On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:37:12PM -0400, Heimdall Imbert wrote:
I understand what you mean.
No, it seems from your response that you do not.
The mailing lists are at best secondary sources, for
particular and possibly unusual difficulties that you
cannot resolve by reading the primary
Heimdall Imbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hahaha, I wanted to say the same thing but figured that this wouldn't be an
appropriate venue for a discussion of this nature. But since someone else
brought it up, I figure I might as well add my two cents. I currently run
Debian and Windows XP on
Read/Write Driver ready to merge on cvs obsd ?
To: Aram HAVARNEANU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Monday, October 27, 2008, 6:29 AM
Am 27.10.2008 um 10:49 schrieb Aram HAVARNEANU:
I have been using it extensively for several years
(since it first
appeared) on about ~10
Am 28.10.2008 um 08:49 schrieb Neko:
IF YOU took time to read PROPERLY Jonathan,
1.) Top posting is evil.
2.) Stop using caps all the time.
3.) I wasn't replying to your post. You are not the only person
discussing on this list.
4.) If YOU took the time to read PROPERLY Neko, to which post it
Neko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
its shows that some poor trolls here dont own ultraportables with no
external drives, and use more than one os alternative.
When your machine is a tool, not a toy, you run one operating system,
whichever that might be.
//art
Neko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
its shows that some poor trolls here dont own ultraportables with no
external drives, and use more than one os alternative.
When your machine is a tool, not a toy, you run one operating system,
whichever that might be.
//art
Art, I have a machine,
Forgive me for stating the obvious but insulting members of misc@ is not
going to get you closer to your goal, Neko. I'm sure that nobody enjoys
receiving multiple emails about this issue.
So please, for the sake of those of us who don't want to read any more about
this situation, let the issue
Hahaha, I wanted to say the same thing but figured that this wouldn't be an
appropriate venue for a discussion of this nature. But since someone else
brought it up, I figure I might as well add my two cents. I currently run
Debian and Windows XP on my laptop and I use it as a learning tool
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Denis Doroshenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neko wrote:
this is the future. people use multiple os on their machine
That's actually the past... multibooting seemed way more popular ten
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:31:14PM -0400, Heimdall Imbert wrote:
Hahaha, I wanted to say the same thing but figured that this wouldn't be an
appropriate venue for a discussion of this nature. But since someone else
brought it up, I figure I might as well add my two cents. I currently run
I understand what you mean. I guess I should have chosen a better word.
And my issue isn't that I don't read (I read as much as I can on user
forums,
I subscribe and read to Debian and OpenBSD mailing distributions and tinker
with what I can). Unfortunately, it feels as if some of the things
On 27 Oct 2008, at 00:00, Neko wrote:
now as for backwards bsd. why does freebsd write to ntfs? why does
osx write to ntfs.. seems to me that is more some obstination done
not
to support it.
As far as Mac OS X goes it does not support writing without a) a
commercial package or b) a not
On 2008-10-27, Neko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
its shows that some poor trolls here dont own ultraportables with no
external drives, and use more than one os alternative.
i pass data from bsd to fat 32 so in m$ its then copy onto ntfs,
i have 1 disk - 8 os,
nothing is being done , but more
On Sunday 26 October 2008, Neko wrote:
its shows that some poor trolls here dont own ultraportables with no
external drives, and use more than one os alternative.
i pass data from bsd to fat 32 so in m$ its then copy onto ntfs,
i have 1 disk - 8 os,
nothing is being done , but more and more
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:01 AM, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 26 October 2008, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:51:38PM +0200, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
| Paul de Weerd wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:01:40PM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
| | On Sun, Oct 26,
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:21 PM, dermiste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Alexey Suslikov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:51:38PM +0200, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
| Paul de
And there is the http://www.fs-driver.org/ - also free
and do read/write on ext2 for Windows.
Crashed my ext2 data partition more than once, but I could always
recover it with e2fsck, but the files in / all lost their names then.
However, the stuff in sub directories still had names. So
Am 27.10.2008 um 10:49 schrieb Aram HAVARNEANU:
I have been using it extensively for several years (since it first
appeared) on about ~10 systems and never had a single problem
with it. Is your bug reproducible? Did you fill a bug report?
It was reproducable, as it seemed to always happen
Neko wrote:
this is the future. people use multiple os on their machine
That's actually the past... multibooting seemed way more popular ten years ago
than now. I'm going to go out on a limb here, and say that most people - even
if their machine is set up to boot multiple systems - really just
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neko wrote:
this is the future. people use multiple os on their machine
That's actually the past... multibooting seemed way more popular ten years ago
than now. I'm going to go out on a limb here, and say that most
Jonathan Schleifer js-openbsd-misc at webkeks.org writes:
Not only that it is GPL, it also needs fuse. AFAIK, there is no fuse
for OpenBSD yet. And it's not running in the kernel space anyway, so
why the hell merge it?
--
Jonathan
Anyone looking at/working on porting the NetBSD
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:57:04AM +0200, Denis Doroshenko wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neko wrote:
this is the future. people use multiple os on their machine
That's actually the past... multibooting seemed way more popular ten years
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 3:57 AM, Denis Doroshenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
by anyone), but there is a serious (these days it is) limitation like
limited maximal size of a file like 2G (must be 2^31-1 perhaps).
actually NTFS seems the *only* sufficiently capable FS within the
Microsoft products
On 26 October 2008 c. 17:34:07 bofh wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 3:57 AM, Denis Doroshenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
by anyone), but there is a serious (these days it is) limitation
like limited maximal size of a file like 2G (must be 2^31-1
perhaps). actually NTFS seems the *only*
If you need to write to ntfs, you're doing it wrong.
On Oct 25, 2008, at 9:12 PM, Neko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so there can be an end to this retard cant write on the file
system bs
http://www.ntfs-3g.org/
so will it be merged in the next obsd release ?
this is the future. people use
Denis Doroshenko wrote:
have you done any analysis of statistical data in order to say so?
otherwise all those way more popular, most people it is a big IYHO.
William Boshuck has the measure of my response to that.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, (2^32)-1, or 4GB, is the max size per file
(http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314463). I can see that being a problem if
you're trying to run a database off of your thumb drive, but otherwise... can
you give
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:01:40PM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Actually, (2^32)-1, or 4GB, is the max size per file
| (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314463). I can see that being a problem if
| you're trying to run
Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, (2^32)-1, or 4GB, is the max size per file
(http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314463). I can see that being a
problem if you're trying to run a database off of your thumb drive,
but otherwise... can you give examples of files that you (or
Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:01:40PM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Actually, (2^32)-1, or 4GB, is the max size per file
| (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314463). I can see that being a problem
Alexey Suslikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And there is the http://www.fs-driver.org/ - also free
and do read/write on ext2 for Windows.
Crashed my ext2 data partition more than once, but I could always
recover it with e2fsck, but the files in / all lost their names then.
However, the stuff in
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:51:38PM +0200, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
| Paul de Weerd wrote:
|
| On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:01:40PM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
| | On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| | Actually, (2^32)-1, or 4GB, is the max size per file
|
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Jonathan Schleifer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexey Suslikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And there is the http://www.fs-driver.org/ - also free
and do read/write on ext2 for Windows.
Crashed my ext2 data partition more than once, but I could always
recover it
Alexey Suslikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I crashed many FAT32 partitions. NTFS is kinda complex
to crash but, as discussed above, it is hard to access in
full-blown read/write mode from non-Windows.
Did you crash yoru FAT32 partitions on a regular basis? The ext2
crashed every 2 - 4 weeks.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:51:38PM +0200, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
| Paul de Weerd wrote:
|
| On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:01:40PM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
| | On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Jonathan Schleifer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexey Suslikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I crashed many FAT32 partitions. NTFS is kinda complex
to crash but, as discussed above, it is hard to access in
full-blown read/write mode from non-Windows.
Did you crash
On Sunday 26 October 2008, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:51:38PM +0200, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
| Paul de Weerd wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:01:40PM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
| | On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Matthew Weigel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NTFS-3G Stable Read/Write Driver ready to merge on cvs obsd ?
To: OpenBSD misc@openbsd.org
Date: Sunday, October 26, 2008, 3:10 AM
Neko wrote:
this is the future. people use multiple os on their
machine
That's
done.
but shure a color-ls.pkg is more important if you ask me, SARCASTIC
neko
--- On Sun, 10/26/08, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NTFS-3G Stable Read/Write Driver ready to merge on cvs obsd ?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED
Neko wrote:
somhow here , most people i know use 4 os, dos/ms/lin/bsd
OK, I'm genuinely curious: why do you run DOS on a machine that you also run
Windows on? Why do you run Linux and OpenBSD on the same machine?
oddly enough freebsd / osx have compatibility by default. but they wouldnt
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Neko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shure im doing it wrong , because nothing is being done.
but shure a color-ls.pkg is more important if you ask me, SARCASTIC
So, what I'm seeing is that you're now being sarcastic because you
want something that is not currently
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:12:57 -0700 (PDT), Neko wrote:
so there can be an end to this retard cant write on the file system bs
http://www.ntfs-3g.org/
so will it be merged in the next obsd release ?
this is the future. people use multiple os on their machine, not just
vm , they will local
Am 26.10.2008 um 04:05 schrieb Rod Whitworth:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:12:57 -0700 (PDT), Neko wrote:
so there can be an end to this retard cant write on the file
system bs
http://www.ntfs-3g.org/
so will it be merged in the next obsd release ?
this is the future. people use multiple os
no
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008, Neko wrote:
so there can be an end to this retard cant write on the file system bs
http://www.ntfs-3g.org/
so will it be merged in the next obsd release ?
this is the future. people use multiple os on their machine, not just
vm , they will local install too, so
Neko wrote:
so there can be an end to this retard cant write on the file system bs
http://www.ntfs-3g.org/
so will it be merged in the next obsd release ?
this is the future. people use multiple os on their machine, not just
vm , they will local install too, so action should be taken to have
45 matches
Mail list logo
