On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 07:28:01PM -0700, Sherwood Botsford wrote:
HOWEVER, these switches are dying like flies at a RAID show.
I've had 5 of them die in the last 3 months. (I also use them in
classrooms -- Overkill, for 3-4 computers in a classroom, but, as
I said, the price is right.) In
On Feb 7, 2008 8:40 AM, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008, at 5:45 PM, Need Coffee wrote:
Does anyone run OpenBSD on blade servers? I don't mean
Sun Blade 150 kind of hardware, but rather blade chassis
with server blades (a la Sun Blade 8000, HP, Dell, etc.).
I'd appreciate
Brett Lymn wrote:
... I have used squid
integrated with Active Directory authentication using purely open
source tools (samba winbindd, MIT kerberos 5, openldap) for _years_.
It works - no ifs no buts, it just goes.
I have not contested that. Anything can be hacked together with enough
On Feb 6, 2008 8:31 PM, Nikns Siankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The full paper is available at the following URL:
http://www.trusteer.com/docs/dnsopenbsd.html
I find the the fixes done in other BSDs rather ugly because they have
to keep a lot of state information:
*
Julian Leyh wrote:
On 13:36 Wed 06 Feb , Jean-Yves Boisiaud wrote:
I change the /etc/boot.conf, which now is :
set tty com0
stty com0 19200
set timeout 5
boot hd0b:/bsd
try set device hd0b instead of the last line...
I tried :
set device hd0b
set image /bsd
It's the same.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 08:57:14PM -0500, scott wrote:
I have an Intel D815EEA2 motherboard; its spec is supposed to include
the RNG hardware; however, the dmesg output is void of any indication
that obsd discovered or uses it.
not all chipset versions have the rng.
perhaps yours does not.
cu
I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the moment. I
am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
on this box along with web, ssh and samba.
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail server at home.
I want to know if I
dmesg
OpenBSD 4.2-stable (fw) #0: Wed Dec 12 13:37:05 CET 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/fw
real mem = 2146136064 (2046MB)
avail mem = 2075025408 (1978MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.34 @ 0xf10c0 (45 entries)
bios0: vendor HP version 2.17 date
Hi,
i am looking for gigabit ethernet controllers to be a used in a high load
networking application.
I found something from intel (Intel(r) PRO/1000 PT Server Adapter)
Any other suggestions on gigabit ethernet adaptors or chips?
Is there a real improvement against cheap controllers like them from
Hi,
Chris schrieb:
And also if is there anything else I would need to know.
For it to work properly at home you would, first, need a fixed IP
address. Second, you can get problems because a lot of spam filters are
blocking dynamic IP ranges or even IP ranges that look dynamic because
of its
Brett Lymn wrote:
So, regarding these claims of interoperability, can you put
LDAP+Kerberos+DNS services on an OpenBSD in a network of Windows clients
and removed the need for any other machines running AD?
have a look at this:
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/pdc/
I found it on:
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail server at
home.
It is doable with OpenBSD on the sort of box you describe. For small
scale operations, it is possible to fit all those things on a single
machine, if you like.
For any useful
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:56:41PM -0500, bofh wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 10:45 AM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see external multi-disk IDE boxes. Besides, PATA is limited to
something like 18 from controller to drive. Even with a PCI
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:22:36PM +0100, Vonarburg, David wrote:
Hi,
i am looking for gigabit ethernet controllers to be a used in a high load
networking application.
I found something from intel (Intel(r) PRO/1000 PT Server Adapter)
Any other suggestions on gigabit ethernet adaptors or
* Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080207 02:13]:
Can anyone recommend a server room temperature sensor that I can use with
openbsd?
I want to monitor temperature and humidity.
I hope to graph the data from the sensor.
The sensor can be connected to my openbsd via usb, serial, or even network.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 07:19:03PM +0100, Pete Vickers wrote:
Hey there,
OpenBSD's bge driver sucks big time, typical symptoms are very slow
transfers, and incrementing errors (netstat -i).
You can confirm this by booting $other_os_boot_cd and retesting.
Ah, I was unaware of this. I've got
Jean-Yves Boisiaud wrote:
Hello,
I'm using OpenBSD with a Soekris NET4801.
To make my job easy and more secure to upgrade software,
I would like to have 2 root partitions on the label, one is active at a
time and the other will filled with the upgrade by dd.
I do not get how this would make
On 2008/02/07 15:41, Joe Warren-Meeks wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:04:13PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Hey there,
recvspace and sendspace do *nothing* to packet-forwarding
performance. they affect only locally sourced/sinked traffic.
Ah yes, of course. So, is there anything I
I/Unixfan wrote:
such a speed the ISA bus can't even achieve.
Apologies, While the rest of what I said was true.. this clearly wasn't.
The ISA bus should be able to accomplish 10Mbit+ speeds..
Please don't hurt me ;)
-Nix Fan.
-Nix Fan.
hi
i did first disable the whole acpi part at the kernel and restart the box.
after reboot the irq rise . and the box feels more performant .
here some statistics
/var/log vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq10/pciide169380
irq11/bge0
On Feb 7, 2008 11:09 AM, Christian Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I was reading through the man pages for ipsec.conf and
ipsecctl, I noticed that for automatic keying there is no way to
specify any type of key size. I was wondering if
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:10:21AM -0800, Unix Fan wrote:
I/Unixfan wrote:
such a speed the ISA bus can't even achieve.
Apologies, While the rest of what I said was true.. this clearly wasn't.
The ISA bus should be able to accomplish 10Mbit+ speeds..
-Nix Fan.
So you're saying 'Nix
Lee's point about getting reverse DNS is not to be missed. It's
important and possible. You'll just have to fight your way past first
level tech support. It took me some work to get it myself, but in the
end I got it.
I ended up telling the first level guy that I _was_ running Windows,
OpenBSD
Absolutely, there is nothing hard about it and in fact it is very stupidly
simple.
Preaching about reverse lookups for these purposes is a sort of masochistic
ignorance.
I don't do reverse dns and most people get my email just fine. If you
don't I probably don't care enough to hear about it.
Shane Harbour wrote:
I beg to differ. It really depends on your ISP and how far you really
want to go. I've run everything (DNS, mail, etc) out of my basement for
3 years now.
Ditto.
I've been running my own OBSD web/mail server in an old 1U SuperMicro
server up my attic for about two
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 10:31:43AM -0600, Daniel A. Ramaley wrote:
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 22:38, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Since this will be for a low-MHz box, it's BIOS probably won't like
large drives either. That means SCSI. If the boxes aren't great or
have room or provide cooling
At 04:43 PM 2/7/2008 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can absolutely run a mail server at home. This is not rocket science
and in fact, it
is dumb easy to do. Try to follow these steps:
1. Get a domain name and look for registrars that can host it for you. For
example,
check this kind of
L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
In reality, you cannot run your own mail server at home. This would
require:
1) DNS resolution for your domain name
2) Appropriate MX records
3) Valid REVERSE DNS for your IP
#3 is usually the big factor for most ISPS,
Hello,
I am running a 4.2 webserver and want to add another machine as hot spare.
The second machine is identical and is living in the same rack - this is
purely for hardware failure / easy upgrading and at a later stage (need
3rd box) CARP.
I understand I can use rsync over SSH to keep
Reliably? I been running it for 3 years already without single incident that
those damn
e-mails I'd sent reached their destinations at all.
At 04:43 PM 2/7/2008 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can absolutely run a mail server at home. This is not rocket science
and in fact, it
is dumb easy
1. You must have DNS services somewhere. I am similarly setup abd I use
www.zoneedit.com. Free and competent.
2. Most cable-based broadbands and DSL do have a fixed dns string. Mine
is in the form of cable-modem-mac-cpe-mac.a.b.ips.com.
Reverse look-up your own dynamic ip and see what it
L. V. Lammert wrote:
Please stop spreading misinformation. Unless you have reverse DNS
setup, ANY email server that adhering to standards should (and
probably will) block your incoming email.
It's also rather incorrect to simply state, You _must_ have reverse DNS
to run a mail server at
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:45:44PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your ISP is blocking port 25, port 110, and port 143 both ways maybe it is
high-time
you consider changing internet service provider. There is no point paying
them good
money when what they are doing is basically blocking
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
What you forget here is that most don't adhere to standards.
I'm not sure it's a standard, but for many it (matching the servers helo
name with the PTR record) is standard practice. Some then continue with
a forward lookup and expect the A
with a bit more analyzing of ktrace output and comparing with a working
setup of someone else (thanks !), i observe my release have about 5
lines of getrusage like this:
CALL getrusage(0, 0x...)
RET getrusage 0
not sure it is useful, but there is no getrusage in *.[ch] so it seems
Lori Barfield wrote:
consumer IP space is really a problem for outgoing mail.
at the very least, all the majors will add spam points to
your messages and so your mail is a lot more likely to
be bulked. even resold IP space at large colos is treated
that way by default, and it causes heartburn
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Lori Barfield wrote:
just having reverse DNS isn't good enough, either, because
if it has a name that looks like dynamic IP space, that
can also get your mail treated with prejudice.
Yes, I've seen that in practice as well.
--
Chris
Hi Stuart and the others,
pass out queue (std_out,lowdelay)
here, you place ACKs from downloads at a higher priority than
your voip calls. this is unlikely to be what you want with priq
over a 140Kb/s link..
there are some other things you could look at too but changing
this would be a
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Well, as always, it depends. What do _you_ mean by a mail server? Do
you mean that you want people to mail you directly and your mail to go
out to the internet directly and bypass your ISP? If so, you'll need a
fixed IP and help from you ISP since they normall block
Works for me and has for years. You would not see these emails if it
didn't.
What you forget here is that most don't adhere to standards.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:26:17AM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
At 04:43 PM 2/7/2008 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can absolutely run a mail server at
Lori Barfield wrote:
consumer IP space is really a problem for outgoing mail.
at the very least, all the majors will add spam points to
your messages and so your mail is a lot more likely to
be bulked. even resold IP space at large colos is treated
that way by default, and it causes heartburn
On Feb 7, 2008 2:51 AM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the moment.
I
am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
on this box along with web, ssh and samba.
I was wondering if anyone has any
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:32:20PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Hey there
What speed is normal house-hold high-speed internet anyway? This
would be the best that most students would have experienced.
Remote directory: /pub/OpenBSD/4.2
ftp get xenocara.tar.gz
local: xenocara.tar.gz remote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reliably? I been running it for 3 years already without single incident that
those damn
e-mails I'd sent reached their destinations at all.
Indeed it comes down to this for the OP... do you want to listen to one
person telling you (very incorrectly) that it can't
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:03:08AM -0800, Unix Fan wrote:
You realize that a 10 Mbit card has a maximum theoretical transfer rate
of 1220 Kilobytes per second... such a speed the ISA bus can't even achieve.
Even my home broadband line exceeds those speeds ;)
Setting workstations to
Either you want to send or receive mail from anyone and from anywhere in
cyberspace,
that is irrefutably possible. Like I said, consider this site:
www.no-ip.com
I am not working for them but I had used their affordable services and it works
well.
One thing, if your ADSL router at home has
If your ISP is blocking port 25, port 110, and port 143 both ways maybe it is
high-time
you consider changing internet service provider. There is no point paying them
good
money when what they are doing is basically blocking ports here and there.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:38:30AM -0600, L. V.
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 22:38, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Since this will be for a low-MHz box, it's BIOS probably won't like
large drives either. That means SCSI. If the boxes aren't great or
have room or provide cooling for SCSI drives, that makes it external.
Could you use a small IDE
You can absolutely run a mail server at home. This is not rocket science and in
fact, it
is dumb easy to do. Try to follow these steps:
1. Get a domain name and look for registrars that can host it for you. For
example,
check this kind of services at www.no-ip.com.
2. Configure your ADSL
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:38:30AM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
In reality, you cannot run your own mail server at home. This would
require:
1) DNS resolution for your domain name
2) Appropriate MX records
3) Valid REVERSE DNS for your IP
#3 is usually the big factor for most ISPS,
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the
moment. I
am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
on this box along with web, ssh and
I run all my stuff at home and even do virtual hosting for web and mail
for one of my wife's websites. I have a separate box for mail running
postfix, dovecot, postgresql, clamd, and spamd. It's not a beefy box
but still works well. Haven't really seen my electrical bill go up. I
did have to
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the moment.
I
am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
on this box along with web, ssh and samba.
I was wondering if anyone has any
On 2008/02/07 11:08, Joe Warren-Meeks wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 07:19:03PM +0100, Pete Vickers wrote:
Hey there,
OpenBSD's bge driver sucks big time, typical symptoms are very slow
transfers, and incrementing errors (netstat -i).
You can confirm this by booting $other_os_boot_cd
I run all my stuff at home. My old firewall (just replace it) was a
pentium pro 200 with 128MB; my mailserver is a PIII 800 and runs www,
postfix, dovecot, mysql and some other junk. Works just fine.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's
Look at everything on interrupt queue 10.
pciide1: using irq 10 for native-PCI interrupt
bge1 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM5721 rev 0x11, BCM5750 B1
(0x4101): irq 10, address 00:17:08:2c:2a:76
em2 at pci7 dev 6 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT QP (82546GB) rev 0x03:
irq 10,
address
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 07:07:00PM +, Joe Warren-Meeks wrote:
for me, 16Mbit/s adsl2+. Quite normal in the UK. It's great.
I have 8Mbit ADSL, and it's way faster than the network at school. Why
on earth should schools cater for usage that has low to no educational
value?
I'm quite happy
Hello,
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Brian Richardson wrote:
Stefan Kell wrote:
some other questions: why a bridge and why not simple router with pf? What
is your bridge configuration?
vr0 is internal interface. ral0 is wireless interface.
brconfig bridge0 add ral0
brconfig bridge0 add vr0
Spreading misinformation? Look, I subscribe to an ISP with ADSL that provided
me with
public dynamic IP address. I register it to a registrar that offers dynamic
hosting
courtesy of www.no-ip.com and I am sending this email to you because of it. And
you tell
me that I am preaching something not
consumer IP space is really a problem for outgoing mail.
at the very least, all the majors will add spam points to
your messages and so your mail is a lot more likely to
be bulked. even resold IP space at large colos is treated
that way by default, and it causes heartburn for businesses.
just
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Well, I've never had high-speed internet and I get along just fine. My
NFS server was my IBM 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram and a 10 MB/s ISA card.
Worked just fine.
What wil the students be doing where they would need more than 10 MB/s
each between them and your
On 2008/02/07 16:06, L. V. Lammert wrote:
If you want to hack a setup together [lacking one
of the DNS requirements like reverse lookup], it's important to know that
your email *MIGHT* not get through, and there's nothing you can do about
it.
Same applies *with* all
2008/2/7, Antti Harri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You mean http://www.networktechinc.com/enviro-mini.html ? Quite
pricey stuff.
There are some weather stations with a usb interface...
Best
Martin
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:04:13PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Hey there,
recvspace and sendspace do *nothing* to packet-forwarding
performance. they affect only locally sourced/sinked traffic.
Ah yes, of course. So, is there anything I can do, or need to do, to
ensure good throughput? Or
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Works for me and has for years. You would not see these emails if it
didn't.
What you forget here is that most don't adhere to standards.
Didn't say it wouldn't work, .. but I, for one, don't want to have to call
someone to make sure they get my
I think you'd be better served by the following pf.conf
Let pf state --combination-- affect the queuing.
#-start-
ext_if=fxp0
int_if=vr0
lan_net=$int_if:network
icmp_types=echoreq
table voipservers const { 200.184.77.145, 200.184.77.138 }
table atas const { 192.168.2.33, 192.168.2.100
I believe I had this same problem when I was compiling the source offered on
iperf's site. This was resolved by compiling the version offered by ports.
On Feb 7, 2008 5:08 AM, Joe Warren-Meeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 07:19:03PM +0100, Pete Vickers wrote:
Hey there,
On 2008/02/07 16:07, Antti Harri wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Dustin Lundquist wrote:
In the past I've used Enviromux devices, polling them via SNMP with MRTG.
http://www.networktechinc.com/enviro-mini.htm
You mean http://www.networktechinc.com/enviro-mini.html ? Quite
pricey stuff.
I
You mean http://www.networktechinc.com/enviro-mini.html ? Quite pricey
stuff.
You can find onewire hardware for apx $50 plus apx $10-$20 per sensor.
I have one with 8 sensors, paid apx $110 (Swedish reseller) 2 in each rack.
-Thomas
Thanks Mats.
On Feb 7, 2008 12:25 AM, Mats O Jansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
I've downloaded the OpenBSD 4.2 current source tree to my 4.2 release
machine. Then I've made small modifications to my kernel, but when I
run make depend I
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:49:58PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spreading misinformation? Look, I subscribe to an ISP with ADSL that provided
me with
public dynamic IP address. I register it to a registrar that offers dynamic
hosting
courtesy of www.no-ip.com and I am sending this email
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:42:38AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Lymn wrote:
I did not.
So, regarding these claims of interoperability, can you put
LDAP+Kerberos+DNS services on an OpenBSD in a network of Windows clients
and removed the need for any other machines running AD?
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Dustin Lundquist wrote:
In the past I've used Enviromux devices, polling them via SNMP with MRTG.
http://www.networktechinc.com/enviro-mini.htm
You mean http://www.networktechinc.com/enviro-mini.html ? Quite
pricey stuff.
I have a simple temperature sensor connected to
ropers P=P0P?P8QP0:
You can use Christoph Egger's OpenBSD/Xen port. No need to go
HVM-only. Unfortunately, my own website is down right now and I
haven't gotten around to fixing that, but the Wayback Machine has the
relevant page:
On Feb 7, 2008 10:00 AM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh. I tossed a compaq scsi array too, last year, when I moved.
Yeah. I know that what I'm looking for, mostly, will be what people
think is worthless and fit for garbage. I'm trying to garbage pick
before that happens to
I stumbled today upon this while following a different article, maybe it is
helpful to you
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/mail/
I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the moment.
I
am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and
NetOne - Doichin Dokov P=P0P?P8QP0:
ropers P=P0P?P8QP0:
You can use Christoph Egger's OpenBSD/Xen port. No need to go
HVM-only. Unfortunately, my own website is down right now and I
haven't gotten around to fixing that, but the Wayback Machine has the
relevant page:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 07:20:00AM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:56:41PM -0500, bofh wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 10:45 AM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Well, for example, I have two boxes where I'm using IDE (the third box
is
I also have this nic in my Lenovo R60:
bge0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM5751M rev 0x21, BCM5750 C1
(0x4201): irq 11, address 00:16:d3:b8:d6:4c
experiencing the same problems
Joe Warren-Meeks wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:04:13PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Hey there,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:52:35AM -0500, bofh wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 11:38 PM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure the IBM dual Pentium Pro 200Mhz that I tossed away (2 of
them!) could take hard drives bigger than 2G, and I want to say, bigger than
10G, so it really
Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I was reading through the man pages for ipsec.conf and
ipsecctl, I noticed that for automatic keying there is no way to
specify any type of key size. I was wondering if anyone know of a way
to do that, because I am very interested in setting
On Feb 6, 2008 12:36 PM, Pierre Riteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should upgrade to a snapshot before. This is in the FAQ...
Pierre is right. See Section 5.3.
Alexander Hall wrote:
Jean-Yves Boisiaud wrote:
Hello,
I'm using OpenBSD with a Soekris NET4801.
To make my job easy and more secure to upgrade software,
I have several targets to keep up to date. All partitions are always
read only.
I prepare an image for all of them, and send the new
L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Works for me and has for years. You would not see these emails if it
didn't.
What you forget here is that most don't adhere to standards.
Didn't say it wouldn't work, .. but I, for one, don't want to have to call
someone to
I don't do reverse dns and most people get my email just fine. If you
don't I probably don't care enough to hear about it.
I have 5 static IPs at home that resolve. Nothing hard about it; I just
refuse to pay $5/month for reverse lookups.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:38:30AM -0600, L. V. Lammert
I beg to differ. It really depends on your ISP and how far you really
want to go. I've run everything (DNS, mail, etc) out of my basement for
3 years now. Granted I had to switch ISPs in order to do so and upgrade
to a server class DSL line. They even delegated control of my reverse
DNS to me.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:07:18PM +0200, Antti Harri wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Dustin Lundquist wrote:
In the past I've used Enviromux devices, polling them via SNMP with MRTG.
http://www.networktechinc.com/enviro-mini.htm
You mean http://www.networktechinc.com/enviro-mini.html ? Quite
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:06:08PM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Works for me and has for years. You would not see these emails if it
didn't.
What you forget here is that most don't adhere to standards.
Didn't say it wouldn't work, .. but I,
At 04:54 PM 2/7/2008 -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:06:08PM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Works for me and has for years. You would not see these emails if it
didn't.
What you forget here is that most don't adhere to
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:26:09AM +0200, Lars Nood?n wrote:
Pose the question again. You are, among other things, unclear.
No. Look in the archives if you want it - I know you don't have any
answers apart from some tired rhetoric.
--
Brett Lymn
Warning:
The information contained in this
It's email. I am not sending a rocket to the moon. Like I said you
either care or you don't. For me it is perfectly acceptable that
someone won't get my email. This has nothing to do with the quality of
my code. This also has no bearing whatsoever on the project. I fail to
see why that needs
On Thursday 07 February 2008 18:39:18 L. V. Lammert wrote:
At 04:54 PM 2/7/2008 -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:06:08PM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Works for me and has for years. You would not see these emails if it
On Feb 7, 2008, at 7:38 AM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at
the moment. I
am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-
Hello again.
In my search for low-MHz machines, at least on eBay, I find lots of old
Compaq Proliants (all around the $300 mark by the way). E.g:
4500R: P-133, 1 GB ram, no drives, $249.
HP doesn't have on their website the owner's manuals for these old
boxes, but they do have the
On Feb 7, 2008, at 7:29 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Hello again.
In my search for low-MHz machines, at least on eBay, I find lots of
old
Compaq Proliants (all around the $300 mark by the way). E.g:
4500R: P-133, 1 GB ram, no drives, $249.
HP doesn't have on their website the
On Feb 7, 2008, at 2:21 PM, James Hartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 12:36 PM, Pierre Riteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You should upgrade to a snapshot before. This is in the FAQ...
Pierre is right. See Section 5.3.
The latest snapshots don't support running userland code in
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Hello again.
In my search for low-MHz machines, at least on eBay, I find lots of old
Compaq Proliants (all around the $300 mark by the way). E.g:
4500R: P-133, 1 GB ram, no drives, $249.
HP doesn't have on their website the owner's manuals for these old
Estimado/a:
Entendemos que ahora es el momento para avanzar en la programacisn de las
acciones a realizar este aqo. Por este motivo comunicamos nuestros
programas de prosperidad en los negocios y de desarrollo del potencial
humano; y proponemos una reunisn informativa sin cargo en su empresa a
Could anyone point me to a good documentation on how to setup a direct
sendmail mail server on openbsd 4.2? I know there's the manpages and
the README file but those are going over my head. Most of the
documents I google for either talk about smarthost or postfix or
sendmail client.
Thanks for
99 matches
Mail list logo
