is a feel good thing like insurance. When it comes time
for them to help
Hello.
I recently saw this article: http://networkpenetration.com/fd.html
It describes how to DoS OpenBSD by using all available file descriptors,
this is done by serveral processes.
It can't be done with only one process, because of the openfiles
limit. But thats no problem - a user of the
Hi!
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 05:00:23PM -0400, Dan wrote:
[...]
With a vendor (Nortel) I can leverage our existing relationship and get
things done. I've had issues get escalated to Senior VP level at
Nortel*that* gets things done. Nortel has sent engineers on site
for some very strange
I see that kde kmplayer was dropped from i386 packages as
of 3.7. Does anyone remember why that happened?
Is there any way now to play mjpeg files from within
Konqueror?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Lose, v., experience a loss, get rid of, lose the weight
Loose, adj., not tight, let go, free, loose
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
IIRC there're consultants offering commercial services around OpenBSD,
too. So you could've hired one to fix the Broadcom problem of yours,
just like you paid for Nortel's on-site troubleshooting.
Not to inflame the issue, but this isn't as solid of an argument as it
Donald J. Ankney wrote:
The cheapest solution I could find for a fibre-channel SAN was Apple's
XSAN.
Fine, but wasn't your requirements here the cheapest solutions, not the
platform on witch it run? I don't know that, only you do. But may be
there was and is a very nice solutions working on
On 4/5/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sick and tired of this OpenBSD doesn't perform well FUD. It is
nothing but FUD or over-generalization.
Well, I don't entirely agree.
At some tasks OpenBSD feels sluggish, X performs much slower for
example then on *sigh* Linux *sigh*.
But
I called the vendor who created the server and they suggested that I
move the LSI card from the pci-express slot to the regular pci slot.
How the $DEITY are you going to do that - with a hacksaw?
Or do you mean PCI-X...
Stuart Henderson wrote:
I called the vendor who created the server and they suggested that I
move the LSI card from the pci-express slot to the regular pci slot.
How the $DEITY are you going to do that - with a hacksaw?
Or do you mean PCI-X...
The card will fit both slots. Since
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
