Re: vm example

Le 21.07.2016 06:43, Stephen Graf a écrit : Does anyone have an example of setting up vm? I am running into a problem with /dev/vmm not configured when trying to run vmd. (OpenBSD 5.9, amd64) Maybe i'm wrong but i thought that you had to enable it before on your kernel. Best regards.

Re: Override NGROUPS_MAX

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Artturi Alm wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 06:32:49PM -0400, Eric Furman wrote: >> The person didn't make a simple config change they made >> a change to the actual kernal code. >> Huge difference. > > thank you for your reply, but that's

vm example

Does anyone have an example of setting up vm? I am running into a problem with /dev/vmm not configured when trying to run vmd. (OpenBSD 5.9, amd64)

Re: Network Interface "Intel I350 Fiber" 8 Port Module shows only 4 Ports

Hi Nick, Am 20.07.2016 um 14:08 schrieb Nick Holland: > On 07/20/16 05:17, Marco Prause wrote: >> Hi @Misc, >> >> I am quite happy to test a 8 Port interface-Card in a 1U Appliance. >> >> Unfortunately at the moment I just see 4 of the 8 interfaces - did >> anybody already have some experience

Re: choosing OpenBSD for fileserver instead of FreeBSD + ZFS

On 2016-07-20 21:48, Karel Gardas wrote: ... Yes, similar functionality is in RAID1C patch I posted on tech@ in the past. Life is too intense now so I barely work on this to update it following Joel Sing requirements. Anyway, someday I hope to push it again to tech@ +1 for RAID1C!

Re: Override NGROUPS_MAX

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 06:32:49PM -0400, Eric Furman wrote: > The person didn't make a simple config change they made > a change to the actual kernal code. > Huge difference. > thank you for your reply, but that's no answer to my question, and you have no sense for my lack of humour it seems.

Re: performace impact of excessive use of the "quick" keyword in pf.conf?

On 2016-07-20, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > Maybe you run into the problem that you need to > > ifconfig pflog0 create > ifconfig pflog0 up > > first. The pflogd rc script does that for you. echo up > /etc/hostname.pflog0

Re: Differences between etherip(4) and gif(4)

On 2016-07-20, Russell Sutherland wrote: > I noticed that the etherip pseudo-device appeared with OpenBSD 5.9 which is > intended for tunnelling. > > Prior to this I have been using the gif pseudo device to accomplish much the > same thing (in my case L2 over L3).

openbgpd blackhole community

Hi all, here at CIX we want to implement BLACKHOLE based on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-blackholing presentation https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-grow-1.pdf Recommendation is to have Blackhole BGP Community: 65535:666, but when configure that community i'm

Re: Override NGROUPS_MAX

> Congratulations. You are no longer running OpenBSD. Your system > has a significant incompatibility, and now we cannot accept any > bug reports from you anymore. Any bug you hit might be due to that > change you made. You own the change. How about config(8)? "Use of an alternative kernel

Re: help: wireless mouse detected but not working

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 03:14:10PM -0300, Michel Behr wrote: > Hi all! I'm trying to use a Logitech wireless mouse - it gets detected > (dmesg attached) but it doesn't work. The laptop has trackpad and it is > working OK. A regular USB mouse works simply plugging, but not a wireless > one. > >

Differences between etherip(4) and gif(4)

I noticed that the etherip pseudo-device appeared with OpenBSD 5.9 which is intended for tunnelling. Prior to this I have been using the gif pseudo device to accomplish much the same thing (in my case L2 over L3). Apart from specifying the mtu to lower value to avoid problems with larger frames,

Re: performace impact of excessive use of the "quick" keyword in pf.conf?

Fabio Almeida(mente...@gmail.com) on 2016.07.20 16:45:08 -0300: > No need to worry about it. > I manage systems with more than 6000 rules without any problem. > In fact you'll need to worry just about disk I/O if all your rules use log > and if the disk is not so fast. > In case you have this

Re: performace impact of excessive use of the "quick" keyword in pf.conf?

No need to worry about it. I manage systems with more than 6000 rules without any problem. In fact you'll need to worry just about disk I/O if all your rules use log and if the disk is not so fast. In case you have this problem you can always use: pflogd_flags="-f /dev/null" in

Re: [OT] Cloud storage accessible via sftp or rsync/ssh?

On 7/20/16 8:31 AM, Sam Hays wrote: 2016-07-20 11:27 GMT+02:00 John Long : Can anybody recommend a good cloud storage provider that has access via sftp or rsync tunneled through ssh? Everything I have found seems targeted at Windows, Linux, phones etc. with no

Re: performace impact of excessive use of the "quick" keyword in pf.conf?

* Peus, Christoph [2015-06-15 20:40]: > I'm currently planning for a complete reorganization i.e. rewrite of a > historically grown pf.conf of about 300 rules. Up to now each and every rule > uses the "quick" keyword, which effectively turns the "last match" concept of >

Re: [OT] Cloud storage accessible via sftp or rsync/ssh?

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:05:42PM -0400, Brian B wrote: >> Run an ??ber cheap VM (or a pair for HA) in AWS or Azure and use their underlying cloud storage, albeit at a cost premium. >> >> That way you can setup any number of protocols to access the storage. > > Thanks, that's actually a _really_

help: wireless mouse detected but not working

Hi all! I'm trying to use a Logitech wireless mouse - it gets detected (dmesg attached) but it doesn't work. The laptop has trackpad and it is working OK. A regular USB mouse works simply plugging, but not a wireless one. It's not a bluetooth device, so AKAIU it should be working. I tried looking

Re: choosing OpenBSD for fileserver instead of FreeBSD + ZFS

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Miles Keaton wrote: > Got a fileserver with a few terabytes of important personal media, like all > old home movies, baby photos, etc. Files that I want my family to have > access to when I die. > > Really it's more of a file archive. A

Re: [OT] Cloud storage accessible via sftp or rsync/ssh?

Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:31:16 + Sam Hays > 2016-07-20 11:27 GMT+02:00 John Long : > > Can anybody recommend a good cloud storage provider that has access > > via sftp or rsync tunneled through ssh? Everything I have found seems > > targeted at Windows,

Re: [OT] Cloud storage accessible via sftp or rsync/ssh?

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:05:42PM -0400, Brian B wrote: > Run an ??ber cheap VM (or a pair for HA) in AWS or Azure and use their > underlying cloud storage, albeit at a cost premium. > > That way you can setup any number of protocols to access the storage. Thanks, that's actually a _really_

Re: [OT] Cloud storage accessible via sftp or rsync/ssh?

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 02:31:16PM +, Sam Hays wrote: > 2016-07-20 11:27 GMT+02:00 John Long : > > Can anybody recommend a good cloud storage provider that has access > > via sftp or rsync tunneled through ssh? Everything I have found seems > > targeted at Windows, Linux,

Re: [OT] Cloud storage accessible via sftp or rsync/ssh?

2016-07-20 11:27 GMT+02:00 John Long : > Can anybody recommend a good cloud storage provider that has access > via sftp or rsync tunneled through ssh? Everything I have found seems > targeted at Windows, Linux, phones etc. with no platform-agnostic interface. > Consider AWS /

Re: Override NGROUPS_MAX

>> I'm still giving a try recompiling with NGROUPS_MAX et KI_NGROUPS >> modified on a test computer ;-). Then I'll install samba from ports. > >Test are concluant until there. I change NGROUPS_MAX and KI_NGROUPS to >1024 and compile all user land and packages required. Can connect to >samba with

Re: Override NGROUPS_MAX

Hi, > I'm still giving a try recompiling with NGROUPS_MAX et KI_NGROUPS > modified on a test computer ;-). Then I'll install samba from ports. Test are concluant until there. I change NGROUPS_MAX and KI_NGROUPS to 1024 and compile all user land and packages required. Can connect to samba with 18

Chicago BSD Users Group

Hello, I am organizing a BSD users group in the Chicago area. If you are reading this and have any interest in joining up with other users, please join the mailing list at talk+subscr...@chibug.org so we can work out details of meeting up (or just to follow along with the discussion).

Re: [OT] Cloud storage accessible via sftp or rsync/ssh?

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 04:01:21PM +0200, matteo filippetto wrote: > 2016-07-20 11:27 GMT+02:00 John Long : > > Can anybody recommend a good cloud storage provider that has access via sftp > > or rsync tunneled through ssh? Everything I have found seems targeted at > > Windows,

Re: [OT] Cloud storage accessible via sftp or rsync/ssh?

2016-07-20 11:27 GMT+02:00 John Long : > Can anybody recommend a good cloud storage provider that has access via sftp > or rsync tunneled through ssh? Everything I have found seems targeted at > Windows, Linux, phones etc. with no platform-agnostic interface. >

Re: [OT] Cloud storage accessible via sftp or rsync/ssh?

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 01:53:23PM +0200, Morten Liebach wrote: > Check rsync.net. That's the type of thing I'm looking for but their prices are totally out of line with anything I've seen. I can pay 100 bucks a year for 1T of storage. I can't pay 1,100 bucks a year for 300G of storage. I'm

Re: choosing OpenBSD for fileserver instead of FreeBSD + ZFS

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Kamil Cholewiński wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Miles Keaton wrote: >> So I figure if I use OpenBSD + softraid RAID 5 (across 4 disks) and then >> write my own little shell script to track the MD5 (find . -type f -exec

Re: choosing OpenBSD for fileserver instead of FreeBSD + ZFS

Interesting. Seems to be in our ports tree as well. Now I know what I'm doing this evening. :) On Jul 20, 2016 9:29 AM, "Scott Bonds" wrote: > Take a look at par2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parchive > > On 07/20, Miles Keaton wrote: > >> Got a fileserver with a few terabytes

Re: [OT] Cloud storage accessible via sftp or rsync/ssh?

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 01:53:20PM +0200, Sol??ne wrote: > Le 2016-07-20 11:27, John Long a ??crit??: > >Can anybody recommend a good cloud storage provider that has > >access via sftp > >or rsync tunneled through ssh? Everything I have found seems > >targeted at > >Windows, Linux, phones etc.

Re: choosing OpenBSD for fileserver instead of FreeBSD + ZFS

Take a look at par2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parchive On 07/20, Miles Keaton wrote: Got a fileserver with a few terabytes of important personal media, like all old home movies, baby photos, etc. Files that I want my family to have access to when I die. Really it's more of a file

Re: choosing OpenBSD for fileserver instead of FreeBSD + ZFS

On 2016-07-20, Miles Keaton wrote: > So I figure if I use OpenBSD + softraid RAID 5 (across 4 disks) and then > write my own little shell script to track the MD5 (find . -type f -exec md5 > {} \;) Note that mtree(8) can checksum files. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber

Re: choosing OpenBSD for fileserver instead of FreeBSD + ZFS

On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Theodoros wrote: > +1, zfs and hammer are great filesystems for such a use. > > Looking forward to RAID10 support on softraid (!). Been running "manually stacked" RAID10 with 6 drives, on a low-traffic production system, for half a year. System boots

Re: choosing OpenBSD for fileserver instead of FreeBSD + ZFS

+1, zfs and hammer are great filesystems for such a use. Looking forward to RAID10 support on softraid (!). On 20 July 2016 at 15:08, Kamil Cholewiński wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Miles Keaton wrote: >> So I figure if I use OpenBSD + softraid

Re: Network Interface "Intel I350 Fiber" 8 Port Module shows only 4 Ports

On 07/20/16 05:17, Marco Prause wrote: > Hi @Misc, > > I am quite happy to test a 8 Port interface-Card in a 1U Appliance. > > Unfortunately at the moment I just see 4 of the 8 interfaces - did > anybody already have some experience with this NICs and this behavior ? ... > OpenBSD 5.8-stable

Re: choosing OpenBSD for fileserver instead of FreeBSD + ZFS

On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Miles Keaton wrote: > So I figure if I use OpenBSD + softraid RAID 5 (across 4 disks) and then > write my own little shell script to track the MD5 (find . -type f -exec md5 > {} \;) whenever I make changes, that should be enough to see if a file has >

Re: choosing OpenBSD for fileserver instead of FreeBSD + ZFS

Hello, I still have my personnal NAS working as storage using standard OpenBSD fs + rsync to a backup machine and a very simple md5sum on that partition (Partition is mounted read only by default, I remount it rw only for rebuild the md5sum each time I add new files on that storage). I don't

Re: choosing OpenBSD for fileserver instead of FreeBSD + ZFS

Le 2016-07-20 13:52, Miles Keaton a écrit : Got a fileserver with a few terabytes of important personal media, like all old home movies, baby photos, etc. Files that I want my family to have access to when I die. Really it's more of a file archive. A backup. Just rsync + ssh. Serving it

Re: [OT] Cloud storage accessible via sftp or rsync/ssh?

Le 2016-07-20 11:27, John Long a écrit : Can anybody recommend a good cloud storage provider that has access via sftp or rsync tunneled through ssh? Everything I have found seems targeted at Windows, Linux, phones etc. with no platform-agnostic interface. Thanks. /jl hello ownCloud /

choosing OpenBSD for fileserver instead of FreeBSD + ZFS

Got a fileserver with a few terabytes of important personal media, like all old home movies, baby photos, etc. Files that I want my family to have access to when I die. Really it's more of a file archive. A backup. Just rsync + ssh. Serving it isn't the point. Just preserving it forever.

[OT] Cloud storage accessible via sftp or rsync/ssh?

Can anybody recommend a good cloud storage provider that has access via sftp or rsync tunneled through ssh? Everything I have found seems targeted at Windows, Linux, phones etc. with no platform-agnostic interface. Thanks. /jl -- ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong against

Network Interface "Intel I350 Fiber" 8 Port Module shows only 4 Ports

Hi @Misc, I am quite happy to test a 8 Port interface-Card in a 1U Appliance. Unfortunately at the moment I just see 4 of the 8 interfaces - did anybody already have some experience with this NICs and this behavior ? The spec lists the chipset as : 8 GbE SFP Fiber 2 x Intel I350-AM4