return code: 0 (ok)
---
and Netcat:
nc -zv 192.168.42.61 443
Connection to 192.168.42.61 443 port [tcp/https] succeeded!
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 9:40 PM Daniel Jakots wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 19:14:17 -0400, Henry Bonath
> wrote:
>
> > Daniel,
> >
> > Than
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 14:00:48 -0400, Henry Bonath
> wrote:
>
> > Note the missing Client Hello on the 6.7 machine as it jumps to
> > Application Data straight away.
> > Configuration files for HAProxy are identical on both systems.
> >
> > I'm currently spi
I would like to chime in here and confirm that I am seeing very
similar behavior with HAProxy on OpenBSD 6.7,
I was preparing to create my own post on this issue until I saw your thread.
I too believe this is a bug.
I also get the same "Empty reply" response you get via Curl:
> GET / HTTP/1.1
>
I've used Hurricane Electric's free DNS service for years now along with
their Tunnelbroker since my ISP still does not support IPv6 yet.
They also support dynamic updates which works with "ddclient" from the
OpenBSD package repo.
https://dns.he.net/
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 8:25 AM Jay Hart
While I cannot comment to the BFD support in OpenBSD, I can say that I have
seen
Peter Hessler around here, so hopefully he sees this and can answer your
question.
BFD would be a very nice addition to see, considering the maturity level we
are getting
to with BGPD and MPLS support.
On Wed, Nov
will
definitely do since this thing will be public-facing.
Again, I appreciate you guys taking the time to explain this to me!
-Henry
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 2:56 PM Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 02:07:58PM -0400, Henry Bonath wrote:
> > Hello Misc,
> >
> >
Thanks Theo, that thought had briefly crossed my mind, and it looks like
you are correct!
/dev/sd0e on /var type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid)
I appreciate your quick response!
-Henry
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 2:10 PM Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Henry Bonath wrote:
>
> > Hello Misc,
&
Hello Misc,
I had thought that I had configured the looking glass correctly per the man
page,
I have everything else working correctly, with custom header and footer
with CSS and all works great.
Whenever I attempt to ping/traceroute from the webpage, it simlpy reports:
"failed."
Here is what
I merely was giving an example of what *could* be done - not
necessarily of what *should* be done ;-)
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 12:40 PM Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2019-06-22, Henry Bonath wrote:
> > What about GRE(4) with a Cisco router on the other end?
> >
> &
What about GRE(4) with a Cisco router on the other end?
/etc/hostname.gre123:
1.1.1.1 1.1.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 up
tunnel IP.OF.OB.SD IP.OF.I.OS
Cisco IOS:
!
interface Tunnel123
ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.252
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0/1
tunnel destination IP.OF.OB.SD
Hello,
I have recently (within the past few months) turned up an MPLS PE on a
1Gbps link in a L3VPN configuration with BGP and RDomains.
I'm seeing some strange throughput numbers that I am seeking to get
some help understanding.
Now I am currently running OpenBSD 6.4 on the particular PE, and I
Here's my build info for 6.5 PowerPC:
pkg list:
autoconf--%2.13
dbus-glib--
g++--%4.9
gcc--%4.9
gmake--
python--%2.7
py-pip--
yasm--
unzip--
zip--
And my .mozconfig:
# This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
# License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed
To chime in here, how I have always implemented Anycast DNS
is by creating additional Loopback adapters in the OS, and then
using BGP or OSPF to distribute said Loopback IPs into a routing
table.
Each DNS server participating in Anycast would have the same
IPv4 and IPv6 address configured on that
Awesome! Thank you for the status update.
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> On 2019-05-09, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> > The build has been running for 25 days so far, across two machines,
> > and the packages will be uploaded once they are finished.
>
> I just
Only if said trailer is Delorean-shaped.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:43 PM Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>
>
> On May 9, 2019 10:41 AM, danieljb...@icloud.com wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 08:55:40AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > The real reason is because we're low on current for the flux
, 2019 at 10:53 AM Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> On 2019-05-09, Henry Bonath wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure how many folks out there are PowerPC users, but I was
> > just curious if anyone had an idea on if or when we might see those
> > out in the mirrors.
>
> The b
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 14:34, Henry Bonath wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure how many folks out there are PowerPC users, but I was
> > just curious if anyone had an idea on if or when we might see those
> > out in the mirrors.
> >
> > I also suppose in the same vein, I co
I'm not sure how many folks out there are PowerPC users, but I was
just curious if anyone had an idea on if or when we might see those
out in the mirrors.
I also suppose in the same vein, I could be learning how to pull the
ports tree and build what I need that way :-)
Thanks!
I'll respond directly here as I recognize you from another mailing
list we both are on :-)
This is *my* desktop of choice on OpenBSD:
https://sourceforge.net/p/cdesktopenv/wiki/OpenBSDBuild/
Why mess with something less tried or true?
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 8:19 AM Christopher Turkel
wrote:
>
; I've used relayd to insert routes to a service based on a health check, and
> then had ospfd advertise those routes. That might be good enough for you.
>
> On Fri., 19 Apr. 2019, 00:40 Henry Bonath, wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone suggest any clever way of controlling OSPFD based on
Does anyone suggest any clever way of controlling OSPFD based on the
status of an HAProxy process?
I like to use OSPFD to advertise /32 loopback IPs which HAProxy binds
to for anycasted highly-available Reverse Proxy/Load Balancer
services.
This works great if the whole box goes down, as OSPF
it.
I'll spin up some test machines and report back what I find out.
-Henry
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:48 AM Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 05:08:32PM -0400, Henry Bonath wrote:
> > Hello, I am seeing some BGP VPNv4 routes staying populated in
> > the RIB
ithdraw the
> routes until the
> hold time has expired ...
> im subject to correction on this one... but it is the behaviour I have
> empirically observed
> on the bgp routers that i manage
> I hope this helps
> Tom Smyth
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 22:11, H
Hello, I am seeing some BGP VPNv4 routes staying populated in
the RIB of route-reflector clients even after dropping the originating neighbor.
I'm on OpenBSD 6.4, running MPLS L3VPN.
I have 2 IBGP route-reflectors, both OpenBSD 6.4.
I run OSPF to distribute Loopbacks into an Area (100)
We run
this community!
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 12:24 AM Adrian Close
wrote:
> Hi Henry,
>
> Le 02/04/2019 13:39, Henry Bonath a écrit :
> > It looks like a patch may have been produced, but I do not know how to
> test
> > it. I'm not sure if I can pull down just a small part o
ell in the specified rtable
e.g.: doas routing-table 42
would run a root shell in rtable 42.
-Henry
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 5:07 PM Pierre Emeriaud
wrote:
> Le mar. 2 avr. 2019 à 23:00, Henry Bonath a écrit :
> >
> > Hello,
> > Does anyone have any suggestions as to how to
> >
> > Le mar. 2 avr. 2019 à 23:00, Henry Bonath a
> écrit :
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > Does anyone have any suggestions as to how to add the current rtable
> to the
> > > $PS1 prompt?
> > >
> > > I tend to flip back and forth
Hello,
Does anyone have any suggestions as to how to add the current rtable to the
$PS1 prompt?
I tend to flip back and forth between routing domains and tend to lose track
of which rdomain I am currently using.
I've been attempting an approach by trying to run 'ps -aux -o rtable'
and using some
Thanks for the follow-up Adrian, I will build one out and give it a test
here tomorrow.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:42 PM Adrian Close
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Le 02/04/2019 13:18, Lee Nelson a écrit :
> > This sounds very similar to the problem I mentioned over the last couple
> of
> > days in an
the other mpw. The problem probably affects all
> broadcast traffic, but so far arp is the only broadcast traffic I have
> dealt with. Like you, I have to statically configure entries in the arp
> tables. This hack does not scale.
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, 18:36 Henry Bonath wro
Tom, Adrian, et al -
I have posted before about this issue a few weeks ago - apparently this
affects more than just
Virtualbox or VMWare, I am experiencing this *EXACT* thing on Hyper-V as
well.
I have not tried this on metal.
My network looks like this:
(Customer VMs)<--->(Hyper-V OpenBSD 6.4
I may also configure a new VM on -current just to see if that makes
any difference.
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 6:02 AM Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2019-03-03, Henry Bonath wrote:
> > To elaborate, after enabling ldpd with - I have observed the
> > following in the log output:
>
]: ldp engine terminated; signal 10
Mar 3 00:58:37 mpls-gw ldpd[54245]: terminating
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 12:32 AM Henry Bonath wrote:
>
> Hello, I am still working through some issues with trying to use
> OpenBSD as a Virtual MPLS PE in a multi-tenant hosted IaaS
> environment.
>
Hello, I am still working through some issues with trying to use
OpenBSD as a Virtual MPLS PE in a multi-tenant hosted IaaS
environment.
I am running OpenBSD 6.4 in a Hyper-V environment.
I recently started seeing one of my LDP adjacencies flapping, so I
replace that particular P device with a
Not sure if this is what you are looking for, but I like Netdisco for this.
It uses SNMP to query network routers, switches, and access points,
and dumps out their TCAM as well as ARP tables into a Database in
order to preserve a history of not only what MAC Address was mapped to
what IP Address,
, 2019 at 5:07 AM Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2019-02-19, Henry Bonath wrote:
> > --- /var/backups/etc_rc.conf.local.current Wed Jan 16 01:30:06 2019
> > +++ /etc/rc.conf.local Fri Feb 15 13:05:17 2019
> > @@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
> > bgpd_flags=
> > ldpd_flags=
&
as to my approach, and
if I wasn’t doing something correctly in regards to working with multiple
rdomains.
This is on OpenBSD 6.4 btw...
Thanks!
-Henry
> On Feb 19, 2019, at 9:47 PM, Scott Reese wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Henry Bonath"
>&g
Hello, I am seeing some strange behavior with my /etc/rc.conf.local
regarding my configuration for running two instances of OSPFD in
different RDomains.
The way I have this configured, is I have a symlink: /etc/rc.d/ospf2d
-> /etc/rc.d/ospfd so that the ospfd that runs in rdomain 2 has its
own
Remi, thank you for confirming.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:03 PM Remi Locherer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 03:08:32PM -0500, Henry Bonath wrote:
> > Is it possible to set to ignore MTU on OpenOSPFD?
>
> No, this is not supported.
>
> >
> > For example on Cisco
Is it possible to set to ignore MTU on OpenOSPFD?
For example on Cisco IOS I can add the command "ip ospf mtu-ignore"
I am having some issues if the MTU is mismatched and some neighbors will be
stuck in Exstart or Exchange.
Other times those neighbors work fine, and it's unclear whether the MTU
Hello,
Does anyone know a way to view the label stack of VPNv4 routes learned via
MP-BGP?
I am currently running a POC of trying out OpenBSD as a Virtual MPLS PE for
some of our hosted tenants, and was finding some issues routing to certain
prefixes via MPLS because packets were being sent to an
018 at 5:49 PM Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 04:52:34PM -0500, Henry Bonath wrote:
> > Hello, I am having an issue with some route-reflectors I set up to try
> > to support a new MPLS backbone.
> > The majority of the MPLS Routers are Cisco IOS, with some of
Hello, I am having an issue with some route-reflectors I set up to try
to support a new MPLS backbone.
The majority of the MPLS Routers are Cisco IOS, with some of the PE
devices running OpenBSD.
The Route Reflectors are OpenBSD 6.4. The route reflectors are not
neighbors of each other.
Here is
To add to this, just as when using other first-hop redundancy protocols
like VRRP or HSRP on a Router or Layer-3 switch,
we only want the single IP address to float between the redundant hosts,
and not the entire subnet.
So we define the most specific subnet mask for IPv4, which is
255.255.255.255
Claudio -
One use case where I personally ran into this need in the past is in an
MPLS PE-CE where OSPF is running between the Provider and Customer. (L3VPN)
One would want to redistribute the Customers OSPF routes into BGP as VPNv4
prefixes into the customers VRF in the provider network.
We
Were you able to resolve?
I have a SCVMM environment and I ran into a similar issue, there is a bug
in VMM 2016 with the NDIS extension but I believe its resolved in 1807.
I have not been able to test, but would like to know if you had any
success, as I was not able to use CARP at all in Hyper-V
This is amazing to know, thank you!
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 3:11 PM wrote:
> Knowing OpenBSD philosophy, you should probably NOT expect a CMS :).
>
> But you don't need to guess when you can check for yourself - all the
> sources are available for an anonymous CVS as described in [1].
>
> You
Also could it be that you are using IPv6, not IPv4? (and your IPv6 is
missing its gateway)
If the IPv6 gateway is bad/missing you'll get that "no route to host"
message.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2018-08-07, traveller wrote:
> > After OpenBSD, one too many
I have always used the Router's global address when configuring a static
route or static default gateway.
I have seen routing protocols like OSPF/BGP/etc. use link-local addresses
for nexthop, but when statically configuring,
I've always used the global address that is located within the same
Have you looked into IPerf? https://iperf.fr/
This is what I typically use for testing network throughput.
Downloading a file is a bit more complex and involves things
like the source server/latency/etc. as well as disk performance.
(I know a 100MB file isnt much but still...)
IPerf has a lot of
50 matches
Mail list logo
